Massed and Spaced Learning in Honeybees: The Role of CS, US, the Intertrial Interval, and the Test Interval

  1. Randolf Menzel1,
  2. Gisela Manz,
  3. Rebecca Menzel, and
  4. Uwe Greggers
  1. Freie Universität Berlin, Fachbereich Biologie/Chemie/Pharmazie–Neurobiologie, 14195 Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Conditioning the proboscis extension reflex of harnessed honeybees (Apis mellifera) is used to study the effect temporal spacing between successive conditioning trials has on memory. Retention is monitored at two long-term intervals corresponding to early (1 and 2 d after conditioning) and late long-term memory (3 and 4 d). The acquisition level is varied by using different conditioned stimuli (odors, mechanical stimulation, and temperature increase at the antenna), varying strengths of the unconditioned stimulus (sucrose), and various numbers of conditioning trials. How learning trials are spaced is the dominant factor both for acquisition and retention, and although longer intertrial intervals lead to better acquisition and higher retention, the level of acquisition per se does not determine the spacing effect on retention. Rather, spaced conditioning leads to higher memory consolidation both during acquisition and later, between the early and long-term memory phases. These consolidation processes can be selectively inhibited by blocking protein synthesis during acquisition.

Footnotes

  • 1 Corresponding author.

  • E-MAIL menzel{at}neurobiologie.fu-berlin.de; FAX 49-30-8385-5455.

  • Article and publication are at http://www.learnmem.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/lm.40001.

    • Received March 9, 2001.
    • Accepted May 14, 2001.
| Table of Contents