Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:20:27.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pure grammaticalization: The development of a teenage intensifier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2006

Ronald Macaulay
Ronald Macaulay
Affiliation:
Pitzer College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the past fifty years, sociolinguistic studies of linguistic change have focused mainly on phonological variables, but recently some attention has been paid to other features, particularly discourse features used by younger speakers that may change within a relatively brief period. This article deals with the appearance of an unusual intensifier “pure” in the speech of adolescents in Glasgow, Scotland. This usage suggests that the Glasgow working-class adolescents have developed a set of norms for their speech community that owes little to adult or outside influence. Grammaticalization is a process that is normally investigated on the basis of historical documents but recent developments in methodology provide an opportunity to explore changes in progress. Intensifiers have historically been unstable and there is evidence that teenagers have recently been developing their own preferences for such items. The range of uses that the Glasgow adolescents have developed for pure suggests a process of grammaticalization that may still be in progress.The project in which the recordings were made was supported by ESRC grant no. R000239757. I am deeply indebted to Jane Stuart-Smith for providing the transcripts and allowing me to make use of them for this article. The sessions were arranged and conducted by the research assistant on the project, Claire Timmins. It is clear from the transcripts that part of the success of the project was the result of her good rapport with the adolescents. There are many joking references to her in the sessions, although the adolescents knew that she would hear these remarks. All the names in the transcripts have been replaced with pseudonyms. I am grateful for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper from Elizabeth Traugott, Lee Munroe, and the anonymous reviewers for LVC.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , October 2006 , pp. 267 - 283
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bolinger, Dwight. (1972). Degree words. The Hague: Mouton.
Bréal, Michel. (1900). Semantics: Studies in the science of meaning (trans., Mrs. Henry Cust). New York: Henry Holt.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere, & Pagliuca, William. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cheshire, Jenny. (1982). Variation in an English dialect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, Robert M. W. (1982). Where have all the adjectives gone? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eckert, Penelope. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
Eckert, Penelope. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eckert, Penelope. (2001). Language and gender in adolescence. In Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), The handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell. 381–397.
Fought, Carmen. (1999). A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3:5–23.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. (1999). Are there principles of grammatical change? A review article of David Lightfoot The development of language. Journal of Linguistics 35:579–595.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. (2004). On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike, & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heine, Bernd, & Kuteva, Tania. (2002). On the evolution of grammatical forms. In Alison Wray (ed.), The transition to language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 376–397.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, & Björn Wiener (eds.), What makes grammaticalization?: A look from its fringes and its components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, Susan, & Thompson, Geoff (eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ito, Rika, & Tagliamonte, Sali. (2003). Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool. Language in Society 32:257–279.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. (1994). On language change: The invisible hand in language (trans. Brigitte Nerlich). London: Routledge.
König, Ekkehard. (1991). The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.
Labov, William. (1984). Intensity. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 43–70.
Lee, David. (1987). The semantics of just. Journal of Pragmatics 11:377–398.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Rayson, Paul, & Wilson, Andrew. (2001). Word frequencies in written and spoken English (based on the British National Corpus). London: Pearson Education.
Macaulay, Ronald K.S. (1991). Locating dialect in discourse: The language of honest men and bonnie lasses. New York: Oxford University Press.
Macaulay, Ronald K.S. (1995). The adverbs of authority. English World-Wide 16:37–60.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K.S. (2001). You're like ‘why not?’ The quotative expressions of Glasgow adolescents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5:3–21Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K.S. (2002). Extremely interesting, very interesting, or only quite interesting: Adverbs and social class. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6:398–417.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K.S. (2005). Talk that counts: Age, gender, and social class differences in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Milroy, James, & Milroy, Lesley. (1985). Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21:339–384.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. (1994). Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 243–259.
Paradis, Carita. (2000). It's well weird: Degree modifiers revisited: The Nineties. In John M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 147–160.
Parkington, Alan. (1993). Corpus evidence of language change: The case of the intensifier. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis, & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 177–192.
Peters, Hans. (1994). Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 269–288.
Ramat, Anna Giacalone, & Hopper, Paul J. (eds.). (1998). The limits of grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Romaine, Suzanne, & Lange, Deborah. (1991). The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66:227–279.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. (1987). What does really really do? In James Monaghan (ed.), Grammar in the construction of texts. London: Frances Pinter. 65–79.
Stenström, Anna-Brita. (2000). It's enough funny, man: Intensifiers in teenage talk. In John M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 177–190.
Stenström, Anna-Brita, Andersen, Gisle, & Hasund, Ingrid Kristine. (2002). Trends in teenage talk: Corpus compilation, analysis and findings. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Stoffel, C. (1901). Intensives and down-toners: A study in English adverbs. Heidelberg: Carl Winter (Anglistische Forschungen, Heft 1).
Stuart-Smith, Jane. (1999). Glasgow. In Paul Foulkes & Gerry Docherty (eds.), Urban voices: Variation and change in British accents. London: Arnold. 203–222.
Tagliamonte, Sali, & D'Arcy, Alex. (2004). He's like, she's like: The quotative system in Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8:493–514.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, & Roberts, Chris. (2005). So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech 80:280–300.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1988). Is internal semantic-pragmatic reconstruction possible? In Caroline Duncan-Rose & Theo Venneman (eds.), Rhetorica, phonologica, syntactica: A festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell from his friends and colleagues. London: Routledge. 128–144.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1990). From less to more situated in language: The unidirectionality of semantic change. In Sylvia Adamson, Vivien Law, Nigel Vincent, & Susan Wright (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Cambridge, 6–9 April 1987. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 497–517.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, & Dasher, Richard B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, & Heine, Bernd (eds.). (1991). Approaches to grammaticalization (2 vols.). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Vendler, Zeno. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.