An Shen Ding Zhi Ling Ameliorates the Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder via Modulating Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor-Related Signaling Pathways

Yaqun, Li; Haixia, Yuan; Yuchen, Song; Mingxin, Zhu; Manqi, Lu; Yunlong, Tian; Aizhen, Wang; Xinmin, Han

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5471586

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5471586 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5471586

An Shen Ding Zhi Ling Ameliorates the Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder via Modulating Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor-Related Signaling Pathways

Li Yaqun,^1,2,3Yuan Haixia,^1,4Song Yuchen,¹Zhu Mingxin,⁴Lu Manqi,⁵Tian Yunlong,²Wang Aizhen,²and Han Xinmin^1,4

Academic Editor: Gauhar Rehman

Received30 Oct 2021

Accepted16 Jun 2022

Published21 Jul 2022

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood neurodevelopmental disorder. It may impact the cognitive and social functions throughout childhood and determine adult outcomes. Dopamine (DA) deficiency theory is the pathogenesis of ADHD that is recognized by most international literature. Existing studies have shown that DA deficiency is caused by the abnormal function of the DA transporter and an imbalance in the DA receptor functionality. Recent clinical and experimental studies have found that the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) signaling pathway acts a pivotal part in DA vesicle circulation and ADHD pathogenesis. An Shen Ding Zhi Ling (ASDZL) is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prescription, which was widely prescribed to treat ADHD in Jiangsu, China, but its therapeutic mechanism is unclear. Therefore, we constructed a spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) model to explain its mechanism. SHRs were randomly assigned to four groups: SHR model group (vehicle), methylphenidate hydrochloride group (MPH), ASDZL group, and 7,8-dihydroxyflavone group (7,8-DHF). At the same time, the above groups were given continuous medication for four weeks. The results show that ASDZL, MPH, and 7,8-DHF group could significantly improve the spatial memory of SHRs in the Morris water maze tests. ASDZL increased the levels of BDNF, TrkB, p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75), C-Jun N-terminal kinases 1 (JNK1), and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus synaptosome of SHRs. The results of this study suggest that ASDZL can relieve the symptoms of ADHD in SHRs by regulating the balance between the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway (promoting vesicle circulation) and the BDNF/P75/JNK1/NF-κB signaling pathway (inhibiting vesicle circulation) within the PFC and hippocampus synaptosome to increase the DA concentration in the synaptic cleft. The BDNF/TrkB signal pathway within the PFC and hippocampus synaptosome was activated by 7,8-DHF to increase DA concentration in the synaptic cleft. Whether 7,8-DHF can activate or inhibit the BDNF/P75 signaling pathway remains unclear.

1. Introduction

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), as a common mental disorder in children, currently affects 5% of children around the world. Its symptoms are mainly inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity [1]. Multivariate meta-regression analyses have shown that the pooled prevalence estimate of ADHD in China was 6.3% [2]. ADHD is a prevalent disorder, with the impairing condition beginning in early childhood and continuing into adolescence and adulthood. ADHD is frequently comorbid with other psychiatric disorders that can create substantial burdens for patients, their families, and communities [3].

The pathogenesis of ADHD remains unclear. Since Swanson et al. proposed the dopamine (DA) deficiency theory, which has been widely recognized and studied by the majority of the international academic community [4]. The DA system has become the focus of recent studies on the neurobiochemical pathogenesis of ADHD [5]. DA is an important modulator of learning and motivation [6] that performs a significant role in the pathogenesis of ADHD. The literature reports have demonstrated that DA deficiency is caused by the abnormal function of the dopamine transporter and an imbalance in the DA receptor function: these findings have formed a basic consensus in the academic community [7]. However, these conclusions do not fully explain the etiology and the pathogenesis of ADHD.

Numerous researchers have found that the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway performs a crucial role in DA vesicle circulation and ADHD pathogenesis [8, 9]. Methylphenidate (MPH) is the first-line drug for the treatment of ADHD that can significantly improve the low activation state of the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway [10].

Pro- and mature-BDNF activate two distinct receptors: p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75^NTR) and TrkB [11]; therefore, the release of BDNF can also activate the P75 neurotrophic factor receptor, thereby activating JNK1 and NF-κB, forming the opposite inhibition of the vesicle circulation pathway, inhibiting the sensitization of the AC/cAMP/PKA pathway, and affecting transmitter release [12–14].

Recently, there has been a significant increase in studies about the treatment of ADHD with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). In the clinical syndrome definition, we propose that the positive pathogenesis of the disease is mostly “heart and liver fire, phlegm fire internal disturbance,” and “clearing the heart and calming the liver, eliminating phlegm and resuscitation, soothing the mind and calming the mind” as the treatment. ASDZL as an empirical formula of TCM has achieved positive clinical outcomes [15, 16]. Studies have shown that 7,8-DHF is a potent TrkB agonist, which can mimic BDNF and performs an important neuroprotective role in the dopaminergic neurons of mice [17].

In this study, our purpose was to explore whether ASDZL affects the function of the SNARE complex by regulating the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway or downregulating the expression levels of the main factors (P75, JNK1, and NF-κB) that inhibit the activation of related pathways and play a regulatory role in the initial process of vesicle circulation in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), corpus striatum, and hippocampus of ADHD model SHRs. In addition, we also assessed the capacity of the TrkB agonist 7,8-DHF in improving the core symptoms of ADHD after activating TrkB and the BDNF/P75 signal pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Processing Method of ASDZL Decoction

ASDZL is composed of 12 Chinese herbs (Cu Chai Hu, Huang Qin, Lian Qiao, Yu Jin, Jue Ming Zi, Tian Zhu Huang, Gou Teng, Sheng Di Huang, Shi Chang Pu, Dang Gui, Yi Zhi Ren, and Yuan Zhi) [18]. All herbs were provided and authenticated by Professor Jianguo Chao. Twelve kinds of Chinese herbs were mixed with distilled water in a ratio of 1:8 and decocted twice for 2 hours each time [19]. Then the above decocting solution was further concentrated into 1.37 g/mL, and UHPLC was used to analyze the components of the aqueous extract of ASDZL [18].

2.2. Animal Experiments

Twelve WKY rats (3–4 weeks of age) and 48 SHRs (3–4 weeks of age) were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China, SCXK (Jing) 2016-0006) and maintained on a 12 h light/dark cycle with a temperature of 23 ± 2°C and relative humidity of 50%–60% in the experimental animal center of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. Animal experiments were performed in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guidelines for Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (No. 202010A039). The weight changes in rats of five groups are shown in Table 1.

2.3. Drug Administration

MPH is a commonly used drug in the clinical treatment of ADHD [20]. 7,8-DHF is a BDNF mimetic that acts as a TrkB receptor agonist [21, 22] and can be used to treat ADHD. MPH and 7,8-DHF were used as positive control drugs in this study. MPH was obtained from Janssen Cilag Manufacturing LLC (0AE008) and was mixed in 0.5% CMC-Na to a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL. 7,8-DHF was obtained from APExBIO (USA, B5484); it was first diluted with DMSO to 25 mg/mL and then diluted with PBS to a final drug concentration of 1 mg/mL. WKY rats were used as a normal control group, and the SHRs were randomly grouped into the following groups (n = 12): SHR group (model), MPH group (2 mg/kg/d), ASDZL group (27.4 g/kg/d), and 7,8-DHF group (5 mg/kg/d). As shown in Table 1, there was no significant difference in body weight among all groups. The WKY and SHR groups were orally administrated with 0.5% CMC-Na, whereas the MPH and ASDZL groups were given the corresponding drugs twice a day for four weeks. The 7,8-DHF group was intraperitoneally injected once a day. Dosages were calculated based on the average surface area of the bodies of humans and rats. Rats were weighed daily before administration, with gavage of 1.0 mL/100 g each time and injection of 0.5 mL/100 g each time according to their body weight. After the last behavioral test, the abdominal aorta of the rats was taken and sacrificed, and the plasma and brain tissues were stored at −80°C.

2.4. Preparation of Synaptosomes

The Percoll density gradient solution was prepared based on the concentration ratio within 30 min before the experiment. Fresh brain tissue was taken after the rats were killed. Impurities such as blood were removed with a large amount of freezing point homogenization buffer and blotted on filter paper before the tissue was weighed. The tissue was cut into a grinding tube according to the requirement of 1:9 (w/v). After centrifugation, the supernatant was taken and further diluted to 10–12 mL with freezing point homogenization buffer and stored on ice. The supernatant protein content was measured and diluted to 5–7 mg/mL. After dilution, 2 mL of supernatant per tube was spread evenly and slowly on a 3% gradient belt and centrifuged at for 5 min at 4°C; then the third and fourth layers of the gradient zone were removed, diluted with precooled sucrose/EDTA buffer, and centrifuged. Finally, the synaptosome was collected and fixed for 2 h in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for experimental use [23].

2.5. Behavioral Tests

After four weeks of treatment, the open field test (OFT) and Morris water maze (MWM) test were performed in each group [24, 25].

2.5.1. OFT

The OFT is the most classic evaluation standard for the ADHD disease model [26]. The open-field arena was made of black-colored iron, whose total area (100 × 100 × 40 cm) was spaced into 16 squares with sides of 25 cm. The movement track of each rat was recorded every five minutes from 8:00 to 12:00, mainly including moving distance (m), time spent in the central area (s), and rearing times. The scent marks of each rat’s urine and feces were removed with 75% ethanol between tests.

2.5.2. MWM Test

The MWM test has been generally used to evaluate the learning and memory abilities of rats. The rats in each group were placed in MWM equipment with a water temperature of (24 ± 2°C) for testing, and the spatial acquisition trials, annulus visits, and time spent in the target quadrant (s) were collected.

2.6. Immunofluorescence

The tissues (PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus) of each group were sampled, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, then embedded in paraffin, and further cut into 3–4 μm sections. The expressions of BDNF, P75, and NF-κB in brain sections were measured by immunofluorescence. DAPI was used to restain the nuclei for immunofluorescence staining and microscopic observation. The average fluorescent intensity was analyzed by the Image-J software [25].

2.7. Western Blotting

The same amount of protein was extracted from each tissue and further separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to the PVDF membrane. Anti-BDNF (1:1,000), TrkB (1:1,000), P75 (1:1,000), JNK1 (1:1,000), NF-κB (1:1,000), and β-actin (1:2,000) were successively added and incubated overnight at 4°C. After incubation with secondary antibody, protein bands were quantitatively analyzed using ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System HE Image Lab software.

2.8. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus tissues, and its purity and concentration were determined. All primers were designed and synthesized by Shanghai Shenggong Biological Engineering Co. Ltd. (Table 2). Five microliter SYBR Green master mix, 0.2 μL reverse primers, and 1.0 μL of cDNA (1:3 dilution) were mixed together to react. The dissociation curve of the reaction solution was measured to further evaluate the specificity of the amplified products. The melting curve and amplification plots of BDNF, TrkB, P75, JNK1, NF-κB, and GAPDH in the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus samples were recorded for all rats.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data were processed by GraphPad Prism 8.0 software.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of ASDZL on the Behavior of SHRs in the OFT

ASDZL and 7,8-DHF had no significant effect on body weight and developmental indexes in rats, as shown in Table 1. The results showed a significantly increased in distance and speed of movement among WKY and SHRs. After four weeks of treatment, the distance and speed of movement of MPH, ASDZL, and 7,8-DHF groups were significantly decreased than that of the SHR group (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The representative pathways of all groups are shown in Figure 1(c).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

3.2. Effect of ASDZL on the Behavior of SHRs in the MWM Test

The time for locating the escape platform in MPH, ASDZL, and 7,8-DHF groups were less than the SHR group (Figure 1(d)). Compared with the WKY group, the SHR group played more visits to the annulus and spent more time in the target quadrant, but the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 1(e)). The number of visits to the annulus by MPH, ASDZL, and 7,8-DHF groups were much greater than that of the SHR group (Figure 1(e)), whereas the time spent by the MPH, ASDZL, and 7,8-DHF groups was less than that in the SHR group, with no significant difference (Figure 1(f)). The representative swimming patterns are shown in Figure 1(g).

3.3. Effect of ASDZL on BDNF, P75, NF-κB in the PFC, Corpus Striatum, and Hippocampus (Immunofluorescence)

Higher average fluorescence intensities of BDNF (Figures 2(a), 2(b), and 2(d)), P75 (Figures 2(e), 2(f), and 2(h)), and NF-κB (Figures 2(i), 2(j), and 2(l)) were showed in the PFC and hippocampus of the MPH, ASDZL, and 7,8-DHF groups compared to the SHR group. There was no significant discrepancy in fluorescence intensity of P75 in the corpus striatum between the ASDZL and SHR groups (Figures 2(e) and 2(g)) or NF-κB among the MPH, 7,8-DHF, and SHR groups (Figures 2(i) and 2(k)). The MPH, ASDZL, and 7,8-DHF groups showed that the fluorescent intensity of BDNF was increasing significantly (Figures 2(a) and 2(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

Figure 2

Effect of ASDZL on BDNF, P75, NF-κB in PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus (immunofluorescence): (a) representative images of BDNF-immunopositive microglia (red) with DAPI (blue); average fluorescence intensity of BDNF in PFC (b), in corpus striatum (c), and in hippocampus (d). (e) Representative images of P75-immunopositive microglia (red) with DAPI (blue); average fluorescence intensity of P75 in PFC (f), in corpus striatum (g), and in hippocampus (h). (i) Representative images of NF-κB-immunopositive microglia (red) with DAPI (blue); average fluorescence intensity of NF-κB in PFC (j), in corpus striatum (k), and in hippocampus (l). n = 3 for each group. , compared to the SHR group.

3.4. Effect of ASDZL on the BDNF/TrkB Signaling Pathway in the PFC, Corpus Striatum, and Hippocampus (Western Blotting)

To further observe whether ASDZL affects BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway, the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus proteins were measured. Compare with the WKY group, the levels of BDNF and TrkB were remarkably lower in the SHR group. Following four weeks of treatment, the levels of BDNF and TrkB were significantly increased in the MPH, ASDZL, 7,8-DHF, and SHR groups, except for the level of TrkB in the corpus striatum of the MPH group (Figures 3(a)–3(i)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

(m)

(n)

(o)

(p)

(q)

(r)

Figure 3

Effect of ASDZL on BDNF, TrkB, P75, JNK1, and NF-κB in the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus (western blotting): (a)–(c) western blot analysis of BDNF, TrkB, P75, JNK1, NF-κB, and β-actin; (d)–(f) relative levels of BDNF; (g)–(i) relative levels of TrkB; (j)–(l) relative levels of P75; (m)–(o) relative levels of JNK1; and (p)–(r) relative levels of NF-κB. n = 3 for each group. , SHR vs. WKY group. , compared to the SHR group. The scale bar corresponds to 1.0 μm.

3.5. Effect of ASDZL on the BDNF/P75/JNK1/NF-κB Pathway in the PFC, Corpus Striatum, and Hippocampus (Western Blotting)

The total levels of relevant proteins were measured to reveal the effect of ASDZL on the BDNF/P75/JNK1/NF-κB pathway in the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus. The levels of P75, JNK1, and NF-κB were conspicuously lower in the SHR group than in the WKY group. The level of P75 showed a conspicuously increase in the PFC and hippocampus of the MPH and ASDZL groups, while there was no conspicuous divergence in the corpus striatum of the MPH, ASDZL, 7,8-DHF, and SHR groups. ASDZL conspicuously increased the level of JNK1 in the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus, whereas MPH only conspicuously increased the level of JNK1 in the PFC. 7,8-DHF aggrandized the level of JNK1 in the hippocampus. The NF-κB/β-actin ratios of the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus were significantly increased in the MPH, ASDZL, 7,8-DHF, and SHR groups, except for the level of NF-κB level in the corpus striatum of the MPH group (Figure 3(a) and 3(j)–3(r)).

3.6. Effect of ASDZL on the BDNF/TrkB Pathway in the PFC, Corpus Striatum, and Hippocampus (qPCR)

To determine the effect of ASDZL on the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway, we analyzed the relative expression of BDNF and TrkB mRNA in the synaptosomes of the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus. The levels of BDNF and TrkB in the SHR group were conspicuously lower than those of the WKY group. After treatment, MPH and ASDZL conspicuously increased the expression of BDNF and TrkB in the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus. However, the 7,8-DHF group displayed no conspicuously divergence in the BDNF of the corpus striatum compared to the SHR group (Figures 4(a)–4(f)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

(m)

(n)

(o)

3.7. Effect of ASDZL on the BDNF/P75/JNK1/NF-κB Pathway in the PFC, Corpus Striatum, and Hippocampus

To understand the effect of ASDZL on the BDNF/P75/JNK1/NF-κB pathway in the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus, we also measured the relative expression levels of mRNA. The relative expression levels of P75 and NF-κB were conspicuously lower in the SHR group than in the WKY group. However, the relative expression levels of JNK1 in the PFC and hippocampus of the SHR group were opposite to the expression trend in the corpus striatum. The MPH and ASDZL groups conspicuously increased the levels of P75, JNK1, and NF-κB in the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus; however, there was no conspicuous divergence in the levels of P75 and NF-κB in the corpus striatum between the 7,8-DHF and SHR groups. MPH, ASDZL, and 7,8-DHF conspicuously decreased the expression of JNK1 in the corpus striatum compared with the SHR group (Figures 4(g)–4(o)).

4. Discussion

ADHD is characterized by the heterogeneity of attention deficiency, impulsiveness, hyperactivity, variable, and frequent comorbidities [27]. Although the evidence is lacking, it is generally recommended to use MPH, a central stimulant, to relieve ADHD in children [28]. The most common adverse events of methylphenidate are headache, loss of appetite, and insomnia [29]. Parents are often concerned about the side effects of these stimulants and tend to consider the use of complementary and alternative drugs, such as TCM to relieve the core symptoms of ADHD [30, 31]. ASDZL is a prescription of TCM created by Professor Han Xinmin and prescribed to relieve ADHD. Clinical researches have demonstrated that ASDZL could relieve symptoms of ADHD, especially the hyperactive-impulsive type [32]. In this study, we evaluated the role of ASDZL and 7,8-DHF on the behavioral performance and synaptic vesicle dopamine release mechanism in ADHD, which provided new synaptic-level views for treating ADHD.

Synaptosomes can mimic various aspects of synaptic functions, which are continually used as objects in neurobiology studies [33, 34]. The release of neurotransmitters is maintained through endocytosis and refilling of presynaptic local synaptic vesicles [35]. A previous study found that ASDZL significantly upregulated the expression of tyrosine hydroxylase and dopa decarboxylase, which are related to DA synthesis in the presynaptic membrane of SHR rats and increased the expression levels of synaptic-associated protein 25 and syntaxin-1A involved in the formation of SNARE complexes and vesicle-associated membrane proteins, among other protein and mRNA, thereby improving the core symptoms of ADHD [36]. The main active ingredients of ASDZL (Baicalin) can significantly increase the expression level of BDNF. Therefore, ASDZL has a special affinity for the DA system and potential regulatory effect on the DA synaptic vesicle cycle [37–40]. Synaptic-associated protein 25 and vesicle-associated membrane proteins are the key proteins constituting the SNARE complex and cooperate with syntaxin-1A and other proteins to participate in the key links of vesicle circulation such as DA vesicle anchoring, membrane transport, membrane fusion, and vesicle exocytosis in the form of SNARE complexes, as well as affect the brain. The level of internal DA regulates the learning and memory abilities of individuals [41–43]. A recent study showed that ASDZL regulated the activity of synaptosome ATPase and LDH enzymes in model rats and increased the content of AC, cAMP, and PKA in synapses, which suggested that ASDZL may perform a therapeutic role by reducing the inhibitory function of D2RS on the AC/cAMP/PKA signaling pathway [44].

Substantial evidence indicates that PFC can regulate attention and working memory by modulating memory-related activity within the PFC [45–47]. The striatum is richly innervated by midbrain DA neurons, which regulate a range of cellular and synaptic functions that control goal-directed behavior and habits [48, 49]. The hippocampus serves a key function in memory, navigation, and cognition [50]. Studies have shown that the three brain regions (PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus) are closely related to the onset of ADHD [51–53].

The DA system in the brain is a large and complex neural network. Further study will be required to determine the causes of defects in DA formation. The BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway might participate in regulating the DA synaptic vesicle circulation by affecting the protein receptor complex, which is closely related to ADHD pathogenesis.

In this study, we intended to examine the impacts of drugs on the BDNF-related pathways that influence the release of DA from synaptic vesicles in three regions of the brain and to determine whether drugs affect differently in different brain regions. Because of the higher levels of BDNF in brain tissue, BDNF and its receptor TrkB are widely distributed in the brain cortex, striatum, hippocampus, and other DA neurons. BDNF is involved in DA neuron synapse growth, transmitter release, cell survival, membrane transport, and synapse formation [54]. TrkB is a transmembrane protein with a high-affinity receptor for BDNF [55, 56], which can mediate most of its biological functions. The decreased expression of BDNF can cause significant changes in DA neuron synapse morphology and dysfunction, leading to a decrease in DA content in the brain. This impact may be related to the low activation of the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway, which inhibits the function of the SNARE complex and affects presynaptic membrane DA vesicle circulation and transmitter release [57, 58]. The phospholipase Cγ was recruited and activated by phosphorylation of Tyr816 residue for promoting neuronal survival and implicating neurite outgrowth and synaptic plasticity [59]. Numerous literature have demonstrated that BDNF participates in the development of PFC were upregulated by catalpol (a Chinese herbal medicine commonly used for ADHD) [25]. The present study showed that MPH, ASDZL, and 7,8-DHF could significantly increase the levels of BDNF/TrkB in PFC synaptosomes. Moreover, ASDZL can significantly increase the levels of BDNF/TrkB in the corpus striatum and hippocampus synaptosome. The results showed that the effect of MPH on the levels of TrkB and 7-8-DHF was inconsistent with the levels of BDNF by western blotting and qPCR analyses. Therefore, ASDZL can activate the BDNF/TrkB pathway in the PFC, corpus striatum, and hippocampus synaptosome, while MPH and 7,8-DHF only activate the BDNF/TrkB pathway in the PFC and hippocampus synaptosome, thereby promoting the formation of SNARE complexes. This complex is the core component in the fusion process of synaptic vesicles and participates in the exocytosis process of almost all secretory cells, eventually promoting DA release from synaptic vesicles [60]. However, it remains unclear whether 7,8-DHF can upregulate the levels of BDNF and MPH can upregulate the levels of TrkB in the corpus striatum synaptosome. We speculated that TrkB is activated to phosphorylate and promotes its insertion on the surface of DA neuron synaptosomes to form dimers, activating the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway and then activating PI3k and promoting TrkB vesicle transport, further enhancing the localized BDNF/TrkB signal. This will promote the formation of the SNARE complex, accelerating its transportation, anchoring, membrane fusion, and other processes, and promoting the circulatory efflux of DA vesicles. Further research will be planned to examine this conjecture.

Another classical signaling pathway of BDNF is the BDNF/P75 signaling pathway. We suspected that this might also affect the release of DA from synaptic vesicles. The P75 neurotrophic factor receptor (P75NTR) is a transmembrane glycoprotein and a low-affinity receptor for BDNF, binding to neurotrophic factors in regulating various functions [61]. The death domain of P75NTR interacts with a large number of intracellular molecules and regulates different signaling cascades, including NF-κB and JNK/caspase pathways in different cellular contexts [62, 63]. Our results suggested that ASDZL can activate the BDNF/P75/JNK1/NF-κB signaling pathway in the PFC and hippocampus synaptosome. However, its effect on P75, JNK1, and NF-κB within the corpus striatum synaptosome remains unclear, with the results for the expression levels of JNK1 were inconsistent between the western blot and qPCR analyses. The analyses showed that MPH could not significantly increase the level of JNK in the hippocampus synaptosomes compared to the model group by Western blotting. The effects of 7,8-DHF on the BDNF/P75/JNK1/NF-κB signaling pathway in the synaptosome of the three brain regions were also not consistent. Therefore, our results suggested that ASDZL promoted the release of DA in the synaptic vesicles by launching the BDNF/TRKB pathway in the PFC, hippocampus synaptosome, and the BDNF/P75/JNK1/NF-κB pathway to inhibit synapses. The release of DA in the vesicles that regulated the DA concentration in the synaptic cleft to reach a steady-state and achieved the goal of improving the core symptoms of ADHD. However, the effect of ASDZL on key factors (including pTrkB and PI3k that promote the enablement of the AC/cAMP/PKA signaling pathway and BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway in the synaptosome) is related to SNARE complex-mediated synaptic vesicle transport and anchoring links. The influence of the regulatory effects of factors and fusion link-related factors, among others, has not been studied.

5. Conclusion

The pathogenesis of ADHD is related to synaptic vesicle cycling. BDNF is an important factor that affects the synthesis, release, and clearance of dopamine in synaptic vesicles. The present study provided a preliminary explanation that the BDNF-related signaling pathway mechanism had an effect on the synthesis and release of DA in the synaptic vesicle cycle of ADHD. Although BDNF and its receptor TrkB are widely distributed in PFC, corpus striatum, hippocampus, and other areas rich in DA neurons, ASDZL only ameliorates the core symptoms of ADHD by adjusting the BDNF pathway in the PFC and hippocampus synaptosome. This mechanism is similar to the theory of balance between yin and yang in Chinese medicine. The 7,8-DHF could activate the BDNF/TrkB signal pathway in the PFC and hippocampus synaptosome to increase the concentration of DA in the synaptic cleft. Whether it can activate or inhibit the BDNF/P75 signaling pathway remains unclear and requires further study.

Data Availability

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethical Approval

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Yaqun Li and Xinmin Han designed the experiments. Haixia Yuan, Yuchen Song, and Manqi Lu performed animal experiments. Mingxin Zhu and Yunlong Tian analyzed the data. Yaqun Li and Aizhen Wang wrote the paper. All authors approved the final manuscript. Yanqun Li and Aizhen Wang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Xinqiang Ni, Rongyi Zhou, Jichao Sun, and Guoxiang Gu for advice on the ADHD model rat. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81873342).

References

A. Papadopoulos, D. Seguin, S. Correa, and E. G. Duerden, “Peer victimization and the association with hippocampal development and working memory in children with ADHD and typically-developing children,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, Article ID 16411, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Liu, Y. Xu, Q. Yan, and L. Tong, “The prevalence of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder among Chinese children and adolescents,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID 11169, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Posner, G. V. Polanczyk, and E. Sonuga-Barke, “Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder,” The Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10222, pp. 450–462, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Swanson, M. Kinsbourne, J. Nigg et al., “Etiologic subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: brain imaging, molecular genetic and environmental factors and the dopamine hypothesis,” Neuropsychology Review, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 39–59, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Schrantee, H. G. Tamminga, C. Bouziane et al., “Age-dependent effects of methylphenidate on the human dopaminergic system in young vs. adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized clinical trial,” JAMA Psychiatry, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 955–962, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Berke, “What does dopamine mean?” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 787–793, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Mariggiò, R. Palumbi, A. Vinella et al., “DRD1 and DRD2 receptor polymorphisms: genetic neuromodulation of the dopaminergic system as a risk factor for ASD, ADHD and ASD/ADHD overlap,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 15, Article ID 705890, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Luo, X. Jiang, G. Cao et al., “Association between BDNF gene polymorphisms and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in school-aged children in Wuhan, China,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 264, pp. 304–309, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Roy, R. J. Barry, F. E. Fernandez et al., “Electrophysiological correlates of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, Article ID 17915, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. B. Wetzell, M. M. Muller, J. L. Cobuzzi, Z. E. Hurwitz, K. DeCicco-Skinner, and A. L. Riley, “Effect of age on methylphenidate-induced conditioned taste avoidance and related BDNF/TrkB signaling in the insular cortex of the rat,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 231, no. 8, pp. 1493–1501, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Podyma, K. Parekh, A. D. Güler, and C. D. Deppmann, “Metabolic homeostasis via BDNF and its receptors,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 488–499, 2021 Jul.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Busquets, M. Ettcheto, A. Eritja et al., “C-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 ablation protects against metabolic-induced hippocampal cognitive impairments,” Journal of Molecular Medicine (Berlin), vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 1723–1733, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Escudero, C. Cabeza, G. Moya-Alvarado et al., “C-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-dependent internalization and Rab5-dependent endocytic sorting mediate long-distance retrograde neuronal death induced by axonal BDNF-p75 signaling,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 6070, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lorenzati, E. Boda, R. Parolisi et al., “C-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1) modulates oligodendrocyte progenitor cell architecture, proliferation and myelination,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 7264, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ni, Y. Zhang-James, X. Han, S. Lei, J. Sun, and R. Zhou, “Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of ADHD: a review,” Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 853–881, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Q. Guo, X. M. Han, X. K. Zhu et al., “Application effect analysis of Chinese medicine clinical pathway for children with hyperactivity,” Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1469–1473, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
J. He, Z. Xiang, X. Zhu et al., “Neuroprotective effects of 7,8-dihydroxyflavone on midbrain dopaminergic neurons in MPP⁺-treated monkeys,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID 34339, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Song, H. Yuan, T. Chen, M. Lu, S. Lei, and X. Han, “An Shen Ding Zhi ling alleviates symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via anti-inflammatory effects in spontaneous hypertensive rats,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 11, Article ID 617581, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Dianyun, S. Jinjun, and H. Xinmin, “Optimization of water extraction process for tranquilizing the nerves and Ding zhi ling by orthogonal test,” Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 41, pp. 1249–1251, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
C. K. Sun, P. T. Tseng, C. K. Wu et al., “Therapeutic effects of methylphenidate for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children with borderline intellectual functioning or intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID 15908, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Seppa, T. Jagomae, K. G. Kukker et al., “Liraglutide, 7,8-DHF and their co-treatment prevents loss of vision and cognitive decline in a Wolfram syndrome rat model,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2275, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Stagni, B. Uguagliati, M. Emili, A. Giacomini, R. Bartesaghi, and S. Guidi, “The flavonoid 7,8-DHF fosters prenatal brain proliferation potency in a mouse model of Down syndrome,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 6300, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Rongyi, S. Jichao, Y. Yue et al., “Effects of An shen Ding zhi ling on the expression of synaptosome dopamine synthesis and transport related factors in rat brain,” Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 45, pp. 169–173, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Xin-qiang, L. Ying-Zhao, L. Li-Min, X. Dan-Gui, L. Hua, and Z. Min, “Effects of acupuncture “Sanyinjiao.” and “Baihui.” on behavior and monoamine neurotransmitters in prefrontal cortex in rats with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,” Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 25, no. 09, pp. 39–43, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Yuan, X. Ni, M. Zheng, X. Han, Y. Song, and M. Yu, “Effect of catalpol on behavior and neurodevelopment in an ADHD rat model,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 118, Article ID 109033, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Archer, “Tests for emotionality in rats and mice: a review,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 205–235, 1973.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Drechsler, S. Brem, D. Brandeis, E. Grünblatt, G. Berger, and S. Walitza, “ADHD: current concepts and treatments in children and adolescents,” Neuropediatrics, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 315–335, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. López-López, M. L. Poch-Olivé, J. López-Pisón, and E. Cardo-Jalón, “Treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in clinical practice. A retrospective study,” Medicina, vol. 79, no. suppl. 1, pp. 68–71, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Childress, A. J. Cutler, A. H. Marraffino, S. Bhaskar, and G. Donnelly, “Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, adult laboratory classroom study of the efficacy and safety of PRC-063 (extended-release methylphenidate) for the treatment of ADHD,” Journal of Attention Disorders, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 857–869, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Liu and Z. Kou, “Exploring the prescription in rules and mechanism for cerebral infarction based on data mining and network Pharmacology,” Drug Combination Therapy, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 12, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chen, J. Yu, L. K. P. Suen et al., “Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) pediatric massage for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in preschool children: a pilot randomized controlled trial,” Integrative Medicine Research, vol. 9, p. 100565, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ding and N. Xinqiang, “Clinical efficacy of An shen Ding zhi ling in the treatment of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder with hyperactive heart and liver,” Sichuan Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 171–174, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Gulyássy, G. Puska, B. A. Györffy et al., “Proteomic comparison of different synaptosome preparation procedures,” Amino Acids, vol. 52, no. 11-12, pp. 1529–1543, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. S. Wijasa, M. Sylvester, N. Brocke-Ahmadinejad et al., “Quantitative proteomics of synaptosome S-nitrosylation in Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 152, no. 6, pp. 710–726, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. L. Chanaday, M. A. Cousin, I. Milosevic, S. Watanabe, and J. R. Morgan, “The synaptic vesicle cycle revisited: new insights into the modes and mechanisms,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 39, no. 42, pp. 8209–8216, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Rongyi, Study on the Mechanism of An shen Ding zhi ling and Baicalin in Regulating the Production, Release and Clearance of Synaptosome Dopamine in ADHD Animal Models, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China, 2018.
S. Jichao, H. Xinmin, R. Xianguo et al., “Saikosaponin A alleviates symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder through downregulation of DAT and enhancing BDNF expression in spontaneous hypertensive rats,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2017, Article ID 2695903, 9 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Rongyi, W. Jiaojiao, H. Xinmin, Y. Haixia, S. Yuchen, and C. Tianyi, “Effects of baicalin on the expression of dopamine release related factors in the synaptosomes of spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 33, no. 05, pp. 2007–2013, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Zhou, J. Wang, X. Han, B. Ma, H. Yuan, and Y. Song, “Baicalin regulates the dopamine system to control the core symptoms of ADHD,” Molecular Brain, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 11, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yuchen, L. Shuang, H. Xinmin, Y. Haixia, Z. Rongyi, and L. Rui, “The effect of tranquilizing the nerves and Ding zhi ling on the TH and DAT in the prefrontal lobe of ADHD model animals,” Chinese Patent Medicine, vol. 42, no. 01, pp. 195–199, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
M. P. Madrigal, A. Portalés, M. P. SanJuan, and S. Jurado, “Postsynaptic SNARE proteins: role in synaptic transmission and plasticity,” Neuroscience, vol. 420, pp. 12–21, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Holz and J. Zimmerberg, “Dynamic relationship of the SNARE complex with a membrane,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 627–630, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wang, J. Tu, S. Zhang et al., “Different regions of synaptic vesicle membrane regulate VAMP2 conformation for the SNARE assembly,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1531, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Y. Zhou, J. J. Wang, Y. You et al., “Effect of baicalin on ATPase and LDH and its regulatory effect on the AC/cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in rats with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,” Zhong Guo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 576–582, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Bahmani, K. Clark, Y. Merrikhi et al., “Prefrontal contributions to attention and working memory,” Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, vol. 41, pp. 129–153, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, R. Wu, B. Johnson, J. Vu, C. Bass, and J. X. Li, “The claustrum-prefrontal cortex pathway regulates impulsive-like behavior,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 39, no. 50, pp. 10071–10080, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Yavas, S. Gonzalez, and M. S. Fanselow, “Interactions between the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and amygdala support complex learning and memory,” F1000research, vol. 8, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhai, W. Shen, S. M. Graves, and D. J. Surmeier, “Dopaminergic modulation of striatal function and Parkinson’s disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 411–422, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Adrover, J. H. Shin, C. Quiroz, S. Ferré, J. C. Lemos, and V. A. Alvarez, “Prefrontal cortex-driven dopamine signals in the striatum show unique spatial and pharmacological properties,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 40, no. 39, pp. 7510–7522, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Donato, C. M. Alberini, D. Amso, G. Dragoi, A. Dranovsky, and N. S. Newcombe, “The ontogeny of hippocampus-dependent memories,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 920–926, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Christoffel, J. J. Walsh, P. Hoerbelt et al., “Selective filtering of excitatory inputs to nucleus accumbens by dopamine and serotonin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 118, no. 24, Article ID e2106648118, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hoogman, J. Bralten, D. P. Hibar et al., “Subcortical brain volume differences in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adults: a cross-sectional mega-analysis,” The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 310–319, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bariselli, N. L. Miyazaki, M. C. Creed, and A. V. Kravitz, “Orbitofrontal-striatal potentiation underlies cocaine-induced hyperactivity,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 3996, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Fiedler, M. Sasi, R. Blum et al., “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor/tropomyosin receptor kinase B signaling controls excitability and long-term depression in oval nucleus of the BNST,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 435–445, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jang, E. Gould, J. Xu, E. J. Kim, and J. H. Kim, “Oligodendrocytes regulate presynaptic properties and neurotransmission through BDNF signaling in the mouse brainstem,” Elife, vol. 8, Article ID e42156, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. W. Lin, S. C. Harward, Y. Z. Huang, and J. O. McNamara, “Targeting BDNF/TrkB pathways for preventing or suppressing epilepsy,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 167, Article ID 107734, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Cervantes-Henríquez, J. E. Acosta-Lopez, A. F. Martinez, M. Arcos-Burgos, P. J. Puentes-Rozo, and J. I. Velez, “Machine learning prediction of ADHD severity: association and linkage to ADGRL3, DRD4, and SNAP25,” Journal of Attention Disorders, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 587–605, 2022 Feb.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. Qiu, W. Pan, D. Luo et al., “Dysregulation of BDNF/TrkB signaling mediated by NMDAR/Ca²⁺/calpain might contribute to postoperative cognitive dysfunction in aging mice,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 23, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Tejeda and M. Díaz-Guerra, “Integral characterization of defective BDNF/TrkB signalling in neurological and psychiatric disorders leads the way to new therapies,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 268, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Karmakar, L. G. Sharma, A. Roy, A. Patel, and L. M. Pandey, “Neuronal SNARE complex: a protein folding system with intricate protein-protein interactions, and its common neuropathological hallmark, SNAP25,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 122, pp. 196–207, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, M. Tian, and Y. Hao, “Role of p75 neurotrophin receptor in neuronal autophagy in intracerebral hemorrhage in rats through the mTOR signaling pathway,” Cell Cycle, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 376–389, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fang, Z. Wei, D. Zheng et al., “Recombinant extracellular domain (p75^ECD) of the neurotrophin receptor p75 attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting the p-JNK/Caspase-3 signaling pathway in rat microvascular pericytes,” Journal of American Heart Association, vol. 9, no. 13, Article ID e016047, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhong, Y. Wang, F. N. Muhammad, J. Gao, and C. Bian, “The p75^NTR and its carboxyl-terminal fragment exert opposing effects on melanoma cell proliferation and apoptosis via modulation of the NF-κB pathway,” FEBS Open Bio, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 226–236, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Li Yaqun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

466

Downloads

453

Citations