1887

Abstract

Summary

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to identify the and genes, encoding the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes AAC(6′)-APH(2″), APH(3′)III and ANT(4′ 4″), respectively, and the methicillin resistance determinant in epidemic aminoglycoside and methicillin-resistant isolates of In total, 37 isolates collected in the period 1980–1985 and 81 isolates from the period 1991–1992 were obtained from 10 different Belgian hospitals. Epidemic isolates from the earlier period were characterised by phage type C (6/47/54/75) of phage group III, whereas two other epidemic phage types of group III—types A (77) and B (47/54/75/77/84/85)—were commonest in isolates from the second period. The bifunctional AAC(6′)-APH(2) was the enzyme encountered most frequently. The prevalence of APH(3 )III decreased significantly in the 1991–1992 period, while ANT(4′, 4″) was found solely in isolates from this period. Resistance mechanisms were more complex in isolates from the 1991–1992 period and the gene was detected in all isolates. The PCR results corresponded well with those obtained in the radiochemical phosphocellulose paper binding assay. Isolates from the 1991–1992 period were shown to express significantly higher levels of acetyltransferase activity than isolates from the 1980s.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-41-4-282
1994-10-01
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/41/4/medmicro-41-4-282.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-41-4-282&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Jevons MP. “Celbenin”-resistant staphylococci. BMJ 1961; 1:124–125
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Pavillard R, Harvey K, Douglas D et al. Epidemic of hospital-acquired infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in major Victorian hospitals. Med J Aust 1982; 1:451–454
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Casewell MW, Hill RLR. The carrier state: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 1986; 18:Suppl A1–12
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cookson B, Peters B, Webster M, Phillips I, Rahman M, Noble W. Staff carriage of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27:1471–1476
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coleman DC, Cafferkey M, Keane CT et al. Mechanisms of pathogenicity of multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 1986; 7:Suppl A29–35
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cookson BD, Phillips I. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Soc Appl Bacteriol Symp Ser 1990; 19:55S–70S
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Locksley RM, Cohen ML, Quinn TC et al. Multiply antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: introduction, transmission, and evolution of nosocomial infection. Ann Intern Med 1982; 97:317–324
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brumfitt W, Hamilton-Miller J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:1188–1196
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cookson BD, Phillips I. Epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 1988; 21:Suppl C57–65
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Maple PAC, Hamilton-Miller JMT, Brumfitt W. World-wide antibiotic resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 1989; 1:537–540
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Schito GC, Varaldo PE. Trends in the epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of clinical Staphylococcus strains in Italy—a review. J Antimicrob Chemother 1988; 21:Suppl C67–81
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Casewell MW. Epidemiology and control of the “modern” methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 1986; 7:Suppl A1–11
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Institut d’Hygiène et d’Epidémiologie, Ministère de la Santé Publique et de l’Environnement Etude des souches hospitalières de Staphylococcus aureus isolées en Belgique. Brussels: Ministère de la Santé Publique et de l’Environnement; 19871–16
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jorgensen JH. Laboratory and epidemiologic experience with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the USA. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1986; 5:693–696
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Vickery AM. Strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in Australian hospitals from 1986 to 1990. Australian Group for Antimicrobial resistance. J Hosp Infect 1993; 24:139–151
    [Google Scholar]
  16. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Performance standard for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Villanova, PA: NCCLS; 1992
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Acar J, Bergogne-Bérézin E, Brognard JM et al. Communiqué 1993 du comité de l’antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. Path Biol 1993; 41:741–748
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haas MJ, Dowding JE. Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Methods Enzymol 1975; 43:611–628
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lowe T, Sharefkin J, Yang SQ, Dieffenbach CW. A computer program for selection of oligonucleotide primers for polymerase chain reactions. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18:1757–1761
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gray GS, Fitch WM. Evolution of antibiotic resistance genes: the DNA sequence of a kanamycin resistance gene from Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Biol Evol 1983; 1:57–66
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Matsumura M, Katakura Y, Imanaka T, Aiba S. Enzymatic and nucleotide sequence studies of a kanamycin-inactivating enzyme encoded by a plasmid from thermophilic bacilli in comparison with that encoded by plasmid pUB110. J Bacteriol 1984; 160:413–420
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rouch DA, Byrne ME, Kong YC, Skurray RA. The aacA–aphD gentamicin and kanamycin resistance determinant of Tn4001 from Staphylococcus aureus: expression and nucleotide sequence analysis. J Gen Microbiol 1987; 133:3039–3052
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Murakami K, Minamide W, Wada K, Nakamura E, Teraoka H, Watanabe S. Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:2240–2244
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Cookson B, Talsiana H, Naidoo J, Phillips I. Strategies for typing and properties of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1986; 5:702–709
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mulligan ME, Arbeit RD. Epidemiologic and clinical utility of typing systems for differentiating among strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991; 12:20–28
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Van der Auwera P, Godard C, Denis C, De Maeyer S, Vanhoof R. In vitro activities of new antimicrobial agents against multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from septicemic patients during a Belgian national survey from 1983 to 1985. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34:2260–2262
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Vanhoof R, Content J, Van Bossuyt E, Dewit L, Hannecart-Pokorni E. Identification of the aadB gene coding for the aminoglycoside-2″.0-nucleotidyltransferase, ANT(2″), by means of the polymerase chain reaction. J Antimicrob Chemother 1992; 29:365–374
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Vanhoof R, Content J, Van Bossuyt E et al. Use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of aacA genes encoding aminoglycoside-6′-N-acetyltransferases in reference strains and gram-negative clinical isolates from two Belgian hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993; 32:23–35
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Tenover FC, Gootz TD, Gordon KP, Tompkins LS, Young SA, Plorde JJ. Development of a DNA probe for the structural gene of the 2″-O-adenyltransferase aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme. J Infect Dis 1984; 150:678–687
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Bengtsson S, Bernander S, Brorson JE et al. In vitro aminoglycoside resistance of gram-negative bacilli and staphylococci isolated from blood in Sweden 1980–1984. Scand J Infect Dis 1986; 18:257–263
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dornbusch K, Miller GH, Hare RS, Shaw KJ. Resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics in gram-negative bacilli and staphylococci isolated from blood. Report from a European collaborative study. The ESGAR study group (European Study Group on Antibiotic Resistance). J Antimicrob Chemother 1990; 26:131–144
    [Google Scholar]
  32. European Study Group on Antibiotic Resistance In vitro susceptibility to aminoglycoside antibiotics in blood and urine isolates consecutively collected in twenty-nine European laboratories. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1987; 6:1987–385
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Huovinen P, Grönroos P, Herva E et al. Aminoglycoside resistance among blood culture isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1984; 20:65–69
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lovering AM, Bywater MJ, Holt HA, Champion HM, Reeves DS. Resistance of bacterial pathogens to four aminoglycosides and six other antibacterials and prevalence of aminoglycoside modifying enzymes, in 20 UK centres. J Antimicrob Chemother 1988; 22:823–839
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Madsen OR, Lorentzen JS, Frimodt-Møller N, Mortensen I, Rosdahl VT. Mechanisms of aminoglycoside resistance in Danish Staphylococcus aureus strains during the years 1979–1987. APMIS 1991; 99:537–540
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Price KE, Kresel PA, Farchione LA, Siskin SB, Karpow SA. Epidemiological studies of aminoglycoside resistance in the U.S.A. J Antimicrob Chemother 1981; 8:Suppl A89–105
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vanhoof R, Godard C, Nulens E et al. Serotypes and extended spectrum beta-lactam resistance in aminoglycoside resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from two Belgian general hospitals: a seven year study. J Hosp Infect 1993; 24:129–138
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Cohen ML, Wong ES, Falkow S. Common R-plasmids in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis during a nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus outbreak. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1982; 21:210–215
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Jaffe HW, Sweeney HM, Weinstein RA, Kabins SA, Nathan C, Cohen S. Structural and phenotypic varieties of gentamicin resistance plasmids in hospital strains of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1982; 21:773–779
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-41-4-282
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-41-4-282
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error