Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Community-based interventions in hypertensive patients: a comparison of three health education strategies

BMC Public Health volume 15, Article number: 33 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Community-based health education programs may be helpful in improving health outcomes in patients with chronic illnesses. This study aimed to evaluate community-based health education strategies in the management of hypertensive patients with low socioeconomic status in Dongguan City, China.

Methods

This was a randomized, non-blinded trial involving 360 hypertensive patients enrolled in the community health service centre of Liaobu Town, Dongguan City, China. Participants were randomized to receive one of the three community-based health education programs over 2 years: self-learning reading (Group 1), monthly regular didactic lecture (Group 2), monthly interactive education workshop (Group 3). Outcomes included the changes in the proportion of subjects with normalized blood pressure (BP), hypertension-related knowledge score, adherence to antihypertensive treatment, lifestyle, body mass index and serum lipids.

Results

After the 2-y intervention, the proportion of subjects with normalized BP increased significantly in Group 2 (from 41.2% to 63.2%, p<0.001), and increased more substantially in Group 3 (from 40.2% to 86.3%, p<0.001), but did not change significantly in Group 1. Improvements in hypertension-related knowledge score, adherence to regular use of medications, appropriate salt intake and regular physical activity were progressively greater from group 1 to group 2 to group 3. Group 3 had the largest reductions in body mass index and serum LDL cholesterol levels.

Conclusion

Interactive education workshops may be the most effective strategy in community-based health promotion education programs for hypertensive patients in improving patients’ knowledge on hypertension and alleviating clinical risk factors for preventing hypertension-related complications.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hypertension is a serious public health concern. More than one-quarter of the adult population over the world has hypertension, a significant health burden in many countries [1,2]. As a major chronic non-communicable disease, hypertension is the most important risk factor for cardiovascular and kidney diseases, stroke and premature death if not detected early and treated appropriately. The estimated prevalence of hypertension in China is 22% in Chinese adult population, corresponding to about 200 million hypertensive patients [3,4]. Targeted interventions for patients with hypertension to control blood pressure are needed to improve health related quality of life and reduce hypertension-related complications and mortality in China.

Health education may result in lifestyle modifications and increase adherence to antihypertensive medications to improve effective blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive patients [4,5]. In general, health education may improve patients’ knowledge on a disease and its therapy leading to better treatment adherence and patients taking a more positive role in the management of their health [6-10]. However, it is unclear what health educational strategy works best in improving patients’ knowledge on hypertension and possibly clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. There is now an increasing community-based effort in the prevention and control of hypertension in China. Hypertension is a major chronic disease that is often managed at community health service centers in China. Health education may play a key role in the management of hypertensive patients [11,12]. The common tools of health education in community health centers in China include health posters, health booklets, individualized lecture, and public lecture [13]. As a developing country, health education is still in an experimental stage in Chinese communities. There are some limitations in most currently available health education programs in China. The contents in most health education programs are often difficult to understand for lay readers, considering that most patients have relatively low educational levels. The educational methods may be somewhat boring and ineffective [14].

The community health service center in Liaobu Town, Dongguan City in recent years developed an interactive health education workshops program in the management of hypertensive patients. It is one of the national health education demonstration project, and the first one to implement comprehensive health education focusing on patients’ participation through dynamic and interactive workshops. The educational tools include cartoon pictures and animations illustrating cardiovascular disease progress models, treatment and prevention measures. It is designed to accommodate the educational levels of the majority of hypertensive patients (primary or middle school) managed at community health centers in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate this new interactive health education workshops program in comparison with two common health education strategies (self-learning reading, regular didactic lecture) by assessing the changes in hypertension-related knowledge, antihypertensive medications adherence, lifestyle and anthropometric, biochemical and clinical parameters.

Methods

Study design

This study was a randomized, non-blinded community-based health education trial involving 360 participants at the Community Health Service Centre in Liaobu Town, Dongguan City, China. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou, China). Informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The trial was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number ChiCTR-OPC-14005283). We followed the CONSORT guidelines in reporting RCTs.

Participants and intervention

Patients were recruited among hypertensive patients managed at the Community Health Service Centre in Liaobu Town, Dongguan City, China. Patients were eligible if they met the following inclusion criteria: a clinical diagnosis of hypertension; conscious (capable of effective oral communication without help); age between 40 and 75 years; completed primary school or higher education; able to communicate with educators; availability to participate in assigned health education activities. Patients were not eligible if they met anyone of the following exclusion criteria: pregnancy; mental disorders, dementia or cognitive impairment; other serious diseases with the need for special care such as malignant tumors, heart failure, kidney disease, AIDS.

The recruitment was conducted in September 2011. With an estimated proportion of normalized blood pressure at 40.0% after 2-y of BP control medications, a sample size of 102 per group is required to detect an improvement to 56.0% in normalized BP after the health education intervention, with an alpha error of 5% and a power of 90%. In our study, a total of 360 eligible patients agreed to participate in the study. They were assigned randomly to one of the three health education on hypertension groups by a statistician who was blinded to the intervention using a computer-generated random sequence number. Group 1 (self-learning reading, n=120) participants received orientation on reading materials to learn knowledge on hypertension through the poster text messages on blackboards and health education booklets monthly. Group 2 (regular lecture, n=120) participated in a public didactic lecture on hypertension monthly by phone invitation. Each lecture lasted about 30 minutes. Group 3 (interactive education workshop, n=120) participated in an interactive participatory education workshop on hypertension knowledge monthly. The interactive education workshop on hypertension was given through the active involvement of participants in the use of visual health education tools (cartoon pictures, animation, food models, salt spoons, oil pots, pedometer and cardiovascular disease models). The number of individuals in group 2 and group 3 shall not be less than 10 in each class. For absentees, the next available lecture would be arranged within a month.

The health education on hypertension intervention lasted two years from September 2011 to October 2013, and the study flowchart is presented in Figure 1. The “health education on hypertension syllabus” was developed by cardiovascular experts. The health education syllabus is comprised of 5 chapters with 60 sections, including hypertension-related knowledge, healthy diet, regular physical exercise, alcohol drink and cigarette smoking cessation, and adherence to anti-hypertensive medications. The learning materials were disseminated through the three different health education strategies. The numbers of drop-outs were 4, 6 and 3 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, leaving 116, 114 and 117 subjects in the three groups, respectively, at the end of the study intervention for assessing the intervention effects Figure 2.

Figure 1
figure 1

Flowchart illustrating patient recruitment and follow-ups in a community-based health education intervention trial in hypertensive patients in Liaobu Town, Dongguan City, China.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

CONSORT flow diagram of participant allocation, follow-up and analysis.

Full size image

Measurements of intervention effects

The primary outcome was the change in the proportion of subjects with normalized BP after the 2-y health education intervention. Other outcomes included the changes in hypertension-related knowledge, lifestyle, anthropometric, biochemical (serum lipids) and clinical parameters.

Hypertension related knowledge was scored based on participants’ responses to questions (Table 1). Self-reported regular use of medications for hypertension refers to strict adherence to medications following the medical instructions - defined as “the number of missed medications less than 3 times in a month”. The type, dose and number of BP lowering drugs followed the regular prescriptions by the general practitioners in the community health service centre, and the details were not recorded. Lifestyle modifications were assessed on self-reported salt intake, physical activity, smoking and alcohol use, according to the Chinese guidelines for prevention and treatment of hypertension [15]. Appropriate salt intake was defined as a salt intake of no more than 6 g per day, as estimated from monthly home consumption of salts divided by the product of 30 days multiplied by the number of individuals in the household. Regular physical activity was defined as moderate exercise lasting no less than 30 minutes, >=3 times per week. “Current smokers” were defined as those who smoked at least one pack of cigarette per month over the last 6 months. “Alcohol drinkers” were defined as those who drank alcohol at least once per week over the last 6 months.

Table 1 Score criteria for questions on hypertension knowledge
Full size table

Blood pressure (BP) was measured on the right arm using the mercury sphygmomanometer, and the average of three readings was taken. Systolic/diastolic blood pressures were classified as normal (<140/90 mmHg), grade 1 (140/90–159/99 mmHg), grade 2 (160/100–179/109 mmHg), and grade 3 (≥180/110 mmHg) hypertension [15]. BMI was calculated as weight/ height2 (kg/m2). Waist circumference was measured in centimeters at the topline of the hip bone using a non-extendable tape. Serum lipids levels were obtained from regular clinical tests, including fasting total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol.

Data analysis

The trial’s primary outcome (BP) was assessed by the general practitioners in the community health centres who were blinded to the intervention group, and research assistants recorded the data in EXCEL. A statistician who was blinded to the intervention analyzed the data. using the statistical analysis software SPSS 13.0. To compare the changes in outcomes after vs. before the intervention in study participants, paired t-test (for continuous variables) or paired Chi-square test (for dichotomous variables) was used. To compare the differences among the three intervention groups at the baseline and after the intervention, ANOVA (for continuous variables) or Chi-square test (for categorical variables) was applied. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of normalized BP (<140/90 mmHg) after the intervention adjusted for any unbalanced baseline characteristics between the study groups. The 2-sided P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Participant characteristics

There were no statistically significant differences in socio-demographic characteristics among the three health education intervention groups (Table 2). All participants were married. There were more women than men in each of the three study groups. Over 80% participants had completed education less than high school.

Table 2 Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants at the baseline
Full size table

The effect of health education on hypertension knowledge, adherence to medications treatment and lifestyle (Table 3)

Table 3 Baseline and post-intervention hypertension knowledge score, adherence to antihypertensive medications and lifestyle variables in hypertensive patients by mode of health education on hypertension (Group 1, reading n=116; Group 2, regular lecture n=114; Group 3, interactive workshop, n=117)
Full size table

At the baseline, most participants (about 2/3) did not regularly take BP lowering medications. After the 2-year health education intervention, there were statistically significant increases in hypertension-related knowledge scores in all the three intervention groups. However, the increase was significantly greater in the interactive education workshop group 3 (mean score increased from 3.4 to 8.6) than in the regular lecture group 2 (mean score increased from 2.7 to 6.6) or self-learning reading group 1 (mean score increased from 3.6 to 5.8). Regular use of medications for hypertension and regular physical activity were significantly more frequent after the intervention in all the three groups, but the improvements were progressively greater from group 1 to group 2 to Group 3. The percentages of current smokers and alcohol drinkers did not change significantly in all the three health education intervention groups, although the average numbers of cigarettes smoked per day decreased slightly after the intervention. There were no significant differences in smoking and alcohol use at both the baseline or after the intervention among the three groups.

The effect of health education on anthropometric, clinical and biochemical parameters (Table 4)

Table 4 Baseline and post-intervention anthropometric, clinical and biochemical parameters in hypertensive patients by mode of health education on hypertension (Group 1, self-learning reading; Group 2, regular lecture; Group 3, interactive workshop)
Full size table

BMI decreased significantly in Group 1 (self-reading) and Group 3 (interactive education workshop), but did not change significantly in group 2 (regular lecture). Waist circumference decreased significantly in Group 3 only. There were no statistically significant differences in BMI among the three groups at the baseline. The decreases in BMI were significant in both group 1 and group 3, but not group 2. Patients in group 3 had the largest reduction in BMI after the intervention.

Both systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly, and the proportion of normalized BP increased significantly after the intervention in both group 2 and group 3 (Table 4). In contrast, there were no significant changes in systolic and diastolic BP or the proportion of normalized BP after the intervention in group 1. The increase in the proportion of subjects with normalized BP between the baseline and post-intervention was larger in group 3 (from 40.2% to 86.3%) than in group 2 (from 41.2% to 63.2%). There was a mean reduction of 15 mmHg in systolic BP and 9.5 mmHg in diastolic BP in Group 3, larger than the mean reduction of 9.1 mmHg in systolic BP, and 5.4 mmHg in diastolic BP in group 2, respectively.

At both baseline and post-intervention, fasting serum triglycerides concentrations were higher in group 1 vs. group 2 or 3, while there were no significant differences in serum total cholesterol and LDL concentrations among the three groups (Table 4). After the intervention, serum total cholesterol concentrations decreased significantly in group 2 or 3 but not group 1. Serum triglycerides concentrations decreased significantly in group 1 only, while HDL concentrations increased significantly in both group 1 or 3 but not group 2. Fasting serum LDL concentrations increased significantly in group 1, did not change significantly in group 2, but decreased significantly in group 3 after the intervention.

As compared to self-learning reading (group 1), regular lecture (group 2) or interactive workshop education on hypertension was associated with a significantly greater likelihood of normalized BP 2-years post-intervention, even after adjusting unbalanced baseline characteristics between the three groups (Table 5). The effect size (OR) was greater for interactive workshop (adjusted OR=14.66, p<0.001) than for regular lecture (adjusted OR=2.37, p=0.008).

Table 5 Adjusted ORs of normalized blood pressure in hypertensive patients after health education intervention
Full size table

Discussion

After the 2-y health education interventions, generally beneficial changes were observed in hypertension-related knowledge scores, adherence to medications, appropriate salt intake and regular physical activity among all the three educational intervention groups, but the improvements were progressively greater from group 1 (self-learning) to group 2 (regular lecture) to group 3 (interactive education workshop). However, only the last two groups (2 and 3) showed significant reductions in systolic BP, diastolic BP, and the proportion of subjects achieving normalized BP, and group 3 showed the most beneficial changes in BP. The results demonstrated an effective community-based interactive health education strategy in improving clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients.

Previous reports have demonstrated that educational interventions on disease-related knowledge may help patients to better understand their health problem and its therapy leading to beneficial changes in health behaviors and adherence to regular treatment in improving health outcomes [16-20]. Similarly, our study confirmed this finding. In addition, we found that an interactive participatory health education strategy works best, as demonstrated by the most significant improvements in hypertension-related knowledge, and the largest reductions in body mass index, BP, and serum LDL levels. In general, the improvements in clinical risk factors (e.g. LDL) were the best in the interactive education workshop group. The only exception is that the improvement in serum triglycerides was the best in the self-learning group, largely because of the unbalance at the baseline; patients in the self-learning group had much higher average serum triglycerides levels at the study entry. However, the three groups had similar serum LDL levels at the baseline. We are aware of only one recent trial on health education in the management of hypertension: Ribeiro et al. compared monthly health education workshops alone to monthly education workshops combined with family orientation through home visits [4], and found the latter strategy was associated much better changes in adherence to treatment and reductions in behavioral and clinical risk parameters. Taking together, it appears that health educational interventions could be an important tool for improving clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients.

We observed no significant changes in the proportions of smokers and alcohol drinkers in all the three health education intervention groups. One possible explanation is that most smokers were nicotine-dependence, thus it is very difficult to quit smoking. Similarly, alcohol drinkers may be alcoholic and difficult to abstain. Several reports in China have showed that nicotine or alcohol dependence is associated with middle age, low education and low income [21-25], which are the characteristics of the study population.

In a systematic review (Glynn LG 2010) [26], education interventions directed at the patients showed no net large reductins in blood pressure. In this review, several RCTs (Hennessy 2006, Hunt 2004, McKinstry 2006, Watkins 1987) [27-30] evaluated education interventions by mailed educational materials (such as booklets) simliar to the intervention Group 1 in our study, and they reported no effect or at best a relatively modest effect on hypertension control. Our study extends those observations in demonstrating that interactive education workshops are much more helpful in BP control than simple self-learning education.

Main study limitation is that the trial was not blinded to participants; blinding is impossible to patients in such health educational interventions. We did not expect this would have affected the comparisons since patients did not know whether any health education program may be helpful in BP control. We only asked the question on missed medications (adherence), but had no information on the details of medications (type, dose and number). However, the randomization would likely have balanced the patients between the education intervention groups. Self-reported data may be prone to inaccuracies. Self-reported adherence to BP lowering drugs could not be taken as actual adherence, but only as an indicator of regular use of medications. Nevertheless, we expected that such inaccuracies in self-reported data were random and would not affect the validity of the comparisons.

Conclusion

In conclusion, interactive education workshops may be the most effective strategy in community-based health education programs for hypertensive patients in improving patients’ knowledge on hypertension and alleviating clinical risk factors for preventing hypertension-related complications.

Abbreviations

CHSI:

Community health service institution

BP:

Blood pressure

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

TG:

Triglycerides

TC:

Total cholesterol

References

  1. Kengne AP, June-Rose McHiza Z, Amoah AG, Mbanya JC. Cardiovascular diseases and diabetes as economic and developmental challenges in Africa. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;56:302–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311:507–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma YQ, Mei WH, Yin P, Yang XH, Rastegar SK, Yan JD. Prevalence of hypertension in Chinese cities: a meta-analysis of published studies. PLoS One. 2013;8:e58302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ribeiro AG, Ribeiro SM, Dias CM, Ribeiro AQ, Castro FA, Suárez-Varela MM, et al. Non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension in primary health care: a comparative clinical trial of two education strategies in health and nutrition. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:637.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaw R, Bosworth HB. Baseline medication adherence and blood pressure in a 24 month longitudinal hypertension study. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21:1401–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer D, Leventhal H, Gutmann M. Common-sense models of illness: the example of hypertension. Health Psychol. 1985;4(2):115–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wade AH, Weir DN, Cameron AP, Tett SE. Using a Problem Detection Study (PDS) to identify and compare health care provider and consumer views of antihypertensive therapy. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17:397–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Horne R. One to be taken as directed: reflections on non-adherence (non-compliance). J Soc Adm Pharm. 1993;10(4):150–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weinman J. Providing written information for patients: psychological considerations. J R Soc Med. 1990;83:303–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Viswanathan H, Anderson R, Thomas III J. Evaluation of an antiretroviral medication attitude scale and relationships between medication attitudes and medication non-adherence. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2005;19(5):306–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo R. The study of evaluation of the community TCM intervention and the quality of life in hypertensive patients (Chinese). Master thesis. China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Clinical Medicine Department;2013

  12. Hu DY. Prevention and treatment of hypertension - from the guidelines to practice. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2010/3.

  13. Ling Y, Fang ZW, Shen WZ, Zhang Y, Zhao XP. The effectiveness evaluation on the Pengpu Community Health Center implementation of the health education and health promotion for community hypertension patients(Chinese). Chinese Primary Health Care. 2004;18(9):37–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen M, Wang XK, Zhu YH. The importance of health education in community (Chinese). Soft Sci Health. 2008;6:469–70.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu LS, Wang W, Yao SH. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of hypertension in China (Chinese). J Hypertens: Chin; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kruger SH, Gerber JJ. Health beliefs and compliance of black South African outpatients with antihypertensive medication. J Soc Adm Pharm. 1998;15(3):201–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gao X, Nau DP, Rosenbluth SA, Scott V, Woodward C. The relationship of disease severity, health beliefs and medication adherence among HIV patients. AIDS Care. 2000;12(4):387–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saounatsou M, Patsi O, Fasoi G, Stylianou M, Kavga A, Economou O, et al. The influence of the hypertensive patient’s education in compliance with their medication. Public Health Nurs. 2001;18(6):436–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Health policy implications for patient education in physical therapy. Available at: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3956/is_199901/ai_n8843473. Accessed November 4, 2013.

  20. WHO. Integrating prevention into health care. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs172/en/print.html. Accessed December 7, 2014.

  21. Chen JB, Ma J, Li CP, Cui Z. Tobacco smoking and nicotine dependence among Tianjin city dwellers: a population-based cross-sectional study (Chinese). Chin J Public Health. 2013;7:988–91.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen JB, Cui Z, Li CP, Ma J. Relationships between nicotine dependence and age-associated factors (Chinese). Chin J Health Educ. 2012;10:802–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen GB, Zhou XN, Chen YL, Chen YH, Dai Z, Fu FH, et al. Investigation of Nicotine Dependence and its influencing factors of smokers in China (Chinese). Med Soc. 2013;12:001–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yang LQ, Wang HZ, Weng C, Zheng YR, Wei BR, Zheng JS. A case control study on influence factors of alcohol dependence in patients with hypertension (Chinese). 2011;11:1475–1476.

  25. Liu MX. Health information needs and the choice of communication mode of community patients with hypertension in city (Chinese). Master thesis: Chengdu University of Science and Technology, Department of Communications; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Glynn LG. Murphy AW. Smith SM: Schroeder K, Fahey T. Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hennessy S, Leonard CE, Yang W, Kimmel SE, Townsend RR, Wasserstein AG. Effectiveness of a two-part educational intervention to improve hypertension control: a cluster-randomized trial. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26:1342–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hunt JS, Siemienczuk J, Touchette D, Payne N. Impact of educational mailing on the blood pressure of primary care patients with mild hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:925–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. McKinstry B, Hanley J, Heaney D, McCloughan L, Elton R, Webb DJ. Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:842–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Watkins CJ, Papacosta AO, Chinn S, Martin J. A randomized controlled trial of an information booklet for hypertensive patients in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987;37:548–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a research grant from Liaobu Social Service Centre, Dongguang, and Key Projects of the Science and Technology Bureau, Dongguan, China (200910515017 and 2011105102019). We gratefully acknowledged Xiaoyan Zhou and Qian Zhao for their kind assistance in statistical analyses.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

      Chu-Hong Lu, Yi-Xiong Lei, Wei-Quan Lin & Pei-Xi Wang

    2. Community Health Services Center of Liaobu, Dongguan, China

      Chu-Hong Lu, Song-Tao Tang, Mian-Qiu Zhang & Sen-Hua Ding

    Authors
    1. Chu-Hong Lu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Song-Tao Tang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Yi-Xiong Lei
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Mian-Qiu Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Wei-Quan Lin
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Sen-Hua Ding
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Pei-Xi Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Pei-Xi Wang.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’ contributions

    CHL, STT and PXW were responsible for the study design. YXL, MQZ, WQL and SHD were responsible for data collection. CHL, STT and PXW conducted the data analyses. CHL and STT drafted the manuscript. PXW finalized the manuscript with inputs from all authors. All authors contributed to the development of the study framework, interpretation of the results, revisions of successive drafts of the manuscript, and approved the version submitted for publication.

    Authors’ information

    Chu-Hong Lu and Song-Tao Tang are Co-first authors.

    Chu-Hong Lu and Song-Tao Tang contributed equally to this work.

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

    The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

    To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Lu, CH., Tang, ST., Lei, YX. et al. Community-based interventions in hypertensive patients: a comparison of three health education strategies. BMC Public Health 15, 33 (2015). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12889-015-1401-6

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12889-015-1401-6

    Keywords

    BMC Public Health

    ISSN: 1471-2458

    Contact us