Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Articles

Predicting Spontaneous Big Five Behavior with Implicit Association Tests

Published Online:September 01, 2006https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.13

Abstract

According to theories brought forward recently, implicit measures based on reaction times, for instance Implicit Association Tests (IATs), should predict spontaneous behavior better than explicit measures. We applied five IATs to the measurement of the Big Five personality factors and tested whether the IATs predicted spontaneous behavior. The results show that, although implicit and explicit measures of personality dimensions were related at times, the correlations between them and with behavior suggest that these constructs should be differentiated. IATs predicted spontaneous behavior, but explicit measures did not. In contrast, explicit measures, but not IATs, were related to transparent self-ratings of behavior.

References

  • Asendorpf, J.B. Banse, R. Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380– 393 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Banaji, M.R. (2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In H.L. Roediger, III & J.S. Nairne (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder. Science conference series (pp. 117-150). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Banse, R. Seise, J. Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145– 160 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. Mauer, N. Riemann, R. Spinath, F.M. Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599– 614 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-FFI. Neo-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrae - deutsche Fassung . [Neo Five Factor Inventory acc. to Costa and McCrae - German version]. Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brickenkamp, R. (1981). Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test d2 . [d2 Test of Attention]. Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buchner, A. Irmen, L. Erdfelder, E. (1996). On the irrelevance of semantic information for the “Irrelevant Speech” effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 765– 779 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burger, J.M. Caldwell, D.F. (2000). Personality, social activities, job-search behavior and interview success: Distinguishing between PANAS trait positive affect and NEO extraversion. Motivation and Emotion, 24, 51– 62 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (revised ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. (2002). The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: Strengths and limitations. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 33, 115– 133 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Devos, T. Banaji, M.R. (2005). American = White?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447– 466 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Egloff, B. Schmukle, S.C. (2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441– 1455 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fazio, R.H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115– 141 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fazio, R.H. Olson, M.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297– 327 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability, and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 385– 400 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. Conrey, F.R. (2004). Der Implizite Assoziationstest als Maß automatisch aktivierter Assoziationen: Reichweite und Grenzen. [The Implicit Association Test as a measure of automatically activated associations: Range and limits] Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 118– 126 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G. McGhee, D.E. Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464– 1480 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G. Nosek, B.A. Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197– 216 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513– 541 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. Costa, P.T. (1999). A Five-Factor theory of personality. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed. pp. 139-153). New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McFarland, S.G. Crouch, Z. (2002). A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20, 483– 510 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mierke, J. Klauer, K.C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107– 122 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Mount, M.K. Barrick, M.R. Strauss, J.P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 272– 280 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nederhof, A.J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263– 280 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scandell, D.J. Wlazelek, B. (1999). The relationship between self-perceived personality and impression management on the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 147– 154 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schnabel, K. Banse, R. Asendorpf, J.B. (in press). Assessment of implicit personality self-concept using the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Concurrent assessment of anxiousness and angriness. British Journal of Social Psychology, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwenkmezger, P. (1995). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar. [Neo Five Factor Inventory] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 237– 238 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M.C. (1999). Mac-IAT [Computer program]. Trier: Universität Trier First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M.C. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test immune to faking?. Experimental Psychology, 51, 165– 179 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Steffens, M.C. (2005). Implicit and explicit attitudes towards lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 49, 39– 66 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steffens, M.C. Buchner, A. (2003). Implicit Association Test: Separating transsituationally stable and variable components of attitudes toward gay men. Experimental Psychology, 50, 33– 48 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Steffens, M.C. Jelenec, P. Anheuser, J. Goergens, N.K. Lichau, J. Still, Y. (2004). A two-factor model of reaction time differences in the Implicit Association Test . Manuscript submitted for publication First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M.C. Kirschbaum, M. Glados, P. (2004). Avoiding stimulus effects in the Implicit Association Test: The Concept Association Task . Manuscript submitted for publication First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M.C. Lichau, J. Still, Y. Jelenec, P. Anheuser, J. Goergens, N.K. Hülsebusch, T. (2004). Individuum oder Gruppe, Exemplar oder Kategorie? Ein Zweifaktorenmodell zur Erklärung der Reaktionszeitunterschiede im Implicit Association Test (IAT). [Individual or group, exemplar or category? A two-factor model for explaining reaction-time differences in the Implicit Association Test (IAT)] Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212, 57– 65 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Steffens, M.C. Plewe, I. (2001). Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 123– 134 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar