Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparison of real-time PCR and nested PCR for toxoplasmosis diagnosis in toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis patients

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 21, Article number: 1180 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Backgrounds

PCR is a proper technique that significantly improves toxoplasmosis diagnosis. However, a more sensitive technique is required. This study compared real-time PCR with nested PCR using B1, SAG-4, and MAG-1 bradyzoite genes to diagnose toxoplasmosis in toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis patients.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from 10 patients with active toxoplasmic chorioretinal lesions and 10 healthy individuals. Blood samples including peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), serum and whole blood samples were used for DNA extraction. Serum was also used to detect anti-toxoplasma IgG and IgM antibodies. Nested PCR and real-time PCR were performed using B1, SAG-4, and MAG-1 target genes.

Results

Five (50%) out of the 10 patients were tested positive for toxoplasmosis with nested PCR using the PBMC samples. All the five patients tested positive with nested PCR were also tested positive for toxoplasmosis with real-time PCR using the PBMC samples. The real-time PCR results demonstrated that 9(90%) out of the 10 patients were positive based on B1 and the remaining one (10%) was positive only based on MAG-1. In general, of the patients, five (50%) were positive using SAG-4 and three (30%) were positive in term of MAG-1 using PBMCs with real-time PCR.

Conclusion

It appears that PBMC samples have the best performance as the PCR extraction method and are a good source for toxoplasmosis diagnosis. The use of B22 and B23 target genes due to their high sensitivity and specificity along with bradyzoite genes are recommended for toxoplasmosis diagnosis using PBMC samples with real-time PCR.

Peer Review reports

Background

Toxoplasma gondii protozoan parasite is an important cause of retinochoroiditis throughout the world. Toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis caused by acute infection or recurrence is often found in congenital or acquired toxoplasmosis [1].This disease typically affects at the posterior pole of a single eye, with solitary, multiple, or satellite lesions to a pigmented retinal scar [2]. Active lesions present as grey-white focuses of retinal necrosis with adjacent choroiditis, vasculitis, hemorrhage, and vitritis [2].

Toxoplasmosis is as one of the most common parasitic infections in the world and has been reported in up to one third of the world’s population.It is responsible for the majority of uveitis or intraocular inflammation cases. In some countries, up to 50% of all posterior uveitis cases are attributed to toxoplasmosis [3,4,5].

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique has obviously improved toxoplasmosis diagnosis and is a proper technique for parasite detection in clinical samples. Although PCR is a useful technique for detection of T. gondii DNA with sensitivity between 53.3% -75% in blood samples of ocular toxoplasmosis patients, a more sensitive technique is still required [6,7,8].

Recently, the real-time PCR technique as a highly secure and efficient method has been extensively used for toxoplasmosis diagnosis using different target genes [9,10,11]. It has been replacing nested PCR as a sensitive technique for rapid ocular toxoplasmosis diagnosis. As described previously, this method decreases contamination risks, confirms specificity, and omits some gel production processes in the conventional PCR [12]. Furthermore, in this method, standardization improves and the parasitic load is quantified in samples for screening test and treatment evaluation [13].

The results of some previous studies indicated that T. gondii bradyzoite (SAG-4 and MAG-1) genes are useful targets for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive and toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis patients, especially when patients were under treatment or prophylaxis. Moreover, PCR using T. gondii B1 gene showed good performance for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis [14,15,16].

In this study, we compared the performances of real-time and nested PCR using B1, SAG-4, and MAG-1 bradyzoite genes for toxoplasmosis diagnosis in the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples of patients with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from 10 patients with toxoplasmic chorioretinal lesions admitted to ophthalmology clinic in the Rasoul Akram Hospital in Tehran, affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences during 2019–2020 and from 10 healthy individuals. The mean age of the patients with an active retinitis lesion was 24.5 ± 6.19 years (ranging from 12 to 42 years) and for healthy people was 28.6 ± 8.3 (ranging between 15 and 45 years). Among ocular patients and healthy controls, 6/10 (60%) and 5/10 (50%) were male, respectively. In this study, we included a total of 10 toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis outpatients from different provinces of Iran, including Mazandaran (Sari, Amol), Golestan (Gorgan), Khuzestan (Ahvaz), Markazi (Arak), Qom, and Tehran. The most toxoplasmic chorioretinal lesions were seen in the right eye and less in the left eye.

All the ocular patients had an active retinitis lesion adjacent to an old hyperpigmented retinal scar compatible with ocular toxoplasmosis reactivation. Clinically detectable retinal vasculitis was recorded in seven of the patients. The patients had moderate to severe vitritis at the time of diagnosis.

Blood samples including PBMC and serum as well as whole blood samples were used to extract DNA and also serum was used to detect anti-Toxoplasma IgG and IgM antibodies. PBMC was prepared from 5 mL blood with Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) through density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll (Amersham Biosciences Europe Gmbh, Milan, Italy) [16].

ELISA: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

The anti-T.gondii IgG and IgM antibodies were evaluated using Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (Euroimmun, Germany) for all the 10 ocular toxoplasmosis patients and 10 healthy individuals. Moreover, the presence or absence of the anti-T.gondii IgG and IgM antibodies was evaluated. According to results positive and negative IgG were considered as > 11 IU/mL and < 8 IU/mL, respectively, positive and negative IgM were defined as > 1.1 IU/mL and < 0.8 IU/mL, respectively.

DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction

The genomic DNA was extracted from the patients’ serum and also PBMC and whole blood samples were obtained using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The primers were selected using B1 that amplified a 115 bp fragment [17]. Nested PCR was performed using SAG-4 primers that amplified a 187 bp fragment, as previously described in detail [15, 18]. The oligonucleotide was used for MAG-1 that amplified a 212 bp fragment [15]. All the PCR protocols and conditions were performed according to Contini et al.’s method [14, 15].

Sequencing

The next round of PCR was performed with internal primers, and the product was purified using the High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim, Germany). Then, the product was used for direct sequencing with the dye termination method and an ABI 3730xl sequencer. The DNA sequence was analyzed with genius software version 10.1. Finally, the results were compared and new sequences were deposited with the accession numbers (MZ027341 to MZ027344 and also MZ054158 to MZ054160) in GenBank.

Real-time polymerase chain reaction

The real-time PCR test was performed using T.gondii B1, SAG-4, and MAG-1 genes. The reactions were performed in a final volume of 20 µl using the Master SYBR Green I (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) 12.5 µl. Each primer was added at the concentrations of 0.5 µM for B1, 0.8 µM for SAG-4, 0.7 µM for MAG-1 and MgCl2, 2 mM for B1, 4 mM for SAG-4 and MAG- 1 and then 5 µl of the extracted DNA samples [14].

All runs were performed with distilled water as negative control and a DNA sample of T.gondii RH strain as positive control. The test specificity was assessed using B1, SAG-4, and MAG- 1 primers through DNA extraction from the T.gondii RH strain and DNA preparation from T. gondii positive patients and from10 healthy individuals as control. Some bacterial species (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and fungal species (Candida albicans, Candida glabrata and Cryptococcus neoformans) and viruses, including cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus were used in this study. Primers used in this study for real-time PCR are summarized in Table 1.

Table.1 Primers used in nested and real-time PCR
Full size table

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done in SPSS version 18, using Chi-square test. Predictive tests were used to analyze and compare the results of Real-Time PCR and nested PCR using different primers (SAG-4, MAG-1, and B1) in the PBMCs and serum samples of the patients. The difference was significant at P < 0.05.

Results

PCR result

Five (50%) out of the 10 patients with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis were positive with nested PCR using the PBMC samples. In general four (40%) of patients were positive results using MAG-1 or SAG-4 and one (10%) patient was positive using B1 with nested PCR. Two of the patients were positive regarding MAG-1 and SAG-4. Moreover one patient was positive with MAG-1 and another was positive using SAG-4 gene. The PCR results were negative in patients’ serum samples using different targets (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of Real-time PCR and Nested PCR methods in diagnosing of toxoplasmosis in retinochoroiditis patients
Full size table

The real-time PCR results demonstrated that all the 10 patients with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis were positive. Accordingly, nine (90%) out of the 10 patients were positive with B1 and the remaining one (10%) was positive only with MAG-1 using the PBMC samples. In general, five (50%) of the patients were positive using SAG-4 (including two patients with SAG-4 and MAG-1) and three (30%) of the patients were positive using MAG-1.

All the five positive patients with nested PCR were also positive with real-time PCR using the PBMC samples. In two of the patients with negative PCR results using MAG-1, SAG-4, and B1 with nested PCR, the real-time PCR results were positive using SAG-4.

Furthermore, in two of the patients, the PCR results were negative in the blood samples of patients with MAG-1, SAG-4, with nested PCR. However, the PCR results were positive in the blood samples of these patients with real-time PCR. In general, nine (90%) of the cases were positive with real-time PCR in PBMC samples in compare with two (20%) were positive in blood samples using B1 gene.The results of real-time PCR and nested PCR are summarized in Table 2.

There was a significant difference between real-time PCR and nested PCR using B1 gene (90% vs. 10%; P = 0.0003). Moreover the use of bradyzoite-specific genes (SAG-4) was found to be more sensitive in real-time PCR than nested PCR (50% vs. 30%. P = 0.36) but the difference was not significant. Furthermore no significant difference was found in detecting MAG-1 between real-time PCR and nested PCR (30% vs. 30%; P = 0.50) in patients with toxoplasmic chorioretinitis.

Real-time PCR specificity

The real-time PCR assays were performed using all target genes (MAG-1, SAG-4, and B1) in a group of 10 healthy individuals and different fungal, bacterial and viral infections, for confirmation of specificity and results of real-time PCR were negative.

Sequencing

The DNA sequence was analyzed, and the results were compared and blasted with deposited sequences in PubMed. The B1 obtained sequences had 100% identity with the T.gondii B1 gene, the RH strain (AF179871.1), 98.63% identity with T. gondii ME49 (XM_002370240.2) and 98.26% identity with TPA: T.gondii VEG (LN714499.1).

One isolate of MAG-1 had 100% similarity with U09029 and T.gondii ME49 MAG1 (XM_002365659.1), and another isolate had 99.53% similarity with LN714498.1.Three isolates of SAG-4 had similarity with the T.gondii strain RH bradyzoite surface antigen (SAG-4) gene (genotype I).

ELISA

Although anti-T.gondii IgG was positive in all the 10 retinochoroiditis patients, IgM was negative in them. Anti-T.gondii IgG was positive in 6 out of 10 healthy individuals; however IgM was negative in all of them.

Discussion

Ocular toxoplasmosis is the most common cause of posterior uveitis, causing blindness [19]. It is diagnosed by observing necrotizing lesions on the ocular fundus, performing serological tests, and responding to treatment. The PCR technique has advantages for toxoplasmosis diagnosis in comparison with conventional methods [14]. Recently, real-time PCR has been used as a sensitive method for ocular toxoplasmosis diagnosis instead of nested PCR [20, 21].

In the present study, 10 patients with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis and moderate to severe vitritis were evaluated using nested PCR and real-time PCR. According to the results, five (50%) patients who were positive using B1, SAG-4, and MAG-1 with nested PCR were also positive using real-time PCR and PBMC samples. Moreover, nine (90%) of the cases that were negative with nested PCR were positive using B1 and real-time PCR in the PBMC samples. Furthermore, two of the patients that were negative using SAG-4 with nested PCR were also positive with real-time PCR using the PBMC samples. The results of both nested PCR and real-time PCR were negative with these three target gens using serum samples in all the patients.

According to the results of present study, nine (90%) out of the 10 patients with retinochoroiditis were positive using B1 with real-time PCR. However, only one case was positive using B1 with nested PCR. This indicated good sensitivity for B1 (P22 and P23) for toxoplasmosis diagnosis using real-time PCR. Furthermore the real-time PCR (50%) was more sensitive than nested PCR (40%) for detection of SAG-4 /MAG-1 bradyzoite genes. These finding are in agreement with the results was reported in a study for diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis [14].

Contini et al., used bradyzoite-specific genes, along with B1 gene for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in blood of patients with retinochoroiditis and result indicated that, the use of real-time PCR (56%) was more sensitive than nested PCR(19%) for detection of B1 gene and also real-time PCR using SAG-4/MAG-1 was more sensitive (59%) than nested PCR(39%) [14].

Our results support the idea that real-time PCR using B1 (B22 and B23) primers is more sensitive than nested PCR for diagnosing of toxoplasmosis.In some previous studies, the use of B22 and B23 primers was recommended for toxoplasmosis diagnosis due to their high sensitivity and specificity and good performance [12, 14]. It has been reported that B22 and B23 primers are highly sensitive in detecting 102 to 10 −3 T.gondii/ml using real-time PCR. However, the sensitivity limit of SAG-4 and MAG-1 was about 1 parasite/ml and thus B1 had a higher sensitivity than SAG-4 and MAG-1 genes for toxoplasmosis diagnosis [14].

Real-time PCR can contribute to toxoplasmosis diagnosis using blood samples and aqueous humor in ocular toxoplasmosis patients [22, 23]. It has been reported that sensitivities of real-time PCR assays using B1 gene is between 10 to 0.75 parasite genome equivalent per reaction [11, 12, 24].

The results of a study indicated that real-time PCR using B1 could detect T.gondii DNA in the aqueous humor samples of 16 (37.21%) patients, the peripheral blood samples of one (2.33%) patient, and both the blood and aqueous humor samples of seven (16.27%) patients among 43 patients with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis [23].

In a study, 144 clinical specimens were evaluated with PCR technique using B1 and TaqMan-AF-PCR using the repetitive 529-bp sequence. The results indicated that all 72 cases were positive according to B1-PCR and Taq Man-PCR whereas 15 (20.8%) which were negative according to B1-PCR were positive according to TaqMan-AF-PCR. Generally, these results demonstrate the high sensitivity and specificity of the Taq Man-based PCR assay using a repeated sequence for toxoplasmosis diagnosis [25].

In a study, 30 fetal tissue sections were evaluated with nested and real-time PCR using B1. The results indicated that 10 (33%) sections were positive also, the outcomes obtained with real-time PCR were compatible with those obtained through nested PCR. The results also demonstrated that real-time PCR using B1 was highly sensitive and reproducible [26].

In another study, 46 biological samples were evaluated by nested PCR using B1 gene and also by two real- time PCR assay, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) and TaqMan protocols targeting a 529 bp repeat region and the 18S RNA gene, respectively. Three out of 46 samples were positive using nested PCR and these results were also confirmed by both real-time PCRs and result of study indicated that real-time PCR assays and nested PCR were sensitive and specific; however real-time PCR using FRET technology was more sensitive than TaqMan PCR and nested PCR [20].

In the present study, two of the cases were positive according to real-time PCR with the blood samples. However, the results were negative with nested PCR.So; another advantage of real-time PCR was positive PCR result using blood samples in comparison with nested PCR that had negative PCR result with blood samples.

Moreover, in the current study, 5 ml of whole blood was used to prepare PBMC samples that were finally used for DNA extraction. However, 200 µl of whole blood or serum samples were used for PCR extraction. The results indicated that PBMC was more efficient than blood or serum samples for DNA extraction. The results also demonstrated that PBMC could truly improve the molecular method for toxoplasmosis diagnosis, which is in line with some previous studies.

PBMC samples have been used to improve PCR diagnostic method in some previous studies, and they are among the good sources for T. gondii diagnosis, according to the previous research [16, 27].

In the present study, a blood sample was collected from one of the patients before and after specific treatment. The result indicated that after specific treatment; DNA was detected using B1 in the PBMC samples with real-time PCR. However, the copy number decreased with regard to anti-Toxoplasma treatment. The result of present study indicated the real-time PCR test can be useful for the monitoring of patients after treatment. This result was compatible with the results of Contini et al. (2005) and Costa et al. (2000), proposing that after treatment, DNA was still detectable in the blood and the copy number decreased depending on the application of anti-Toxoplasma treatment [14, 24].

In the present study, the MAG-1 obtained sequences from ocular toxoplasmosis patients had 100% identity with MAG-1 gene of the T. gondii ME49, that was reported by Parmley et al., who previously sequenced the MAG-1 gene (GenBank- U09029) [28]. Furthermore, the B1 obtained sequence had 100% identity with T. gondii B1 gene, the RH strain (AF179871.1), that was previously described [29, 30].

Moreover, the PCR product sequencing of three SAG-4 positive cases with nested PCR demonstrated similarity with the T. gondii strain RH bradyzoite surface antigen (SAG-4) gene (genotype I). The PCR results using SAG2 in a study in Brazil demonstrated that type I T. gondii was the predominant strain in patients with ocular toxoplasmosis [31]. It has been proposed that type II T. gondii may be responsible for most cases of acquired ocular lesions, whereas type I T. gondii may be found more in congenital toxoplasmosis [2].

In general, real-time PCR is a simple and fast method that can be easily reproduced with low risks of contamination compared to the conventional PCR. Furthermore, real-time PCR with B22 and B23 along with SAG-4 and MAG-1 bradyzoite genes using PBMC samples is recommended for toxoplasmosis diagnosis and monitoring of patients after treatment. Also, the PBMC specimen is a proper supply for DNA extraction and can truly improve toxoplasmosis diagnosis.

Considering the low number of ocular toxoplasmosis cases in this study, future studies with large number of toxoplasmosis patients are recommended.

Conclusion

PBMC samples had the best performance for amplification with the PCR method and were a good source for toxoplasmosis diagnosis. The use of B22 and B23 target genes due to their high sensitivity and specificity along with SAG-4 and MAG-1 bradyzoite genes is recommended for toxoplasmosis diagnosis using PBMC samples with real-time PCR.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SAG-4:

Surface antigen glycoprotein-4

MAG-1:

Matrix antigen-1

PBMC:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked  immunosorbent assay

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

RT-PCR:

Real-time PCR

FRET:

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer

References

  1. Montoya JG, Parmley S, Liesenfeld O, Jaffe GJ, Remington JS. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(8):1554–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Commodaro AG, Belfort RN, Rizzo LV, Muccioli C, Silveira C, Burnier MN Jr, et al. Ocular toxoplasmosis: an update and review of the literature. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(2):345–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Soheilian M, Heidari K, Yazdani S, Shahsavari M, Ahmadieh H, Dehghan M. Patterns of uveitis in a tertiary eye care center in Iran. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2004;12(4):297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vallochi AL, Goldberg AC, Falcai A, Ramasawmy R, Kalil J, Silveira C, et al. Molecular markers of susceptibility to ocular toxoplasmosis, host and guest behaving badly. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2008;2(4):837.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Khanaliha K, Motazedian M, Sarkari B, Bandehpour M, Sharifnia Z, Kazemi B. Expression and purification of P43 Toxoplasma gondii surface antigen. Iran J Parasitol. 2012;7(3):48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cassaing S, Bessieres M, Berry A, Berrebi A, Fabre R, Magnaval J. Comparison between two amplification sets for molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(3):720–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bou G, Figueroa MS, Martí-Belda P, Navas E, Guerrero A. Value of PCR for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in aqueous humor and blood samples from immunocompetent patients with ocular toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(11):3465–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Figueroa MS, Bou G, Marti-Belda P, Lopez-Velez R, Guerrero A. Diagnostic value of polymerase chain reaction in blood and aqueous humor in immunocompetent patients with ocular toxoplasmosis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2000;20(6):614–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchbinder S, Blatz R, Rodloff AC. Comparison of real-time PCR detection methods for B1 and P30 genes of Toxoplasma gondii. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;45(4):269–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hierl T, Reischl U, Lang P, Hebart H, Stark M, Kyme P, et al. Preliminary evaluation of one conventional nested and two real-time PCR assays for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii in immunocompromised patients. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53(7):629–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reischl U, Bretagne S, Krüger D, Ernault P, Costa J-M. Comparison of two DNA targets for the diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis by real-time PCR using fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes. BMC Infect Dis. 2003;3(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chabbert E, Lachaud L, Crobu L, Bastien P. Comparison of two widely used PCR primer systems for detection of Toxoplasma in amniotic fluid, blood, and tissues. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(4):1719–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maubon D, Brenier-Pinchart M, Fricker-Hidalgo H, Pelloux H. Real-time PCR in the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis: the way to standardisation? Parodontol. 2007;55(6):304–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Contini C, Seraceni S, Cultrera R, Incorvaia C, Sebastiani A, Picot S. Evaluation of a real-time PCR-based assay using the lightcycler system for detection of Toxoplasma gondii bradyzoite genes in blood specimens from patients with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35(3):275–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Contini C, Cultrera R, Seraceni S, Segala D, Romani R, Fainardi E, et al. The role of stage-specific oligonucleotide primers in providing effective laboratory support for the molecular diagnosis of reactivated Toxoplasma gondii encephalitis in patients with AIDS. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51(10):879–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bokharaei-Salim F, Esteghamati A, Khanaliha K, Kalantari S, Sayyahfar S, Donyavi T, et al. Evaluation of a PCR assay for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cell among HIV/AIDS patients. J Parasit Dis. 2020;44(1):159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bretagne S, Costa JM, Vidaud M, Nhieu JTV, Feith JF. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii by competitive DNA amplification of bronchoalveolar lavage samples. J Infect Dis. 1993;168(6):1585–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ödberg-Ferragut C, Soête M, Engels A, Samyn B, Loyens A, Van Beeumen J, et al. Molecular cloning of the Toxoplasma gondii sag4 gene encoding an 18 kDa bradyzoite specific surface protein. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996;82(2):237–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klaren VN, Kijlstra A. Toxoplasmosis, an overview with emphasis on ocular involvement. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2002;10(1):1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Calderaro A, Piccolo G, Gorrini C, Peruzzi S, Zerbini L, Bommezzadri S, et al. Comparison between two real-time PCR assays and a nested-PCR for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii. Acta Biomed. 2006;77(2):75–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rothova A, de Boer JH, Ninette H, Postma G, de Visser L, Zuurveen SJ, et al. Usefulness of aqueous humor analysis for the diagnosis of posterior uveitis. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(2):306–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Santos FF, Commodaro A, Nascimento HM, Furtado JM, Muccioli C, Rizzo LV, et al. Real-time PCR in the diagnosis of infectious posterior uveitis by toxoplasmosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(13):5284.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Santos FFD, Nascimento H, Muccioli C, Costa DFD, Rizzo LV, Commodaro AG, et al. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in peripheral blood and aqueous humor of patients with Toxoplasmic active focal necrotizing retinochoroiditis using real-time PCR. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2015;78(6):356–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Costa J-M, Pautas C, Ernault P, Foulet F, Cordonnier C, Bretagne S. Real-time PCR for diagnosis and follow-up of Toxoplasma reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation using fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(8):2929–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Menotti J, Garin YJ, Thulliez P, Sérugue M, Stanislawiak J, Ribaud P, et al. Evaluation of a new 5’-nuclease real-time PCR assay targeting the Toxoplasma gondii AF146527 genomic repeat. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(4):363–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin M-H, Chen T-C, Kuo T-T, Tseng C-C, Tseng C-P. Real-time PCR for quantitative detection of Toxoplasma gondii. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(11):4121–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Khanaliha K, Hedayatfar A, Minaeian S, Bokharaei-Salim F, Alemzadeh SA, Garshasbi S, et al. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii bradyzoite genes in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells among patients with toxoplasmic chorioretinitis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/trstmh/trab062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Parmley SF, Yang S, Harth G, Sibley LD, Sucharczuk A, Remington JS. Molecular characterization of a 65-kilodalton Toxoplasma gondii antigen expressed abundantly in the matrix of tissue cysts. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1994;66(2):283–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Burg JL, Grover CM, Pouletty P, Boothroyd JC. Direct and sensitive detection of a pathogenic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii, by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27(8):1787–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Khalifa KS, Roth A, Roth B, Arasteh KN, Janitschke K. Value of PCR for evaluating occurrence of parasitemia in immunocompromised patients with cerebral and extracerebral toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32(11):2813–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vallochi AL, Muccioli C, Martins MC, Silveira C, Belfort R Jr, Rizzo LV. The genotype of Toxoplasma gondii strains causing ocular toxoplasmosis in humans in Brazil. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(2):350–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All the authors are grateful to the volunteers who participated in this study.

Funding

This study was funded by Research Center of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Iran University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran with Grant number (98-3-49-16227).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Khadijeh Khanaliha & Abdoulreza Esteghamati

  2. Department of Virology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Farah Bokharaei-Salim

  3. Eye Research Center, The Five Senses Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Alireza Hedayatfar & Sayyed Amirpooya Alemzadeh

  4. Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran

    Alireza Hedayatfar

  5. Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Qasem Asgari

  6. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Saba Garshasbi

  7. Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Borna Salemi

Authors
  1. Khadijeh Khanaliha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Farah Bokharaei-Salim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alireza Hedayatfar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abdoulreza Esteghamati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sayyed Amirpooya Alemzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qasem Asgari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Saba Garshasbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Borna Salemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.K. wrote and investigated the manuscript. F.S. helped in technical works and revised the manuscript. A.H. contributed to research methodology. A.E. reviewed the manuscript. S.A. edited manuscript. Q.A. helped in software and data analysis. S.G. prepared Tables. B.S. helped in sample collection. All the authors reviewed, Read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farah Bokharaei-Salim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the current study and informed consent forms were approved by ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (code number: IR.IUMS.REC.1398.1101). All patients participated in this study were informed about the study procedures and agreed to participate in this study and informed consent is obtained from all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khanaliha, K., Bokharaei-Salim, F., Hedayatfar, A. et al. Comparison of real-time PCR and nested PCR for toxoplasmosis diagnosis in toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis patients. BMC Infect Dis 21, 1180 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12879-021-06873-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12879-021-06873-3

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us