1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 71, Issue 8

Genome-based studies indicate that the Clade B strains belong to species and lack of the hospital infection associated markers No Access

Abstract

and the heterotypic synonym from dairy origin have recently been identified as a novel species based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. type strain NCTC 7171 was used as the reference genome for determining and to be separate species. However, this taxonomic classification did not consider the diverse lineages of , and the double nature of hospital-associated (clade A) and community-associated (clade B) isolates. Here, we investigated the taxonomic relationship among isolates of of different origins and , using a genome-based approach. Additional to 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, we estimated the relatedness among strains and species using phylogenomics based on the core pangenome, multilocus sequence typing, the average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization. Moreover, following the available safety assessment schemes, we evaluated the virulence profile and the ampicillin resistance of and clade B strains. Our results confirmed the genetic and evolutionary differences between clade A and the intertwined clade B and group. We also confirmed the absence in these strains of virulence gene markers and and the lack of the PBP5 allelic profile associated with ampicillin resistance. Taken together, our findings support the reassignment of the strains of clade B as .

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): clade B , Enterococcus faecium , Enterococcus lactis , virulence markers and whole-genome based studies
© 2021 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004948
2021-08-17
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ben Braïek O, Smaoui S. Enterococci: between emerging pathogens and potential probiotics. Biomed Res Int 2019; 2019:5938210 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ghattargi VC, Gaikwad MA, Meti BS, Nimonkar YS, Dixit K et al. Comparative genome analysis reveals key genetic factors associated with probiotic property in Enterococcus faecium strains. BMC Genomics 2018; 19:1–16 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Paula P de, Moraes M de, Schueler J, Souza N de, Furlaneto MC et al. Enterococcus faecium in artisanal ripening cheese: technological and safety aspects. Res Soc Dev 2020; 9:e299119452
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Gao W, Howden BP, Stinear TP. Evolution of virulence in Enterococcus faecium, a hospital-adapted opportunistic pathogen. Curr Opin Microbiol 2018; 41:76–82 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. EFSA BIOHAZ Panel Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez-Ordonez A, Bolton D et al. The list of QPS status recommended biological agents for safety risk assessments carried out by EFSA; 2021 https://zenodo.org/record/4428353 accessed 26 Apr 2021
  6. EFSA RG, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos M de L et al. Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms. EFSA J 2018; 16:
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Lebreton F, van Schaik W, McGuire AM, Godfrey P, Griggs A et al. Emergence of epidemic multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium from animal and commensal strains. MBio 2013; 4: [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Homan WL, Tribe D, Poznanski S, Li M, Hogg G et al. Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecium . J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40:1963–1971 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee T, Pang S, Abraham S, Coombs GW. Antimicrobial-resistant CC17 Enterococcus faecium: The past, the present and the future. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2019; 16:36–47
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gorrie C, Higgs C, Carter G, Stinear TP, Howden B. Genomics of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium . Microb Genom 2019; 5: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gao W, Howden BP, Stinear TP. Evolution of virulence in Enterococcus faecium, a hospital-adapted opportunistic pathogen. Curr Opin Microbiol 2018; 41:76–82 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Freitas AR, Tedim AP, Novais C, Coque TM, Peixe L. Distribution of putative virulence markers in Enterococcus faecium: towards a safety profile review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 73:306–319 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Pietta E, Montealegre MC, Roh JH, Cocconcelli PS, Murray BE. Enterococcus faecium PBP5-S/R, the missing link between PBP5-S and PBP5-R. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58:6978–6981 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Freitas AR, Pereira AP, Novais C, Peixe L. Multidrug-resistant high-risk Enterococcus faecium clones: can we really define them?. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2021; 57:106227 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Montealegre MC, Roh JH, Rae M, Davlieva MG, Singh K et al. Differential penicillin-binding protein 5 (pbp5) levels in the Enterococcus faecium clades with different levels of ampicillin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61:1–10 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Guzman Prieto AM, van Schaik W, Rogers MRC, Coque TM, Baquero F et al. Global emergence and dissemination of enterococci as nosocomial pathogens: Attack of the clones?. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:1–15 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Botina SG, Sukhodolets VV. Speciation in bacteria: Comparison of the 16S rRNA gene for closely related Enterococcus species. Russ J Genet 2006; 42:247–251 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Morandi S, Cremonesi P, Povolo M, Brasca M. Enterococcus lactis sp. nov., from Italian raw milk cheeses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1992–1996 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Sukhodolets VV, Botina SG, Lysenko AM, Trenina MA. The lactic acid enterococci Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus durans: nucleotide sequence diversity in 16S rRNA genes. Mikrobiologiia 2005; 74:810–815 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Morandi S, Brasca M, Lodi R. Technological, phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of wild lactic acid bacteria involved in the production of Bitto PDO Italian cheese. Dairy Sci Technol 2011; 91:341–359
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Ren X, Li M, Guo D. Enterococcus xinjiangensis sp. nov., isolated from yogurt of Xinjiang, China. Curr Microbiol 2016; 73:374–378 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Li YQ, Gu CT. Proposal of Enterococcus xinjiangensis Ren et al. 2020 as a later heterotypic synonym of Enterococcus lactis . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021004716
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Ibal JC, Pham HQ, Park CE, Shin J-H, Badger JH. Information about variations in multiple copies of bacterial 16S rRNA genes may aid in species identification. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0212090 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Chung M, Munro JB, Tettelin H, Dunning Hotopp JC. Using core genome alignments to assign bacterial species. mSystems 2018; 3: [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Bayjanov JR, Baan J, Rogers MRC, Troelstra A, Willems RJL et al. Enterococcus faecium genome dynamics during long-term asymptomatic patient gut colonization. Microb Genomics 2019; 5: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:D36–42 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3691–3693 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 2019; 35:4453–4455 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W256–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications [version 1; referees: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:124 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 20181–8
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Beukers AG, Zaheer R, Goji N, Amoako KK, Chaves A et al. Comparative genomics of Enterococcus spp. isolated from bovine feces. BMC Microbiol 2017; 17:52 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:316–324 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Galloway-Peña J, Roh JH, Latorre M, Qin X, Murray BE. Genomic and SNP analyses demonstrate a distant separation of the hospital and community-associated clades of Enterococcus faecium . PLOS ONE 2012; 7:e30187 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim EB, Marco ML. Nonclinical and clinical Enterococcus faecium strains, but not Enterococcus faecalis strains, have distinct structural and functional genomic features. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014; 80:154–165 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Stolyar SM, Ravin N, Graf J, Espejo Romilio RT, Espejo RT et al. Multiple ribosomal RNA operons in bacteria; Their concerted evolution and potential consequences on the rate of evolution of their 16s rRNA. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Větrovský T, Baldrian P. The variability of the 16s rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. PLoS One 2013; 8:e57923 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Palmer KL, Godfrey P, Griggs A, Kos VN, Zucker J et al. Comparative genomics of enterococci: Variation in Enterococcus faecalis, clade structure in E. faecium, and defining characteristics of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus . mBio 2012; 3:1–11
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhong Z, Kwok LY, Hou Q, Sun Y, Li W et al. Comparative genomic analysis revealed great plasticity and environmental adaptation of the genomes of Enterococcus faecium . BMC Neurosci 2019; 20:
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kanyó I, Molnár LV. Procaryotic species and subspecies delineation using average nucleotide identity and gene order conservation. Gene Reports 2016; 5:75–82 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ciufo S, Kannan S, Sharma S, Badretdin A, Clark K et al. Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2386–2392 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Moldovan MA, Gelfand MS. Pangenomic definition of prokaryotic species and the phylogenetic structure of Prochlorococcus spp. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:428 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Bonacina J, Suárez N, Hormigo R, Fadda S, Lechner M et al. A genomic view of food-related and probiotic Enterococcus strains. DNA Res 2017; 24:11–24 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Mikalsen T, Pedersen T, Willems R, Coque TM, Werner G et al. Investigating the mobilome in clinically important lineages of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis . BMC Genomics 2015; 16:1–16
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Gouliouris T, Raven KE, Ludden C, Blane B, Corander J et al. Genomic surveillance of Enterococcus faecium reveals limited sharing of strains and resistance genes between livestock and humans in the United Kingdom. MBio 2018; 9: [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Novais C, Tedim AP, Lanza VF, Freitas AR, Silveira E et al. Co-diversification of Enterococcus faecium core genomes and PBP5: Evidences of PBP5 horizontal transfer. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:1–17 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Miller WR, Munita JM, Arias CA. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in enterococci. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2014; 12:1221–1236 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Morroni G, Brenciani A, Litta-Mulondo A, Vignaroli C, Mangiaterra G et al. Characterization of a new transferable MDR plasmid carrying the pbp5 gene from a clade B commensal Enterococcus faecium . J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 74:843–850 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N et al. Enterococcus faecium produces membrane vesicles containing virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance related proteins. J Proteomics 2018; 187:28–38 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Kim DS, Singh KV, Nallapareddy SR, Qin X, Panesso D et al. The fms21 (pilA)-fms20 locus encoding one of four distinct pili of Enterococcus faecium is harboured on a large transferable plasmid associated with gut colonization and virulence. J Med Microbiol 2010; 59:505–507 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  58. van Schaik W, Top J, Riley DR, Boekhorst J, Vrijenhoek JEP et al. Pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium and identification of a large transferable pathogenicity island. BMC Genomics 2010; 11:1–18 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Sillanpää J, Prakash VP, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE. Distribution of genes encoding MSCRAMMs and pili in clinical and natural populations of Enterococcus faecium . J Clin Microbiol 47:896–901 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  60. García-Solache M, Rice LB. The Enterococcus: A Model of Adaptability to its Environment Clinical Microbiology Reviews. American Society for Microbiology; 2019
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Hassanzadazar H, Ehsani A, Mardani K. Antibacterial activity of Enterococcus faecium derived from Koopeh cheese against Listeria monocytogenes in probiotic ultra-filtrated cheese. Vet Res forum an Int Q J 2014; 5:169–175
     [Google Scholar]
  62. do Nascimento M da S, Moreno I, Kuaye AY. Antimicrobial activity of Enterococcus faecium Fair-E 198 against Gram-positive pathogens. Braz J Microbiol 2010; 41:74–81
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Yerlikaya O, Akbulut N. In vitro characterisation of probiotic properties of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus durans strains isolated from raw milk and traditional dairy products. Int J Dairy Technol 2020; 73:98–107
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Pieniz S, Andreazza R, Okeke BC, Camargo FAO, Brandelli A. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Enterococcus species isolated from meat and dairy products. Braz J Biol 2015; 75:923–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004948
Loading
Genome-based studies indicate that the Enterococcus faecium Clade B strains belong to Enterococcus lactis species and lack of the hospital infection associated markers
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 71, 004948 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004948
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004948
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004948
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error