Comparative analysis of the primate X-inactivation center region and reconstruction of the ancestral primate XIST locus

  1. Huntington F. Willard1,4
  1. 1Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
  2. 2Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
  3. 3Département d'informatique, Université du Québec À Montréal, Montréal H3C 3P8, Canada;
  4. 4Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
  5. 5Genome Technology Branch and NIH Intramural Sequencing Center (NISC), National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA

    Abstract

    Here we provide a detailed comparative analysis across the candidate X-Inactivation Center (XIC) region and the XIST locus in the genomes of six primates and three mammalian outgroup species. Since lemurs and other strepsirrhine primates represent the sister lineage to all other primates, this analysis focuses on lemurs to reconstruct the ancestral primate sequences and to gain insight into the evolution of this region and the genes within it. This comparative evolutionary genomics approach reveals significant expansion in genomic size across the XIC region in higher primates, with minimal size alterations across the XIST locus itself. Reconstructed primate ancestral XIC sequences show that the most dramatic changes during the past 80 million years occurred between the ancestral primate and the lineage leading to Old World monkeys. In contrast, the XIST locus compared between human and the primate ancestor does not indicate any dramatic changes to exons or XIST-specific repeats; rather, evolution of this locus reflects small incremental changes in overall sequence identity and short repeat insertions. While this comparative analysis reinforces that the region around XIST has been subject to significant genomic change, even among primates, our data suggest that evolution of the XIST sequences themselves represents only small lineage-specific changes across the past 80 million years.

    Footnotes

    • 6 Corresponding author.

      E-mail juliann.horvath{at}duke.edu.

    • [Supplemental material is available for this article. The sequence data from this study have been submitted to GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/) under accession nos. AC204188, AC203493, AC204810, AC203729, and FJ156094-96.]

    • Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.111849.110.

    • Received June 17, 2010.
    • Accepted March 18, 2011.
    | Table of Contents

    Preprint Server