Kontakt 2015, 17(2):e67-e72 | DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2015.01.005

Gender, age and proactive coping as predictors of coping in patients with limb amputationNursing - Original article

Andrea Solgajováa,*, Tomáš Sollárb, Gabriela Vörösováa
a Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre, Fakulta sociálnych vied a zdravotníctva, katedra ošetrovateľstva, Slovenská republika
b Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre, Fakulta sociálnych vied a zdravotníctva, Ústav aplikovanej psychológie, Slovenská republika

Patients with indications of amputation experience stressful situations of high intensity as several stressors combine, including particularly the surgical procedure, pain, immobilisation, hospitalisation, and concerns about future. The intensity of the stressful situation can be so high that patients do not have the ability to cope with it. In such situations, the nursing diagnosis "Ineffective Coping" (00069) is given to patients, which requires an intervention. In clinical decision making, nurses should take various predisposing factors into consideration regarding patient care to predict the development of coping. The research objective was to study the effects of gender, age and proactive coping strategies on the effectiveness of coping in patients with lower limb amputation. The research included 50 respondents (25 women and 25 men) with the indicated amputation of a lower limb. We used the NOC (Nursing Outcomes Classification) scale - Coping (1302) to assess the effectiveness of coping, and the PCI (Proactive Coping Inventory) to assess proactive coping. The software SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical data analysis. The gender and age do not prove to be statistically significant predictors of coping in patients with lower limb amputation. Three proactive coping strategies are suggested as significant predictors of effective coping (Preventive Coping, Avoidance Coping, and Strategic Planning). Knowing the preferred coping strategies in patients can be beneficial for nurses as it is the main predictor of coping with amputation in patients.

Keywords: Stress; Coping; Load; Amputation; Nursing Outcomes Classification system

Received: October 5, 2014; Revised: November 11, 2014; Accepted: January 19, 2015; Published: June 19, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Solgajová A, Sollár T, Vörösová G. Gender, age and proactive coping as predictors of coping in patients with limb amputation. Kontakt. 2015;17(2):e67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2015.01.005.
Download citation

References

  1. Kebza V. Zvládaní stresu. Praha: Státní zdravotní ústav; 1997.
  2. Křivohlavý J. Psychologie zdraví. Praha: Portál; 2001.
  3. Schreiber V. Stres. Praha: Avicenum; 1985.
  4. Herdman TH (ed.). NANDA International. Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and Classification 2012-2014. 9th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
  5. Ackley BJ, Ladwig GB. Nursing Diagnosis Handbook: An Evidence-Based Guide to Planning Care. 10th ed. Elsevier, Inc.; 2014.
  6. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Coping and adaptation. In: Gentry WD (Ed.). Handbook of behavioral medicine. New York: Springer; 1984, pp. 282-305.
  7. Bratská M. Zisky a straty v záťažových situáciách alebo príprava na život. Bratislava: Práca; 2001.
  8. Schwarzer R, Taubert S. Tenacious goal pursuits and striving toward personal growth: Proactive coping. In: Frydenberg E (ed.). Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions and challenges. London: Oxford University Press; 2002, pp. 19-35. Go to original source...
  9. Greenglass ER. Proactive coping, work stress and burnout. J Int Stress Manage Assoc 2001;13:5-8.
  10. Kobasa SC, Maddi SR, Puccetti MC, Zola MA. Effectiveness of hardiness exercise and social support as resources against illness. J Psychosom Res 1985;29:525-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Matthews KA. Coronary heart disease and type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth - Kewley and Friedman quantitative review. Psychol Bull 1988;104: 373-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Suls J, David JP, Harvey JH. Personality and coping: Three generations of research. J Pers 1996;64:711-35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Keefe FJ, Williams DA. A comparison of coping strategies in chronic pain patients in different age groups. J Gerontol 1990;45(4):161-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Ruiselová Z. Štýly zvládania záťaže. In: Ruiselová Z a kol. Štýly zvládania záťaže a osobnosť. Bratislava: SAV; 2006, s. 9-20.
  15. Moorhead S et al. Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). 4th ed. Mosby, Inc.; 2008.
  16. Sollár T, Romanová, M. Proaktívne zvládania - koncept a súčasný stav merania. In: Sollárová E (ed.). Pomáhajúce profesie - aktuálne trendy v teórii, výskume a praxi. Sekcia 1. Záťaž a odolnosť v pomáhajúcich profesiách. Nitra: UKF; 2011, s. 103-30.
  17. Livneh H, Antonak RF, Gerhardt J. Multidimensional Investigation of the Structure of Coping Among People with Amputations. Psychosomatics 2000;41:235-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Hampel P, Rudolph H, Stachow R, Lab-Lentzsch A, Petermann F. Coping among children and adolescents with chronic illness. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 2005;18(2):145-55. Go to original source...
  19. Cavanagh SR, Shin LM, Karamouz N, Rauch SL. Psychiatric and Emotional Sequelae of Surgical Amputation. Psychosomatics 2006;47:459-64. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Výrost J, Lovaš L, Baumgartner F, Bolfíková E, Frankovský M, Hadušovská S. Possibilities of empirical classifications of demanding life situations. Stud Psychol 1995;37:93-106.
  21. Desmond DM. Coping, affective distress, and psychosocial adjustment among people with traumatic upper limb amputations. J Psychosom Res 2007;62:15-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Coping strategies as predictors of psychosocial adaptation in a sample of elderly veterans with acquired lower limb amputations. Social Sci Med 2006;62:208-16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Greenglass ER, Marques S, deRidder M, Behl S. Positive coping and mastery in a rehabilitation setting. Int J Rehabil Res 2006;28(4):331-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Greenglass ER, Fiksenbaum L. Proactive Coping, Positive Affect, and Well-Being Testing for Mediation Using Path Analysis. Eur Psychol 2009;14(1):29-39. Go to original source...
  25. Pucher I, Kickinger W, Frischenschlager O. Coping With Amputation and Phantom Limb Pain. J Psychosom Res 1999;46(4):379-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Suls J, Fletcher B. The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol 1985;4(3):249-88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...