Comparing Genomes within the Species Mycobacterium tuberculosis

  1. Midori Kato-Maeda1,
  2. Jeanne T. Rhee2,
  3. Thomas R. Gingeras3,
  4. Hugh Salamon1,4,
  5. Jorg Drenkow3,
  6. Nat Smittipat1, and
  7. Peter M. Small1,5,6
  1. 1Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine and 2Department of Epidemiology, Stanford Medical School University, Stanford, California 94305, USA; 3Affymetrix, Santa Clara, California 95051, USA

Abstract

The study of genetic variability within natural populations of pathogens may provide insight into their evolution and pathogenesis. We used a Mycobacterium tuberculosis high-density oligonucleotide microarray to detect small-scale genomic deletions among 19 clinically and epidemiologically well-characterized isolates of M. tuberculosis. The pattern of deletions detected was identical within mycobacterial clones but differed between different clones, suggesting that this is a suitable genotyping system for epidemiologic studies. An analysis of genomic deletions among an extant population of pathogenic bacteria provided a novel perspective on genomic organization and evolution. Deletions are likely to contain ancestral genes whose functions are no longer essential for the organism's survival, whereas genes that are never deleted constitute the minimal mycobacterial genome. As the amount of genomic deletion increased, the likelihood that the bacteria will cause pulmonary cavitation decreased, suggesting that the accumulation of mutations tends to diminish their pathogenicity. Array-based comparative genomics is a promising approach to exploring molecular epidemiology, microbial evolution, and pathogenesis.

Footnotes

  • Present addresses: 4Berlex Biosciences, 15049 San Pablo Avenue, Richmond, CA 94804, USA; 5300 Pasteur Drive, Grant Building S-143, Medical Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

  • 6 Corresponding author.

  • E-MAIL peter{at}molepi.stanford.edu; FAX 650-498-7011.

  • Article and publication are at www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr166401.

    • Received October 4, 2000.
    • Accepted February 5, 2001.
| Table of Contents

Preprint Server