Architectures of somatic genomic rearrangement in human cancer amplicons at sequence-level resolution

  1. Graham R. Bignell1,
  2. Thomas Santarius1,
  3. Jessica C.M. Pole2,
  4. Adam P. Butler1,
  5. Janet Perry1,
  6. Erin Pleasance1,
  7. Chris Greenman1,
  8. Andrew Menzies1,
  9. Sheila Taylor1,
  10. Sarah Edkins1,
  11. Peter Campbell1,
  12. Michael Quail1,
  13. Bob Plumb1,
  14. Lucy Matthews1,
  15. Kirsten McLay1,
  16. Paul A.W. Edwards2,
  17. Jane Rogers1,
  18. Richard Wooster1,
  19. P. Andrew Futreal1,4, and
  20. Michael R. Stratton1,3,4
  1. 1 Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom;
  2. 2 Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Hutchinson/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge, CB2 2XZ, United Kingdom;
  3. 3 Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, United Kingdom

Abstract

For decades, cytogenetic studies have demonstrated that somatically acquired structural rearrangements of the genome are a common feature of most classes of human cancer. However, the characteristics of these rearrangements at sequence-level resolution have thus far been subject to very limited description. One process that is dependent upon somatic genome rearrangement is gene amplification, a mechanism often exploited by cancer cells to increase copy number and hence expression of dominantly acting cancer genes. The mechanisms underlying gene amplification are complex but must involve chromosome breakage and rejoining. We sequenced 133 different genomic rearrangements identified within four cancer amplicons involving the frequently amplified cancer genes MYC, MYCN, and ERBB2. The observed architectures of rearrangement were diverse and highly distinctive, with evidence for sister chromatid breakage–fusion–bridge cycles, formation and reinsertion of double minutes, and the presence of bizarre clusters of small genomic fragments. There were characteristic features of sequences at the breakage–fusion junctions, indicating roles for nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination-mediated repair mechanisms together with nontemplated DNA synthesis. Evidence was also found for sequence-dependent variation in susceptibility of the genome to somatic rearrangement. The results therefore provide insights into the DNA breakage and repair processes operative in somatic genome rearrangement and illustrate how the evolutionary histories of individual cancers can be reconstructed from large-scale cancer genome sequencing.

Footnotes

  • 4 Corresponding authors.

    4 E-mail mrs{at}sanger.ac.uk; fax +44-(0)1223-494809.

    4 E-mail paf{at}sanger.ac.uk; fax +44-(0)1223-494809.

  • [Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

  • Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.6522707

    • Received March 20, 2007.
    • Accepted June 18, 2007.
| Table of Contents

Preprint Server