Dynamics of the epigenetic landscape during erythroid differentiation after GATA1 restoration

  1. Ross C. Hardison1,2,12
  1. 1Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
  2. 2Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
  3. 3Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA;
  4. 4Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA;
  5. 5Departments of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
  6. 6Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
  7. 7Division of Hematology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA;
  8. 8Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA;
  9. 9Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
  10. 10Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA;
  11. 11Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

    Abstract

    Interplays among lineage-specific nuclear proteins, chromatin modifying enzymes, and the basal transcription machinery govern cellular differentiation, but their dynamics of action and coordination with transcriptional control are not fully understood. Alterations in chromatin structure appear to establish a permissive state for gene activation at some loci, but they play an integral role in activation at other loci. To determine the predominant roles of chromatin states and factor occupancy in directing gene regulation during differentiation, we mapped chromatin accessibility, histone modifications, and nuclear factor occupancy genome-wide during mouse erythroid differentiation dependent on the master regulatory transcription factor GATA1. Notably, despite extensive changes in gene expression, the chromatin state profiles (proportions of a gene in a chromatin state dominated by activating or repressive histone modifications) and accessibility remain largely unchanged during GATA1-induced erythroid differentiation. In contrast, gene induction and repression are strongly associated with changes in patterns of transcription factor occupancy. Our results indicate that during erythroid differentiation, the broad features of chromatin states are established at the stage of lineage commitment, largely independently of GATA1. These determine permissiveness for expression, with subsequent induction or repression mediated by distinctive combinations of transcription factors.

    Footnotes

    • 12 Corresponding author.

      E-mail rch8{at}psu.edu.

    • [Supplemental material is available for this article.]

    • Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.125088.111. Freely available online through the Genome Research Open Access option.

    • Received April 21, 2011.
    • Accepted July 11, 2011.

    Freely available online through the Genome Research Open Access option.

    Related Article

    | Table of Contents
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

    Preprint Server