DNA compaction by azobenzene-containing surfactant

Yuriy Zakrevskyy, Alexey Kopyshev, Nino Lomadze, Elena Morozova, Ludmila Lysyakova, Nina Kasyanenko, and Svetlana Santer
Phys. Rev. E 84, 021909 – Published 8 August 2011

Abstract

We report on the interaction of cationic azobenzene-containing surfactant with DNA investigated by absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, and atomic force microscopy. The properties of the surfactant can be controlled with light by reversible switching of the azobenzene unit, incorporated into the surfactant tail, between a hydrophobic trans (visible irradiation) and a hydrophilic cis (UV irradiation) configuration. The influence of the trans-cis isomerization of the azobenzene on the compaction process of DNA molecules and the role of both isomers in the formation and colloidal stability of DNA-surfactant complexes is discussed. It is shown that the trans isomer plays a major role in the DNA compaction process. The influence of the cis isomer on the DNA coil configuration is rather small. The construction of a phase diagram of the DNA concentration versus surfactant/DNA charge ratio allows distancing between three major phases: colloidally stable and unstable compacted globules, and extended coil conformation. There is a critical concentration of DNA above which the compacted globules can be hindered from aggregation and precipitation by adding an appropriate amount of the surfactant in the trans configuration. This is because of the compensation of hydrophobicity of the globules with an increasing amount of the surfactant. Below the critical DNA concentration, the compacted globules are colloidally stable and can be reversibly transferred with light to an extended coil state.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 27 April 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.021909

©2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Yuriy Zakrevskyy1,*, Alexey Kopyshev1, Nino Lomadze1, Elena Morozova2, Ludmila Lysyakova2, Nina Kasyanenko2, and Svetlana Santer1,†

  • 1Experimental Physics, Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24/25, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
  • 2Department of Molecular Biophysics, Faculty of Physics, St. Petersburg State University, Ulyanovskaya St. 1, Petrodvorets, St. Petersburg 198504, Russia

  • *yuriy.zakrevskyy@uni-potsdam.de
  • santer@uni-potsdam.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 84, Iss. 2 — August 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×