- Original Article
- Published:
Bacillus halotolerans strain LYSX1-induced systemic resistance against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica in tomato
Annals of Microbiology volume 69, pages 1227–1233 (2019)
Abstract
Purpose
Determination of the nematicidal potential and mode of action of bacteria isolated from tobacco rhizosphere soil against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica in tomato plants.
Methods
Antagonistic bacteria were isolated from rhizosphere soil of tobacco infested with root-knot nematodes. Culture filtrate was used to examine nematicidal activity and ovicidal action of bacterial strains. Biocontrol of M. javanica and growth of treated tomato plants were assessed in pot experiments. To clarify whether secondary metabolites of bacteria in tomato roots induced systemic resistance to M. javanica, bacterial culture supernatants and second-stage juvenile nematodes were applied to spatially separated tomato roots using a split-root system. Bacterial strains were identified by 16S rDNA and gyrB gene sequencing and phylogenetic analysis.
Results
Of the 15 bacterial strains isolated, four (LYSX1, LYSX2, LYSX3, and LYSX4) demonstrated nematicidal activity against second-stage juveniles of M. javanica, and strain LYSX1 showed the greatest antagonistic activity; there was dose-dependent variability in nematicidal activity and inhibition of egg mass hatching by strain LYSX1. In vivo application of LYSX1 to tomato seedlings decreased the number of egg masses and galls and increased the root and shoot fresh weight. Treatment of half of the split-root system with LYSX1 reduced nematode penetration to the other half by 41.64%. Strain LYSX1 was identified as Bacillus halotolerans.
Conclusion
Bacillus halotolerans LYSX1 is a potential microbe for the sustainable biocontrol of root-knot nematodes through induced systemic resistance in tomato.
Introduction
Root-knot nematodes (RKNs), Meloidogyne spp., are sedentary endoparasites that cause extensive damage to a wide variety of economically important crops in tropical, subtropical, and temperate zones (Kayani et al. 2013) and cause annual global yield losses of more than US$400 million (Huang et al. 2014). Control of RKNs is problematic, due to their wide range of hosts and their adaptability to soil conditions. Synthetic broad-spectrum pesticides are commonly used to reduce RKN parasitism; however, many have been withdrawn or banned in some countries, because of their potential deleterious effects on environmental safety and human health following prolonged use (Nicol et al. 2011). In contrast, biological control is considered a safe and eco-friendly alternative to hazardous chemical pesticides, where microorganisms have been recommended for the management of RKNs in sustainable agricultural production systems (Hallman et al. 2009).
Bacillus spp. bacteria may be sustainable alternatives in the management of plant-parasitic nematodes (Li et al. 2015; Castaneda-Alvarez and Aballay 2016; Engelbrecht et al. 2018). For example, B. subtilis may suppress nematode host recognition through the production of toxins (Siddiqui and Mahmood 1999), and pesticidal crystal proteins (Cry proteins) formed by B. thuringiensis during the stationary phase have nematicidal effects against RKNs (Peng et al. 2011; Bravo et al. 2012) due to the degradation of the nematode cuticle by extracellular bacteria enzymes (Niu et al. 2007; Wei et al. 2010), and. B. cereus has been shown to be toxic to second-stage juvenile (J2s) of M. javanica, as a result of the ammonia and nitrite production (Oka et al. 1993). Rhizobacteria-mediated-induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants may affect nematode activity (Hasky-Günther et al. 1998; Reitz et al. 2000; Siddiqui and Shaukat 2002; Niknam and Dhawan 2003; Adam et al. 2014), and while B. halotolerans has been shown to manage fungal plant diseases (Sagredo-Beltrán et al. 2018; Slama et al. 2019), its nematicidal effects remain unclear. Hence, the objectives of this study were to (1) isolate and identify Bacillus spp. from rhizosphere soils of tobacco, (2) evaluate the in vitro and in vivo antagonistic efficacy of B. halotolerans strain LYSX1 against the RKN M. javanica, and (3) examine the antagonistic mode of action of strain LYSX1 against M. javanica.
Materials and methods
Preparation of M. javanica
M. javanica were isolated from Hainan Province and maintained as described by Wang et al. (2007). Egg masses collected from infested tomato roots were sterilized using 3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 5Â min and rinsed three times with sterile distilled water prior to use. J2s were separated using a Baermann funnel technique and sterilized using the method described by Gray (1984).
Bacteria strains and growth conditions
Antagonistic bacteria were isolated from the rhizosphere soil of tobacco infested with RKN in Songxian County, Henan Province, using the dilution-plate method, and were identified according to growth cultural characters on Luria broth (LB) solid medium (Sui 2015). Escherichia coli strain DH5α, which was stored in our laboratory, was used as the host for all plasmids. LB was used as the culture medium for E. coli strains, and Landy culture medium was used to ferment isolated bacteria (Landy et al. 1948). When required, media were supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin.
In vitro antagonism of bacterial isolates against M. javanica
Isolated strains of bacteria were cultured separately in Landy culture medium at 37 °C, and then placed in a shaker at 200 rpm for 48 h. Fermented cultures were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C, and supernatants were sterilized through 0.22-μm filters; these were designated as undiluted standard culture filtrate (100% concentration) that was subsequently diluted, with sterile distilled water, to 50 and 25% concentration to test nematicidal activity using methods described by Xia et al. (2011). The number of dead nematodes in each treatment was counted under a light microscope after 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Landy medium without bacteria and sterile distilled water served as controls, and the experiment was repeated three times with three replicates per trial.
Ovicidal action of bacterial strains was assessed using a slightly modified procedure from that described by Terefe et al. (2009), where six equal-sized sterilized egg masses were randomly selected and transferred, using sterile forceps, to a 6-cm-diameter watch crystal containing 1 mL of 100%, 50%, or 25% concentration of LYSX1 supernatant. Egg masses kept in sterile water were used as a control and incubated at 25 °C for up to 14 days in hatching chambers, and hatch solution was replaced every 2 days. Nematode suspension was poured into a counting dish, and the number of juveniles was counted using a dissecting microscope. Tests were performed in triplicate and repeated three times.
In vivo antagonism of strain LYSX1 against M. javanica
Biocontrol efficiency against M. javanica reproduction and host plant growth of strain LYSX1, which elicited high levels of mortality in J2s and hatching inhibition of egg masses, was assessed in a pot experiment. Tomato seeds (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Sufen) were sterilized using 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min and rinsed several times with distilled water, and then treated seeds were germinated in bowl-growing tray containing autoclaved sandy loamy soil (1:1 v/v). One week after germination, single seedlings were transplanted into 10-cm diameter plastic pots, and 40 days later, 25 mL cell-free culture filtrates at 100%, 50%, and 25% concentration were added as a soil drench around the root system of each plant; control plants were treated with tap water. After 24 h, 1000 newly-hatched M. javanica per plant were inoculated into three × 3-cm deep holes. The experiment was repeated three times and comprised five replicates of each treatment that were arranged in a randomized complete block design in a glasshouse. Plants were watered daily and fertilized weekly with a compound fertilizer. The experiment was terminated 50 days after nematode inoculation, and fresh weight of shoots and roots, numbers of galls, and egg masses per root system were recorded.
Induced systemic resistance to M. javanica
To clarify whether secondary metabolites of LYSX1 in tomato roots induce systemic resistance to M. javanica, supernatants and J2s were applied to spatially separated tomato roots using a split-root approach (Reitz et al. 2000). We transplanted 7-day-old tomato seedlings, which had been cultured as described above, into an upper pot, so that roots grew through two openings in the base into the two pots below. After 40Â days, one of the two lower pots was inoculated with 25Â mL of 100% concentration of LYSX1 supernatant. The same amount of tap water served as a control treatment. After 48Â h, the untreated lowest root system pot was inoculated with 1000 M. javanica J2s. Each treatment was replicated five times and arranged in a randomized complete block design, and the experiment was repeated three times. The experiment was terminated 15Â days after nematode inoculation, and nematode invasion was determined using the method described by Siddiqui and Shaukat (2002).
Identification of LYSX1
Morphological and physiological characteristics of the LYSX1 strain were identified according to Logan and De Vos (2009), where chromosomal DNA of LYSX1 was extracted using a Bacterial Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Axygen Scientific Inc. USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Partial 16S rDNA and gyrB gene sequences were amplified using primer pairs (27F: 5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3 and 1492R: 5′-GGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′, and UP-2r: 5’-AGCAGGGTACGGATGTGCGAGCC-.
RTCNACRTCNGCRTCNGTCAT-3′ and UP-1: 5′-GAAGTCATCATGACCGTTCTGCAYGCNGGNG-GNAARTTYGA-3′, respectively). Amplicons were purified from gel, cloned into pMD18-T vector (Takara Biotechnology, Japan), and transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells (Sambrook et al. 1989). Transformed cells were then cultured at 37 °C overnight on LB agar plates, supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/mL). Individual colonies were selected and screened using PCR with vector sequencing primers (M13F: 5′-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′ and M13R: 5′-CAGGAAACAGCTAT-GACC-3′). Nucleotide sequence data are included in the NCBI nucleotide sequence database with accession numbers MH359398 and MH359399. For phylogenetic analysis, 16S rDNA and gyrB gene sequences of most related bacteria strains were acquired separately from the GenBank database and aligned using ClustalX (Thompson et al. 1997), and a phylogenetic tree of combined 16S rDNA and gyrB gene in LYSX1 multiple sequence alignments was created in MEGA version 4.0 using neighbor-joining (NJ) trees, where genetic distances were computed using the maximum composite likelihood model, with bootstrapping analysis (1000 replicates) to evaluate tree topology confidence (Felsenstein 1985).
Statistical analysis
Treatment effects were analyzed using analysis of variance, followed by Fisher’s least-significant-difference test (p ≤ 0.01) in SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Illinois, USA).
Results
Antagonistic bacteria
We isolated 15 bacteria from the tobacco rhizosphere soil, based on colonial morphology; of these, four, which were respectively named LYSY1, LYSY2, LYSY3, and LYSY4, showed antagonistic efficacy in vitro toward M. javanica (Table 1), causing 75.33 to 100% juvenile mortality after 12-h exposure. Strain LYXS1 exhibited greater levels of nematicidal activity than the other strains, so it was selected for subsequent assays.
Antagonistic properties of LYSX1 against M. javanica
Figure 1 shows that all concentrations of LYSX1 resulted in mortality of M. javanica J2s, and mortality tended to increase in a time- and dose-dependent manner. The mortality rate of J2s treated with high-concentration culture supernatants was remarkably higher than for those treated with low concentrations and controls at 12 h and 24 h (p ≤ 0.01). Levels of mortality in the 50% and 100% concentration treatments were similar after 36 and 48 h; 25% supernatants caused 47.33% and 81.33% J2s mortality at 36 h and 48 h, respectively.
In vitro, LYSX1 treatments resulted in significant inhibition of egg hatching compared with the control (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 2). One hundred percent concentration treatment brought about 98.81% inhibition of egg hatching after 2 weeks of incubation. The effect of hatching inhibition was significantly reduced with decreased concentration.
Effect of LYSX1 on host plant growth and M. javanica
To determine the biocontrol efficacy of LYSX1 in greenhouse conditions, tomato plants were cultivated in the presence or absence of nematodes and LYSX1. Following inoculation with 100% and 50% concentrations of strain LYSX1, the numbers of egg masses and root knots per plant 50 days after inoculation displayed reductions of 39.72% and 42.00% (100% treatment), or 31.36% and 30.83% (50% treatment) compared to the control, respectively (Table 3). The fresh weights of root and shoot showed an increment of 53.30% and 28.70% (100% treatment), or 43.91% and 21.59% (50% treatment), respectively. However, the 25% concentration treatment produced no significant difference in biomass or disease density in tomato plants compared with the control (p ≤ 0.01).
Induced systemic resistance to M. javanica
The ability of strain LYSX1 to induce systemic resistance was assessed in this study. Fifteen days after nematode inoculation, the 100% concentration of LYSX1 significantly reduced nematode penetration from one half of the split-root system to the other, by 41.64% when compared with the control (Fig. 2).
Identification of the LYSX1 strain
The detailed phenotypic characteristics of LYSX1 (Table 4) indicate that it belongs to the genus Bacillus (Logan and De Vos 2009). The sequences of the genes 16S rDNA (1437 bp) and gyrB (1257 bp) were concatenated to form a single sequence of 2694 bp (16S rDNA-gyrB) and compared with a concatenate of orthologous genes from Bacillus. Sequences were aligned, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood model with 1000 bootstrap replicates (Fig. 3). Most branches were supported by high bootstrap values in this tree. Based on Fig. 3, strain LYSX1 belongs to the cluster of B. halotolerans.
Discussion
We evaluated nematicidal efficacy on M. javanica of bacterial strains isolated from a tobacco rhizosphere, and selected strain LYSX1 for further analysis due to its greater in vitro nematicidal activity. Phenotypic characteristics and nucleotide sequences of 16S rDNA and gyrB genes of strain LYSX1 indicated that it belongs to the Bacillus halotolerans group. Previous studies have demonstrated biocontrol activity of Bacillus spp. against plant-parasitic nematodes (Siddiqui and Mahmood 1999; Engelbrecht et al. 2018); however, previously recorded biocontrol activity of B. halotolerans was for fusarium wilts and root rots caused by soil-borne fungi, such as Fusarium oxysporum, Phytophthora capsici, and Rhizoctonia solani (Sagredo-Beltrán et al. 2018; Slama et al. 2019). Thus, this study is the first to demonstrate suppression of plant-parasitic nematodes by a strain of B. halotolerans. Unpublished data show that culture filtrates of strain LYSX1 were also antagonistic to M. incognita, M. arenaria, and M. hapla, similar to the nematicidal activity against M. javanica reported in this study, and also inhibited mycelial radial growth in plant pathogenic fungi, such as F. graminearum, R. cerealis, Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Gloeosporium fructigenum, indicating that LYSX1 may have a broad spectrum of biocontrol activity against multiple plant diseases. Similar findings have been reported by Siddiqui et al. (2001), who demonstrated antagonistic activities of bacterial culture supernatants to the phytopathogenic nematode M. javanica and fungi Macrophomina phaseolina and R. solani. Some strains of Bacillus obtained from agricultural soils have been shown to suppress the growth of soil-borne fungal pathogens (V. dahlia, R. solani, and F. culmorum) and a bacterial pathogen (Ralstonia solanacearum) and cause in vitro mortality in M. incognita juveniles (Köberl et al. 2013; Adam et al. 2014). This study demonstrated that LYSX1 elicits concentration-independent antagonistic activity against M. javanica J2s and egg masses, suggesting extracellular nematicidal substances may be present in the culture supernatant. Indeed, Slama et al. (2019) reported that plipastatin A1, Inthomycin-A, cyclo (L-Val-L-Phe), and 5-deoxybutirosamine generated by B. halotolerans BFOA1–BFOA4 had antimicrobial properties. Analysis of the LYSX1 supernatant showed that the nematicidal active ingredients were non-protein, heat and cold resistant, and were highly polar (data no shown), so further studies are required to couple with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis to identify specific nematicidal active substances.
Numerous Bacillus strains have been proposed as efficient alternatives to synthetic pesticides for the sustainable management of phytonematodes in agricultural systems, due to promotion of plant growth and nematicidal potential. These biocontrol bacteria mainly comprise B. subtilis, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. firmus, B. pumilus, B. megaterium, B. cereus, B. methylotrophicus, B. velezensis, B. mojavensis, B. tequilensis, B. flexus, and B. altitudinis (Burkett-Cadena et al. 2008; Xia et al. 2011; Engelbrecht et al. 2018; Xiang et al. 2018); however, there are no reports of B. halotolerans as a biocontrol agent, to our knowledge. Our evaluation of the strain LYSX1 for its nematode management potential under glasshouse conditions showed its potential for the promotion of plant growth in tomato seedlings (greater fresh root and shoot weight) and the reduction of disease severity caused by M. javanica (lower number of egg masses and root knots) when applied at 50 or 100% concentrations; while these concentrations elicited similar effects, treatment with 25% concentration of LYSX1 had no effect on plant growth or disease density of tomato plants. Thus, our results indicate an application rate of 50% concentration is optimal for the suppression of M. javanica under glasshouse conditions; however, additional studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of LYSX1 against RKN under field conditions.
ISR in nematode host plants was first reported by Hasky-Günther et al. (1998), who indicated that culture filtrate of B. sphaericus B43 induced systemic resistance against Globodera pallida in potato. Our results from a split-root system clearly demonstrated that B. halotolerans LYSX1 reduced nematode penetration rates by inducing systemic resistance in tomato plants to M. javanica; this indicates that B. halotolerans LYSX1 secondary metabolites acted as signals to induce systemic resistance against the RKNs. Similarly, Siddiqui and Shaukat (2003) found that the antibiotic secondary metabolite, 2, 4-diacetylphloroglucinol (2, 4-DAPG), produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 may function as an inducing agent of systemic resistance in tomato roots against M. javanica. The lipopolysaccharide of Rhizobium etli strain G12 is also essential for eliciting systemic resistance in potato against the potato cyst nematode G. pallida infestation (Reitz et al. 2000). However, the compound in B. halotolerans LYSX1 involved in inducing systemic resistance remains unclear, so further research is required to identify inducement factors and confirm mediation of ISR against RKN in tomato.
Conclusion
Our results demonstrated that B. halotolerans strain LYSX1 antagonized the RKN M. javanica through induced systemic resistance in tomato plants.
References
Adam M, Heuer H, Hallmann J (2014) Bacterial antagonists of fungal pathogens also control root-knot nematodes by induced systemic resistance of tomato plants. PLoS One 9:e90402. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0090402
Bravo A, Gómez I, Porta H, GarcÃa-Gómez BI, Rodriguez- Almazan C, Pardo L, Soberón M (2012) Evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis cry toxins insecticidal activity. Microb Biotechnol 6:17–26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00342.x
Burkett-Cadena M, Kokalis-Burelle N, Lawrence KS, Van Santen E, Kloepper JW (2008) Suppressiveness of root-knot nematodes mediated by rhizobacteria. Biol Control 47:55–59. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.07.008
Castaneda-Alvarez C, Aballay E (2016) Rhizobacteria with nematicide aptitude: enzymes and compounds associated. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:203. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11274-016-2165-6
Engelbrecht G, Horak I, Jansen van Rensburg PJ, Claassens S (2018) Bacillus-based bionematicides: development, modes of action and commercialisation. Biocontrol Sci Technol 28:629–653. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/09583157.2018.1469000
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
Gray NF (1984) Ecology of nematophagous fungi: comparison of the soil sprinkling method with the Baermann funnel technique in the isolation of endoparasites. Soil Biol Biochem 16:81–83. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/0038-0717(84)90131-7
Hallman J, Davies KG, Sikora R (2009) Biological control using microbial pathogens, endophytes and antagonists. In: Perry RN, Moens M, Starr JL (eds) Root-knot nematodes. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 380–411
Hasky-Günther K, Hoffmann-Hergarten S, Sikora RA (1998) Resistance against the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida systemically induced by the rhizobacteria Agrobacterium radiobacter (G12) and Bacillus sphaericus (B43). Fundam Appl Nematol 21:511–517
Huang W, Sun J, Cui J, Wang G, Kong L, Peng H, Chen S, Peng D (2014) Efficacy evaluation of fungus Syncephalastrum racemosum and nematicide avermectin against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber. PLoS One 9:e89717. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0089717
Kayani MZ, Mukhtar T, Hussain MA, Ul-Haque MI (2013) Infestation assessment of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) associated with cucumber in the Pothowar region of Pakistan. Crop Prot 47:49–54. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.01.005
Köberl M, Ramadan EM, Adam M, Cardinale M (2013) Bacillus and Streptomyces were selected as broad-spectrum antagonists against soilborne pathogens from arid areas in Egypt. FEMS Microbiol Lett 342:168–178. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.01.005
Landy M, Warren GH, RosenmanM SB, Colio LG (1948) Bacillomycin: an antibiotic from Bacillus subtilis active against pathogenic fungi. Exp Biol Med 67:539–541. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3181/00379727-67-16367
Li J, Zou C, Xu J, Ji X, Niu X, Yang J, Huang X, Zhang K (2015) Molecular mechanisms of nematode-nematophagous microbe interactions: basis for biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 53:67–95. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120336
Logan NA, De Vos P (2009) Bacillus Cohn 1872, 174AL. In: Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, 2rd edn. Springer, New York, pp 21–128
Nicol JM, Turner SJ, Coyne DL, Nijs L, Hockland S, Maafi ZT (2011) Current nematode threats to world agriculture. In: Jones J, Gheysen G, Fenoll C (eds) Genomics and molecular genetics of plant-nematode interactions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–43
Niknam GR, Dhawan SC (2003) Induction of systemic resistance by Bacillus subtilis isolate Bst against Rotylenchulus reniformis in tomato. Nematol Medit 31:239–243
Niu Q, Huang X, Zhang L, Lian L, Li Y, Li J, Yang J, Zhang K (2007) Functional identification of the gene bace16 from nematophagous bacterium Bacillus nematocida. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75:141–148. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00253-006-0794-7
Oka Y, Chet I, Spiegel Y (1993) Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica by Bacillus cereus. Biocontrol Sci Technol 3:115–126. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00253-006-0794-7
Peng D, Chai L, Wang F, Zhang F, Ruan L, Sun M (2011) Synergistic activity between Bacillus thuringiensis Cry6Aa and Cry55Aa toxins against Meloidogyne incognita. Microb Biotechnol 4:794–798. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00295.x
Reitz M, Rudolph K, Schröder I, Hoffmann-Hergarten S, Hallmann J, Sikora RA (2000) Lipopolysaccharides of Rhizobium etli strain G12 act in potato roots as an inducing agent of systemic resistance to infection by the cyst nematode Globodera pallida. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3515–3518. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AEM.66.8.3515-3518.2000
Sagredo-Beltrán J, De La Cruz-RodrÃguez Y, Alvarado-RodrÃguez M, Vega-ArreguÃn J, RodrÃguez-Guerra R, Alvarado-Gutiérrez A, Fraire-Velázquez S (2018) Genome sequence of Bacillus halotolerans strain MS50-18A with antifungal activity against phytopathogens, isolated from saline soil in San LuÃs PotosÃ, Mexico. Genome Announc 6:e00135–e00118. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/genomeA.00135-18
Sambrook J, Fritsch ED, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, New York
Siddiqui ZA, Mahmood I (1999) Role of bacteria in the management of plant parasitic nematodes: a review. Bioresour Technol 69:167–179. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/s0960-8524(98)00122-9
Siddiqui IA, Shaukat SS (2002) Rhizobacteria-mediated induction of systemic resistance (ISR) in tomato against Meloidogyne javanica. J Phytopathol 150:469–473. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1046/j.1439-0434.2002.00784.x
Siddiqui IA, Shaukat SS (2003) Suppression of root-knot disease by Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 in tomato: importance of bacterial secondary metabolite, 2, 4-diacetylpholoroglucinol. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1615–1623. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.08.006
Siddiqui AI, Ehetshamul-Haque S, Shahid Shaukat S (2001) Use of rhizobacteria in the control of root rot-root knot disease complex of mungbean. J Phytopathol 149:337–346. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1046/j.1439-0434.2001.00630.x
Slama HB, Cherif-Silini H, Chenari Bouket A, Qader M, Silini A, Yahiaoui B, Alenezi FN, Luptakova L, Triki MA, Vallat A, Oszako T, Rateb ME, Belbahri L (2019) Screening for Fusarium antagonistic bacteria from contrasting niches designated the endophyte Bacillus halotolerans as plant warden against Fusarium. Front Microbiol 9:3236. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03236
Sui X (2015) Prokaryotic evolution and systematics experimentation. Science Press, Beijing
Terefe M, Tefera T, Sakhuja PK (2009) Effect of a formulation of Bacillus firmus on root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita infestation and the growth of tomato plants in the greenhouse and nursery. J Invertebr Pathol 100:94–99. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jip.2008.11.004
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/25.24.4876
Wang X, Li H, Hu Y, Fu P, Xu J (2007) Molecular cloning and analysis of a new venom allergen-like protein gene from the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Exp Parasitol 117:133–140. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.exppara.2007.03.017
Wei L, Xue Q, Wei B, Wang Y, Li S, Chen L, Guo J (2010) Screening of antagonistic bacterial strains against Meloidogyne incognita using protease activity. Biocontrol Sci Technol 20:739–750. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/09583151003714109
Xia Y, Xie S, Ma X, Wu H, Wang X, Gao X (2011) The purL gene of Bacillus subtilis is associated with nematicidal activity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 322:99–107. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02336.x
Xiang N, Lawrence KS, Donald PA (2018) Biological control potential of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria suppression of Meloidogyne incognita on cotton and Heterodera glycines on soybean: a review. J Phytopathol 166:449–458. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/jph.12712
Funding
This work was financially supported by projects from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31201558 and 31401774).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xia, Y., Li, S., Liu, X. et al. Bacillus halotolerans strain LYSX1-induced systemic resistance against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica in tomato. Ann Microbiol 69, 1227–1233 (2019). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s13213-019-01504-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s13213-019-01504-4