Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Self-Regulatory Processes in the Appraisal of Moral Courage Situations

Published Online:August 29, 2016https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000274

Abstract

Abstract. The present research conceives of morally courageous behavior as goal-directed behavior and extends its investigation from a mere situational approach to a more comprehensive understanding including dispositional determinants related to self-regulatory processes. We tested the assumption that individual difference variables differentially affect the appraisal of the two core constituents of moral courage, namely, norm violation and risk of intervention. In two samples from different cultural (Switzerland/Austria vs. The Netherlands) as well as educational (university vs. representative population sample) backgrounds, participants evaluated norm violation and risk of intervention for six vignettes of situations calling for moral courage. Across both samples, self-transcendence values (benevolence, universalism) predicted the perception of norm violation, whereas personality factors related to affective self-regulation in stressful situations (behavioral inhibition system, state orientation) predicted the perception of intervention risk. These results provide evidence for the imperative of accounting for individual differences in the self-regulation of moral courage behavior.

References

  • Backes, S., Brandstätter, V. & Brandstätter, H. (2014). Moral courage: Its personal and situational determinants. Politische Psychologie, 3, 5–23. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 78–102. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumann, N., Kaschel, R. & Kuhl, J. (2005). Striving for unwanted goals: Stress-dependent discrepancies between explicit and implicit achievement motives reduce subjective well-being and increase psychosomatic symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781–799. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.781 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumert, A., Halmburger, A. & Schmitt, M. (2013). Interventions against norm violations: Dispositional determinants of self-reported and real moral courage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1053–1068. doi: 10.1177/0146167213490032 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bjørkelo, B., Einarsen, S., Birkeland Nielsen, M. & Berge Matthiesen, S. (2011). Silence is golden? Characteristics and experiences of self-reported whistleblowers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 206–238. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bledow, R. & Frese, M. (2009). A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship to performance. Personnel Psychology, 62, 229–258. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brandstätter, V. & Jonas, K. J. (2012). Moral courage training programs as a means of overcoming societal crisis. In K. J. JonasT. A. MortonEds., Restoring civil societies. The psychology of intervention and engagement following crisis (pp. 265–283). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brauer, M. & Chaurand, N. (2010). Descriptive norms, prescriptive norms, and social control: An intercultural comparison of people’s reactions to uncivil behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 490–499. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.640 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2002). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272–300. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1102_8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V. & Steca, P. (2007). Prosocial agency: The contribution of values and self-efficacy beliefs to prososcial behavior across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 218–239. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carver, C. S. & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cesario, J., Plaks, J. E., Hagiwara, N., Navarrete, C. D. & Higgins, E. T. (2010). The ecology of automaticity: How situational contingencies shape action semantics and social behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 1311–1317. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dijksterhuis, A. & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. P. ZannaM. P. ZannaEds., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 1–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Edelstein, W. & Fauser, P. (2001). Demokratie lernen und leben [Learning and living democracy]. Bonn, Germany: Bund-Länder-Kommission für Bildungsplanung und Forschungsförderung (BLK). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erkut, S., Jaquette, D. & Staub, E. (1981). Moral judgment-situation interaction as a basis for predicting prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality, 49, 1–44. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faber, T. W. & Jonas, K. J. (2013). Perception in a social context: Attention for response-relevant means. Social Cognition, 31, 301–314. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influences of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135–1151. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Pollozek, F. & Frey, D. (2006). The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies? European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 267–278. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.297 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Jonas, E. & Rudukha, T. (2004). Zivilcourage und Hilfeverhalten: Der Einfluss negativer sozialer Konsequenzen auf die Wahrnehmung prosozialen Verhaltens [Moral courage and helping behavior: The influence of negative social consequences on the perception of prosocial behavior]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 35, 61–66. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, M. P. & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 69–119. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012). Mindset theory of action phases. In P. Van LangeA. W. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 526–545). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269–288. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P., Kastenmüller, A. & Frey, D. (2006). Civil courage and helping behavior: Differences and similarities. European Psychologist, 11, 90–98. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.11.2.90 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Greitemeyer, T., Osswald, S., Fischer, P. & Frey, D. (2007). Civil courage: Implicit theories, determinants, and measurement. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 115–119. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Halmburger, A., Baumert, A. & Schmitt, M. (2015). Anger as driving factor of moral courage in comparison with guilt and global mood: A multimethod approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 39–51. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J. & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jonas, K. J. (2009). Self-regulation of courageous bystander interventions. In S. ScuzzarelloC. KinnvallK. R. MonroeEds., On behalf of others: The psychology of care in a global world (pp. 106–123). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • K. J. JonasM. BoosV. Brandstätter (2007). Zivilcourage trainieren! Theorie und Praxis [Training civil courage! Theory and practice]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jonas, K. J. & Brandstätter, V. (2004). Zivilcourage: Definition, Befunde und Massnahmen [Moral courage: Definition, empirical evidence, and interventions]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 35, 185–200. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Jonas, K. J. & Sassenberg, K. (2006). Knowing how to react: Automatic response priming from social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 709–721. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y. & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331–378. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. MaherW. B. MaherEds., Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99–171). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kuhl, J. (1994). Action and state orientation: Psychometric properties of the action control scales (ACS-90). In J. KuhlJ. BeckmannEds., Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 47–59). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kuhl, U. (1986). Selbstsicherheit und prosoziales Handeln: Zivilcourage im Alltag [Assertiveness and prosocial behavior: Moral courage in everyday life]. München, Germany: Profil. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Labuhn, A. S., Wagner, U., van Dick, R. & Christ, O. (2004). Determinants of civil courage: Results of a questionnaire study. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 35, 93–103. doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.35.2.93 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Latané, B. & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Levine, M. & Crowther, S. (2008). The responsive bystander: How social group membership and group size can encourage as well as inhibit bystander intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1429–1439. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McGovern, L. P. (1976). Dispositional social anxiety and helping behavior under three conditions of threat. Journal of Personality, 44, 84–97. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meyer, G. (2004). Was heißt mit Zivilcourage handeln? [What means “acting with civil courage”?]. In G. MeyerU. DovermannS. FrechG. GugelEds., Zivilcourage lernen: Analysen - Modelle - Arbeitshilfen (pp. 22–40). Bonn, Germany: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, G. (2009). Taking risks for others: Social courage as a public virtue. In S. ScuzzarelloC. KinnvallK. R. MonroeEds., On behalf of others: The psychology of care in a global world (pp. 82–105). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mikulincer M.Shaver P. R.Eds.. (2012). The social psychology of morality. Exploring the causes of good and evil. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Niesta Kayser, D., Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P. & Frey, D. (2010). Why mood affects help giving but not moral courage: Two types of prosocial behaviours. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1135–1157. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.717 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Osswald, S., Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P. & Frey, D. (2010). Moral prototypes and moral behavior: Specific effects on emotional precursors of moral behavior and on moral behavior by the activation of moral prototypes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1078–1094. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.728 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Papies, E. K. & Aarts, H. (2011). Nonconscious self-regulation, or the automatic pilot of human behavior. In K. D. VohsR. F. BaumeisterEds., Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and applications (2nd ed., pp. 125–142). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, M. D. & Clore, G. L. (2001). Simulation, scenarios, and emotional appraisal: Testing the convergence of real and imagined reactions to emotional stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1520–1532. doi: 10.1177/01461672012711012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Mueller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, P., Bamberg, S., Davidov, E., Herrmann, J. & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Die Messung von Werten mit dem “Portraits Value Questionnaire” [The measurement of values with the “Portraits Value Questionnaire”]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 261–275. doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.38.4.261 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modelling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 711–728. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M. & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sekerka, L. E. & Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). Moral courage in the workplace: Moving to and from the desire and decision to act. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 132–149. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Skitka, L. J. (2012). Moral convictions and moral courage: Common denominators of good and evil. In M. MikulincerP. R. ShaverEds., The social psychology of morality. Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 349–365). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, P., Bond, M. H. & Kagitcibasi, C. (2006). Understanding social psychology across cultures. London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spini, D. & Doise, W. (1998). Organising principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 603–622. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Strobel, A., Beauducel, A., Debener, S. & Brocke, B. (2001). Eine deutschsprachige Version des BIS/BAS-Fragebogens von Carver und White [A German version of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 216–227. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar