Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Original Articles

Assessing the Big-Five Personality Domains via Short Forms

Published Online:October 03, 2006https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.139

Abstract

This research evaluated a German version of a recently introduced brief measure of the Big-Five domains (Ten Item Personality Inventory [TIPI]). Since we could not confirm the virtues of the TIPI in a representative, general population-based sample from Germany, we develop a revised short form, measuring the Big-Five personality domains with 16 adjectives. These new scales showed better reliability than the TIPI, fit the Big-Five factor structure, and were orthogonal. As preliminary evidence of construct validity, support was found for convergence correlations with the NEO-FFI and other criterion measures. Although somewhat inferior to standard Big-Five instruments, this brief adjective measure can stand as reasonable proxy for longer Big-Five measures when research conditions do not allow the use of longer instruments.

References

  • Aiken, L.R. (1999). Personality assessment. Methods & practices . Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Aluja, A. García, O. Rossier, J. García, L.F. (2005). Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R, and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 591– 604 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187– 215 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. Ostendorf, F. (1993). Neo-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae . [The Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)]. Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M.W. Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T. Terracciano, A. McCrae, R.R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322– 331 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Fruyt, F. McCrae, R.R. Szirmák, Z. Nagy, J. (2004). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory as a measure of the five-factor model. Belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 11, 207– 215 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Digman, J.M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246– 1256 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Drewes, D.W. (2000). Beyond the Spearman-Brown: A structural approach to maximal reliability. Psychological Methods, 5, 214– 227 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gosling, S.D. Rentfrow, P.J. Swann, W.B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504– 528 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Holden, R.R. Fekken, G.C. (1994). The NEO five factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 441– 444 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1– 55 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • John, O.P. Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Langford, P.H. (2003). A one-minute measure of the Big Five? Evaluating and abridging Shafer's (1999a) Big Five markers. Personality & Individual Differences, 35, 1127– 1140 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, S.-Y. Poon, W.Y. Bentler, P.M. (1995). A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 339– 358 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. Zonderman, A.B. Costa, P.T. Bond, M.H. Paunonen, S.V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552– 566 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moosbrugger, H. Fischbach, A. (2002). Evaluating the dimensionality of the Eysenck Personality Profiler-German version (EPP-D): A contribution to the Super Three vs. Big Five discussion. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 191– 211 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ostendorf, F. (1991). Sprache und Persönlichkeit . [Language and personality]. Stuttgart: Roderer First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Petrides, K.V. Jackson, C.J. Furnham, A. Levine, S.Z. (2003). Exploring issues of personality measurement and structure through the development of a short form of the Eysenck Personality Profiler. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 271– 280 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B. Koch, K. Borg, I. Reitz, T. (2004). Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala für die Messung der Big-Five-Persönlichkeitsdimensionen in Umfragen. [Development and validation of a brief scale for measuring Big-Five personality dimensions in surveys]. In ZUMA Nachrichten 55 (Vol. 28, pp. 5-28). Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raykov, T. (1998). On the use of confirmatory factor analysis in personality research. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 291– 293 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Satorra, A. Bentler, P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. v. Eye & C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scheier, M.F. Carver, C.S. Bridges, M.W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063– 1078 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. Maes, J. (2000). Vorschlag zur Vereinfachung des Beck-Depressions-Inventars (BDI). [Simplification of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)] Diagnostica, 46, 38– 46 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. [The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Development and first results on reliability and validity] Diagnostica, 45, 173– 177 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Viswesvaran, C. Ones, D.S. (2000). Measurement error in “Big Five Factors” personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 224– 235 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • von Collani, G. Herzberg, P.Y. (2003). Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühls von Rosenberg. [A revised version of the German adaptation of Rosenberg's self-esteem scale] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 3– 7 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Woods, S.A. Hampson, S.E. (2005). Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale. European Journal of Personality, 19, 373– 390 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar