Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T02:43:32.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2006

VIOLA SPEK
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Health, Tilburg University, The Netherlands Diagnostic Centre Eindhoven, The Netherlands
PIM CUIJPERS
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
IVAN NYKLÍČEK
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Health, Tilburg University, The Netherlands
HELEEN RIPER
Affiliation:
Trimbos-instituut, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, The Netherlands
JULES KEYZER
Affiliation:
Diagnostic Centre Eindhoven, The Netherlands
VICTOR POP
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Health, Tilburg University, The Netherlands Diagnostic Centre Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background. We studied to what extent internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) programs for symptoms of depression and anxiety are effective.

Method. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials.

Results. The effects of internet-based CBT were compared to control conditions in 13 contrast groups with a total number of 2334 participants. A meta-analysis on treatment contrasts resulted in a moderate to large mean effect size [fixed effects analysis (FEA) d=0·40, mixed effects analysis (MEA) d=0·60] and significant heterogeneity. Therefore, two sets of post hoc subgroup analyses were carried out. Analyses on the type of symptoms revealed that interventions for symptoms of depression had a small mean effect size (FEA d=0·27, MEA d=0·32) and significant heterogeneity. Further analyses showed that one study could be regarded as an outlier. Analyses without this study showed a small mean effect size and moderate, non-significant heterogeneity. Interventions for anxiety had a large mean effect size (FEA and MEA d=0·96) and very low heterogeneity. When examining the second set of subgroups, based on therapist assistance, no significant heterogeneity was found. Interventions with therapist support (n=5) had a large mean effect size, while interventions without therapist support (n=6) had a small mean effect size (FEA d=0·24, MEA d=0·26).

Conclusions. In general, effect sizes of internet-based interventions for symptoms of anxiety were larger than effect sizes for depressive symptoms; however, this might be explained by differences in the amount of therapist support.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)