Abstract
Abstract. We investigated whether threat words presented in attended (foveal) and in unattended (parafoveal) locations of the visual field are attention grabbing. Neutral (nonemotional) words were presented at fixation as probes in a lexical decision task. Each probe word was preceded by 2 simultaneous prime words (1 foveal, 1 parafoveal), either threatening or neutral, for 150 ms. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the primes and the probe was either 300 or 1,000 ms. Results revealed slowed lexical decision times on the probe when primed by an unrelated foveal threat word at the short (300-ms) delay. In contrast, parafoveal threat words did not affect processing of the neutral probe at either delay. Nevertheless, both neutral and threat parafoveal words facilitated lexical decisions for identical probe words at 300-ms SOA. This suggests that threat words appearing outside the focus of attention do not draw or engage cognitive resources to such an extent as to produce interference in the processing of concurrent or subsequent neutral stimuli. An explanation of the lack of parafoveal interference is that semantic content is not extracted in the parafovea.
References
(2003). Influence of prime-target relationship on semantic priming effects from words in a lexical-decision task. Acta Psychologica, 113, 283– 295
(2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 875– 890
(1991). Semantic processing of unattended parafoveal words. Acta Psychologica, 77, 21– 34
(2002). No negative semantic priming from unconscious flanker words in sight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 839– 853
(2003). Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 352– 358
(1994). Attentional bias in anxiety: A defective inhibition hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 165– 195
(1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 145– 173
(2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently?. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 61– 92
(2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681– 700
(1992). Semantic processing of foveally and parafoveally presented words in a lexical decision task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 299– 322
(2004). Attention and the processing of emotional words and names: Not so special after all. Psychological Science, 15, 171– 178
(2004). Is emotional content picked up of parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(2002). The role of semantic, orthographic, and phonological prime information in unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 245– 261
(2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1038– 1052
(2000). Processing of attended and ignored words in the parafovea: Inhibitory aspects of semantic processing. Psicologica, 21, 233– 256
(2002). The crucial roles of stimulus matching and stimulus identity in negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 521– 528
(1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(1996). Preferential preattentive processing of threat in anxiety: Preparedness and attentional biases. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in anxiety disorders (pp. 253-290). New York: Guilford.
(2001). Influence of prime-probe stimulus onset asynchrony and prime precuing manipulations on semantic priming effects with words in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 75– 91
(1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380– 391
(1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372– 422
(1995). Cognitive processing of personally relevant information. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 325– 340
(1998). Running from William James’ bear: A review of preattentive mechanisms and their contribution to emotional experience. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 667– 696
(2003). Automatic vigilance for task-related information: Perseverance after failure and inhibition after success. Memory and Cognition, 31, 343– 352
(2001). Automatic attention to stimuli signalling chances and dangers: Moderating effects of positive and negative goal and action contexts. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 231– 248
(2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
(1996). LEXESP: Una base de datos informatizada del español. [LEXESP: A computerized database of Spanish]. Barcelona, Spain: Universitat de Barcelona.
(1995). Attentional shifts to emotionally charged cues: Behavioural and ERP data. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 507– 523
(2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach-and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024– 1037
(1996). Automatic affective appraisal of words. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 199– 211
(1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3– 24
(1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
(2001). Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures. The Quartely Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 665– 681
