Next Article in Journal
Economic Burden of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: An Analysis of Claims Data
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Complete Clearance for Assessing Treatment Efficacy for 5-Fluorouracil Interventions in Actinic Keratoses: How Baseline Lesion Count Can Impact This Outcome
 
 
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy (JMAHP) is published by MDPI from Volume 12 Issue 1 (2024). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Taylor & Francis.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pricing of Orphan Drugs in Oncology and Rare Diseases

1
Pricing, Health Economics and Valuation, A2M, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
Professor School of Economics and Management, Cattaneo-LIUC University, Varese, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2020, 8(1), 1838191; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/20016689.2020.1838191
Submission received: 15 July 2020 / Revised: 2 October 2020 / Accepted: 9 October 2020 / Published: 1 December 2020

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this paper is to determine an upper price limit for an orphan drug by taken a broader perspective and, including also other monetary and non-monetary values for the society. Methods: This model is based on the expected free cash flows and the required minimum rate of return for the investor. In addition we calculated an innovation premium resulting from cost savings due to the substitution effect and the monetary gain in QALYs of a new medicine. We selected Spinraza®, a first in class drug with only best supportive care as comparator, and Perjeta®, a first in class drug with already an actual treatment as comparator. Results: The results show that Spinraza® leads to an innovation premium of € 78,966 and Perjeta® shows an innovation premium of € 4,388, because there were no cost savings. The analyses show the outcomes are sensitive to discount rate for QALYs. Conclusion: The break-even price from only an investor perspective may not reflect the value of drug from a broader perspective. This study shows drug prices based on an innovation premium may be more representative of the actual value of innovation for the society.
Keywords: price; valuation; orphan; oncology; cost-effectiveness; reimbursement price; valuation; orphan; oncology; cost-effectiveness; reimbursement

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nuijten, M.; Capri, S. Pricing of Orphan Drugs in Oncology and Rare Diseases. J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2020, 8, 1838191. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/20016689.2020.1838191

AMA Style

Nuijten M, Capri S. Pricing of Orphan Drugs in Oncology and Rare Diseases. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy. 2020; 8(1):1838191. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/20016689.2020.1838191

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nuijten, Mark, and Stefano Capri. 2020. "Pricing of Orphan Drugs in Oncology and Rare Diseases" Journal of Market Access & Health Policy 8, no. 1: 1838191. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/20016689.2020.1838191

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop