Construct Validity of the German Version of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised
Abstract
Abstract. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (PCL-R) is among the most well-established instruments for the assessment of psychopathy. The PCL-R is a 20-item observer rating instrument based on file review and a semi-structured interview. The current study aimed to investigate the validity of the German adaptation of the PCL-R, its factor structure, construct validity, and association with socially desirable responding in a sample of male offenders (N = 118). A parcel model with four facets and two factors yielded excellent model fit. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed based on correlational analyses, a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix, and a canonical correlation analysis (CCA) including measures of psychopathy, antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), global personality dimensions, alexithymia, and impulsivity. The MTMM matrix as well as substantial associations with self-reported psychopathic traits and observer ratings of ASPD indicated convergent validity. Correlational analyses revealed that Factor 1 of the PCL-R was associated with low neuroticism, whereas Factor 2 was associated with impulsivity as well as with low agreeableness and conscientiousness. The PCL-R total score and Factor 2 were negatively correlated with impression management. Overall, the current findings support the validity of the German adaptation of the PCL-R.
References
2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
(2014). A meta-analysis exploring the relationship between psychopathy and instrumental versus reactive violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813519629
(2006). Psychopathic traits and experimentally induced deception in self-report assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.011
(2008). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrae (NEO-FFI)
([NEO-Five-Factor-Inventory by Costa and McCrae (NEO-FFI)] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.2002). Sex differences in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder: A review and integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 1179–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00125-8
(1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
(1976). The mask of sanity: An attempt to reinterpret the so-called psychopathic personality (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
(1982). Set correlation as a general multivariate data-analytic method. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 301–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1703_2
(1984). Estimators for two measures of association for set correlation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 907–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164484444012
(2010). Antisocial personality disorder is on a continuum with psychopathy. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51, 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.09.006
(2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171
(2019). An examination of Psychopathy Checklist-Revised latent factor structure via exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 31, 581–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000676
(1989). NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
(2014). Psychopathy, intelligence, and impulsivity in German violent offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37, 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.018
(1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
(2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
(2004). Predicting borderline and antisocial personality disorder features in nonclinical subjects using measures of impulsivity and aggressiveness. Psychiatry Research, 125, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2003.12.001
(2013).
(Alternatives to the Psychopathy Checklist – Revised . In K. A. KiehlW. P. Sinnot-ArmstrongEds., Handbook on psychopathy and law (pp. 34–57). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.2008). Antisocial personality disorder as a predictor of criminal behaviour in a longitudinal study of a cohort of abusers of several classes of drugs: Relation to type of substance and type of crime. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.01.001
(1997). Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Achse II: Persönlichkeitsstörungen
([Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Axis II: Personality Disorders] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.2015, September). Self-Report Psychopathy (SRP) Questionnaire – Ulm translation: Validierung einer deutschen Übersetzung
([Self-Report Psychopathy (SRP) Questionnaire – Ulm translation: Validation of a German translation] . Poster presentation at the Arbeitstagung der Fachgruppe Differentielle Psychologie, Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Psychologische Diagnostik, Mainz, Germany.2017). Validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scales (SRP-III full and short versions) in a community sample. Assessment, 24, 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115606205
(2016). Psychopathy in women: Prediction of criminality and violence in UK and USA psychiatric patients resident in the community. Psychiatry Research, 237, 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.014
(2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
(1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(80)90028-8
(1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (PCL-R). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
(2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
(1980). Some preliminary notes on the use of a research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
(2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452
(2018).
(The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, properties, debates, and new directions . In C. J. PatrickEd., Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 39–79). New York, NY: Guilford Press.1989). Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: Construct validity and assessment implications. Psychological Assessment, 1, 6–17.
(2004). Alexithymia and psychopathy: Comparison and application of California Q-set prototypes. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_06
(2017). Duplicity among the dark triad: Three faces of deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000139
(2013). Probing item social desirability by correlating personality items with Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): A validity examination. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.017
(2009). Structure and correlates of the German version of the Brief UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scales. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.25.3.175
(2015). Is PCL-R psychopathy associated with either type or severity of personality disorder? Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26, 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2015.1072575
(2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2018). Using latent variable- and person-centered approaches to examine the role of psychopathic traits in sex offenders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000249
(2000). Testing and validation of the 26-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in a representative population sample. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 46, 368–384. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2000.46.4.368
(2001). Toronto-Alexithymie-Skala-26 (TAS-26)
([Toronto Alexithymia Scale 26] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.2012). The differential association between alexithymia and primary versus secondary psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.027
(2007). The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): A reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406292087
(2015). Psychopathy deconstructed and reconstructed: Identifying and assembling the personality building blocks of Cleckley’s chimera. Journal of Personality, 83, 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12118
(2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
(2011). Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID I) and Axis II disorders (SCID II). Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18, 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.693
(2004). Eine Validierungsstudie zum NEO-FFI in einer Stichprobe junger Erwachsener
([A validation of the NEO-FFI in a sample of young adults] . Diagnostica, 50, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.3.1341961). The Johari Window: A graphic model of awareness in interpersonal relations. Human Relations Training News, 5, 6–7.
(2018).
(Psychopathy and personality: An articulation of the benefits of a trait-based approach . In C. J. PatrickEd., Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 259–280). New York, NY: Guilford Press.2011). Testing the relations between impulsivity-related traits, suicidality, and nonsuicidal self-injury: A test of the incremental validity of the UPPS model. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019978
(2007). Using a general model of personality to identify the basic elements of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.160
(1997). Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II), version 2.0. Journal of Personality Disorders, 11, 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.279
(2007). The UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale: Factor structure and associations with college drinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1927–1937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.013
(2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1
(2003). A test of the four-factor model of impulsivity-related traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1403–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00122-8
(2011). Psychopathic traits from the perspective of self and informant reports: Is there evidence for a lack of insight? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 758–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022477
(2016). Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (SRP): German Version Unpublished manuscript, University of Ulm, Germany.
(2014). Assessment of psychopathy in Austria: Psychometric properties of the Psychopathy Checklist – Revised. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000177
(2017). Deutsche Version der Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (PCL-R) von R. D. Hare: Manual
([German version of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (PCL-R) by R. D. Hare: Manual] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.2014). Psychopathy and violent reoffending in German-speaking countries: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000178
(2003). NEO Five-Factor Inventory scores: Psychometric properties in a community sample. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 36, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2003.11909738
(2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit
([An inventory for the assessment of social desirability] . Diagnostica, 48, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.48.3.1212012). Examining the factor structure of the Hare Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.648294
(2015). Antisociality and the construct of psychopathy: Data from across the globe. Journal of Personality, 83, 678–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12127
(2013). The Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (PCL-R), low anxiety, and fearlessness: A structural equation modeling analysis. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027886
(2014). Factor structure and construct validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy (SRP) Scale and the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory (YPI) in young men. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2012_26_063
(2015). A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83, 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126
(2013). The structural and predictive properties of the Psychopathy Checklist – Revised in Canadian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal offenders. Psychological Assessment, 25, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029840
(2007). The evolutionary role of self-deceptive enhancement as a protective factor against antisocial cognitions. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2258–2269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.008
(1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
(2016). Self-Report Psychopathy Scale – Fourth Edition (SRP 4). Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
(2010). Psychopathy, alexithymia and emotional intelligence in a forensic hospital. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.484641
(2013). The relation between self-reported psychopathic traits and distorted response styles: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026482
(2016). Kriminalprognosen in der Praxis
([Risk assessment in clinical practice] . Diagnostica, 63, 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a0001682002). Faking psychopathy? An examination of response styles with antisocial youth. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7801_03
(1997). Construct validity of psychopathy in a female offender sample: A multitrait–multimethod evaluation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.106.4.576
(2012). Assessment of psychopathy: Inter-correlations between Psychopathy Checklist Revised, Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality – Institutional Rating Scale, and Self-Report of Psychopathy Scale – III. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.746756
(2002). A quick distribution-free test for trend that contributes evidence of construct validity. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 78–88.
(2001). Alexithymia in patients with antisocial personality disorder in a military hospital setting. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 38, 81–87.
(2008). A German adaptation of the UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale: Psychometric properties and factor structure. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.67.2.107
(2011). The NEO-FFI in multiple sclerosis: Internal consistency, factorial validity, and correspondence between self and informant reports. Assessment, 18, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110368482
(2014). International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13, 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.922141
(2011). Impulsivity and psychopathy: Associations between the Barrett Impulsivity Scale and the Psychopathy Checklist Revised. Psychiatry Research, 187, 414–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.02.003
(1990). Structural model evaluation and modification. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
(1968). A general canonical correlation index. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 160–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026143
(2002). Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 370–389. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7802_10
(2009). Trait impulsivity and response inhibition in antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.03.003
(1985). Toward the development of a new self-report alexithymia scale. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 44, 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287912
(2015). Assessing the reliability and validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scales in a UK offender population. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26, 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.981565
(1990). Finding a correction for the sampling error in multivariate measures of relationship: A Monte Carlo study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490501003
(2006). A French adaptation of the UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.38
(2016). Alexithymia, emotion dysregulation, impulsivity and aggression: A multiple mediation model. Psychiatry Research, 237, 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.025
(2014). The inverse relation between psychopathy and faking good: Not response bias, but true variance in psychopathic personality. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 25, 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.952767
(1931). A new formula for predicting the shrinkage of the coefficient of multiple correlation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 2, 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732951
(2001). The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7
(2005). Validation of the UPPS Impulsive Behaviour Scale: A four-factor model of impulsivity. European Journal of Personality, 19, 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.556
(2012). Psychopathy and internalizing psychopathology. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.04.004
(2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020473
(2006). Delinquency in male adolescents: The role of alexithymia and family structure. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.001
(