Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T03:19:15.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Graphical Exposition of the Ordered Probit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2010

William E. Becker  and
Peter E. Kennedy
William E. Becker
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Peter E. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser university
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The use of probit and logit models has become quite common whenever the dependent variable in a regression is qualitative. These models have been used to explain either/or choices and decisions involving multiple alternatives. A two-dimensional graphical interpretation of these different models has been provided by Johnson [3]. The purpose of this paper is to provide a three-dimensional graphical exposition of the ordered probit model, which was first estimated by McKelvey and Zavoina [4] and is now built into computer packages, such as LIMDEP [1].

Type
Miscellanea
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 127 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Greene, W.H.LIMDEP: An econometric modeling program for the IBM PC. The American Statistician 39 (1985): 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan, 1990.Google Scholar
3.Johnson, T. The analysis of qualitative and limited responses. In Becker, W. and Walstad, W. (eds.) Econometric Modeling in Economic Education Research, pp. 141 & ndash;184, Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff, 1987.Google Scholar
4.McKelvey, R.D. & Zavoina, W.. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4 (1975): 103 & ndash;120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar