Aim: To report our experience of managing patients affected by descending duodenal injuries secondary to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to review the literature. Methods: Analysis of 5 cases of descending duodenal injury as a consequence of laparoscopic cholecystectomy managed between June 1992 and September 2006. Results: The median age was 59 (range 49–67) years.In all cases an emergency laparotomy showed an injury to the descending duodenum. Two patients underwent direct suture of the duodenum and external biliary drainage through a T-tube, 1 case underwent a duodenojejunostomy and in another a duodenopancreatectomy. The latter patient underwent drainage of the duodenum with a Petzer tube, followed 5 days later by gastric resection, closure of the duodenal stump and repair of the duodenal wound by suture. The median postoperative stay was 45 days and 1 patient died. Conclusion: Descending duodenal injuries are extremely rare complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with potentially fatal consequences if not promptly recognized and treated. The site of the descending duodenal injury is important for determining the surgical approach.

Keywords:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Descending duodenum, Descending duodenal injury, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, complications, Emergency laparotomy
1.
Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, Valinsky LI, Hockey RL, Pikora TJ, Knuiman MW, Sheiner HJ, Edis A: Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population study. Ann Surg 1999;229:449–457.
2.
El-Banna M, Abdel-Atty M, El-Meteini M, Aly S: Management of laparoscopic-related bowel injuries. Surg Endosc 2000;14:779–782.
3.
Ress AM, Sarr MG, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB, Donohue JH, McIlrath DC: Spectrum and management of major complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993;165:655–662.
4.
Deziel DJ, Millikan KV, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC: Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 1993;165:9–14.
5.
Schrenk P, Woisetschlanger R, Rieger R, Wayand W: Mechanism, management, and prevention of laparoscopic bowel injuries. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:572–574.
6.
Bischoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder I: Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 1999;161:887–890.
7.
Reich H: Laparoscopic bowel injury. Surg Laparoscopy Endosc 1992;2:74–78.
8.
Wherry DC, Marohn MR, Malanopsji MP, Hetz SP, Rich NM: An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg 1996;224:145–154.
9.
Wolfe BM, Gardiner BN, Leary BF, Frey CF: Endoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of complications. Arch Surg 1991;126:1192–1198.
10.
Huang XQ, Feng YQ, Huang ZQ: Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in China: an analysis of 39,238 cases. Chin Med J 1997;110:704–706.
11.
Anaretti C, Mosca D, Di Blasio P: Spontaneous and postoperative bile peritonitis. Surgical technique. Min Chir 2002;57:41–48.
12.
Peters JH, Gibbons GD, Innes JT, Nichols KE, Front ME, Roby SR, Ellison CE: Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 1991;110:769–778.
13.
Singh R, Kaushik R, Sharma R, Attri AK: Non-biliary mishaps during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Gastroenterol 2004;23:47–49.
14.
Croce E, Golia M, Russo R, Azzolla M, Olmi S, De Murtas G: Duodenal perforations after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1999;13:523–525.
15.
Philips JM: Complication in laparoscopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1977;15:157–162.
16.
Thompson BH, Wheeless CR Jr: Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopy sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1973;41:669–676.
17.
Z’graggen K, Wehrli H, Metzger A, Buehler M, Frei E, Klaiber C: Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland: a prospective 3-year study of 10,174 patients. Surg Endosc 1998;12:1303–1310.
18.
Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, Branum GD, Hunter JG: Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 2001;234:549–558.
19.
Berry MA, Ragraj M: Conservative treatment of recognized laparoscopic colonic injury. J Soc Laparosc Surg 1998;2:195–196.
20.
Rahimi MA, Yazdi G: Conservative management of thermal injuries of the bowel during laparoscopic electrocoagulation of the ovarian surface for treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995;2(suppl):S44–S45.
21.
De Shazo CV, Snyder WH, Daugherty CG, Crenshaw CA: Mucosal pedicle graft or jejunum for large gastrointestinal defects. Am J Surg 1972;124:671–672.
22.
Papachristou DN, Fortner JG: Reconstruction of duodenal wall defects by the use of a gastric island flap. Arch Surg 1977;112:199–200.
23.
Walley BD, Goco I: Duodenal patch grafting. Am J Surg 1980;140:706–708.
24.
Jones SA, Gazzaniga AB, Keller TB: The serosal patch: a surgical parachute. Am J Surg 1973;126:186–196.
25.
Talving P, Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH: Civilian duodenal gunshot wounds: surgical management made simpler. World J Surg 2006;30:488–494.
26.
Snyder WH III, Weigelt JA, Watkins WL, Bietz DS: The surgical management of duodenal trauma: precepts based on review of 247 cases. Arch Surg 1980;115:422–429.
27.
Ivatury RR, Gaudino J, Ascher E, Nallathambi M, Ramirez-Schon G, Stahl WM: Treatment of penetrating duodenal injuries: primary repair vs. repair with decompressive enterostomy/serosal patch. J Trauma 1985;25:337–341.
28.
Carrillo EH, Richardson DJ, Miller FB: Evolution in the management of duodenal injuries. J Trauma 1996;40:1037–1045.
29.
Cogbill TH, Moore EE, Feliciano DV, Hoyt DB, Jurkovich GJ, Morris JA, Mucha P Jr, Ross SE, Strutt PJ, Moore FA, et al: Conservative management of duodenal trauma: a multicenter perspective. J Trauma 1990;30:1469–1475.
30.
Voyles CR, Tucker RD: Education and engineering solutions for potential problems with laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery. Am J Surg 1992;164:57–62.
31.
Ward EM, LeRoy AJ, Bender CE, Donohue JH, Hughes RW: Imaging of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Abdom Imaging 1993;18:150–155.
32.
Taylor AM, Li MK: Laparoscopic management of complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust NZ J Surg 1994;64:827–829.
33.
Yamashita Y, Kurohiji T, Kakegawa T: Evaluation of two training programs for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence of major complications. World J Surg 1994;18:279–285.
34.
Baev S, Pozarliev T, Todorov GT: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 700 consecutive cases. Int Surg 1995;80:296–298.
35.
Cala Z, Velnic D, Cvitanovic B, Rasic Z, Perko Z: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results after 1,000 procedures. Acta Med Croatica 1996;50:147–149.
36.
Chen XR, Lou D, Li SH, Mao JX, Zhou ZD, Yu SM, Duan ZW: Avoiding serious complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy – lessons learned from an experience of 2,428 cases. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1996;25:635–639.
37.
Kum CK, Eypasch E, Aljaziri A, Troidl H: Randomized comparison of pulmonary function after the ‘French’ and ‘American’ techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1996;83:938–941.
38.
Roviaro GC, Maciocco M, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, Vergani V, Rabughino G, Scarduelli A: Complications following cholecystectomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1997;42:324–328.
39.
Kwon AH, Inui H, Kamiyama Y: Laparoscopic management of bile duct and bowel injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 2001;25:856–861.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.