ABSTRACT
Importance In 2014, the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) extended existing pneumococcal vaccination recommendations for adults aged ≥65 years to include 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13), primarily to prevent non-bacteremic pneumonia.
Objective To determine PCV13 effectiveness against all-cause inpatient plus outpatient medically-attended lower-respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and pneumonia among US older adults.
Design Prospective, open cohort study following participants from 2016 to 2019. We conducted analyses in a self-matched framework, comparing outcomes during participants’ follow-up periods before and after receipt of PCV13.
Setting Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) integrated healthcare delivery system.
Participants Adults aged ≥65 years who received PCV13 between 2016-2019.
Exposures Receipt of PCV13 at ages ≥65 years, concordant with ACIP guidelines.
Main outcomes and measures We estimated the adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) for first LRTI and pneumonia episodes during each respiratory season, comparing PCV13-exposed and PCV13-unexposed time at risk for each participant using a self-matched inference framework. We computed aHR estimates using Cox proportional hazards models. We defined vaccine effectiveness (VE) as (1–aHR)×100%. We also estimated PCV13-attributable absolute reductions in incidence of LRTI and pneumonia.
Results Observations were available both before and after PCV13 receipt for 42,700 participants. Among these individuals, 1,419 experienced LRTI and 969 experienced pneumonia over approximately 26,000 combined years of follow-up before PCV13 receipt; 3,849 experienced LRTI and 2,727 experienced pneumonia over approximately 74,000 combined years of follow-up after PCV13 receipt. In adjusted analyses, VE was 9.5% (95% confidence interval: 2.2% to 16.3%) against all-cause medically-attended LRTI and 8.8% (–0.2% to 17.0%) against all-cause medically-attended pneumonia. In contrast, we did not identify evidence of protection against LRTI and pneumonia following receipt of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. We estimated that PCV13 prevented 0.7 (0.2 to 1.4) and 0.5 (0.0 to 1.0) cases of LRTI and pneumonia, respectively, per 100 vaccinated persons annually. Over a five-year time horizon, one case of LRTI and pneumonia, respectively, was prevented for every 27 (14 to 116) and 42 (–97 to 268) individuals receiving PCV13.
Conclusions and relevance PCV13 vaccination among older adults reduced the burden of medically-attended respiratory illness in this population.
Question Does 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13) reduce the burden of lower respiratory-tract infection (LRTI) and pneumonia among older adults?
Findings In this longitudinal cohort study of adults aged 65 years and older from 2016-2019, PCV13 reduced incidence of LRTI and pneumonia episodes due to any cause by 9.5% and 8.8%, respectively. This effect corresponded to prevention of 0.7 and 0.5 episodes of LRTI and pneumonia, respectively, per 100 vaccinated persons each year. Protection from 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine was not apparent.
Meaning Among older adults, PCV13 vaccine administration substantially reduces the burden of medically-attended LRTI and pneumonia.
Competing Interest Statement
JAL discloses receipt of grant funding and consulting fees from Pfizer, Inc., Merck, Sharp & Dohme, and VaxCyte unrelated to this study. SYT discloses receipt of grant funding from Pfizer, Inc. LRG, AC, LJ, and BDG are employees of Pfizer, Inc.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by Pfizer, Inc.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Institutional Review Board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are not available for public sharing.