Investigating Measures of Achievement Motivation(s)
Abstract
After a long debate there is now growing agreement that implicit and explicit achievement motivation can be seen as distinct constructs. One of their major differences lies in their predictive validity, which supposedly differs depending on the setting. Empirical evidence exists to the effect that different explicit measures based on different theoretical concepts build one construct. For implicit measures, however, such evidence is lacking. Thus, scores on three implicit and three explicit achievement motivation measures, an intelligence test, and a Big 5 questionnaire were obtained (N = 150) as well as two criteria. The explicit achievement motivation measures were classified as being based either on Murray’s or on McClelland’s theory. Results replicate the idea of a common construct for explicit measures but not for implicit measures. The assumed predictions did not occur for all tests and disappeared when controlling for intelligence.
References
(2001). I-S-T 2000 R (Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R) [
Intelligence Structure Test 2000 R ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.(2005). Implicit and self-attributed motives to achieve: Two separate but interacting needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 205–222.
(2004). Assessing individual differences in achievement motivation with the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 536–555.
(2006). Cognitive abilities and their interplay: Reasoning, crystallized intelligence, working memory components, and sustained attention. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 57–72.
(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
(2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
(2006). A revised 10-item version of the Achievement Motives Scale. Psychometric properties in German-speaking samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 216–224.
(1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.
(1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3–53.
(2004). NEO-PI-R. NEO Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae. Revidierte Fassung [
NEO-PI-R. NEO Personality Inventory ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.(2004). OLMT. Objektiver Leistungsmotivationstest [
Objective Achievement Motivation Test ]. Moedling: Schuhfried.(1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154.
(2009). The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 80–90.
(2002). Implicit and self-attributed achievement motives: Concordance and predictive validity. Journal of Personality, 70, 729–755.
(2007). Methodological and dispositional predictors of congruence between implicit and explicit need for achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 961–974.
(2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
