Enhancing Commercialization Level of Academic Research Outputs in Research University

Authors

  • Tayebeh Khademi Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Kamariah Ismail Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Chew Tin Lee Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Arezou Shafaghat Construction Research Centre (CRC), Institute for Smart Infrastructure and Innovation Construction (ISIIC), Faculty of Civil Engineering, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4622

Keywords:

Commercialization, Research University, Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO), Technology Transfer Office (TTO)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to improve the commercialization level in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). For achieving this goal various factors and issues were examined to identify how they affect the procedure of university commercialization. These factors include the role of technology transfer office /center, availability of finance, availability of potential licensee and entrepreneurial orientation (EO) among the university researchers. Among these four factors, this study focused more on EO among academic researchers and its effect on the commercialization rate. This study was based on a qualitative research method and was designed to use a case study approach. For investigating the factors and issues in this study, a total of ten face-to-face interviews were conducted. The respondents were chosen from inventors, researchers, academic entrepreneurs, and Technology Transfer Office staff in UTM. The researcher utilized the content-analysis approach to analyze the data obtained from the semi-structured interviews of the respondents. The results indicated that EO among the university researchers, the role of technology transfer office /center, the availability of potential licensee and availability of finance were significant to the research output commercialization at university. Overall, the most critical factor was availability of finance.

References

PMSEIC. 2001. Commercialisation of Public Sector Research. Canberra.

Florida, R., W. M. Choen. 1999. Engine or Infrastructure? The University Role in Economic Development. In: Branscomb, L. M., F. Kodama, R. Florida (Eds.). Industrializing Knowledge-university–industry Linkages in Japan and the United States.

Ndonzuau, F. N., F. Pirnay, B. Surlemont. 2002. A Stage Model of Academic Spinoff Creation. Technovation. 22: 281–289.

Rasmussen, E., O. Moen, M. Gulbrandsen. 2006. Initiatives to Promote Commercialisation of University Knowledge. Technovation. 26(4): 518–533. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.005.

Aziz, K. A., H. Harris, M. Norhashim. 2011. University Research, Development & Commercialisation Management: A Malaysian Best Practice Case Study. World Review of Business Research. 1(2): 179–192.

Mohd Sadullah, A. F. 2005. Facing the Challenges: Universities and Technologies Development in Malaysia. Symbiosis, Malaysia.

Chandran, V. G. R., C. Y. Wong. 2010. Patenting Activities by Developing Countries: The Case of Malaysia. World Patent Information. doi: 10. 1016/j.wpi.2010.01.001.

Eldred, E. W., M. E. McGrath. 1997. Commercializing New Technology. Research Technology Management. March-April. 22–33.

Reimers, N. 1999. Best North American Practices in Technology Transfer. Report to Expert Panel on the Commercialization of University Research of the Prime Minister‟s Advisory Council on Science and Technology, ACST, viewed 20 March 2002, <http://www.acst-ccst.gca.ca>.

AUCC (Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada). 2001. Commercialization of University Research. Viewed 10 January 2008, http://www.aucc.ca/_pdf/english/reports/2001/commerc_05_25_e.pdf.

Tornatzky, L., P. Waugaman, D. Gray. 2002. Innovation U: New University Roles in a Knowledge Economy. Southern Growth Policies Board. ISBN 0-927364-25-5.

Lambert, R. 2003. Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration, HMSO, viewed 20 April 2010, <http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/lambert_review_final_450.11515811023 87.pdf>.

Smilor, R., J. Matthews. 2004. University Venturing: Technology Transfer and Commercialization in Higher Education. International Journal of technology Transfer & Commercialisation. 3(1): 111–128.

Miles, N., R. Daniels. 2007. The State of the Innovation Economy in the UK-2007: Problems, Opportunities and Solutions. Viewed 20 April 2011, http://o2c.elektomi.net/controversy-corner/State%20of%20InnovEco.pdf.

Zhao, L. M., A. Reisman. 1992. Toward Meta Research on Technology-transfer. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 39(1): 13–21.

Crabb, Thomas M. 2002. Research and Development, a First Consideration in Commercialization. Sae Technical Paper Series. 1.

Zhao, F. 2004. Commercialization of Research: A Case Study of Australian Universities. Higher Education Research and Development 23(2).

Thika, A. 2010. Fundamental Characteristics of University Commercialization Companies in South Australia. Ph.D. Thesis. University of South Australia.

Bozeman, B. 2001. Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory. Research Policy. 29: 627–655.

Wittamore, K., R. Bahns, A. Brown, P. Carter, G. Clements, C. Young. 1998. International Technology Transfer-A Developing Empirical Model, Management of Technology, Sustainable Development and Eco-Efficiency. In: The Seventh International Conference on Management of Technology 16–20 February, Orlando (on CD).

Golder, P. N., R. Shacham, D. Mitra. 2009. Innovations‘ Origins: When, by Whom, and How Are Radical Innovations Developed? Marketing Science. 28: 166–179.

Golder, P. N., G. J. Tellis. 1997. Will it Ever Fly? Modeling the Takeoff of Really New Consumer Durables. Marketing Sci. 16(3): 256–270.

Golder, P. N., G. J. Tellis .1993. Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend. J. Marketing Res., 30 158–170

Robinson, W.T.,C. Fornell. 1985. Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries. J. Marketing Res. 22: 305–317.

Urban G. L., T. Carter, S. Gaskin, Z. Mucha. 1986. Market Share Rewards to Pioneering Brands: An Empirical Analysis and Strategic Implications. Management Sci. 32(6): 645–659.

Lam, A. 2011. What Motivates Academic Scientists to Engage in Research Commercialization: Gold, Ribbon or Puzzle? Research Policy. 15.

Rahal, A. D. 2005. Assessment Framework for the Evaluation and Prioritization of University Technologies for Licensing and Commercialization. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Central Florida, Orlando.

Strickland, L. 2007. Commercializing Your Business: A Primer. Carolina Newswire: Article Archives. Retrieved October 18, 2011, from http://carolinanewswire.com/news/News.cgi?database=columns.db&command= viewone&id=296.

Siegel, D. S., D. Waldman, A. Link. 2003. Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Relative Productivity of University Technology Offices: An Exploratory Study. Research Policy. 32(1): 27–48.

Markman, D. G., T. P. Gianiodis, H. P. Phan, B. D. Balkin. 2005. Innovation Speed: Transferring University Technology to Market. Research Policy. 1058–1075.

Ismail, K., W. Z. Wan Omar. 2008. The Commercialization Process of Patents by Universities. In Ismail K. (Ed.) Issues in Commercialization and Management Printed in Malaysia by Univison Press. 1–27.

Horng, D., and C. Hsueh. 2005. How to Improve Efficiency in Transfers of Scientific Knowledge from University to Firm: The Case of Universities in Taiwan. The Journal of Academy of Business. Cambridge. 7(2).

Bercovitz, J., M. Feldmann. 2006. Entrepreneurial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development. Journal of Technology Tranfer. 31: 175–188.

Howells, J., M. Nedeva, L. Georghiou. 1998. Industry-Academic Links in the UK. HEFCE, Bristol, Final report to Higher Education Funding Council for England, the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales and the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council.

Temsiripoj, W. 2003. Academic-Industry Links in Thailand and the UK: A Comparative Analysis. PhD Thesis, Manchester University.

Wu, W. 2009. Managing and Incentivizing Research Commercialization in Chinese Universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-009- 9116-4.

Worasinchai, L., V. M. Ribie`re, A. A. Bechina Arntzen. 2008. Working Knowledge, The University-Industry Linkage in Thailand: Concepts and Issues. The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. 38(4): 507–524.

Wang, Y., L. Lu. 2007. Knowledge Transfer Through Effective University Industry Interactions: Empirical Evidences from China. Journal of Technology Management in China. 25(2): 119–33.

Low, H. H., A. Md Rasli, A. Amat Senin. 2011. Enhancing Academic Researchers‘ Perceptions toward University Commercialization. Int. J. Eco. Rec. 2(5): 33–48.

Muscio, A. 2009. What Drives the University Use of Technology Transfer Offices? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer. DOI 10.1007/s10961- 009-9121-9127.

Moroz, P. W., K. G. Hindle, R. B. Anderson. 2008. Commercialization of New Knowledge within Universities: Exploring Performance Disparities. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning. 4(1): 4–19.

Lerner, J. 2005. The University and the Start-up: Lessons from the Past Two Decades. Journal of Technology Transfer. 30(1): 49–56.

Lockett, A., M. Wright, S. J. Franklin. 2003. Technology Transfer and Universities, Spin-out Strategies. Small Business Economics. 20(2): 185–200.

Byers, T. H., R. C. Dorf, A. J. Nelson. 2011. Technology Venture from Idea to Enterprise. 3rd ed. Printed in Singapore. The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Lach, S. and M. Schankerman. 2002. Incentives and Inventive Activity in Universities. Hebrew University and London School of Economics, Mimeo.

Zhang, J. 2009. The Performance of University Spin-Offs: An Exploratory Analysis Using Venture Capital Data. J Technol Transf. 34: 255–285.

Wright, M., B. Clarysse, P. Mustar, A. Lockett. 2007. Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe. Cornwall: Edward Elgar Publishing

Vincett, P. S. 2010. The Economic Impacts of Academic Spin-off Companies, and Their Implications for Public Policy. Research Policy. 39: 736–747.

Abu Talib, N. 2007. Commercialization and Its Discontents. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling.

Chandran, V. G. R. 2010. R&D Commercialization Challenges For Developing Countries: The Case of Malaysia. Tech Monitor. Nov–Dec 2010. 25–30.

MASTIC (Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre). 2010. Insights@Mastic: Innovation. Vol. 11&12, Bumper Issue.

Chandran, V. G. R., A. G. Farha, P. Veera. 2009. The Role of Collaboration, Market and Intellectual Property Rights Awareness in University Technology Commercialization. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management. 6(4): 363–378.

Chandran, V. G. R., A. G. Farha, P. Veera. 2008. The Commercialization of Research Results Among Researchers in Public Universities and Research Institutions. Asian Profile. 36(3): 235–250.

Wonglimpiyarat, J. 2011. Government Programmes in Financing Innovations: Comparative Innovation System Cases of Malaysia and Thailand. Technology in Society. 33: 156–164.

MOHE (Ministry of Higher Education). 2010. Niche 1: Commercialisation and Innovation Development, AKEPT (Higher Education Leadership Academy) Centre For Leadership Research and Innovation, Putrajaya, viewed 18 April 2010, <http://www.mohe.gov.my/akept/doc/ACLRI/Niche_1.pdf>.

Howells, J. 2006. Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation. Research Policy. 35: 715–728.

Barge-Gil, A., A. Modrego. 2011. The Impact of Research and Technology Organizations on Firm Competitiveness. Measurement and Determinants. Journal of Technology Transfer. 36(1): 61–83.

Comacchio, A., S. Bonesso, C. Pizzi. 2011. Boundary Spanning Between Industry and University: The Role of Technology Transfer Centres. J Technol Transf. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9227-6.

McAdam, R., K. Miller, M. McAdam, S. Teague. 2012. The Development of University Technology Transfer Stakeholder Relationships at a Regional Level: Lessons for the Future. Technovation. 32: 57–67.

Franklin, M., A.Lockett. 2001. Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-Out Companies. Journal of Technology Transfer. 26: 127–141.

Collier, A. 2007. Australian Framework for the Commercialisation of University Scientific Research. Promentheus. 25(1): 51–68.

Rothaermel, F. T., S. D. Agung, L. Jiang. 2007. University Entrepreneurship: Taxonmy of the Literature. Industrial and Corporate Change. 16: 691–791.

Dai, Y. 2007. Patent or Publish?–University Researcher‘s Choice between Traditional and Commercial Research Outcomes. Ph.D. Thesis. Syracuse University.

Hauksson, A. Q. 1998. The Commercialization of University Research Discoveries: Are University Technology Transfer Offices Stimulating the Process? Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT.

Powers, J. B. 2000. Academic Entrepreneurship in Higher Education: Institutional Effects on Performance of University Technology Transfer, Dissertation. Indiana University.

Thursby, M. C., R. Jensen, J. M. Thursby. 2001. Objective, Characteristics and Outcomes of Major University Licensing; a Survey of Major U.S Universities. Journal of Technology Transfer. 26(1–2): 59–72.

Matkin, G. 1990. Technology Transfer and the University. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Hertzfeld, H. R., A. N. Link, N. S. Vonortas. 2006. Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms in Research Partnerships. Research Policy. 35(6): 825–838.

Lowe, R., S. Marriott. 2006. Enterprise: Entrepreneurship and Innovation–Concepts, Contexts and Commercialization. 1st ed. Netherland: Butterworth- Heinemann (An imprint of Elsevier).

Wright, M., A. Lockett, B. Clarysse, M. Binks. 2006. University Spin-Out Companies and Venture Capital. Research Policy. 35: 481–501.

Roberts, E. B. 1991. The Technological Base of the New Enterprise. Research Policy. 20(4): 283–297.

Hindle, K., J. Yencken. 2004. Public Research Commercialisation, Entrepreneurship and New Echnology Based Firms: An Integrated Model. Technovation. 24: 793–803.

Liyanage, S., P. F. Greenfield. 1999. Towards a Fourth-Generation R&D Management Model-Research Networks in Knowledge Management. International Journal of Technology Management. 18: 294–372.

Keyvanfar, A., Shafaghat, A., Majid, M. Z. A., Lamit, H., Hussin, M. W., Binti Ali, Kh. N., Dhafer Saad, A. 2014. User Satisfaction Adaptive Behavior Criteria For Assessing Energy Efficient Building Indoor Cooling and Lighting Qualities. Journal of Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 39: 277–293.

Lamit, H, Shafaghat, A., Majid, M. Z. A., Keyvanfar, Ahmad, M. H., Malik, T. A. 2013. Grounded Group Decision Making (GGDM) Model, Journal of Advanced Science Letters. 19(10): 3077–3080.

Niosi, J. 1999. Fourth-generation R&D: From Linear Models to Flexible Innovation. Journal of Business Research. 45: 111–117.

Song, X. M., M. E. Parry. 1997. A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the U.S. .Journal of Marketing. 61(April): 1–18.

Day, G. S. 1994. The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organization. Journal of Marketing. 58(October): 3–13.

Xue, P. 2007. Intellectual Property Protection and Management in Chinese Universities. Intellectual Property Protection. 26: 45–51.

Colyvas, J., A. Gelijns, R. Mazzoleni. 2002. How University Inventions Get into Practices. Management Science. 48(1): 61–67.

Thursby, J. G., M. C. Thursby. 2003. University Industry Licensing; Characteristics, Concern, Issues, from the Perspective of the Buyer. Journal of Technology Transfer. 28: 207–213.

Swamidass, P. M., V. Vulasa. 2009. Why University Inventions Rarely Produce Income? Bottlenecks in University Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 33(8): 672–678.

Luan, C., C. Zhou, A. liu. 2010. Patent Strategy In Chinese Universities: A Comparative Perspective. Scientometrics. 84: 53–63.

Covin, J. G., D. P. Slevin. 1991. A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. 16: 7–25.

Yafai K. N., Hassan J. S., Balubaid S., Zin, R. M., Hainin, M. R. 2014. Development of a Risk Assessment Model for Oman Construction Industry. Jurnal Teknologi. 70(7): 55–64.

Naman, J., D. Slevin. 1993. Entrepreneurship and the Concept of Fit: A Model and Empirical Tests. Strategic Management Journal. 14: 137–153.

Covin, J. G., D. P. Slevin. 1989. Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments. Strategic Management Journa. 10: 75–87.

Miller, D. 1983.The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science. 29: 770–792.

Wiklund, J. 1999. The Sustainability of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Performance Relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. 24(1): 39–50.

Zahra, S. A. 1993. New Product Innovation in Established Companies: Associations with Industry and Strategy Variables. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 47–69.

Lussier, R. N., M. C. Sonfield, J. D. Frazer, F. Greene, J. Corman. 1998. The Entrepreneurial Strategy Matrix and Venture Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Paper Presented at the 22nd National Small Business Consulting Conference.

Sawhney, M., R. C. Wolcott, I. Arroniz. 2006. The 12 Different Ways for Companies to Innovate. MIT Sloan Management Review. 47: 75–81.

Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Penrose, Edith T. 1958. The Theory of Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lieberman, Marvin B., B. David, Montgomery. 1998. First-Mover Advantages. Strategic Management Journal: Special Issue: Strategy Content Research. 41–58.

Miller, Danny, H. Peter, Friesen. 1978. Archetypes of Strategy Formulation. Management Science. 24(9): 921–33.

Venkataraman, N. 1989. Strategic Orientation of Business Entreprises: The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement. Management Science. 35(8): 942–62.

Valipour A., Yadollahi M., Zin R. M., Yahaya, N., Noor N. 2014. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 41(2): 164–177.

Lyon, D. W., G.T. Lumpkin, G.G. Dess. 2000. Enhancing Entrepreneurial Orientation Research: Operationalizing and Measuring a Key Strategic Decision Making Process. Journal of Management. 26: 1055–1085.

Brockhaus, R. H., Sr. 1980. Risk Taking Propensity of Entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal. 23: 509–520.

Kreiser, P. M., L. D. Marino, M. K. Weaver. 2002. Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale: A Multi-country Analysis. Entrepreneurship: Theory& Practice. 26: 71–93.

Ross, J. 1987. Corporations and Entrepreneurs: Paradox and Opportunity. Business Horizons. 30: 76–80.

Das, T. K., B. S. Teng. 2001. Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances: An Integrated Framework. Organizational Studies. 22: 251–83.

Hart, S. L. 1992. An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Process. Academy of Management Review. 17: 327–51.

Bailyn, L. 1985. Autonomy in the Industrial R&D Lab. Human Resource Management. 24(2): 129–46.

Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Second ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Patton, E., S. H. Appelbaum. 2003. The Case for Case Studies in Management Research [Electronic version]. Management Research News. 26(5): 60–71.

Yin, R. K. 1984. Case Study Research-Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Patton, M.Q. 2000. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Method. London: SAGE Publications

Creswell, J. W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and research Design, Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Osks: Publications

Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman. 1994. An Expanded Souerce Book: Qualitative Data Analysis. Second edition ed. London: Sage Publications

Siegel, D., J. Thursby, C. Marie, M. Thursby, A. Ziedonis. 2001. Organizational Issues in University-Industry Technology Transfer: An Overview. Journal of Technology Transfer. 26: 5–11.

Li, C. Y. 2012. The Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Technology Commercialization: The Moderating Roles of Technological Turbulence and Integration. African Journal of Business Management. 6(1): 370–387.

Downloads

Published

2015-05-25

How to Cite

Enhancing Commercialization Level of Academic Research Outputs in Research University. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 74(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4622