Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Quantifying surface severity of the 2014 and 2015 fires in the Great Slave Lake area of Canada

Nancy H. F. French https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-3003 A C , Jeremy Graham A , Ellen Whitman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-3645 B and Laura L. Bourgeau-Chavez A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Michigan Tech Research Institute, Michigan Technological University, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.

B Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada.

C Corresponding author. Email: nhfrench@mtu.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 29(10) 892-906 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF20008
Submitted: 13 January 2020  Accepted: 10 July 2020   Published: 25 August 2020

Journal Compilation © IAWF 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

The focus of this paper was the development of surface organic layer severity maps for the 2014 and 2015 fires in the Great Slave Lake area of the Northwest Territories and Alberta, Canada, using multiple linear regression models generated from pairing field data with Landsat 8 data. Field severity data were collected at 90 sites across the region, together with other site metrics, in order to develop a mapping approach for surface severity, an important metric for assessing carbon loss from fire. The approach utilised a combination of remote sensing indices to build a predictive model of severity that was applied within burn perimeters. Separate models were created for burns in the Shield and Plain ecoregions using spectral data from Landsat 8. The final Shield and Plain models resulted in estimates of surface severity with 0.74 variance explained (R2) for the Plain ecoregions and 0.67 for the Shield. The 2014 fires in the Plain ecoregion were more severe than the 2015 fires and fires in both years in the Shield ecoregion. In further analysis of the field data, an assessment of relationships between surface severity and other site-level severity metrics found mixed results.

Additional keywords: boreal ecosystems, duff, fire severity, peat, remote sensing.


References

Baig MHA, Zhang L, Shuai T, Tong Q (2014) Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 8 at-satellite reflectance. Remote Sensing Letters 5, 423–431.

Barrett K, McGuire AD, Hoy EE, Kasischke ES (2011) Potential shifts in dominant forest cover in interior Alaska driven by variations in fire severity. Ecological Applications 21, 2380–2396.
Potential shifts in dominant forest cover in interior Alaska driven by variations in fire severity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22073630PubMed |

Bourgeau-Chavez LL (1994) ‘Using ERS-1 SAR imagery to monitor variations in burn severity in an Alaskan fire-disturbed boreal forest ecosystem.’ (MS, School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI).

Bourgeau-Chavez, LL, Endres, S, Jenkins, L, Battaglia, M, Serocki, E, Billmire, M (2017) ABoVE: burn severity, fire progression, and field data, NWT, Canada, 2015–2016. ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center for Biogeochemical Dynamics. (Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, USA)10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1548

Bourgeau-Chavez, LL, Graham, JA, Endres, S, French, NHF, Battaglia, M, Hansen, D, Tanzer, D (2019) ABoVE: ecosystem map, Great Slave Lake Area, Northwest Territories, Canada, 1997–2011. ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center for Biogeochemical Dynamics. (Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, USA)10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1695

Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Grelik SL, Billimire MG, Jenkins L, Kasischke ES, Turetsky MR (2020) Assessing Boreal Peat Fire Severity and Vulnerability of Peatlands to Early Season Wildland Fire. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 3, 20
Assessing Boreal Peat Fire Severity and Vulnerability of Peatlands to Early Season Wildland Fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chen D, Loboda TV, Hall JV (2020) A systematic evaluation of influence of image selection process on remote sensing-based burn severity indices in North American boreal forest and tundra ecosystems. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 159, 63–77.
A systematic evaluation of influence of image selection process on remote sensing-based burn severity indices in North American boreal forest and tundra ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chuvieco E, Riaño D, Danson FM, Martin P (2006) Use of a radiative transfer model to simulate the postfire spectral response to burn severity. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, G04S09
Use of a radiative transfer model to simulate the postfire spectral response to burn severity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cocke AE, Fulé PZ, Crouse JE (2005) Comparison of burn severity assessments using differenced normalized burn ratio and ground data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 189–198.
Comparison of burn severity assessments using differenced normalized burn ratio and ground data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Commission for Environmental Cooperation (1997) ‘Ecological regions of North America: towards a common perspective’. Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC), Montreal. Available at http://www3.cec.org/islandora/en/item/1701-ecological-regions-north-america-toward-common-perspective-en.pdf [Verified 23 July 2020]

Dyrness CT, Norum RA (1983) The effects of experimental fires on black spruce forest floors in interior Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13, 879–893.
The effects of experimental fires on black spruce forest floors in interior Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Epting J, Verbyla D, Sorbel B (2005) Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+. Remote Sensing of Environment 96, 328–339.
Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Evans JS (2019) spatialEco. R-package version 1.2-0. Available at https://github.com/jeffreyevans/spatialEco [Verified December 2019].

French NHF (2002) ‘The impact of fire disturbance on carbon and energy exchange in the Alaskan boreal region: a geospatial analysis.’ PhD thesis, University of Michigan.

French NHF, Kasischke ES, Hall RJ, Murphy KA, Verbyla DL, Hoy EE, Allen JL (2008) Using Landsat data to assess fire and burn severity in the North American boreal forest region: an overview and summary of results. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 443–462.
Using Landsat data to assess fire and burn severity in the North American boreal forest region: an overview and summary of results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Government of Canada (2011) Canadian Digital Elevation Model (CDEM). Available at https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/7f245e4d-76c2-4caa-951a-45d1d2051333 [Verified October 2019].

Grosse G, Harden J, Turetsky M, McGuire AD, Camill P, Tarnocai C, Frolking S, Schuur EAG, Jorgenson T, Marchenko S, Romanovsky V, Wickland KP, French N, Waldrop M, Bourgeau-Chavez L, Striegl RG (2011) Vulnerability of high latitude soil organic carbon in North America to disturbance. Journal of Geophysical Research 116, G00K06
Vulnerability of high latitude soil organic carbon in North America to disturbance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hall RJ, Freeburn JT, de Groot WJ, Pritchard JM, Lynham TJ, Landry R (2008) Remote sensing of burn severity: experience from Western Canada boreal forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 476–489.
Remote sensing of burn severity: experience from Western Canada boreal forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harden JW, Trumbore SE, Stocks BJ, Hirsch A, Gower ST, O’Neill KP, Kasischke ES (2000) The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget. Global Change Biology 6, 174–184.
The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hoy EE, French NHF, Turetsky MR, Trigg SN, Kasischke ES (2008) Evaluating the potential of Landsat TM/ETM+ for assessing fire severity in Alaskan black spruce forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 500–514.
Evaluating the potential of Landsat TM/ETM+ for assessing fire severity in Alaskan black spruce forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jain TB (2004) Tongue-tied. Wildfire. June/July: pp. 22–26.

Kasischke ES, Johnstone JF (2005) Variation in post-fire organic layer thickness in a black spruce forest complex in Interior Alaska and its effects on soil temperature and moisture. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35, 2164–2177.
Variation in post-fire organic layer thickness in a black spruce forest complex in Interior Alaska and its effects on soil temperature and moisture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kasischke ES, French NHF, Harrell P, Christensen NL, Ustin SL, Barry D (1993) Monitoring of wildfires in boreal forests using large area AVHRR NDVI composite image data. Remote Sensing of Environment 45, 61–71.
Monitoring of wildfires in boreal forests using large area AVHRR NDVI composite image data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kasischke ES, Turetsky MR, Ottmar RD, French NHF, Shetler G, Hoy E, Kane ES (2008) Evaluation of the composite burn index for assessing fire severity in black spruce forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 515–526.
Evaluation of the composite burn index for assessing fire severity in black spruce forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Key CH, Benson NC (2006) Landscape assessment (LA). In ‘FIREMON: Fire effects monitoring and inventory system’. (Eds DC Lutes, RE Keane, JF Caratti, CH Key, NC Benson, S Sutherland, LJ Gangi) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-164-CD, pp. LA-1-55 164. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Kuhn M (2016) caret: classification and regression training. R package version 6.0-71. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret [Verified 23 July 2020]

Lentile LB, Holden ZA, Smith AMS, Falkowski MJ, Hudak AT, Morgan P, Lewis SA, Gessler PE, Benson NC (2006) Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 319–345.
Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Loboda TV, French NHF, Hight-Harf C, Jenkins LK, Miller ME (2013) Mapping fire extent and burn severity in Alaskan tussock tundra: an analysis of the spectral response of tundra vegetation to wildland fire. Remote Sensing of Environment 134, 194–209.
Mapping fire extent and burn severity in Alaskan tussock tundra: an analysis of the spectral response of tundra vegetation to wildland fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lumley T (2017) leaps: regression subset selection. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=leaps [Verified October 2019].

McCune B, Keon D (2002) Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. Journal of Vegetation Science 13, 603–606.
Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McKenzie D, Miller C, Falk DA (Eds) (2011) ‘The landscape ecology of fire.’ (Springer: New York)

Miller JD, Quayle B (2015) Calibration and validation of immediate post-fire satellite-derived data to three severity metrics. Fire Ecology 11, 12–30.
Calibration and validation of immediate post-fire satellite-derived data to three severity metrics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miller JD, Thode AE (2007) Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta normalized burn ratio (dNBR). Remote Sensing of Environment 109, 66–80.
Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta normalized burn ratio (dNBR).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Natural Resources Canada (2018) Canadian National Fire Database. Available at https://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/ha/nfdb?type=nbac&year=9999 [Verified 23 July 2020]

Parks S, Dillon G, Miller C (2014) A new metric for quantifying burn severity: the relativized burn ratio. Remote Sensing 6, 1827–1844.
A new metric for quantifying burn severity: the relativized burn ratio.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parson A, Robichaud PR, Lewis SA, Napper C, Clark JT (2010) Field guide for mapping post-fire soil burn severity. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-243. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Pekel JF, Cottam A, Gorelick N, Belward AS (2016) High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540, 418–422.

Reed BC, Brown JF, VanderZee D, Loveland TR, Merchant JW, Ohlen DO (1994) Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery. Journal of Vegetation Science 5, 703–714.

Rikimaru A, Roy P, Miyatake S (2002) Tropical forest cover density mapping. Tropical Ecology 43, 39–47.

Roberts DW, Cooper SV (1989) Concepts and techniques of vegetation mapping. In ‘Land classifications based on vegetation: applications for resource management.’ USDA Forest Service General Technical Report GTR INT-257, pp. 90–96 (Ogden, UT, USA)

Rogers BM, Veraverbeke S, Azzari G, Czimczik CI, Holden SR, Mouteva GO, Sedano F, Treseder KK, Randerson JT (2014) Quantifying fire-wide carbon emissions in interior Alaska using field measurements and Landsat imagery. Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences 119, 1608–1629.
Quantifying fire-wide carbon emissions in interior Alaska using field measurements and Landsat imagery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Soverel NO, Perrakis DDB, Coops NC (2010) Estimating burn severity from Landsat dNBR and RdNBR indices across western Canada. Remote Sensing of Environment 114, 1896–1909.
Estimating burn severity from Landsat dNBR and RdNBR indices across western Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tarnocai C (2006) The effect of climate change on carbon in Canadian peatlands. Global and Planetary Change 53, 222–232.
The effect of climate change on carbon in Canadian peatlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tarnocai C, Kettles IM, Lacelle B (2002) Peatlands of Canada Database, Geological Survey of Canada Open File 4002. Natural Resources Canada computer file, Ottawa. Available at https://www.mcgill.ca/library/find/maps/peat [Accessed: 23 July 2020]

Turetsky MR, Benscoter B, Page S, Rein G, van der Werf GR, Watts A (2015) Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss. Nature Geoscience 8, 11–14.
Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Cleve K, Chapin FS III, Flanagan PW, Viereck LA, Dyrness CT (Eds) (1986) ‘Forest Ecosystems in the Alaskan Taiga.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Veraverbeke S, Rogers BM, Randerson JT (2015) Daily burned area and carbon emissions from boreal fires in Alaska. Biogeosciences 12, 3579–3601.
Daily burned area and carbon emissions from boreal fires in Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Verbyla D, Kasischke E, Hoy E (2008) Seasonal and topographic effects on estimating fire severity from Landsat TM/ETM+ data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 527–534.
Seasonal and topographic effects on estimating fire severity from Landsat TM/ETM+ data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Viereck LA, Van Cleve K, Dyrness CT (1986) Forest ecosystem distribution in the taiga environment. In ‘Forest ecosystems in the Alaskan taiga.’ (Eds K Van Cleve, FS Chapin III, PW Flanagan, LA Viereck, CT Dyrness) pp. 22–43. (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Weiss A (2001) Topographic position and landforms analysis. Poster presentation, ESRI user conference, San Diego, CA (Vol. 200). Available at http://www.jennessent.com/downloads/tpi-poster-tnc_18x22.pdf [Verified 23 July 2020]

Whitman E, Parisien M-A, Thompson D, Flannigan M (2018) Topoedaphic and forest controls on post-fire vegetation assemblies are modified by fire history and burn severity in the Northwestern Canadian boreal forest. Forests 9, 151
Topoedaphic and forest controls on post-fire vegetation assemblies are modified by fire history and burn severity in the Northwestern Canadian boreal forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |