Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Optimisation of Gaussian mixture model for satellite image classification

Optimisation of Gaussian mixture model for satellite image classification

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Vision, Image and Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A new methodology for classifying multidimensional satellite remote-sensing data is proposed. This technique is based on the Gaussian mixture modelling of the feature vectors extracted from the satellite image and the Bayesian approach to pattern recognition. The key contribution is the optimisation of the Gaussian mixture model for each class based on the training data. An array of techniques are employed for this purpose, including attribute learning vector quantisation, minimum description length model selection, semi-tied covariance matrices, minimum-classification-error learning, fusion of classifiers and the genetic algorithm. Contextual analysis is also developed for recognition. Experimental results on thematic mapper satellite image data demonstrate that the proposed technique outperforms various existing methods for pattern learning and classification.

References

    1. 1)
      • Lanterman, A., Achwarz, A., Wallace, L., Rissanen, L.: `Intertwining themes in the theories of model order estimation', Research Report, 1991.
    2. 2)
      • T. Kohonen . The self-organizing map. Proc. IEEE , 9 , 1464 - 1480
    3. 3)
      • R. Haralick , K. Shanmugam , I. Dinstein . Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. , 610 - 621
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • M.J. Gales . Semi-tied covariance matrixes for hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. , 3 , 272 - 281
    6. 6)
      • M.F. Augustteijin , L.E. Clemens , K.A. Shaw . Performance evaluation of texture measures for ground cover identification in satellite images by means of a neural network classifier. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , 2 , 1044 - 1063
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • G.J. McLachlan , T. Krishnan . (1997) The EM algorithm and extensions.
    9. 9)
      • J.S. Weszka , C.R. Dyer , A. Rosenfeld . A comparative study of texture measures of terrain classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. , 269 - 285
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • R.T. Frankot , A. Chellappa . Lognormal random-field models and their applications to radar image synthesis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , 2 , 195 - 207
    12. 12)
      • B. Solaiman , E. Pierce , F.T. Ulaby . Multisensor data fusion using fuzzy concepts: application to land-cover classification using ERS-1/JERS-1 SAR composites. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , 3 , 1316 - 1326
    13. 13)
      • H. Li , N. Abe . Generalizing case frames using a thesaurus and the MDL principle. Comput. Linguist. , 2 , 217 - 244
    14. 14)
      • Palaniappan, K., Zhu, F., Zhuang, X., Zhao, Y., Blanchard, A.: `Enhanced binary tree genetic algorithm for automatic cover classification', IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Honolulu, HI, p. 24–28.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • J.T. Chien . On-line hierarchical transformation of hidden Markov models for speech recognition. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. , 6 , 656 - 667
    17. 17)
      • J. Rissanen . (1989) Stochastic complexity in statistical inquiry.
    18. 18)
      • J. Makhoul , S. Roucos , H. Gish . Vector quantization in speech coding. Proc. IEEE , 1551 - 1588
    19. 19)
      • J.L. Gauvain , C.H. Lee . Maximum a posteriori estimation for multivariate Gaussian mixture observationsof Markov chains. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. , 2 , 291 - 298
    20. 20)
      • D.E. Goldberg . (1999) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning.
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • L. Davis , L. Davis . (1991) Handbook of genetic algorithm.
    23. 23)
      • J.D. Paola , R.A. Schowengerdt . A detailed comparison of backpropagation neural network and maximum-likelihood classifiers for urban land use classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , 4 , 981 - 996
    24. 24)
      • A.H. Schistad Solberg , T. Taxt , A.H. Jain . A Markov random field model for classification of multisource satellite imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , 1 , 100 - 113
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • Y.J. Hung , P.H. Swain . Bayesian contextual classification based on modified M-estimates and Markov random fields. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , 1 , 67 - 78
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
      • P.C. Smits , S.G. Dellepiane . Synthetic aperture radar image segmentation by detail observing Markov random field approach. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , 4 , 844 - 857
    34. 34)
      • Zhu, Y., Zhao, Y., Palaniappan, K., Zhou, X., Zhuang, X.: `Optimal Bayesian classifier for land cover classification using Landsat TM data', IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Honolulu, HI, p. 447–450.
    35. 35)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-vis_20045126
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-vis_20045126
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address