Extended-Spectrum <i>β</i>-Lactamase (ESBL) Genotypes among Multidrug-Resistant Uropathogenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> Clinical Isolates from a Teaching Hospital of Nepal

Pandit, Roshan; Awal, Balkrishna; Shrestha, Sumesh Shreekhanda; Joshi, Govardhan; Rijal, Basista Prasad; Parajuli, Narayan Prasad

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6525826

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Limitations Conclusion Data Availability Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 6525826 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6525826

Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) Genotypes among Multidrug-Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates from a Teaching Hospital of Nepal

Roshan Pandit,^1,2Balkrishna Awal,^1,2Sumesh Shreekhanda Shrestha,¹Govardhan Joshi,^1,3Basista Prasad Rijal,¹and Narayan Prasad Parajuli⁴

Academic Editor: Adalberto R. Santos

Received14 Nov 2019

Revised26 Feb 2020

Accepted03 Mar 2020

Published15 Apr 2020

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTI) represent the most common bacterial infections among patients visiting outpatient clinics of healthcare centers in Nepal. However, treatment of such infections is compounded by emergence and spread of multidrug-resistant uropathogens associated with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). In this study, we aimed to investigate the burden of antimicrobial resistance and occurrence of ESBL genes among clinical isolates of uropathogenic Escherichia coli at a tertiary care teaching hospital of Nepal. During the study period, we processed a total of 1,626 urinary tract specimens, isolated significant bacterial pathogens, and investigated their antimicrobial susceptibilities. Escherichia coli (n = 154), the predominant pathogen associated with UTI, was further investigated for the existence of ESBL enzymes by using conventional phenotypic as well as molecular approaches. Among suspected cases of UTI, we found that 15.2% were having UTI and female patients of the reproductive age group were more affected (). Escherichia coli (154, 62.1%) was the key uropathogen, and majority (∼64.9%) of them were multidrug resistant (MDR). Among MDR E. coli isolates, 40.3% were producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). bla-TEM (83.8%), bla-CTX-M (66.1%), and bla-SHV (4.8%) were common ESBL genotypes. Nitrofurantoin, gentamycin, and imipenem were the most effective antibiotics for ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates. It indicates that the high rates of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli are frequent causes of UTI in our hospital. Nitrofurantoin and aminoglycosides are the most useful first-line drugs to be used in the cases of UTI. We recommend the regular investigation of drug resistance among all isolates and develop a useful antibiotic prescription policy in our country.

1. Introduction

Urinary tract infection (UTI) represent a wide variety of clinical entities involving microbial invasion of any tissue of the urinary system from the renal cortex to the urethral meatus [1]. Every year, millions of people from all age groups are affected by UTI with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and significant healthcare costs [2]. Furthermore, it is one of the most common infections in the community among the patients admitted to hospitals and is one of the principal causes of Gram-negative bacteremia [3, 4]. Females are more affected than males, and about 20% of women experience at least an episode of UTI during their life time and recurrence is very common [5, 6]. Therefore, accurate diagnosis and appropriate use of antimicrobials for treatment and prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) are necessary to reduce the burden as well as long-term consequences [7].

Etiological agents involved in urinary tract infection are much diverse, and the most commonly encountered microorganisms are Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae including Escherichia coli [8]. The infections associated with these organisms are empirically treated with conventional antibiotics based on frequency of pathogens, local trends of antibiotic susceptibilities, and the illness severity [9]. However, increasing rates of antibiotic resistance and high recurrence rates have greatly reduced the therapeutic options for UTI in recent years [10]. Of particular concern, members of the family Enterobacteriaceae causing UTIs, including E. coli and K. pneumoniae, harboring acquired plasmids encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) are rising globally [11, 12]. These plasmids rapidly spread resistance to third-generation cephalosporins as well as other antibiotics [13, 14]. First detected in 1983, more than 300 variants of ESBLs have been identified in various members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other nonenteric organisms [13]. Among various genotypes, CTX-M, SHV, and TEM have been described predominantly among the clinical strains of Enterobacteriaceae conferring broader antimicrobial resistance including β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides [15].

Early identification of ESBL-producing bacterial isolates causing clinical illness is highly important for appropriate treatment as well as for effective infection control in hospitals [11]. Increased rate of multidrug-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli among urinary tract infections has been reported previously from Nepal, and much of these studies were limited to phenotypic description of resistant bacteria [16, 17]. However, reports describing molecular types of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infections among the patients and their epidemiology are largely unknown. Therefore, it is very important for us to know the local epidemiology of urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and investigate the useful treatment alternatives in our settings. In this perspective, we aimed to determine the incidence, bacterial etiology of urinary tract infections, and genotypes of ESBL-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli at a tertiary care health center of Kathmandu, Nepal.

2. Patients and Methods

This study was carried out at the Department of Clinical Laboratory Services of Manmohan Memorial Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, for six months (from February 2017 to July 2017). During the study period, a total of 1,626 urinary tract specimens were collected from patients presented with clinical suspicion of urinary tract infection and they were investigated for potential bacterial uropathogens.

3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Specimens representing the urinary tract infections among outpatients and inpatients attending Manmohan Memorial Teaching Hospital (MMTH) were included in the study. The clinical diagnosis of UTI was made by the respective unit physician in the presence of fever and/or any of the symptoms such painful micturition, increased frequency, burning micturition, and suprapubic pain/flank pain. All the urinary specimens (midstream urine and catheter-aspirated urine), aseptically collected before initiation of antimicrobial therapy, were included in the study. However, repeated samples from the same patient and those not fulfilling the criteria of the American Society for Microbiology were excluded.

4. Laboratory Procedure and Identification of Bacterial Uropathogens

Midstream urine and catheter-aspirated urine specimens were processed by standard microbiological methods without delay in the bacteriology laboratory of MMTH. They were processed semiquantitatively by inoculating 0.001 mL of the specimen (using a calibrated wire loop) onto the cystine lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) agar, and the inoculated plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C in aerobic atmosphere. Growth of single organism with a count of ≥10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL was considered to represent the infection, and the organisms were identified using appropriate routine identification methods including colony morphology, Gram stain, and an in-house set of biochemical tests [18]. Among all isolates, the most predominant uropathogen, Escherichia coli, was further selected for the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility as well as detection of the multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- (ESBL-) producing strains.

5. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli was determined by the disk diffusion method of modified Kirby–Bauer on the Mueller–Hinton agar (HiMedia Laboratories, India) following standard procedures recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI), Wayne, USA [19]. Antibiotics included in the testing panel were amoxicillin (AMX 10 µg), gentamycin (GEN 10 µg), cotrimoxazole (COT 30 µg), cefixime (CFM 5 µg), Nitrofurantoin (NIT 300 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP 5 µg), cefotaxime/ceftriaxone (CTX/CTR 30 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ 30 µg), piperacillin (PI 100 µg), Piperacillin-tazobactam (PIT 100/10 µg), tetracycline (TE 30 µg), imipenem (IMP 30 µg), and meropenem (MEM 30 µg) (HiMedia Laboratories, India). Interpretations of antibiotic susceptibility results were made according to the zone size interpretative standards of the CLSI [19]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control strain for antibiotic susceptibility.

6. Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli and Potential ESBL Producers

In this study, Escherichia coli isolates resistant to at least one agent of three different classes of commonly used antimicrobial agents were regarded as multidrug resistant (MDR) [20]. If the zone of inhibition (ZOI) was ≤25 mm for ceftriaxone, ≤22 mm for ceftazidime, and/or ≤27 mm for cefotaxime, the isolate was considered a potential ESBL producer as recommended by the CLSI and further tested by confirmatory methods [19].

7. Combined Disk Test for Phenotypic Detection of ESBL

Presumptive ESBL-producing isolates by initial screening were emulsified with 4–6 ml of peptone water to adjust the inoculum density equal to that of 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards. Combination disk test (CDT), as recommended by the CLSI, was performed on all Escherichia coli isolates presumed to be ESBL producers. In this test, the cefotaxime (30 µg) disk alone and in combination with clavulanic acid (cefotaxime + clavulanic acid, 30/10 µg) disk were applied onto a plate of Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) which was inoculated with the test strain and then incubated in ambient air for 16–18 hours at 35 ± 2°C. The isolate showing increase of ≥5 mm in the zone of inhibition of the combination discs in comparison to that of the cefotaxime disk alone was considered an ESBL producer [19].

8. Molecular Typing of ESBL Genes

All the phenotypic ESBL Escherichia coli isolates were subjected to molecular analysis for the confirmation of ESBL production. Molecular detection of Escherichia coli harboring ESBL genes (bla-CTX-M, bla-TEM, and bla-SHV) was carried out by conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at the Kathmandu Center for Genomics and Research Laboratory (KCGRL), Kathmandu, Nepal. The methods for molecular detection of ESBL-producing isolates of Escherichia coli were similar as in our previous work [21].

9. Plasmid DNA Extraction and Amplification

For plasmid DNA extraction, a single colony of each potential ESBL-producing Escherichia coli was inoculated into Luria-Bertani broth and incubated till the logarithmic state. Extraction and purification of plasmid DNA of bacteria was carried out using a commercial kit (SureSpin Plasmid Mini kit from Genetix Biotech, Asia) following manufacturer’s instructions. Purified DNA from bacterial isolates was used as a template to detect ESBL genotypes: CTX-M, TEM, and SHV β-lactamase genes. Primers for the amplification of ESBL genotypes (bla-CTX-M, bla-TEM, and bla-SHV) were designed and purchased from GeNei™, India, and their sequences are as listed in Table 1.

Polymerase chain reaction- (PCR-) based amplification of ESBL genes was carried out as the method previously described [22]. For instance, multiplex PCR was carried out to detect the plasmid genes for SHV and CTX-M, while conventional linear PCR was used for TEM-type ESBL genes. Amplification reactions were carried out in a DNA thermal cycler (CG) with the following thermal and cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 minutes, denaturation at 94°C for 45 seconds of 35 cycles, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec of 35 cycles (for bla-SHV and bla-CTX-M) and 55°C for 30 sec of 35 cycles (for bla-TEM), extension at 72°C for 3 minutes of 35 cycles, and final extension at 72°C for 2 minutes. Previously confirmed Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates possessing bla-TEM, bla-SHV, and bla-CTX-M genes were used as a positive control, and nuclease-free water was used as a negative control in each run of PCR.

After PCR amplification, 2.5 μL of each reaction was separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel for 30 min at 100 V (10 V/Cm) in 1 × TBE buffer. DNA was stained with ethidium bromide (1 μg/ml), and the amplified DNA bands were visualized using a UV-transilluminator (Cleaver Scientific Ltd).

10. Data Analysis

The information regarding patient’s profile and the results were entered into a computer program. Data analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS™) version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and presented in percentage base distribution. Data with value of less than 0.05 (CI 95%) were regarded as significant.

11. Results

11.1. Patients with Urinary Tract Infection

Out of the total 1,626 urinary tract specimens from patients suspected of having UTI, 248 (15.2%) showed significant growth of at least one uropathogen confirming the urinary tract infection. Females (166, 66.9%) were the significant subgroup of patients () affected with UTI, and most of them belonged to the age group 21–30 years. Incidence of UTI varied with different age group, gender, and type of patients (inpatients or outpatients) (Table 2).

11.2. Bacterial Uropathogens

Two hundred and forty eight bacterial uropathogens were recovered from a total of 1,626 patients with suspected UTI. Gram-negative bacteria (82.5%) were more common, and Escherichia coli (154, 62.1%) remained the predominant pathogen associated with UTI in all age groups. Other pathogens isolated from our UTI cases were Staphylococcus aureus (24, 9.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (22, 8.9%), Enterococcus faecalis (18, 7.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10,4.0%), and Candida albicans (4, 3.2%).

11.3. Antibiogram of Escherichia coli

Diverse pattern of antimicrobial susceptibilities was observed among the E. coli isolates. Nitrofurantoin (92.2%) and gentamycin (76.6%) were the most effective first-line therapeutic regimens for uropathogenic E coli isolates. Almost half of the isolates were resistant to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Moreover, 64.9% (100/154) of Escherichia coli were found multidrug resistant. In combination, about 21% of the isolates were resistant to beta-lactam, quinolones, and sulfonamides, 12% were resistant to beta-lactam, aminoglycosides, and sulfonamides, and 9% were resistant to beta-lactam, quinolones, and aminoglycosides (Figure 1, Table 3).

11.4. ESBL Escherichia coli

About 40.3% (62/154) of our Escherichia coli isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers.

ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates were significantly more resistant to antibiotics as compared to nonproducers of ESBL (Table 3).

11.5. Genotype Distribution among ESBL E coli

Sixty two isolates of E. coli were confirmed by molecular analysis of ESBL genes. Among the ESBL genotypes, bla-TEM (83.8%) was more common, followed by bla-CTX-M (66.1%) and bla-SHV (4.8%). More than half (54.8%) of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates were coharboring bla-TEM and bla-CTX-M (Table 4, Figure 2).

12. Discussion

Urinary tract infection (UTI) continues to be the common clinical entity among the patients of the outpatient department and also represents one of the common nosocomial infections in Nepalese hospitals [6, 16]. However, the reported incidences and their epidemiology in Nepal are not consistent enough to reveal the actual scenario regarding the etiological spectrum and antimicrobial susceptibilities [5, 23–25]. In this laboratory-based study, we examined the organisms causing urinary tract infections and their antibiograms along with the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase enzymes by phenotypic and genotypic approaches. To the best of our knowledge, this report represents the first genotypic characterization of ESBL-producing uropathogens from the cases of urinary tract infections from Nepal.

Overall incidence of UTI in our study was quite low (15.2%) when compared to the previous reports from similar studies in Nepal [6, 16, 25]. The lower incidence in this study might be due to the prior use of antibiotics and infection due to slow-growing organisms or due to those organisms that were not able to grow on our routine culture media. In addition, more outpatients were found with UTI than inpatients. Concomitantly, significantly more females (66.9%) were found with UTI, as previously described elsewhere [5, 6, 25]. The higher occurrence of UTI in females of the reproductive age group in this study has been well supported by other studies [5, 26]. Furthermore, elderly males were found more affected by UTI in this study, as they might have bladder outflow obstruction and other chronic comorbid conditions.

We observed that Gram-negative bacteria were the most predominant (81.4%) organisms associated with our cases of UTI, and Escherichia coli (62.0%) was the major pathogen. Members of Enterobacteriaceae have been well described as the primary agents for UTI than other organisms in several studies. Higher incidence of E. coli seen in our study also resembled the results of previous studies from Nepal [16, 17, 25]. Although very low number of Gram-positive bacteria and yeasts were isolated in this study, they are also responsible for UTI in various studies [6, 27].

Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogenic bacterial species is one of the major findings of this study. Escherichia coli, the major uropathogen, was highly resistant to commonly used therapeutic drugs (beta-lactams, sulphonamides, quinolones, and aminoglycosides). Out of 154 E. coli isolates, 89.3% were resistant to ampicillin, 68.9% resistant to piperacillin, 50.4% to cefixime, 49.1% to cotrimoxazole, and 41.6% to ofloxacin. This finding is similar to the previous reports by Baral et al. [17], Neupane et al. [28], and Rijal et al. [26] from Nepal. Ampicillin and other oral cephalosporins were ineffective in our study, hence should be assessed before using as an empirical therapy. In addition to this, susceptibility findings of isolates against cephalosporins and quinolones show a substantial increase in their resistance, as reported by others [16, 29]. However, nitrofurantoin (92.2%) and gentamycin (76.6%) were effective against uropathogenic E coli strains. As stated by others too, these can be considered as the first-line therapeutic regimen for UTI cases in our settings [24, 26]. Carbapenems including imipenem and meropenem would be useful as secondary therapy for multidrug-resistant and complicated UTIs [30]. However, in the recent years, the emergence of urinary isolates with carbapenem resistance is further complicating the treatment of UTIs [31].

In this study, we found a high proportion of E. coli (64.9%) isolates to be multidrug resistant (MDR). Our findings on MDR bacteria in UTI cases are compatible with the reports from different parts of the world, including Nepal [17, 28, 32, 33]. These MDR E. coli strains are common in the study hospital as we previously reported the similar findings in pediatric UTI cases [34]. Furthermore, the most common MDR pattern among E. coli isolates was resistance towards beta-lactams + quinolones + sulphonamides (21%), which may be due to the production of hydrolytic enzymes (β-lactamases) by the bacteria [30]. Our finding suggests that the antibiotic treatment options for UTIs caused by E. coli have been severely challenged due to the resistance to commonly used antibiotics, leading to the situation relying only on certain reserve antibiotics.

Over the time, incidence and epidemiology of MDR and ESBL-producing uropathogenic E. coli have been continuously changing and higher rates are reported from developing countries [30]. In this study, 40.3% of the E. coli isolates were found as ESBL producers, and the patients over age of 50 years were found with higher incidence of ESBL E coli. The rate of ESBL in this study is very high when compared to the reported rates from previous studies [17, 29]. However, the rate of ESBL-producing uropathogenic E coli in Nepal has been constantly rising, and recently, Neupane et al (33.2%) and Bhandari et al (38.6%) have documented an increased rate of ESBL producers from UTI cases [28, 35]. From international perspectives, similar rates of ESBL-producing E. coli are also reported by Jena et al (41.07%) from India [32], Masud et al (40.9%) from Bangladesh [36], Moore et al (44%) from Cambodia [37], and Kizilca et al (41.4%) from Turkey [38]. However, the rates of ESBL-producing uropathogenic E coli from developed countries are very low as reported elsewhere [30, 39]. The reason behind the variation in ESBL-producing strains among studies might be attributable to the local antibiotic prescribing practices, extensive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics especially third-generation cephalosporins, and endemicity of drug-resistant pathogens in the locality.

Alongside, we observed diverse genotypes of ESBL among E coli isolates. In this study, bla-TEM (83.8%) was the most predominant genotype of ESBL among E coli isolates, which is well supported by a recent Indian study [32]. However, the bla-CTX-M gene has been described as the most common genotype of ESBL among enterobacteriaceae in several literatures [40–42]. In our previous report too, we found the dominance of the bla-CTX-M gene among ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae from various clinical specimens [22]. Moreover, multiple occurrences of genes in a same organism were also noted, where bla-TEM + bla-CTX-M (54.8%) was common. These genes are usually present on the large plasmids accompanied with the genetic determinants conferring resistance towards various antimicrobials [43]. In this study too, ESBL-producing isolates were more resistant to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. However, nitrofurantoin and aminoglycosides proved to be the optimal first-line drugs in the cases of UTI caused by ESBL E coli in our study. This may be due to the restricted use of these drugs in our hospital setting, and nitrofurantoin is usually reserved to be prescribed only in cases of UTIs since it is excreted and concentrated in urine [29, 30]. Carbapenems can be reserved for severe cases of UTI where primary therapy is ineffective [30].

Infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms are a global problem. Mobile genetic elements contained in the bacterial species are easily transferable to other organisms in the vicinity [36]. Timely detection of the resistant strains along with their antimicrobial susceptibilities is very important for the effective management of UTI in the endemic regions. However, limited facilities of detection and poor understanding of such bugs in the developing counties are responsible for global dissemination of such pathogens [13, 15].

13. Limitations

Although it was a cross-sectional study, we were unable to evaluate the risk factors and outcomes of the patients with UTI. Molecular characterization of ESBL-producing E. coli strains with detailed analysis of phylogenetic outline would be more useful in understanding the epidemiology of ESBL E. coli in our setting. Furthermore, determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of therapeutic antibiotics would be helpful for treatment and monitoring of the drug-resistant infections.

14. Conclusion

High burden of antimicrobial resistance and increased prevalence of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli associated with UTI are the major findings of this study. Diverse genotypes of ESBL E. coli along with resistance towards common antibiotics were observed. Nitrofurantoin and aminoglycosides were found as the most useful first-line drugs to be used in the cases of UTI in our setting. In this perspective, regular national-wide epidemiological surveillance of bacterial pathogens causing UTIs and their antimicrobial resistance would be useful in developing the treatment guidelines in our country.

Abbreviation

ATCC:	American Type Culture Collection
ASM:	American Society for Microbiology
E coli:	Escherichia coli
CLSI:	Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute
ESBL:	Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases
MDR:	Multidrug resistant
MHA:	Mueller–Hinton agar
CTX-M:	Cefotaximase-Munich
TEM:	Temoniera
SHV:	Sulfhydryl variant
UTI:	Urinary tract infection.

Data Availability

All data generated during the study are included in this manuscript.

Ethical Approval

This research was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of the Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences (IRC MMIHS), Kathmandu, Nepal. A letter of approval (ref no: 21/MMIHS/2072) was obtained before starting the research work.

Informed consent was taken from the patients or their parents before participating in the study. Data regarding personal information and infectious disease were coded and kept confidential. Moreover, consent for publication of the research findings were taken from every patient enrolled in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

NPP conceived the design of the study, reviewed the literature, and identified the clinical cases. RP, SSS, and GJ performed the laboratory tests. BPR, BKA, and NPP supervised the work. RP and NPP analyzed the data. RP, NPP, and BPR prepared the manuscript. All authors read the manuscript and approved.

Acknowledgments

The authors are highly grateful to Assoc Prof. Puspa Raj Khanal and Prof. Sujan Babu Marahatta from MMIHS for valuable suggestions during the research work. They also sincerely thank all the patients of MMTH for participating in this study, and special thanks are due to Mr. Sandeep Thapa and Dr. Nilam Thakur Kunwar from KCGRL for their support during molecular analysis.

References

M. S. Najar, C. L. Saldanha, and K. A. Banday, “Approach to urinary tract infections,” Indian Journal of Nephrology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 129–139, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Orenstein and E. S. Wong, “Urinary tract infections in adults,” American Family Physician, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1225–1234, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Lalueza, L. Sanz-Trepiana, N. Bermejo et al., “Risk factors for bacteremia in urinary tract infections attended in the emergency department,” Internal and Emergency Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. Chin, M. S. Kim, S. H. Han et al., “Risk factors of all-cause in-hospital mortality among Korean elderly bacteremic urinary tract infection (UTI) patients,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. e50–e55, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Raza, S. Pandey, and C. P. Bhatt, “Microbiological analysis of isolates in Kathmandu medical college teaching hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal,” Kathmandu University Medical Journal (KUMJ), vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 295–297, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. P. Kattel, J. Acharya, S. K. Mishra, B. P. Rijal, and B. M. Pokhrel, “Bacteriology of urinary tract infection among patients attending Tribhuvan University teaching hospital Kathmandu, Nepal,” Journal of Nepal Association for Medical Laboratory Sciences P, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
D. R. Hicklinsg and V. W. Nitti, “Management of recurrent urinary tract infections in healthy adult women,” Reviews in Urology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 41–48, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. L. Flores-Mireles, J. N. Walker, M. Caparon, and S. J. Hultgren, “Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 269–284, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Foxman, “Urinary tract infection syndromes,” Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 28, no. 1, 13 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Nickel, “Urinary tract infections and resistant bacteria: highlights of a symposium at the combined meeting of the 25th international congress of chemotherapy (ICC) and the 17th European congress of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ECCMID), march 31-april 3, 2007, Munich, Germany,” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 78–80, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Picozzi, G. Paola, E. Costa et al., “Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-positive Esscherichia coli causing complicated upper urinary tract infection: urologist should act in time,” Urology Annals, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 107–112, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-H. Chen, W.-C. Ko, and P.-R. Hsueh, “Emerging resistance problems and future perspectives in pharmacotherapy for complicated urinary tract infections,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 587–596, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Paterson and R. A. Bonomo, “Extended-spectrum-lactamases: a clinical update,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 657–686, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Livermore, “Current epidemiology and growing resistance of gram-negative pathogens,” The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 128–142, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Pitout and K. B. Laupland, “Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 159–166, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. K. Yadav, N. Adhikari, R. Khadka, A. D. Pant, and B. Shah, “Multidrug resistant Enterobacteriaceae and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli: a cross-sectional study in National Kidney Center, Nepal,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 42, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Baral, S. Neupane, B. P. Marasini, K. R. Ghimire, B. Lekhak, and B. Shrestha, “High prevalence of multidrug resistance in bacterial uropathogens from Kathmandu, Nepal,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 5, p. 38, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. D. Isenberg, Clinical Microbiology Procedure Handbook, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA, 2nd edition, 2004.
P. A. Wayne, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, USA, 12th edition, 2015.
A.-P. Magiorakos, A. Srinivasan, R. B. Carey et al., “Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 268–281, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Maharjan, A. Bhetwal, S. Shakya et al., “Ugly bugs in healthy guts! Carriage of multidrug-resistant and ESBL-producing commensal Enterobacteriaceae in the intestine of healthy Nepalese adults,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 11, pp. 547–554, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. P. Parajuli, P. Maharjan, G. Joshi, and P. R. Khanal, “Emerging perils of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates in a teaching hospital of Nepal,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, p. 7, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Shakya, R. Amatya, B. M. Karki, P. K. Mandal, and K. K. Shrestha, “Spectrum of bacterial pathogens and their antibiogram from cases of urinary tract infection among renal disorder patients,” Nepal Medical College Journal : NMCJ, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 75–79, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Kumari, G. Ghimire, J. K. Magar, T. M. Mohapatra, and A. Rai, “Antibiogram pattern of isolates from UTI cases in Eastern part of Nepal,” Nepal Medical College Journal : NMCJ, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 116–118, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Acharya, R. Gautam, and L. Subedee, “Uropathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in Bharatpur, Nepal,” Nepal Medical College Journal : NMCJ, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 30–33, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Rijal, G. Ghimire, K. Gautam, and A. Barakoti, “Antibiotic susceptibility of organisms causing urinary tract infection in patients presenting to a teaching hospital,” Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 24–27, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Mishra, S. Agrawal, S. Raut, A. M. Kurhade, and R. M. Powar, “Profile of yeasts isolated from urinary tracts of catheterized patients,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 44–46, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Neupane, N. D. Pant, S. Khatiwada, R. Chaudhary, and M. R. Banjara, “Correlation between biofilm formation and resistance toward different commonly used antibiotics along with extended spectrum beta lactamase production in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from the patients suspected of urinary tract infections visiting Shree Birendra Hospital, Chhauni, Kathmandu, Nepal,” Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 5, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chander and C. D. Shrestha, “Prevalence of extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae urinary isolates in a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 6, no. 1, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Bader, M. Loeb, and A. A. Brooks, “An update on the management of urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance,” Postgraduate Medicine, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 242–258, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. van Duin, E. Cober, S. S. Richter et al., “Impact of therapy and strain type on outcomes in urinary tract infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae,” The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 70, pp. 1203–1211, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jena, R. K. Sahoo, N. K. Debata, and E. Subudhi, “Prevalence of TEM, SHV, and CTX-M genes of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from urinary tract infections in adults,” 3 Biotech, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 244, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Aypak, A. Altunsoy, and N. Düzgün, “Empiric antibiotic therapy in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections and fluoroquinolone resistance: a prospective observational study,” Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 27, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. P. Parajuli, P. Maharjan, H. Parajuli et al., “High rates of multidrug resistance among uropathogenic Escherichia coli in children and analyses of ESBL producers from Nepal,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 6, p. 9, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bhandari, N. D. Pant, A. Poudel, and M. Sharma, “Assessment of the effectiveness of three different cephalosporin/clavulanate combinations for the phenotypic confirmation of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing bacteria isolated from urine samples at National Public Health Laboratory, Kathmandu, Nepal,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 9, p. 390, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Masud, H. Afroz, and M. Fakruddin, “Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase positive bacteria in radiologically positive urinary tract infection,” SpringerPlus, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 216, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Moore, S. Sona, S. Poda et al., “Antimicrobial susceptibility of uropathogens isolated from Cambodian children,” Paediatrics and International Child Health, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 113–117, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Kizilca, R. Siraneci, A. Yilmaz et al., “Risk factors for community-acquired urinary tract infection caused by ESBL-producing bacteria in children,” Pediatrics International, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 858–862, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-Z. Yan, K.-D. Sun, L.-H. Pan et al., “A screening strategy for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase in the clinical laboratory,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 211–215, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Pokhrel, B. Thapa, R. Kafle, P. Shah, and C. Tribuddharat, “Co-existence of beta-lactamases in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli from Kathmandu, Nepal,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 694, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kiratisin, A. Apisarnthanarak, C. Laesripa, and P. Saifon, “Molecular characterization and epidemiology of extended-spectrum-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates causing health care-associated infection in Thailand, where the CTX-M family is endemic,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 281–2824, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sharma, S. Pathak, and P. Srivastava, “Prevalence and antibiogram of Extended Spectrum beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Gram negative bacilli and further molecular characterization of ESBL producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 2173–2177, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Lee, I. K. Bae, and S. Hee Lee, “New definitions of extended-spectrum β-lactamase conferring worldwide emerging antibiotic resistance,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 216–232, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Roshan Pandit et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3917

Downloads

1630

Citations