1887

Abstract

, and share a very high similarity based on multi-locus sequence analysis. In this study, their correct taxonomic status was determined using genomic and phenotypic investigations. Average nucleotide identity based on MUMmer alignment of the genomes and DNA–DNA hybridization resulted in values of 98.55–100 and 78.7–100 %, respectively, strongly indicating that all strains are members of the same species. In addition, morphological investigations, fatty acid analyses and substrate utilization tests revealed no striking differences between the strains. Therefore, we propose the reclassification of and as later heterotypic synonyms of . The type strain is lodged in several culture collections (ATCC 17788=DSM 794=NCIMB 10690).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005589
2022-10-21
2024-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Poehlein A, Solano JDM, Flitsch SK, Krabben P, Winzer K et al. Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis. Biotechnol Biofuels 2017; 10:58 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Carbone D, Tombolato A. Sulla macerazione rustica della canapa. Staz Sper Agr Ital 1917; 50:563–575
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergey DH, Breed RS, Murray EGD, Hitchens AP. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 5th ed. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co; 1939 pp 1–1032
    [Google Scholar]
  4. McCoy E, McClung LS. Studies on anaerobic bacteria. VI.the nature and systematic position of a new chromogenic clostridium. Arch Microbiol 1935; 6:230–238 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cato EP, George WL, Finegold SM. Genus Clostridium Prazmowski 1880, 23AL. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol 2 Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co; 1986 pp 1141–1200
    [Google Scholar]
  6. International Union of Microbiological Societies Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB: List No. 25. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:220–222 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones DT, Woods DR. Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited. Microbiol Rev 1986; 50:484–524 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Köpke M, Dürre P. Production of biobutanol. In Luque R, Campelo J, Clark J. eds Handbook of Biofuels Production, Abbington Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd; 2011 pp 221–257
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hellinger E. Clostridium aurantibutyricum (n. sp.) a pink butyric acid Clostridium. J Gen Microbiol 1947; 1:203–210 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:1–22 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rrna sequencing. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics 1991115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tamburini E, Daly S, Steiner U, Vandini C, Mastromei G. Clostridium felsineum and Clostridium acetobutylicum are two distinct species that are phylogenetically closely related. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:963–966 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lechner M, Findeiss S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF et al. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:124 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540–552 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Huson DH, Scornavacca C. Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst Biol 2012; 61:1061–1067 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ratledge C, Wilkinson SG. Microbial Lipids New York: Academic Press Inc; 1988
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Scholz O, Boon PI. Biofilms on submerged River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. Myrtaceae) wood in billabongs: an analysis of bacterial assemblages using phospholipid profiles. Hydrobiologia 1993; 259:169–178 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Haack SK, Garchow H, Odelson DA, Forney LJ, Klug MJ. Accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretation of Fatty Acid methyl ester profiles of model bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994; 60:2483–2493 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Li JS, Du Y, Gu D, Cai W, Green A et al. Discovery and biosynthesis of clostyrylpyrones from the obligate anaerobe Clostridium roseum. Org Lett 2020; 22:8204–8209 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005589
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005589
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error