ΛCDM or self-interacting neutrinos: How CMB data can tell the two models apart

Minsu Park, Christina D. Kreisch, Jo Dunkley, Boryana Hadzhiyska, and Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine
Phys. Rev. D 100, 063524 – Published 20 September 2019

Abstract

Of the many proposed extensions to the ΛCDM paradigm, a model in which neutrinos self-interact until close to the epoch of matter-radiation equality has been shown to provide a good fit to current cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, while at the same time alleviating tensions with late-time measurements of the expansion rate and matter fluctuation amplitude. Interestingly, CMB fits to this model either pick out a specific large value of the neutrino interaction strength, or are consistent with the extremely weak neutrino interaction found in ΛCDM, resulting in a bimodal posterior distribution for the neutrino self-interaction cross section. In this paper, we explore why current cosmological data select this particular large neutrino self-interaction strength, and by consequence, disfavor intermediate values of the self-interaction cross section. We show how it is the 1000 CMB temperature anisotropies, most recently measured by the Planck satellite, that produce this bimodality. We also establish that smaller scale temperature data, and improved polarization data measuring the temperature-polarization cross-correlation, will best constrain the neutrino self-interaction strength. We forecast that the upcoming Simons Observatory should be capable of distinguishing between the models.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 24 April 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063524

© 2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Gravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Authors & Affiliations

Minsu Park1,2,*, Christina D. Kreisch2,†, Jo Dunkley1,2, Boryana Hadzhiyska3, and Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine3,4

  • 1Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 2Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, 1919 Lomas Boulevard NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA

  • *minsup@princeton.edu
  • ckreisch@astro.princeton.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 100, Iss. 6 — 15 September 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×