Central-Cue Discriminability Modulates Object-Based Attention by Influencing Spatial Attention
Abstract
The role of central-cue discriminability in modulating object-based effects was examined using Egly, Driver, and Rafal’s (1994) “double-rectangle” spatial cueing paradigm. Based on the attentional focusing hypothesis (Goldsmith & Yeari, 2003), we hypothesized that highly discriminable central-arrow cues would be processed with attention spread across the two rectangles (potential target locations), thereby strengthening the perceptual representation of these objects so that they influence the subsequent endogenous deployment of attention, yielding object-based effects. By contrast, less discriminable central-arrow cues should induce a more narrow attentional focus to the center of the display, thereby weakening the rectangle object representations so that they no longer influence the subsequent attentional deployment. Central-arrow-cue discriminability was manipulated by size and luminance contrast. The results supported the predictions, reinforcing the attentional focusing hypothesis and highlighting the need to consider central-cue discriminability when designing experiments and in comparing experimental results.
References
(2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 818–833.
(2005). How does attention select and track spatially extended objects? New effects of attentional concentration and amplification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 461–476.
(2007). Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 608–618.
(1998). Switching attention within and between objects: The role of subjective organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 7–16.
(2006). Reinstating object-based attention under positional certainty: The importance of subjective parsing. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 992–1003.
(2008). Object-based attention with endogenous cueing and positional certainty. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1435–1443.
(1997, November). Further studies of attention to space and objects with endogenous cueing. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia, PA.
(1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269–297.
(1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161–177.
(1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
(1998). What’ s in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 189–219.
(2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 897–918.
(2006, November). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focusing: The role of perceptual organization. Talk presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Houston, TX.
(2004). Perceptual grouping and attention: Not all groupings are equal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 687–696.
(1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1238–1251.
(2002). Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1017–1027.
(1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1997). Object-based allocation of visual attention in response to exogenous, but not endogenous, spatial precues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 512–515.
(2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 4, 61–64.
(2005). Object-based and space-based attention. In , Neurobiology of attention (pp. 130–134). New York, NY: Elsevier.
(1996, October). Exogenous and endogenous cueing: Spatial vs. object-based visual attention. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL.
(2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1–46.
(2008). Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 132–144.
(2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 41–51.
(1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146–160.
(1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31–49.
(2010). Is object-based attention mandatory? Strategic control over mode of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 565–579.
(2011). Organizational and spatial dynamics of attentional focusing in hierarchically structured objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 758–780.
