Attention Tests in Different Stimulus Presentation Modes
A Facet Model of Performance in Attention Tests
Abstract
Tests of attention are frequently used in clinical psychology, neuropsychology, and other applied settings. Depending on the assessment tradition, attention tests are designed and administered differently. Among other aspects, assessment traditions enable testtakers to conduct the tests at either their own pace or at a pace set by the test developer, and apply either rows of stimuli or single stimuli. The current study systematically varied these aspects and examined how these variations affected the structure of attention tests and their correlation with reasoning. A facet model was established that included a facet related to the way attention tests are designed and administered as well as a facet related to the attention ability assessed. Results revealed that both facets explained variance in test performance. Moreover, results revealed that the facet-related test design and administration yielded higher correlations with reasoning than the ability facet. A specific combination of pace and stimulus configuration showed the highest correlations with the applied reasoning tests. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
References
(2009). Amos 18.0 [Computer software]. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corp.
(2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41–75.
(2002). Test d2 – Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test [
The test d2 – A timed test of selective attention ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.(1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404–431.
(1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2001). The development of visual attention in infancy. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 337–367.
(2005). Factor structure and validity of paper-and-pencil measures of mental speed: Evidence for a higher-order model? Intelligence, 33, 491–514.
(2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, 241–261.
(2005). Measuring human intelligence with artificial intelligence: Adaptive item generation. In J. E. Pretz R. J. Sternberg, Eds., Cognition and intelligence: Identifying the mechanisms of the mind (pp. 251–267). New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2010). Neuroticism and speed-accuracy tradeoff in serial mental addition and comparison performance. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 130–137.
(2007). On the separability of cognitive abilities related to Posner’s attention components. European Psychologist, 12, 103–118.
(1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In , Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
(2011). Konzentrationsdiagnostik [
Assessment of concentration ]. In L. Hornke M. Amelang M. Kersting, Eds., Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Psychologische Diagnostik, Band 3: Leistungs-, Intelligenz- und Verhaltensdiagnostik (pp. 51–96). Göttingen: Hogrefe.(1994). System for understanding cognitive capabilities: A theory and the evidence on which it is based. In , Current topics in human intelligence: Vol. 4. Theories of intelligence (pp. 151–203). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
(1982). Reaction time and psychometric g. In , A model for intelligence (pp. 93–132). New York: Springer.
(2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Oxford: Elsevier.
(2011). The theory of intelligence and its measurement. Intelligence, 39, 171–177.
(2008). Investigating the structure of attention: How do test characteristics of paper-pencil sustained attention tests influence their relationship with other attention tests? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 108–116.
(2008). Sustained attention and mental speed abilities: The same or different constructs? Journal of Individual Differences, 29, 205–216.
(1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1980). Revisions-Test [
Revision test ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.(1991). Analysis of the elements of attention: A neuropsychological approach. Neuropsychology Review, 2, 109–145.
(2006). Latent factors underlying individual differences in attention measures: Perceptual and executive attention. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 177–188.
(1996). Theorien der Aufmerksamkeit [
Theories of attention ]. In O. Neumann A. F. Sanders, Eds., Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Bd. C II 2: Aufmerksamkeit (pp. 559–643). Göttingen: Hogrefe.(2009). A CTC(M–1) model for different types of raters. Methodology, 5, 88–98.
(2001). Effectiveness of attention rehabilitation after an acquired brain injury: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology, 15, 199–210.
(1987). Cognitive theories of attention and the rehabilitation of attentional deficits. In M. J. Meier A. L. Benton L. Diller, Eds., Neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 182–201). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
(2006). Prädiktoren von Ausbildungserfolg am Beispiel von Schulnoten: Intelligenz, Persönlichkeit und Leistungsmotivation [
Predictors of trainings success exemplified by school grades: Intelligence, personality, and achievement motivation ]. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Marburg.(1962). Advanced progressive matrices. London: Lewis & Co.
(2007). Objektiver Leistungsmotivations-Test, OLMT [
Objective achievement motivation test, OLMT ]. Mödling, Austria: Schuhfried.(2006). Messen Konzentrationstests Konzentration? Eine Analyse von Konzentrationstestleistungen [
Do concentration tests assess concentration? Analysis of the components of concentration test performances ]. Diagnostica, 52, 33–44.(2005). An overview of research into the cognitive basis of intelligence. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 43–51.
(2010). The relationship of attention and intelligence. In A. Gruszka G. Mathews B. Szymura, Eds., Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 247–262). New York: Springer.
(2004). Attention and working memory as predictors of intelligence. Intelligence, 32, 329–347.
(2005). The structure of the relationship between attention and intelligence. Intelligence, 33, 589–611.
(2008). Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 535–551.
(1988). Aging, attention, and intelligence. Psychology and Aging, 3, 59–74.
(2009). Differential effects of prolonged work on performance measures in self-paced speed tests. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 5, 105–113.
(2006). Wahrnehmungs- und Aufmerksamkeitsfunktionen [
Functions of perception and attention ]. Moedling, Austria: Schuhfried.(2000). Aufmerksamkeitsstörungen [
Attention deficits ]. In , Lehrbuch der Klinischen Neuropsychologie: Grundlagen, Methoden, Diagnostik, Therapie (pp. 345–365). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.(1997). The psychology of attention. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
(1995). Aufmerksamkeit und Konzentration [
Attention and concentration ]. In , Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Bd. C VIII 2, Verhaltens- und Leistungsunterschiede (pp. 375–402). Göttingen: Hogrefe.(2003). Konstruktion eines komplexen Konzentrationstests. Diagnostica, 49, 110–119.
(2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3, 159–177.
(1993). Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP) [
Testbattery for Attentional Performance, TAP ]. Würselen, Germany: Vera Fimm Psychologische Testsysteme.
