Stress-controlled Poisson ratio of a crystalline membrane: Application to graphene

I. S. Burmistrov, I. V. Gornyi, V. Yu. Kachorovskii, M. I. Katsnelson, J. H. Los, and A. D. Mirlin
Phys. Rev. B 97, 125402 – Published 5 March 2018

Abstract

We demonstrate that a key elastic parameter of a suspended crystalline membrane—the Poisson ratio (PR) ν—is a nontrivial function of the applied stress σ and of the system size L, i.e., ν=νL(σ). We consider a generic two-dimensional membrane embedded into space of dimensionality 2+dc. (The physical situation corresponds to dc=1.) A particularly important application of our results is to freestanding graphene. We find that at a very low stress, when the membrane exhibits linear response, the PR νL(0) decreases with increasing system size L and saturates for L at a value which depends on the boundary conditions and is essentially different from the value ν=1/3 previously predicted by the membrane theory within a self-consistent scaling analysis. By increasing σ, one drives a sufficiently large membrane (with the length L much larger than the Ginzburg length) into a nonlinear regime characterized by a universal value of PR that depends solely on dc, in close connection with the critical index η controlling the renormalization of bending rigidity. This universal nonlinear PR acquires its minimum value νmin=1 in the limit dc, when η0. With the further increase of σ, the PR changes sign and finally saturates at a positive nonuniversal value prescribed by the conventional elasticity theory. We also show that one should distinguish between the absolute and differential PR (ν and νdiff, respectively). While coinciding in the limits of very low and very high stress, they differ in general: ννdiff. In particular, in the nonlinear universal regime, νdiff takes a universal value which, similarly to the absolute PR, is a function solely of dc (or, equivalently, of η) but is different from the universal value of ν. In the limit of infinite dimensionality of the embedding space, dc (i.e., η0), the universal value of νdiff tends to 1/3, at variance with the limiting value 1 of ν. Finally, we briefly discuss generalization of these results to a disordered membrane.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 16 January 2018
  • Revised 14 February 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.125402

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

I. S. Burmistrov1,2, I. V. Gornyi1,3,4,5, V. Yu. Kachorovskii1,3,4,5, M. I. Katsnelson6, J. H. Los6, and A. D. Mirlin1,3,5,7

  • 1L. D. Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kosygina Street 2, 119334 Moscow, Russia
  • 2Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 101000 Moscow, Russia
  • 3Institut für Nanotechnologie, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 4A. F. Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
  • 5Institut für Theorie der kondensierten Materie, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 6Radboud University, Institute for Molecules and Materials, NL-6525AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • 7Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, 188300 St. Petersburg, Russia

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 97, Iss. 12 — 15 March 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×