Regulatory Focus Scale (RFS): Development of a Scale to Record Dispositional Regulatory Focus
Abstract
This article presents the Regulatory Focus Scale (RFS), an instrument comprising 10 items to record promotion orientation and prevention orientation, in accordance with regulatory focus theory (Higgins, 1997, 1998). In Study 1 (n = 130), 33 newly-constructed items were specified to record dispositional regulatory focus. They were administered along with the Regulatory Strength Measure (RSM) and items of various dimensions of the Schwartz values questionnaire (Schwartz Portrait Questionnaire, SPQ). Using distribution and factor analyses (exploratory und confirmatory), 10 new items were put together to create the RFS. Promotion orientation factors were named Openness to New Things and Autonomy, whereas prevention orientation factors were termed Orientation to the Expectations of Others and Sense of Obligation. There were only low correlations between the RFS and the results of the RSM, but very clear correlations between the RFS and the SPQ. In Study 2, using an independent sample (n = 200), it was possible to confirm the factor structure of the RFS found in Study 1.
References
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van NostrandBrendl, C. M. , Higgins, E. T. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative?. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 95-160). New York: Academic PressCrowe, E. , Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 69, 117– 132Deci, E. L. , Koestner, R. , Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627– 668Dweck, C. S. , Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256– 273Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior?. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 204-243). New York: Guilford PressFazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumFörster, J. , Higgins, E. T. , Bianco, A. T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 148– 164Freitas, A. L. , Liberman, N. , Salovey, P. , Higgins, E. T. (2002). When to begin? Regulatory focus and initiating goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 121– 130Friedman, R. S. , Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001– 1013Greenwald, A. G. , McGhee, D. E. , Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464– 1480Herzberg, F. , Mausner, B. , Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: WileyHiggins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280– 1300Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1– 46Higgins, E. T. , Friedman, R. S. , Harlow, R. E. , Idson, L. C. , Ayduk, O. N. , Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3– 23Higgins, E. T. , Shah, J. , Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515– 525Idson, L. C. , Higgins, E. T. (2000). How current feedback and chronic effectiveness influence motivation: Everything to gain versus everything to lose. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 583– 592Kluger, A. N. , Ganzach, Y. (2004). Two Faces of Excellence: Perfection versus Eminence. In G. B. Graen (Ed.), New Frontiers of Leadership (pp. 67-97). Greenwich, CT: Information Age PublishingLiberman, N. , Idson, L. C. , Camacho, C. J. , Higgins, T. E. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1135– 1145Liberman, N. , Molden, D. C. , Idson, L. C. , Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 5– 18Lockwood, P. , Jordan, C. H. , Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 83, 854– 864McClelland, D. C. (1951). Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & WinstonMcClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van NostrandRoese, N. J. , Hur, T. , Pennington, G. L. (1999). Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1109– 1120Roney, C. J. , Higgins, E. T. , Shah, J. (1995). Goals and framing: How outcome focus influences motivation and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1151– 1160Schwartz, S. H. , Lehmann, A. , Roccas, S. (1999). Multimethod probes of basic human values. In J. Adamopoulos & Y. Kashima (Eds.), Social psychology and cultural context: essays in honor of Harry C. Triandis (pp. 107-123). Newbury Park, CA: SageShah, J. Y. , Higgins, E. T. , Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology). 74, 285– 293VanDijk, D. , Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus?. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 113– 135