Abstract
Abstract. Intuitive eating is defined as an adaptive way of eating that maintains a strong connection with the internal physiological signs of hunger and satiety. It has four elements: unconditional permission to eat whenever and whatever food is desired, eating for physical rather than for emotional reasons, reliance on hunger and satiety cues to determine when and how much to eat, and body-food choice congruence. In this study, we assessed the differences and similarities between intuitive eating, as measured with the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 (IES-2), and eating styles (restrained, emotional, and external eating), assessed with the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ). Using a Spanish sample of mainly university students (n = 1,095) we found that (a) unconditional permission to eat presented a large negative correlation with restrained eating, r = –.82; (b) eating for physical reasons had a large negative correlation with emotional eating, r = –.70; (c) the dimensions of intuitive eating only showed very small correlations with positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, body dissatisfaction or weight control behavior after restrained, emotional, and external eating had been partialled out. Altogether, the present results suggest that two of the dimensions of intuitive eating as assessed with the IES-2 are not very new or innovative. The most promising new dimension of intuitive eating seems to be body-food choice congruence.
References
2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204
(2011). The acceptance model of intuitive eating: A comparison of women in emerging adulthood, early adulthood, and middle adulthood. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022129
(2011). Weight science: Evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift. Nutrition Journal, 2011, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-10-9
(2016). Internal structure and measurement invariance of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) in a (nearly) representative Dutch community sample. European Eating Disorders Review, 24, 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2448
(2014). Obesity, health at every size, and public health policy. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301486
(2016). A systematic review of the psychosocial correlates of intuitive eating among adult women. Appetite, 96, 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.012
(2016). Validation of a French-Canadian adaptation of the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 for the adult population. Appetite, 105, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.001
(2015). Cross-cultural validity of the Intuitive Eating Scale-2. Psychometric evaluation in a sample of the general French population. Appetite, 84, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.009
(2014). Validation of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) in a sample of Spanish women. Appetite, 73, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.014
(2013). Intuitive eating in young adults. Who is doing it, and how is it related to disordered eating behaviors? Appetite, 60, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.029
(1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
(2006).
(Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling . In G. R. HancockR. O. MuellerEds., Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 871–878). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.1991). Eating Disorders Inventory-2: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
(1998). Inventario de Trastornos de la Conducta Alimentaria-2
([Eating Disorders Inventory-2] . Madrid, Spain: Tea Ediciones.2004). EDI-3 Eating Disorders Inventory-3: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
(1982). The Eating Attitudes Test: Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine, 12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700049163
(2012). Are men more intuitive when it comes to eating and physical activity? American Journal of Men’s Health, 6, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988311428090
(2016). Package “MplusAutomation”. Retrieved from at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MplusAutomation/
(2003). Incremental validity of new clinical assessment measures. Psychological Assessment, 15, 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.456
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
(2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15, 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446
(2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
(2011). The proof of the pudding is in the eating: Is the DEBQ‐external eating scale a valid measure of external eating? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 44, 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20799
(2012). Eating when bored: Revision of the Emotional Eating Scale with a focus on boredom. Health Psychology, 31, 521–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025893
(2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306
(2007). Comparison of self-reported and measured BMI as correlates of disease markers in US adults. Obesity, 15, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.504
(1999). A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual differences, 27, 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7
(2007). Medicare’s search for effective obesity treatments: Diets are not the answer. The American Psychologist, 62, 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.3.220
(2005). The weight-loss-at-any-cost environment: How to thrive with a health-centered focus. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 37, 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60205-4
(2011). La Escala de Afecto Positivo y Negativo (PANAS) en parejas casadas mexicanas
([The Positive and Negative Affect Scale in married Mexican couples] . Ciencia Ergo Sum, 18, 117–125.2013).
(Exploratory structural equation modeling . In G. R. HancockR. O. MuellerEds., Structural equation modeling. A second course (2nd ed., pp. 395–436). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición
([International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: Second edition] . Psicothema, 25, 151–157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.241998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(2011). Dieting and disordered eating behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood: Findings from a 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 111, 1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.04.012
(2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
. (2017). Package “psych”. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/psych.pdf
(2017). Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 in a community sample. Appetite, 117, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.018
(2013). A school-based program implemented by community providers previously trained for the prevention of eating and weight-related problems in secondary-school adolescents: The MABIC study protocol. BMC Public Health, 13, 955. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-955
(2006). Intuitive eating, diet composition, and the meaning of food in healthy weight promotion. American Journal of Health Education, 37, 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2006.10598892
(2007). Risk factors for eating disorders. The American Psychologist, 62, 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.3.181
(2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297301
(1995). Intuitive eating: A recovery book for the chronic dieter. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
(2006). Development and psychometric evaluation of a measure of intuitive eating. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.2.226
(2013). The Intuitive Eating Scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation with college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030893
(2006). Are intuitive eating and eating disorder symptomatology opposite poles of the same construct? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.4.474
(2016). German version of the Intuitive Eating Scale: Psychometric evaluation and application to an eating disordered population. Appetite, 105, 798–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.019
(1986). The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2<295::AID-EAT2260050209>3.0.CO;2-T
(2012). The predictive validity of the DEBQ‐external eating scale for eating in response to food commercials while watching television. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 45, 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20940
(2012). Moderation of distress-induced eating by emotional eating scores. Appetite, 58, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.10.005
(2013). Satisfaction with Life Scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: Validation and normative data. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, E82. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.82
(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
(