Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:57:24.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asserting the role of biobehavioral sciences in translational research: The behavioral neurobiology revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2006

STEPHEN W. PORGES
STEPHEN W. PORGES
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role of biobehavioral sciences is critically evaluated within the model for translational research proposed in the NIH Roadmap. Concern is expressed regarding the lack of specification and representation of intervening disciplines along the translational chain from assessment to treatment to outcome. The implications of this model on the future of developmental psychopathology are discussed. A new model is proposed that emphasizes the role of biobehavioral sciences in translational research focusing on psychiatric disorders.The preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (MH 067446).

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 923 - 933
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Caccioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Sheridan, J. F., & McClintock, M. K. (2000). Multilevel integrative analysis of human behavior: Social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 829–843.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Blender, J. A. (2004). A multiple-levels-of-analysis approach to the study of developmental processes in maltreated children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 17325–17326.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Dawson, G. (2002). Multiple levels of analysis [Editorial]. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 417–420.Google Scholar
Contie, V. L. (2006). Clinical and translational science. NCRR Reporter, Winter.
Geiger, R. L. (2004). The commercialization of the university. American Journal of Education, 110, 389–399.Google Scholar
Hall, J. E. (2001). The promise of translational physiology. American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 281, 1127–1128.Google Scholar
Holden, C. (2003). Deconstructing schizophrenia. Science, 299, 333–335.Google Scholar
Porges, S. W. (2003). Social engagement and attachment: A phylogenetic perspective. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008, 31–47.Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. J., Peek, S. C., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Changing ecological determinants of conduct problems from early adolescence to early adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 873–896.Google Scholar
Zerhouni, E. (2003). The NIH Roadmap. Science, 302, 63–72.Google Scholar