Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Multimorbidity and healthcare resource utilization in Switzerland: a multicentre cohort study

BMC Health Services Research volume 19, Article number: 708 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Multimorbidity is associated with higher healthcare resource utilization, but we lack data on the association of specific combinations of comorbidities with healthcare resource utilization. We aimed to identify the combinations of comorbidities associated with high healthcare resource utilization among multimorbid medical inpatients.

Methods

We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study including 33,871 multimorbid (≥2 chronic diseases) medical inpatients discharged from three Swiss hospitals in 2010–2011. Healthcare resource utilization was measured as 30-day potentially avoidable readmission (PAR), prolonged length of stay (LOS) and difference in median LOS. We identified the combinations of chronic comorbidities associated with the highest healthcare resource utilization and quantified this association using regression techniques.

Results

Three-fourths of the combinations with the strongest association with PAR included chronic kidney disease. Acute and unspecified renal failure combined with solid malignancy was most strongly associated with PAR (OR 2.64, 95%CI 1.79;3.90). Miscellaneous mental health disorders combined with mood disorders was the most strongly associated with LOS (difference in median LOS: 17 days) and prolonged LOS (OR 10.77, 95%CI 8.38;13.84). The number of chronic diseases was strongly associated with prolonged LOS (OR 9.07, 95%CI 8.04;10.24 for ≥10 chronic diseases), and to a lesser extent with PAR (OR 2.16, 95%CI 1.75;2.65 for ≥10 chronic diseases).

Conclusions

Multimorbidity appears to have a higher impact on LOS than on PAR. Combinations of comorbidities most strongly associated with healthcare utilization included kidney disorders for PAR, and mental health disorders for LOS.

Peer Review reports

Background

With the progress of medical science, survival has increased for patients with several chronic diseases, leading to a higher prevalence of multimorbidity, most often defined as the presence of at least two chronic diseases [1,2,3]. Given its association with poor quality of life, functional decline and healthcare resource utilization, multimorbidity represents a significant burden for the healthcare systems and the patients [4,5,6].

Potentially avoidable readmission (PAR) and length of stay (LOS) are two different and relatively simple measures of healthcare resource utilization among inpatients [7]. Given that both the rate of PAR and the LOS can be effectively reduced by various preventive but often complex and costly interventions, it is essential to identify patients at higher risk for PAR or prolonged LOS, in order to improve allocation of these interventions [8,9,10]. While previous studies conducted mainly in the United States, but also Australia, Ireland and Spain, described an association between multimorbidity and readmission or prolonged LOS [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], data in Switzerland are scarce, with only two studies showing a prolonged LOS in patients with multimorbidity [1,2,3]. Nevertheless, we lack descriptive and more detailed quantitative data on the association between particular combinations of chronic comorbidities and PAR or prolonged LOS. Furthermore, more complex effects of chronic comorbidities on the odds for PAR or prolonged LOS, such as interactions that may lead to more than multiplicative effects on this odds, have not yet been studied.

Our primary aim was to identify combinations of chronic comorbidities associated with higher healthcare resource utilization, measured as PAR and prolonged LOS, to quantify this association, and to identify potential interactions between those comorbidities on the odds for PAR or prolonged LOS. Our hypothesis was that particular combinations of comorbidities are associated with a higher odds for PAR or prolonged LOS, and that some comorbidities found in those combinations may have a more or a less than multiplicative effect on this odds. Our secondary aim was to quantify the association between the number of chronic diseases and healthcare resource utilization. Our hypothesis was that a higher number of chronic diseases is associated with higher odds for PAR and prolonged LOS.

Methods

Study design, setting, and participants

We used a retrospective cohort including all consecutive patients with multimorbidity – defined by its most usual definition, i.e. the presence of at least two chronic diseases [3, 19] – who were discharged home or to a nursing home from the medical departments of three large university teaching hospitals in Switzerland (Bern University Hospital [Inselspital], Lausanne University Hospital [CHUV], and Geneva University Hospitals [HUG]) between 2010 and 2011. These three hospitals are comparable in terms of size, types of patients cared for and treatment approaches. This is an ancillary study using only the Swiss sample from a larger multinational cohort initially developed to study readmission in four countries (Canada, USA, Switzerland, Israel) [20]. The unit of analysis was hospital discharge. All data were extracted from hospital electronic medical records. We did not assess death events following discharge. As the data were fully anonymised, an ethical approval was not required according to Swissethics. Reporting is in accordance with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement [21].

Classification of diseases

We used the Chronic Condition Indicator, developed by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, a Federal-State-Industry partnership sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, to differentiate between chronic and not chronic diseases [22]. According to this standardised tool, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis codes are classified as chronic if they meet following criteria: a health condition lasting at least 12 months and causing limitations on self-care, independent living and social interactions, and/or resulting in the need for ongoing intervention with medical products, services and special equipment. To focus on conditions that define multimorbidity, we included only chronic diseases in our analysis, and thus excluded ICD codes for acute diseases, risk factors, symptoms, screening strategies and complications of diseases, as previously done [23]. We then collapsed all chronic diseases into a clinically meaningful number of categories using the Clinical Classification Software, also developed by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project [24], defining the different chronic comorbidities to be analysed. We finally grouped together some of those comorbidities that were expected to be found in combination (details in Additional file 1).

Study outcomes

Our primary outcome was potentially avoidable readmission (PAR) to any department of the same hospital within 30 days following hospital discharge. To identify PAR, we used the SQLape algorithm, which is based on administrative data and ICD codes and was initially developed in Switzerland to benchmark hospitals [20, 25]. Shortly, this algorithm classifies a readmission as unavoidable if it was predictable, for example for planed chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or if it involves a new body system not affected during index admission. Readmissions for transplantation, severe trauma, severe chronic disease or rehabilitation treatment are also considered unavoidable. On the other hand, readmission for complications is deemed avoidable. Our secondary outcome was a prolonged LOS, assessed both as a continuous and binary variable. For the binary assessment, we defined a prolonged LOS as a LOS longer or equal to the upper quartile (75%).

Statistical analyses

We presented patients’ baseline characteristics as median with interquartile range (IQR) or proportions, as appropriate.

For the primary aim, we used a mixed-effects logistic regression adjusted for age and sex, with a random intercept for hospital to identify the 20 combinations of comorbidities with the highest odds for PAR and for a prolonged LOS. For clinical relevance, we only considered combinations with a prevalence of ≥0.5%. We presented the results as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We compared the patients with, to the patients without the combinations of comorbidities. For each of these 20 combinations, we then analysed interactions to identify the comorbidities that had a more or a less than multiplicative effect on the odds for PAR or prolonged LOS. A more than multiplicative effect means that the OR of the combination is higher than the ORs of the single comorbidities multiplied together. A less than multiplicative effect means the opposite. We used quantile regression controlled for age, sex and hospital to assess the difference in median LOS between patients with and without a combination of comorbidities.

For the secondary aim, we used a mixed-effects logistic univariable regression with a random intercept for centre to quantify the association between the number of chronic diseases and PAR or prolonged LOS, respectively. We used a forest plot to present the results.

We performed all analyses with STATA 15.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) or R version 3.4.4 (R Project for Statistical Computing).

Results

Among the 42,739 patients available in the initial cohort, 33,871 (79.3%) were multimorbid and included in the study (Fig. 1). Among them, 1948 (5.8%) had a PAR within 30 days after discharge, and 9634 (28.4%) had a prolonged LOS. Median age was 68 years (IQR 56–78), median number of chronic diseases was 4 (IQR 3–6), and median LOS was 8 days (IQR 4–14; Table 1). Median LOS was 5 days (IQR 2–8) in patients without prolonged LOS and 18 days (IQR 15–25) in those with prolonged LOS. The most frequent comorbidities were chronic heart disease, chronic kidney disease (CKD), solid malignancy and substance-related disorders, each occurring in more than 10% of the patients.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow-chart. Abbreviations: PAR, potentially avoidable readmission

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Combinations of comorbidities and 30-day potentially avoidable readmission

Among the 20 combinations of comorbidities with the highest OR for PAR, 10 included CKD and 7 included solid malignancy (Table 2). Acute and unspecified renal failure combined with solid malignancy showed the highest OR for PAR (OR 2.69, 95%CI 1.81;3.99), followed by pulmonary heart disease combined with solid malignancy (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.70;3.63, Table 2). The 18 following combinations increased the odds for PAR by 92 to 140%. CKD in combination with other diseases of kidney and ureters, and CKD in combination with solid malignancy had a less than multiplicative effect on the odds for PAR. Paralysis in combination with other nervous system disorders had a more than multiplicative effect on the odds for PAR, while the comorbidities of the other 17 combinations showed no significant interaction (Table 2).

Table 2 Combinations of comorbidities and 30-day potentially avoidable readmission
Full size table

Combinations of comorbidities and prolonged length of stay

Two combinations of comorbidities showed a particular high OR for a prolonged LOS and a particular high difference in median LOS (Table 3): 1) miscellaneous mental health disorders combined with mood disorders (OR for prolonged LOS: 11.28, 95%CI 8.71;14.61; difference in median LOS: 17.4 days, 95%CI 16.5;18.3); 2) diseases of white blood cells combined with hematological malignancy (OR for prolonged LOS: 10.95, 95%CI 9.06;13.24; difference in median LOS: 15.7 days, 95%CI 15.1;16.4).

Table 3 Combinations of comorbidities and prolonged length of stay
Full size table

The 18 following combinations increased the odds for a prolonged LOS by 179 to 383% and showed a difference in median LOS of 4 to 8 days. These combinations included mostly mental health conditions, neurological diseases and renal diseases. The comorbidities of five combinations had a more than multiplicative effect on the odds for a prolonged LOS, while those of three combinations had a less than multiplicative effect on this odds (Table 3).

Number of chronic diseases and healthcare resource utilization

The odds for PAR increased with each additional chronic disease, reaching an OR of 2.31 (95%CI 1.87;2.85) for patients with 10 or more chronic diseases (Fig. 2). The effect on prolonged LOS was more pronounced, reaching an OR of 9.62 (95% CI 8.51;10.88) in patients with 10 or more chronic diseases (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association between the number of chronic diseases and 30-day potentially avoidable readmission. Legend: Odds ratio (box) with 95% confidence interval (lines) for 30-day potentially avoidable readmission. The reference category is the presence of 2 chronic diseases, as we included only patients with multimorbidity. Abbreviations: #, number of chronic diseases; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Association between the number of chronic diseases and prolonged length of stay. Legend: Odds ratio (box) with 95% confidence interval (lines) for prolonged length of stay. The reference category is the presence of 2 chronic diseases, as we included only patients with multimorbidity. A prolonged length of stay was defined as a stay longer than or equal to the upper quartile (75%). Abbreviations: #, number of chronic diseases; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio

Full size image

Discussion

In this large sample of medical patients hospitalised in Switzerland, we identified combinations of chronic comorbidities associated with higher healthcare resource utilization, measured as PAR and prolonged LOS. Among the 20 combinations of comorbidities with the highest odds for PAR, 10 included CKD. These combinations increased the odds for PAR by 92 to 169%. Miscellaneous mental health disorders combined with mood disorders, and diseases of white blood cells combined with hematological malignancy, were strongly associated with a prolonged LOS. The comorbidities of 5 of the 20 combinations with the highest odds for a prolonged LOS had a more than multiplicative effect on the odds. The number of chronic diseases was strongly associated with LOS. This quantitative description of combinations of chronic comorbidities with the highest impact on healthcare resource utilization may help to identify patients most likely to benefit from preventive interventions in Switzerland.

Combinations of comorbidities and 30-day potentially avoidable readmission

CKD was often found among the combinations of comorbidities with the highest odds for PAR. Previous studies described an increased risk for readmission among patients with CKD, but little was known on which patients with CKD may be more vulnerable [26,27,28,29]. Our study identified 10 different chronic comorbidities that increased the odds for PAR when combined with CKD, with the highest odds for the combinations including liver disease, solid malignancy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis. Paying particular attention to those comorbidities in patients with CKD, particularly when developing preventive interventions, may help to reduce the rate of PAR in this population.

Solid malignancy was also frequently found among these top combinations. As we included only PAR, we did not consider patients readmitted for planned chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the outcome. Therefore, our findings suggest that these readmissions were rather related to complications of treatment or frailty, which is frequent among those patients and associated with adverse health outcome such as readmission [30,31,32]. This report is important, as both frailty and complications of treatment could be targeted by preventive interventions.

Combinations of comorbidities and length of stay

Mood disorders were often found among one fourth of the combinations of comorbidities with the highest odds for prolonged LOS, and had the highest impact on the LOS in combination with miscellaneous mental health disorders. Previous studies associated psychological or psychiatric comorbidity with prolonged LOS in general hospital settings [33, 34]. In our study, we further found that a combination of psychological or psychiatric comorbidities was particularly strongly associated with prolonged LOS. Additionally, the two comorbidities had a multiplicative effect on the odds for a prolonged LOS. As miscellaneous mental health disorders include mostly sleep disorders not related to a somatic condition, our finding underlines the importance of paying attention to minimize factors associated with sleep disturbance during hospital stay, and particularly in patients with a preexisting psychiatric comorbidity, as they seem more vulnerable.

The second combination with the highest impact on LOS was diseases of white blood cells with hematological malignancy. This could be mainly explained by the neutropenia either resulting from chemotherapy or directly related to hematological malignancy [35]. Unfortunately, we may have only little impact on the prolonged LOS in this case, as neutropenic patients most often have to stay in an isolated hospital room, and because of the frequent and hardly avoidable complications of neutropenia, including severe mucositis and infections.

Neurological disorders were also frequent among the top combinations associated with a prolonged LOS. This finding is important, as different interventions, depending on the type of neurological disorder, may impact the LOS. On the one hand, in patients with cerebrovascular diseases, care by neurohospitalists or in stroke units have been shown to shorten the LOS [36, 37]. On the other hand, disability resulting from neurological disorders, such as paralysis, increases the need for supportive care after discharge, which may require some time to organize because of limited available resources. This is important, considered that a modification in resource allocation may decrease this adverse impact on the LOS.

Until now, we lacked data on how the different comorbidities may interact to influence the LOS. In this study, we found that the comorbidities of one fourth of the combinations with the highest OR for a prolonged LOS showed a more than multiplicative effect on the odds. This suggests that assessing multimorbidity as a count or a list of diseases only may mask important additional information on the higher healthcare resource utilization associated with specific combinations of comorbidities, and thus not exactly reflect the complex impact of multimorbidity on the LOS in particular.

Number of chronic diseases and healthcare resource utilization

A prolonged LOS and a higher rate of readmission had been associated with the number of diseases, but we lacked quantitative data on this association [4, 15, 17, 18, 38]. Furthermore, little is known on this association with PAR, rather than with any readmission. Interestingly, the number of chronic diseases was far more strongly associated with LOS than with PAR, reaching an OR of 9.62 for prolonged LOS, but of only 2.31 for PAR in patients with 10 or more chronic diseases. This suggests that the number of chronic diseases may increase patients’ level of complexity, which has in turn been associated with prolonged LOS [39, 40]. The number of chronic diseases may thus help to identify patients that may benefit more of interventions aimed at shortening LOS. On the other hand, the association between the number of chronic diseases and PAR was less strong. This suggests that particular types of diseases, rather than the number of diseases, are associated with an increased odds for PAR. This hypothesis is supported by previous data finding a stronger association between PAR and some diseases, such as infection, neoplasm, heart failure or gastrointestinal and liver disorders [41]. The number of chronic diseases alone may therefore be less useful to allocate interventions aimed at reducing PAR.

Limitations and strengths

Our study presents some limitations. First, although using ICD codes allowed assessing a broad number of diseases, diagnoses are subject to coding quality that may lead to underreporting. Second, we assessed diagnoses using hospital records only, which may have led to some biases in morbidity measurement. However, diagnoses are not coded with the ICD system in primary care settings in Switzerland, thus not allowing their classification with the Chronic Condition Indicator and the Clinical Classification Software. Third, as our study was not designed to assess causal relationships, we can only report associations. Fourth, our findings may have limited generalizability to patients hospitalised in primary or secondary care hospitals that may be less severely ill than those cared for in tertiary university teaching hospitals.

This study has several strengths also. First, we used a large and multicentre sample of patients. Second, we classified the diseases using standardised tools and considered all ICD-coded diagnoses, unlike most previous studies that often included a limited number of diseases [4, 22, 24, 42,43,44,45]. Finally, we used innovative methods to measure multimorbidity and its impacts on healthcare resource utilization, such as the assessment of combinations of comorbidities and of interactions between the comorbidities.

Conclusions

In this large multicentre analysis of multimorbid medical inpatients, we found that half of the combinations of comorbidities most strongly associated with PAR included CKD and one third of them included solid malignancy. This should prompt physicians and researchers to develop specific preventive interventions particularly focused on these groups of patients, with the aim to reduce the risk of PAR and thus the burden of disease for patients with CKD or solid malignancy. Miscellaneous mental health disorders combined with mood disorders, and diseases of white blood cells combined with hematological malignancy, were the most strongly associated with LOS, with a difference in median LOS of 17.4 and 15.7 days, respectively. Hospital physicians caring for medical patients should thus be particularly attentive to identify and take care of mental health conditions, particularly sleep disorders, as these comorbidities may easily go unnoticed, but are associated with higher healthcare utilization. The number of chronic diseases was far more strongly associated with prolonged LOS than with PAR. This measure of multimorbidity may thus be more useful to identify patients at risk of prolonged LOS that may most benefit of interventions to shorten LOS.

In conclusion, this detailed and quantitative description may help healthcare providers to identify patients with combinations of diseases associated with higher healthcare resource utilization, and thus to better focus preventive interventions in order to reduce PAR and shorten LOS, with the overall objective to decrease healthcare costs and adverse consequences of multimorbidity for the patients, without decreasing quality of care.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

ICD:

International classification of diseases

IQR:

Interquartile range

LOS:

Length of stay

OR:

Odds ratio

PAR:

Potentially avoidable readmission

References

  1. Hedinger D, Braun J, Kaplan V, Bopp M. Determinants of aggregate length of hospital stay in the last year of life in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Seale C. Changing patterns of death and dying. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(6):917–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnston MC, Crilly M, Black C, Prescott GJ, Mercer SW. Defining and measuring multimorbidity: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Eur J Pub Health. 2019;1:182–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahler C, Huber CA, Brungger B, Reich O. Multimorbidity, health care utilization and costs in an elderly community-dwelling population: a claims data based observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gijsen R, Hoeymans N, Schellevis FG, Ruwaard D, Satariano WA, van den Bos GA. Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(7):661–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(4):430–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/perfmeasguide/perfmeaspt3.html. Accessed January 25 2019.

  8. Miani C, Ball S, Pitchforth E, Exley J, King S, Roland M, et al. Health services and delivery research. Organisational interventions to reduce length of stay in hospital: a rapid evidence assessment. NIHR Journals Library: Southampton; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coffman J, Rundall TG. The impact of hospitalists on the cost and quality of inpatient care in the United States: a research synthesis. Med Care Res Rev. 2005;62(4):379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leppin AL, Gionfriddo MR, Kessler M, Brito JP, Mair FS, Gallacher K, et al. Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(7):1095–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(20):2269–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Chronic Conditions among Medicare Beneficiaries, Chartbook, 2012 Edition. Baltimore, 2012.

  13. George J, Vuong T, Bailey MJ, Kong DC, Marriott JL, Stewart K. Development and validation of the medication-based disease burden index. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(4):645–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiley JF, Chan YK, Ahamed Y, Ball J, Carrington MJ, Riegel B, et al. Multimorbidity and the risk of all-cause 30-day readmission in the setting of multidisciplinary Management of Chronic Heart Failure: a retrospective analysis of 830 hospitalized patients in Australia. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018;33(5):437–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Friedman B, Jiang HJ, Elixhauser A, Segal A. Hospital inpatient costs for adults with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(3):327–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Glynn LG, Valderas JM, Healy P, Burke E, Newell J, Gillespie P, et al. The prevalence of multimorbidity in primary care and its effect on health care utilization and cost. Fam Pract. 2011;28(5):516–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49(2):156–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Librero J, Peiro S, Ordinana R. Chronic comorbidity and outcomes of hospital care: length of stay, mortality, and readmission at 30 and 365 days. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(3):171–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Violan C, Foguet-Boreu Q, Flores-Mateo G, Salisbury C, Blom J, Freitag M, et al. Prevalence, determinants and patterns of multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Donze JD, Williams MV, Robinson EJ, Zimlichman E, Aujesky D, Vasilevskis EE, et al. International validity of the HOSPITAL score to predict 30-day potentially avoidable hospital readmissions. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(4):496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Chronic Condition Indicator (CCI) for ICD-9-CM. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/chronic/chronic.jsp. Accessed June 23 2018.

  23. Wong A, Boshuizen HC, Schellevis FG, Kommer GJ, Polder JJ. Longitudinal administrative data can be used to examine multimorbidity, provided false discoveries are controlled for. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(10):1109–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) for ICD-9-CM. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs/ccs.jsp. Accessed June 23 2018.

  25. Donze J, Aujesky D, Williams D, Schnipper JL. Potentially avoidable 30-day hospital readmissions in medical patients: derivation and validation of a prediction model. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(8):632–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1418–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tesfaye WH, Peterson GM, Castelino RL, McKercher C, Jose MD, Wimmer BC, et al. Medication regimen complexity and hospital readmission in older adults with chronic kidney disease. Ann Pharmacother. 2019;1:28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mathew AT, Strippoli GF, Ruospo M, Fishbane S. Reducing hospital readmissions in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2015;88(6):1250–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tuttle KR, Alicic RZ, Short RA, Neumiller JJ, Gates BJ, Daratha KB, et al. Medication therapy management after hospitalization in CKD: a randomized clinical trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(2):231–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Handforth C, Clegg A, Young C, Simpkins S, Seymour MT, Selby PJ, et al. The prevalence and outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(6):1091–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosted E, Schultz M, Sanders S. Frailty and polypharmacy in elderly patients are associated with a high readmission risk. Danish Med J. 2016;63(9);1–6.

  32. Biganzoli L, Mislang AR, Di Donato S, Becheri D, Biagioni C, Vitale S, et al. Screening for frailty in older patients with early-stage solid tumors: a prospective longitudinal evaluation of three different geriatric tools. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(7):922–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Freidl M, Benda N, Friedrich F. Psychiatric illness and length of stay in general hospitals: do case finding methods matter? Neuropsychiatr. 2015;29(2):77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Saravay SM, Steinberg MD, Weinschel B, Pollack S, Alovis N. Psychological comorbidity and length of stay in the general hospital. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148(3):324–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lustberg MB. Management of neutropenia in cancer patients. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2012;10(12):825–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Freeman WD, Dawson SB, Raper C, Thiemann K, Josephson SA, Barrett KM. Neurohospitalists reduce length of stay for patients with ischemic stroke. Neurohospitalist. 2011;1(2):67–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu HF, Newcommon NN, Cooper ME, Green TL, Seal B, Klein G, et al. Impact of a stroke unit on length of hospital stay and in-hospital case fatality. Stroke. 2009;40(1):18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mihailoff M, Deb S, Lee JA, Lynn J. The Effects of Multiple Chronic Conditions on Adult Patient Readmissions and Hospital Finances: A Management Case Study. Inquiry. 2017;54:46958017729597.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu Y, Phillips M, Codde J. Factors influencing patients’ length of stay. Aust Health Rev. 2001;24(2):63–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Yoshida S, Matsushima M, Wakabayashi H, Mutai R, Murayama S, Hayashi T, et al. Validity and reliability of the patient Centred assessment method for patient complexity and relationship with hospital length of stay: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e016175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Donzé J, Lipsitz S, Bates DW, Schnipper JL. Causes and patterns of readmissions in patients with common comorbidities: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2013;347:f7171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pati S, Swain S, Metsemakers J, Knottnerus JA, van den Akker M. Pattern and severity of multimorbidity among patients attending primary care settings in Odisha. India PloS one. 2017;12(9):e0183966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pati S, Swain S, Hussain MA, van den Akker M, Metsemakers J, Knottnerus JA, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of multimorbidity in South Asia: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e007235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lochner KA, Cox CS. Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, United States, 2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Diederichs C, Berger K, Bartels DB. The measurement of multiple chronic diseases--a systematic review on existing multimorbidity indices. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66(3):301–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

We also analysed the association between patterns and multimorbidity and readmission / LOS in a larger multinational cohort including the same patients from Swiss hospitals, along with patients from 7 hospitals in the USA and 1 hospital in Israel. However, as the results were significantly different, and because data in Switzerland are particularly scarce, we believe that this separate publication is relevant.

Funding

Dr. Aubert was supported by research grants from the Swiss Society of General Internal Medicine Foundation, and from the Clinical Trials Unit from Bern University, Switzerland. Prof. Donzé was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. The funding bodies had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland

    Carole E. Aubert, Drahomir Aujesky & Jacques Donzé

  2. Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Carole E. Aubert

  3. CTU, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Niklaus Fankhauser & Andreas Limacher

  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Pedro Marques-Vidal

  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

    Jérôme Stirnemann

  6. Division of General Medicine, BWH Hospitalist Service, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Jacques Donzé

  7. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Jacques Donzé

  8. Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital neuchâtelois, Neuchâtel, Switzerland

    Jacques Donzé

Authors
  1. Carole E. Aubert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Niklaus Fankhauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pedro Marques-Vidal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jérôme Stirnemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Drahomir Aujesky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andreas Limacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jacques Donzé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CEA and JD designed the study, directed its analysis, including quality assurance and control, interpreted the data and drafted the article. NF and AL designed the study’s analytic strategy and performed the statistical analyses. PM, JS, and DA contributed to major revisions of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript in its current state.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carole E. Aubert.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

As the data were fully anonymised, an ethical approval was not required according to Swissethics.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Multimorbidity and healthcare resource utilization in Switzerland: a multicentre cohort study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aubert, C.E., Fankhauser, N., Marques-Vidal, P. et al. Multimorbidity and healthcare resource utilization in Switzerland: a multicentre cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 19, 708 (2019). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12913-019-4575-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12913-019-4575-2

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us