Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Genome-wide association study reveals new loci for yield-related traits in Sichuan wheat germplasm under stripe rust stress

BMC Genomics volume 20, Article number: 640 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

As one of the most important food crops in the world, increasing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield is an urgent task for global food security under the continuous threat of stripe rust (caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) in many regions of the world. Molecular marker-assisted breeding is one of the most efficient ways to increase yield. Here, we identified loci associated to multi-environmental yield-related traits under stripe rust stress in 244 wheat accessions from Sichuan Province through genome-wide association study (GWAS) using 44,059 polymorphic markers from the 55 K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip.

Results

A total of 13 stable quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were found to be highly associating to yield-related traits, including 6 for spike length (SL), 3 for thousand-kernel weight (TKW), 2 for kernel weight per spike (KWPS), and 2 for both TKW and KWPS, in at least two test environments under stripe rust stress conditions. Of them, ten QTLs were overlapped or very close to the reported QTLs, three QTLs, QSL.sicau-1AL, QTKW.sicau-4AL, and QKWPS.sicau-4AL.1, were potentially novel through the physical location comparison with previous QTLs. Further, 21 candidate genes within three potentially novel QTLs were identified, they were mainly involved in the regulation of phytohormone, cell division and proliferation, meristem development, plant or organ development, and carbohydrate transport.

Conclusions

QTLs and candidate genes detected in our study for yield-related traits under stripe rust stress will facilitate elucidating genetic basis of yield-related trait and could be used in marker-assisted selection in wheat yield breeding.

Background

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important food crops in the world and provides 20% of calories consumed by humans [1]. Producing enough wheat for the growing population is one of the vital tasks for food security. However, abiotic and biotic stresses are among the greatest challenges to wheat production. As one of the most destructive wheat diseases in the world, stripe rust that is caused by fungus Puccinia striiformis Westend. f. sp. tritici Erikss. (Pst) is a serious threat to wheat production [2]. Therefore, improving wheat yield under stripe rust stress is extremely urgent. Thus, identifying loci associated with yield-related traits under stripe rust stress may provide favourable alleles and their useful markers for breeding wheat cultivars with high yield in combination with stripe rust resistance.

The productive spike number per unit area, kernel number per spike (KPS) and thousand-kernel weight (TKW) are key components of wheat yield. The productive spike number per unit area mainly depends on the fertile tiller number (FTN). Most spike-related traits, such as spike length (SL), spikelet number per spike (SlPS), kernel number per spikelet (KPSl) and the spikelet compactness (SlC), affect the KPS and thus also affect the yield [3,4,5]. Many studies have showed that the SL has a positive correlation with KPS and SlPS [3, 4, 6, 7]. Moreover, Mohsin et al. [8] reported that the SL and the KPS had a positive effect on grain yield. Würschum et al. [7] demonstrated that KPSl was positively correlated with the KPS. The SlC is positively correlated with SlPS, but negatively related to SL [3, 6, 9]. The TKW, which depends on the kernel weight, is associated with the accumulation of starch produced by photosynthesis [10, 11]. Therefore, wheat yield is a complex quantitative trait contributed by many morphological, physiological and biochemical components, all of which can be improved to increase the yield directly or indirectly.

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a powerful tool to identify loci associated to target traits based on linkage disequilibrium (LD) using natural populations. It is a rapid and cost-effectiveness way to detect target markers for marker-assisted breeding. GWAS was first used in human research and has made great contributions to identify genes associated to human diseases [12,13,14,15,16]. The GWAS approach has been widely used in plant and animal research [17,18,19,20,21]. For wheat, GWAS has been successfully used for identifying quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for disease resistance and yield [22,23,24,25]. The release of the high-quality genome reference IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 [26] has provided great assistance to detect linked markers and candidate genes for target traits. The availability of marker arrays for high throughput genotyping is a key for GWAS. There are many SNP arrays have been developed for wheat, such as 9 K, 35 K, 55 K, 90 K, 660 K and 820 K. These arrays are able to provide high-density maps for detecting loci associated with target traits.

In the present study, 244 wheat accessions (including 79 landraces and 165 cultivars) from Sichuan Province, China were genotyped by using the wheat 55 K SNP Array [27]. Based on multi-environmental yield-related traits data under stripe rust stress, a GWAS was conducted to identify the associated loci for yield-related traits, such as FTN, SL, SlPS, Kernel weight per spike (KWPS), TKW and SlC. The research further analysed the genetic architecture of the yield-related traits, provide molecular markers to use in genome selection for wheat high-yield breeding and may provide new insights for genetic dissection of other complex quantitative traits in wheat.

Results

Phenotypic characterization of eight yield-related traits

The yield-related traits were collected from Chongzhou in 2017, 2018 (CZ17, CZ18), Mianyang in 2017 (MY17) under stripe rust stress, and Chongzhou in 2017, 2018 without Pst inoculation as control (CZ17ck, CZ18ck). The materials in CZ17ck and CZ18ck were set as control without inoculating with Pst. The materials in CZ17, MY17 and CZ18 were inoculated with mixed Pst isolates. The Pearson correlation coefficient analysis showed the significant correlations among the five environments when the seven yield-related traits except FTN were analysed separately. FTN had significant correlation among the four test environments except for CZ18 (Additional file 1). Shown as Fig. 1, the genotype-by-year interaction was significant for all measured yield-related traits except KWPS, while the genotype-by-location interaction was not significant. The FTN, SL, KPSl and KPS in 2017 all performed better than in 2018, while the SlPS, TKW and SlC all performed better in 2018 than in 2017. Moreover, the plants in CZ17 and MY17 showed lower KPS, KWPS and TKW than in CZ17ck, and the plants in CZ18 showed lower KWPS, TKW and SlC than in CZ18ck.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The box plots of eight yield-related traits in multiple environments. It clearly showed that the genotype-by-year interaction variance was significant for all yield-related traits we measured except for KWPS. FTN, Fertile tiller number; SL, Spike length; SlPS, Spikelet number per spike; KPSl, Kernel number per spikelet; KPS, Kernel number per spike; KWPS, Kernel weight per spike; TKW, Thousand-kernel weight; SlC, Spikelet compactness. CZck = Chongzhou without Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst) inoculation; CZ = Chongzhou with Pst inoculation; MY = Mianyang with Pst inoculation

Full size image

The phenotypic variations of eight yield-related traits under stripe rust stress were determined based on their best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) values (Table 1). FTN and KPSl ranged from 6 to 9 and from 3.7 to 4.3, respectively. SL ranged from 9.3 to 14.1 cm. The ranges of SlPS and KPS were 18 to 25 and 41 to 62, respectively. The lowest KWPS was 1.21 g (g) and TKW 24.26 g, while the highest KWPS was 2.99 g and TKW 52.02 g. The maximal SlC was 2.53, and the minimum value was 1.54. In addition, SlPS, TKW and SlC had high heritabilities (0.78, 0.80 and 0.86, respectively) whereas FTN and KPSl had relatively low heritabilities (0.37 and 0.31, respectively). The Shannon-Weaver diversity index analysis showed that KPS (H′ = 0.86) and TKW (H′ = 0.85) exhibited relatively high diversity compared to FTN (H′ = 0.68) and SlPS (H′ = 0.67).

Table 1 The phenotypic variations for 244 wheat accessions under stripe rust stress based on BLUP values
Full size table

Phenotypic differences between landraces and cultivars under stripe rust stress

The 244 entries consisted of 79 landraces and 165 cultivars. The t-test identified significant differences between landraces and cultivars in FTN, SlPS, KPSl, KWPS, TKW and SlC under stripe rust stress based on the BLUP values (Table 2). The mean BLUP value of the landrace group was significantly higher than that of the cultivar group for FTN (7.3), SlPS (21) and SlC (1.95), whereas the cultivar group exhibited significant higher KPSl (4.1), KWPS (2.19) and TKW (42.14) values than the landrace group (Table 2). In addition, analysis of the Shannon-Weaver diversity indices showed that the landrace group exhibited higher phenotypic diversity in FTN, SL, SlPS and SlC than the cultivar group, whereas the latter group had higher diversity in KPSl, KWPS and TKW (Table 2).

Table 2 The phenotypic variations between landraces and cultivars under stripe rust stress based on BLUP values
Full size table

Correlations among yield-related traits under stripe rust stress and stripe rust reaction

Pearson correlation coefficient analysis among the yield components and stripe rust reaction measured as IT (Additional file 2) showed that IT was significantly negatively correlated with FTN, KPS, KWPS and TKW; SlC was significantly negatively correlated with SL and TKW; FTN negatively correlated with KPSl, KWPS and TKW; and SlPS negative correlated with TKW (Fig. 2). Positive correlation was detected between SlC with FTN and SlPS; between FTN and SlPS; between SlPS with KPS and SL; and among KPS, SL, KPSl, KWPS and TKW except between TKW and KPS (Fig. 2). In addition, the correlation network analysis showed a very strong correlation between KWPS and TKW (0.79), and between KPS and KWPS (0.62) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The correlations matrix and network analysis among eight yield-related traits and infection type (IT). FTN, Fertile tiller number; SL, Spike length; SlPS, Spikelet number per spike; KPSl, Kernel number per spikelet; KPS, Kernel number per spike; KWPS, Kernel weight per spike; TKW, Thousand-kernel weight; SlC, Spikelet compactness. *, Significant at p < 0.05; **, Significant at p < 0.01

Full size image

The impact of stripe rust on yield-related traits

The Pearson correlation coefficient analysis showed IT was negatively correlated with FTN, KPS, KWPS and TKW. In order to further understand the stripe rust effects on yield traits, we compared the control plots (CZ17ck and CZ18ck) and the inoculated plots (MY17, CZ17, and CZ18) (Table 3). The control plots had higher KPS, KWPS and TKW than inoculated plots, whereas the inoculated plots had higher FTN than the control plots (Table 3). Based on the IT data in the inoculated fields, of the 244 accessions, 169 were resistant and 75 susceptible (Additional file 2). The resistant accessions exhibited higher FTN, KPS, KWPS, and TKW than the susceptible accessions in both inoculated and non-inoculated plots (Table 3). However, compared with the non-inoculated plots, FTN increased by 15.5 and 15.4% for the resistant and susceptible accessions inoculated with Pst, respectively. In addition, with Pst inoculation, KPS, KWPS and TKW of resistance accessions were reduced by 1.5, 8.5 and 5.6%, and KPS, KWPS and TKW of susceptible ones reduced by 2.7, 11.8 and 10.2%, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 The difference in yield-related traits between resistant and susceptible accessions with or without Pst inoculation
Full size table

Genome-wide association analyses

Based on the genotyping data generated using the 55 K SNP array (Affymetrix Axiom Wheat55K), a total of 44,059 high-quality SNP markers were selected for genetic variation (Additional file 3) [27]. The previous result of the analysis of population structure (Q-matrix) showed the optimal ΔK value was 2, indicating that the 244 accessions could be divided into 2 sub-populations. Sub-population 1 harboured 78 accessions, including 77 landraces and one cultivar. Sub-population 2 contained 166 accessions, including 164 cultivars and 2 landraces [27]. Significant differences were observed in the BLUP values of five yield-related traits (FTN, SlPS, KWPS, TKW and SlC) between two sub-populations. The sub-population 1 mainly contained landraces exhibited higher FTN, SlPS and SlC than those in sub-population 2, while the accessions in sub-population 2 showed higher KWPS and TKW than those in sub-population 1 (Fig. 3, Additional file 4). The LD half decay distance was 2.12 Mb based on the r2 values between significant pairs of intra-chromosomal SNP markers with physical distances [27]. Significant associated loci within a genomic region of 2.12 Mb or less on the same chromosome were treated as a same QTL.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Significant difference in five yield-related traits under stripe rust stress between two sub-populations based on Q-matrix. FTN, Fertile tiller number; SlPS, Spikelet number per spike; KWPS, Kernel weight per spike; TKW, Thousand-kernel weight; SlC, Spikelet compactness. CZ17 = Chongzhou 2017; MY17 = Mianyang 2017; CZ18 = Chongzhou 2018; BLUP, the best linear unbiased prediction

Full size image

Subsequently, GWAS was conducted to identify loci associated with yield-related traits in three environments under stripe rust stress based on the MLM model with Q + K as covariates. We identified 7, 9 and 6 high confidence markers (−log10 P > 3) associated with SL, TKW and KWPS, respectively. Of them, four markers associated with both TKW and KWPS (Table 4). All of these high confidence markers were detected in at least two of the environments. Moreover, 16 favourable SNP alleles were detected (Table 4, Additional file 5). Accessions possessing the favourable alleles performed better in SL, KWPS and TKW than those did not have the favourable alleles (Fig. 4). Shown as Fig. 5, the loci with high confidences of association in the three environments were displayed as Manhattan plots with P values across the 21 wheat chromosomes. Based on the LD distance of 2.12 Mb, the associated loci were determined as 13 QTLs (Table 4). The six QTLs associated with SL were mapped on chromosome 1AL, 2AL, 2DS, 4AS and 5AL, three QTLs associated with TKW were located on chromosome 1BL, 2AS, and 4AL, two QTLs associated with KWPS were all mapped on chromosome 4AL, two QTLs associated with both KWPS and TKW were mapped on chromosome 1BL and 2AS. The two QTLs associated with KWPS located on chromosome 4AL explained up to 20% phenotypic variation, and the QTL on 1AL associated with SL also explained high phenotypic variation, ranging from 8.3 to 10.6% and was detected in all three environments. Moreover, comparing with the physical locations of reported QTLs or genes associated with SL, KWPS and TKW based on the reference RefSeq v1.0 [26], three of the QTLs were potentially novel (Table 4).

Table 4 The details of QTLs associated with yield-related traits under stripe rust stress
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

The difference in traits between accessions with and without favourable allele were displayed as histogram. The accessions with favourable allele showed higher mean values of spike length, kernel weight per spike and thousand-kernel weight than that without favourable allele in three environments under stripe rust stress and BLUP values. CZ17 = Chongzhou 2017; MY17 = Mianyang 2017; CZ18 = Chongzhou 2018; BLUP, the best linear unbiased prediction

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

The P values of associated loci with yield-related traits under stripe rust stress exhibited as Manhattan plots. The associated loci with SL, KWPS and TKW in three test environments were displayed as Manhattan plots with P values across 21 wheat chromosomes. The significant associated loci were considered as –log10(P) > 3 which upper the blue lines. SL, Spike length; KWPS, Kernel weight per spike; TKW, Thousand-kernel weight. CZ17 = Chongzhou 2017; MY17 = Mianyang 2017; CZ18 = Chongzhou 2018

Full size image

Putative candidate genes of the three potentially novel QTLs

Based on the Chinese Spring reference RefSeq v1.0 (IWGSC) and RefSeq Annotation v1.1 [26], 59, 29 and 33 genes included in QSL.sicau-1AL, QTKW.sicau-4AL and QKWPS.sicau-4AL.1 region were selected. Of them, 21 candidate genes were predicted to be involved in the regulation of phytohormone, cell division and proliferation, meristem development, plant or organ development, and carbohydrate transport (Additional file 6).

Discussion

Characterization of yield-related traits under stripe rust stress

We evaluated 244 wheat accessions in three field environments under stripe rust stress (CZ17, MY17 and CZ18) and two sites without inoculating Pst (CZ17ck and CZ18ck) in Sichuan. The seven yield-related traits displayed significant differences between 2017 and 2018 except KWPS. FTN, SL, KPSl and KPS in 2017 performed better than in 2018, while SlPS, TKW and SlC in 2018 were better than in 2017. Different traits are formed in different growth periods and required and also affected by different growth conditions, such as water, temperature, soil fertility, light and others. Compared the weather conditions during the wheat growing seasons between 2017 and 2018, we considered temperature was the main factor for the difference in FTN between the 2 years (Additional file 7). From the three-leaf stage to the beginning of stem-elongation in the vegetative growth period was the important time to produce tillers [28], and one of the key factors is temperature. Temperatures below 3 °C are not good for tiller development, and the optimal range is 13–18 °C [29, 30]. Wheat in Sichuan Province is sowed from late October to early November, and the vegetative growth is about from planting time to the following March. The weather conditions from December, 2016 to February, 2017 (CZ17 and MY17) were warm, but the temperatures in December, 2017 to February, 2018 (CZ18) were lower than in CZ17 and MY17. The lowest temperature in CZ18 was less than 0 °C (Additional file 7), which seriously reduced the tiller number. Thus, we speculated that the warm weather was the main factor for the higher number of fertile tillers during the vegetative growth period from 2016 to 2017.

Yield-related traits SlPS, TKW and SlC exhibited relatively higher broad-sense heritabilities, while FTN and KPSl showed lower broad-sense heritabilities (Table 1). The results indicated that the environments had a great influence on FTN and KPSl, but less effect on SlPS, TKW and SlC. In other words, SlPS, TKW and SlC were more stable than FTN and KPSl. Consistent with many other reports, FTN had a low heritability and was strongly influenced by environments [5, 9, 31] and KPSl also displayed relatively low heritability, whereas SlPS, TKW and SlC had relatively higher heritabilities [3, 9, 32,33,34].

The Shannon-Weaver diversity indices reflected the phenotypic diversity to some extent. KPS and TKW showed the highest phenotype diversities and FTN and SlPS displayed the lowest diversities in this study, which were consistent with the reports of Li et al. [35] and Liu et al. [36]. A high phenotypic diversity is beneficial to phenotypic improvement in breeding. As the important components of yield, KPS and TKW exhibited high phenotypic diversities, and accessions with favourable alleles for these traits can be used as elite germplasm for breeding whet cultivars high yield potential.

Compared with the non-inoculation control experiments (CZ17ck and CZ18ck), the accessions under stripe rust stress (CZ17, MY17 and CZ18) exhibited lower KPS, KWPS and TKW. The further comparison between the non-inoculation control and Pst-inoculation indicated that many accessions exhibited significantly lower KPS, KWPS and TKW, but higher FTN under stripe rust stress. However, stripe rust did not significantly affect SL, SlPS, KPSl and SlC. The resistant accessions exhibited higher mean values of yield-related traits than susceptible accessions no matter inoculated or not inoculated indicating that stripe rust resistance protects most of the yield-related traits.

Interestingly, both resistant and susceptible accessions under stripe rust stress exhibited higher FTN. As we discussed above, FTN is mainly determined during the vegetative growth period from the three-leaf stage to the beginning of stem-elongation stage [28]. This period is prior to the Pst inocultion. So, we speculated that the stripe rust should not have significant effects on FTN. There were many reports also demonstrated that the stripe rust didn’t affect tiller number [37, 38]. The differences in FTN between the control and Pst-inoculation fields could be due to other conditions such as weather, water, and soil fertility rather than stripe rust.

There is no doubt that stripe rust can reduce yield, especially the KPS, KWPS and TKW [39,40,41]. In the present study, the values of KPS, KWPS and TKW of resistant accessions under stripe rust stress were reduced by 1.5, 8.5 and 5.6%, while those of susceptible accessions under stripe rust stress were reduced 2.7, 11.8 and 10.2% separately. Thus, susceptible accessions had more serious reduction by stripe rust than resistant accessions. In other words, resistance can effectively reduce the losses of KPS, KWPS and TKW under stripe rust stress. We inoculated wheat plants with Pst around the shooting stage in January and rust appeared on flag leaves at the heading stage, and reached the highest severity around the anthesis to grain filling stage. The anthesis stage is the important time to product kernels (e.g. KPS) [42] and the grain filling period is the key time to determine the kernel weight (e.g. KWPS and TKW) [43]. The Pst pathogen produced abundant urediniospore during the flag-leaf stage, and thus reduced the photosynthetic area, which caused the decrease of sugar production [44]. The decrease of sugar supply to the spike results in the fewer grains and smaller grains, and thus exhibited the lower KPS, KWPS and TKW.

Spikes are mainly produced from the 4-leaf stage to the heading stage, and thus SlPS is mainly determined around the 5-leaf stage to 6/7-leaf stage [28]. SlC was calculated by dividing SL by SlPS. In our study, both SL and SlPS might just escape from the major damage period of stripe rust, and thus, did not show significant differences.

The yield is the complex and comprehensive trait, which was affected by many factors. The degree of Pst infection, the time of the Pst infection, the weather, the water, the soil fertility, even the personal error for measurement, many parameters like above may affect our study. But most of all, we can be sure the infection of stripe rust can result in the decrease of KPS, KWPS and TWK in this study, which were the important components to results in the yield loss.

Landraces as elite germplasm for breeding

The 244 accessions used in this study, including 79 landraces and 165 cultivars, belong to two different germplasm resources in Sichuan Province. The classification based on the Q-matrix with Bayesian model-based clustering also clearly divided the 244 accessions into two sub-populations. Except one cultivar, accessions in sub-population 1 were all landraces, whereas those in sub-population 2 were primarily cultivars. Obvious distinctions were found in both phenotypes and genotypes between landraces and cultivars. Therefore, the utilization of these landraces should broaden the genetic background in the wheat breeding programs in Sichuan Province.

The comparison analysis for the eight yield-related traits under stripe rust stress between landraces and cultivars showed the significant differences in FTN, SlPS, KPSl, KWPS, TKW and SlC (Table 2). The landraces showed higher FTN, SlPS and SlC than cultivars. Nevertheless, the cultivars had higher KPSl, KWPS and TKW than the landraces. Besides, the landraces exhibited higher diversities in FTN, SL, SlPS and SlC based on the Shannon-Weaver diversity index, while the cultivars displayed higher diversity in KPSl, KWPS and TKW. The wheat landraces may have been shaped by traditional growth practices, while the cultivars have been developed for adapting the local cropping systems. The higher adaptability to different environments, diversity and inheritability are the basic characteristics of landraces [45]. The cultivars were bred by human-mediated selection mainly aiming at achieving high-yield. As one of the three yield components, kernel weight (KWPS and TKW) has been the main target of breeding. The higher KWPS and TKW of the tested cultivars were the outcomes of yield breeding for cultivars. Different from the pursuit of high yield in cultivars, the wheat landraces mainly selected by local farmers, they reserved seeds for planting, the plants with more seeds were their targets, and thus exhibiting higher FTN, SlPS and SlC and higher diversities for these traits. The traits with higher diversities are easy to modify in breeding. Many studies have demonstrated that landraces are excellent germplasm sources, especially for abiotic and biotic stresses [46,47,48,49,50]. Landraces also have many elite yield-related genes [51,52,53,54]. Many Chinese wheat cultivars have been developed using landraces, such as Bima 1, Shannong 205, Wuyimai, and Yulin 3 [55, 56]. The represent study provides additional evidence for taking the advantages of landraces with favourable alleles for yield-related traits under stripe rust stress.

Markers associated to yield-related traits

Here, we identified 13 QTLs associated with SL, KWPS and TKW, which were located on 1AL, 1BL, 2AS, 2AL, 2DS, 4AS, 4AL and 5AL. The QTLs associated with SL, KWPS and TKW was named as QSL.sicau, QKWPS.sicau and QTKW.sicau, respectively (Table 4). Compared the physical locations of QTLs in this study with reported QTLs or genes based on the Chinese Spring reference RefSeq v1.0 [26], three potential novel QTLs were identified. They were QSL.sicau-1AL, QTKW.sicau-4AL and QKWPS.sicau-4AL.1, which were located at different physical positions from previously reported genes related to SL, TKW and KWPS.

The six QTLs were identified associated with SL, including one potentially new (QSL.sicau-1AL) and five previously reported QTLs. QSL.sicau-2AL was located around the position of 432.58 Mb at 2A, which was the same as QSl.sdau-2A [57]. QSL.sicau-2DS overlapped with QPht/SL.cau-2D.2 [58], and the QSL.sicau-4AS was covered by QSl.sau-4A [59]. Two QTLs were located at 5AL. One was QSL.sicau-5AL.1, which was the same as QSL.caas-5AL that was flanked by marker JD_c15758_288 and BS00041911_51 [32], and another was QSL.sicau-5AL.2, which overlapped with QSl-5A1 that was flanked by SSR marker Xbarc261 and Xbarc151 [60].

Three QTLs were associated with TKW and two with KWPS. QTKW.sicau-4AL and QKWPS.sicau-4AL.1 were potentially new based on their physical locations. QTKW.sicau-1BL.2 was located in the distal region of 1BL was covered by QTgw.ipk-1B-FS4 [61]. QTKW.sicau-2AS.1 was mapped on the short end of 2AS, which was overlapped with QTkw-2A.2 [9] and Qtkw2A-2 [62]. QKWPS.sicau-4AL.2 associated with KWPS was a major QTL, with up to 20% PVE. This QTL was covered by QKwps|Tkw-WJ-4A.1 [63].

We also consistently detected two QTLs associated with both TKW and KWPS. QTKW.sicau-1BL.1 and QKWPS.sicau-1BL were located in the same region around 670 Mb. They were overlapped with Qgwe.ipk-1B that was associated with KWPS [64]. However, there are no reports on the association of this QTL with TKW. Our results indicated that this QTL is also related to TKW. In addition, QTKW.sicau-2AS.2 and QKWPS.sicau-2AS were also mapped at the same position of 24.05 Mb, which was very close to Qtkw2A-1 [62]. Qtkw2A-1 associated with TKW but not KWPS [62]. We found that this QTL is related to both KWPS and TKW.

We identified Qyrsicau-1BL.1 around the position of 670 Mb that was associated with stripe rust IT and DS [27], which belonged to the same QTL block of both QTKW.sicau-1BL.1 and QKWPS.sicau-1BL. These results indicate that this QTL block around the position of 670 Mb on 1BL confers stripe rust resistance, and thus related to KWPS and TKW under stripe rust stress in the present study. In addition, Qyrsicau-1BL.2 around the region of 681 Mb associated with stripe rust IT [27] was the same as QTKW.sicau-1BL.2 which was also associated with TKW in this study. This is another QTL block conferring stripe rust resistance and thus associated to TKW. These two QTLs might be with pleiotropy were both located on 1BL and just 11 Mb apart. Thus, 1BL harbours numerous QTLs for stripe rust resistance and other traits.

Candidate genes for the three potentially novel QTLs

A total of 121 genes were selected for the analyses of candidate genes of the three potential novel QTLs. Of these genes, 11, 3 and 7 candidate genes were identified for QSL.sicau-1AL, QTKW.sicau-4AL and QKWPS.sicau-4AL.1, respectively (Additional file 6). Eleven presumptive candidate genes (TraesCS1A02G439500, TraesCS1A02G440000, TraesCS1A02G442400, TraesCS1A02G443700, TraesCS1A02G444100, TraesCS1A02G444500, TraesCS1A02G444700, TraesCS1A02G445100, TraesCS1A02G445200, TraesCS1A02G445300 and TraesCS1A02G445400) were speculated to exist in QSLsicau-1AL. TraesCS1A02G439500 is homologous to Arabidopsis gene EAF1B (early flowering 1B) which involved in the regulation of transition from vegetative to reproductive phase [65] and the regulation of photoperiodism [66]. The period from vegetative to reproductive growth is important time for spike development in wheat, and the spike development is sensitive to light [28, 67,68,69]. TraesCS1A02G440000 is aligned with rice gene GH3.8 (Probable indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase), that is the auxin-responsive gene [70]. Auxin is an important hormone in plant development and we considered the homologous gene in wheat of auxin-responsive gene GH3.8 associates with spike development and affects the SL. TraesCS1A02G442400 is an uncharacterized protein in wheat and orthologous with Arabidopsis gene BTAF1 (TATA-binding protein-associated factor 1) involved in the positive regulation of shoot apical meristem development [71]. The shoot apical meristem is responsible for the initiation of many organs, such as nodes, leaves, spike, and inflorescence [72]. Here, we speculate that shoot apical meristems also play an important role in spike development. TraesCS1A02G443700 is the U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSM8, its orthologous gene is LSM8 in Arabidopsis, which plays a critical role in the regulation of development-related gene expression [73]. The LSM8 in wheat may also regulate the expression of spike development-related gene. TraesCS1A02G444500 is homologous to gene BAM2 (derived from barely any meristem 1) in Arabidopsis, which involved in the cell division and differentiation, floral organ development, gametophyte development and regulation of meristem growth [74, 75]. The cell division and differentiation and meristem growth are all associated with the plant development. Hord et al. [76] reported the BAM1/BAM2 receptor-like kinases regulate the early anther development through cell division and differentiation. The spike development along with the anther development, maybe also regulated by the BAM2 in wheat. TraesCS1A02G444700 is orthologous with the aspartic proteinase NANA in Arabidopsis. It’s involved in the carbohydrate metabolic process, maintenance of shoot apical meristem identity and general morphology and development [77, 78]. The carbohydrate metabolic can provide the energy for spike development. The shoot apical meristem and general morphology and development all maybe involved in the spike development [79]. TraesCS1A02G444100, TraesCS1A02G445100, TraesCS1A02G445200, TraesCS1A02G445300, and TraesCS1A02G445400 were all aligned with rice gene RR42 (Two-component response regulator 42), which is involved in the cytokinin-activated signaling pathway and phosphorelay signal transduction system [80, 81]. Cytokinin is the classic plant growth phytohormones and functions to promote the cell division and cell differentiation, which may contribute to the spike development in wheat.

There were three putative candidate genes for QTKW.sicau-4AL, TraesCS4A02G229100, TraesCS4A02G229600, and TraesCS4A02G229700. TraesCS4A02G229100 is the auxin regulated gene involved in organ size (TaARGOS-A). Zhao et al. [82] studied the TaARGOS influenced plant growth and stress tolerance, and the GO annotation showed it involved in the positive regulation of organ growth. Its homologous gene ARGOS in rice responds to auxin stimuli, positively regulate cell and organ growth [83]. Auxin is an important hormone in plant development. In Arabidopsis, ARF2 functions as an auxin response factor playing a vital role in determining final size of the seed [84]. In rice, auxin transporters can affect kernel size and increase the TKW [85]. We speculate that TraesCS4A02G229100 as an ARGOS gene also respond to auxin and regulated the organ (spike or grain) growth in wheat. TraesCS4A02G229600 and TraesCS4A02G229700 were all orthologous with Arabidopsis gene At2g43860, as a polygalacturonase, involved in the carbohydrate metabolic process [86]. Carbohydrate is a main product of photosynthesis, and it can be transported to spikes for kernel growth and further determining kernel size and weight [10, 87].

Seven putative candidate genes, TraesCS4A02G255800, TraesCS4A02G256500, TraesCS4A02G256700, TraesCS4A02G257100, TraesCS4A02G257200, TraesCS4A02G257700, and TraesCS4A02G258000, were detected in QKWPS.sicau-4AL.1. TraesCS4A02G255800 is homologous to the transcription factor bHLH74 (basic helix-loop-helix 74) in Arabidopsis. It involved in cell elongation, plant development and triggering flowering in response to blue light [88,89,90]. In rice, the homologous gene bHLH74 can regulate the cell elongation and finally control the grain size [91]. Grain size, as an important yield component, may also be regulated by bHLH74 homologous gene in wheat. TraesCS4A02G256500 is aligned with rice gene ACC1 (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase 1). The ACC1 is a kind of synthase, which could catalyze the formation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate that’s a direct precursor of ethylene in higher plants. Ethylene is well known as the effect on fruit ripening and organ abscission. Yang et al. [92] found the abscisic acid and ethylene in wheat grains can respond to the drought during the grain filling. Naik and Mohapatra (2000) [93] reported the ethylene had effect on the grain filling of basal rice kernels. The grain filling is the important stage to determine the kernel yield in wheat. We speculated the homologous gene ACC1 in wheat can regulate the ethylene as well and further impact the kernel yield. TraesCS4A02G256700 is the gene Wknox1a, which mainly expresses in shoot apical meristem-containing shoots and young spikes in wheat [94]. Wknox1a is aligned with rice gene OSH1, which affects the inflorescence morphology [95]. In addition, OSH1 regulates the auxin mediated signalling pathway [96], and as a member of the KNOX protein family, it plays an important role in shoot apical meristem maintenance [97]. Auxin and shoot apical meristems are all involved in the inflorescence development and further affect kernel traits [72, 84]. TraesCS4A02G257100 was the homolog of GDP-mannose transporter GONST1 in Arabidopsis. One of the important functions of GONST1 is carbohydrate transport [98]. It is involved in transporting carbohydrates from leaves to spikes, a vital activity to support kernel growth. The condition of the kernel growth would affect KWPS in wheat. TraesCS4A02G257200 is orthologous with Arabidopsis gene AMSH3. AMSH3 is essential for plant growth and development [99]. KWPS is determined by many aspects of growth and development, such as spike development, spikelet and kernel development. TraesCS4A02G257700 is the inositol-tetrakisphosphate 1-kinase and the GO annotation showed it’s involved in inositol trisphosphate metabolic process. Its orthologous gene ITPK1 in maize, also involved in inositol trisphosphate metabolic process, participates in phytic acid biosynthesis in developing seeds. Phytic acid is an important storage form of phosphorus in cereal grains [100], which may influence the kernel yield directly. TraesCS4A02G258000 is homologous to COMPASS-like H3K4 histone methylase component WDR5a (WD40-REPEAT 5a) in Arabidopsis. It involved in vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem, and expressed in developing embryos and endosperms, shoot and root apical regions [101, 102]. The differentiation of meristem from vegetative to reproductive growth is important time for the initial of spikelet development in wheat and further impacts the yield components [28, 67].

Although the putative candidate genes were analysed based on collinearity analysis with the limited known information about the gene/protein function, it still provides us much important information to identify the possible candidate genes. We will further study these candidate genes by genetic mapping or reverse genetics in the future.

Conclusions

Molecular marker-assisted breeding is an effective and environment-friendly way to improve yield and disease resistance. In this study, we collected 244 accessions with high diversity from Sichuan, the phenotypic comparison analysis between resistance and susceptible accessions with or without Pst inoculation showed that the resistance accessions had much reduced yield losses (KPS, KWPS and TKW). Combined with 44,059 effective markers, we identified three potential novel loci and 16 favourable alleles through GWAS analysis, providing reliable markers and elite genetic stocks for molecular marker-assisted breeding.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

A total of 244 wheat accessions (Additional file 2) were used in this study, including 79 landraces and 165 cultivars which have been used or developed by different breeding programs in Sichuan Province since 1997.

Evaluation of yield-related traits and stripe rust infection type

The 244 wheat accessions were evaluated in two locations in Sichuan with different years but all under stripe rust stress: Chongzhou (30°33′37.3″ N, 103°38′45.4″ E, elevation 513 m) in 2017 (CZ17) and 2018 (CZ18); Mianyang (31°23′N, 104°49′E, elevation 440 m) in 2017 (MY17). All experimental fields were inoculated with mixed urediniospores of the local Pst races, including CYR32, CYR33, CYR34, G22–14, Su11–4, Su11–5, Su11–7 [27]. The 244 wheat accessions were also planted in different fields in Chongzhou (30°33′46.3″N, 103°38′38.5″E, elevation 514 m) without inoculation in 2017 (CZ17ck) and 2018 (CZ18ck). This field is about 0.5 km away from the inoculated field and sprayed with fungicide 25% Triadimefon at the rate of 0.2 kg/ha at the early infection stage (around booting stage for twice) and heading stage. In all test environments, twenty seeds of each accession were evenly planted in a 2 m row with a 0.3 m between rows. The accessions with three replications planted in each location were evaluated for eight yield-related traits: FTN, SL, SlPS, KPSl, KPS, KWPS, TKW, and SlC which was calculated by dividing SL by SlPS. All of the traits were measured on five randomly selected plants for each accession at harvest. The rule of identification of infection type (IT) for stripe rust was the same as Ye et al. [27]. In order to reduce the environmental impacts on yield-related traits, the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) values were calculated based on linear model using the lme4 package in the R program [103]. The broad-sense heritability (H2) estimates for each of the yield-related traits were calculated across all test environments using formula H2 = VG/(VG + VE) using the lme4 package [103], where VG and VE are the genotypic and environmental variances, respectively [104]. The phenotypic variation was determined by the range, mean, standard deviation (STDEV) and coefficient of variation (CV) for each trait and BLUP value. The Pearson correlation coefficient and the t-test were achieved using SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The Shannon-Weaver diversity index (H′) was calculated for each trait using the BLUP values [105].

Genotyping analysis

The genomic DNA was extracted from the mixed leaves collected from 5 one-week-old seedings using the plant DNA kits (Biofit Co., China) for each accession. A total of 244 DNA samples were genotyped using the 55 K SNP array (Affymetrix Axiom Wheat55K) at the China Golden Marker Biotechnology Company Ltd. (Beijing, China). The effective markers used for further analyses were selected with missing values ≤10% and minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 5%.

Population structure, kinship and linkage disequilibrium analysis

The population structure (Q-matrix) was analysed using software STRUCTURE v2.3.4 with Bayesian model-based clustering [106]. Five independent STRUCTURE runs were performed with the K from 2 to 10 using the admixture model with 100,000 replicates for burn-in length and 100,000 replicates for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) iterations. The optimal K value was chosen using the ΔK method in web-based software STRUCTURE HARVESTER [107]. The kinship (K-matrix) was estimated between pairs of accessions as a measure of relatedness based on the identity-by-state (IBS) method using TASSEL v5.2.38 [108]. The pairwise measure of linkage disequilibrium (LD) was estimated as squared allele frequency correlation (r2) between pairs of intra-chromosomal markers with known chromosomal position using TASSEL v5.2.38 [108]. Significant pair-wise markers were chosen using the threshold pDiseq < 0.001 and r2 > 0.1 [108]. The LD decay plot and half decay distance were generated with the r2 values and the distances between markers using the ggplot2 package in the R program [109]. All high confidence associated loci in the half decay distance region on the same chromosome were defined as the same QTL block.

Genome-wide association analyses

Combining the yield-related traits under stripe rust stress with 44,059 effective SNP markers, GWAS analyses were performed on the 244 accessions using software TASSEL v5.2.38 based on the mixed linear model (MLM) with Q and K as covariates [108, 110, 111]. For GWAS results, a threshold P-value of 0.001 (−log10 P = 3) was considered as the significant association markers. To make significant associated loci more reliable, the high confidence associated loci were selected for further analyses. The high confidence associated loci should be the significant association loci which must be detected in at least two test environments. The associated loci with related traits were visualized with Manhattan plots with P values using the ggplot2 package in the R program [109].

Analyses of high confidence significant associated loci

There are many QTLs associated with yield-related traits previously reported. In order to identify potentially novel loci, the physical location of each QTL was determined based on the high-quality Chinese Spring reference IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 [26] using software BLAST+ v2.7.1 [112].

Analyses of putative candidate genes in three potentially novel QTLs

By referencing the Chinese Spring reference genome (IWGSC RefSeq v1.0) and RefSeq Annotation v1.1 [26], the genes included in three potentially novel QTLs were selected based on the LD decay distance 2.12 Mb. The collinear analysis was carried out using online BLAST at the EnsemblPlants website (https://plants.ensembl.org/Multi/Tools/Blast) with default parameters.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

BLUP:

Best linear unbiased prediction

CV:

Coefficient of variation

CZ:

Chongzhou

FTN:

Fertile tiller number

GWAS:

Genome-wide association study

H′ :

Shannon-Weaver diversity index

H 2 :

Broad-sense heritability

IT:

Infection type

KPS:

Kernel number per spike

KPSl:

Kernel number per spikelet

KWPS:

Kernel weight per spike

LD:

Linkage disequilibrium

MY:

Mianyang

Pst :

Puccinia striiformis f. sp. Tritici

QTL:

Quantitative trait locus

SL:

Spike length

SlC:

Spikelet compactness

SlPS:

Spikelet number per spike

STDEV:

Standard deviation

TKW:

Thousand-kernel weight

References

  1. Brenchley R, Spannagl M, Pfeifer M, Barker GL, D’Amore R, Allen AM, McKenzie N, Kramer M, Kerhornou A, Bolser D, et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature. 2012;491(7426):705–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Khanfri S, Boulif M, Lahlali R. Yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis): a serious threat to wheat production worldwide. Not Sci Biol. 2018;10(3):410–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma Z, Zhao D, Zhang C, Zhang Z, Xue S, Lin F, Kong Z, Tian D, Luo Q. Molecular genetic analysis of five spike-related traits in wheat using RIL and immortalized F2 populations. Mol Gen Genomics. 2007;277(1):31–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo Z, Chen D, Alqudah AM, Röder MS, Ganal MW, Schnurbusch T. Genome-wide association analyses of 54 traits identified multiple loci for the determination of floret fertility in wheat. New Phytol. 2017;214(1):257–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Xu Z, Fan X, Zhou Q, Cao J, Wang F, Ji G, Yang L, Feng B, Wang T. A genome-wide association study of wheat spike related traits in China. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1584.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhai H, Feng Z, Li J, Liu X, Xiao S, Ni Z, Sun Q. QTL analysis of spike morphological traits and plant height in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a high-density SNP and SSR-based linkage map. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1617.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Würschum T, Leiser WL, Langer SM, Tucker MR, Longin CFH. Phenotypic and genetic analysis of spike and kernel characteristics in wheat reveals long-term genetic trends of grain yield components. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131(10):2071–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohsin T, Khan N, Naqvi FN. Heritability, phenotypic correlation and path coefficient studies for some agronomic characters in synthetic elite lines of wheat. J Food Agric Environ. 2009;7(3–4):278–82.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cui F, Zhao C, Ding A, Li J, Wang L, Li X, Bao Y, Li J, Wang H. Construction of an integrative linkage map and QTL mapping of grain yield-related traits using three related wheat RIL populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127(3):659–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer U, Köllner B, Willenbrink J, Krause GHM. Effects of different ozone exposure regimes on photosynthesis, assimilates and thousand grain weight in spring wheat. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2000;78(1):49–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Foulkes MJ, Slafer GA, Davies WJ, Berry PM, Sylvester-Bradley R, Martre P, Calderini DF, Griffiths S, Reynolds MP. Raising yield potential of wheat. III. Optimizing partitioning to grain while maintaining lodging resistance. J Exp Bot. 2010;62(2):469–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Altshuler D, Daly MJ, Lander ES. Genetic mapping in human disease. Science. 2008;322(5903):881–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A, et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009;461(7265):747–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Samocha KE, Robinson EB, Sanders SJ, Stevens C, Sabo A, McGrath LM, Kosmicki JA, Rehnström K, Mallick S, Kirby A, et al. A framework for the interpretation of de novo mutation in human disease. Nat Genet. 2014;46(9):944–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Greene CS, Krishnan A, Wong AK, Ricciotti E, Zelaya RA, Himmelstein DS, Zhang R, Hartmann BM, Zaslavsky E, Sealfon SC, et al. Understanding multicellular function and disease with human tissue-specific networks. Nat Genet. 2015;47(6):569–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Emilsson V, Ilkov M, Lamb JR, Finkel N, Gudmundsson EF, Pitts R, Hoover H, Gudmundsdottir V, Horman SR, Aspelund T, et al. Co-regulatory networks of human serum proteins link genetics to disease. Science. 2018;361(6404):769–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang X, Sang T, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhao Y, Li C, Zhu C, Lu T, Zhang Z, Li M, et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat Genet. 2010;42(11):961–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnston SE, McEWAN JC, Pickering NK, Kijas JW, Beraldi D, Pilkington JG, Pemberton JM, Slate JON. Genome-wide association mapping identifies the genetic basis of discrete and quantitative variation in sexual weaponry in a wild sheep population. Mol Ecol. 2011;20(12):2555–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Diniz DB, Lopes MS, Broekhuijse ML, Lopes PS, Harlizius B, Guimarães SEF, Duijvesteijn N, Knol EF, Silva FF. A genome-wide association study reveals a novel candidate gene for sperm motility in pigs. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;151(3–4):201–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sukumaran S, Dreisigacker S, Lopes M, Chavez P, Reynolds MP. Genome-wide association study for grain yield and related traits in an elite spring wheat population grown in temperate irrigated environments. Theor Appl Genet. 2015;128(2):353–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rashid Z, Singh PK, Vemuri H, Zaidi PH, Prasanna BM, Nair SK. Genome-wide association study in Asia-adapted tropical maize reveals novel and explored genomic regions for sorghum downy mildew resistance. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zegeye H, Rasheed A, Makdis F, Badebo A, Ogbonnaya FC. Genome-wide association mapping for seedling and adult plant resistance to stripe rust in synthetic hexaploid wheat. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105593.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen G, Zhang H, Deng Z, Wu R, Li D, Wang M, Tian J. Genome-wide association study for kernel weight-related traits using SNPs in a Chinese winter wheat population. Euphytica. 2016;212(2):173–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu N, Bai G, Lin M, Xu X, Zheng W. Genome-wide association analysis of powdery mildew resistance in US winter wheat. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11743.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Godoy J, Gizaw S, Chao S, Blake N, Carter A, Cuthbert R, Dubcovsky J, Hucl P, Kephart K, Pozniak C, et al. Genome-wide association study of agronomic traits in a spring-planted north American elite hard red spring wheat panel. Crop Sci. 2018;58(5):1838–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Appels R, Eversole K, Feuillet C, Keller B, Rogers J, Stein N, Pozniak CJ, Choulet F, Distelfeld A, Poland J, et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science. 2018;361(6403):eaar7191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ye X, Li J, Cheng Y, Yao F, Long L, Yu C, Wang Y, Wu Y, Li J, Wang J, et al. Genome-wide association study of resistance to stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) in Sichuan wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. White J, Edwards J. Wheat growth and development. Department of Primary Industries: Orange; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rüegger A, Winzeler H, Nösberger J. Dry matter production and distribution of 14C - assimilates of spelt (Triticum spelta L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as influenced by different temperatures before and during grain filling. J Agron Crop Sci. 1990;165(2–3):110–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bos HJ. Neuteboom J.H. morphological analysis of leaf and tiller number dynamics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): responses to temperature and light intensity. Ann Bot. 1998;81(1):131–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kashif M, Khaliq I. Heritability, correlation and path coefficient analysis for some metric traits in wheat. Int J Agric Biol. 2004;6(1):138–42.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gao F, Wen W, Liu J, Rasheed A, Yin G, Xia X, Wu X, He Z. Genome-wide linkage mapping of QTL for yield components, plant height and yield-related physiological traits in the Chinese wheat cross Zhou 8425B/Chinese spring. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:1099.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou Y, Conway B, Miller D, Marshall D, Cooper A, Murphy P, Chao S, Brown-Guedira G, Costa J. Quantitative trait loci mapping for spike characteristics in hexaploid wheat. Plant Genome. 2017;10(2):1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang R, Liu Y, Isham K, Zhao W, Wheeler J, Klassen N, Hu Y, Bonman JM, Chen J. QTL identification and KASP marker development for productive tiller and fertile spikelet numbers in two high-yielding hard white spring wheat cultivars. Mol Breed. 2018;38(11):135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Li HQ, Zhang HG, Liu BL, Liu DC, Zhang B. Assessing genetic diversity and its changes of bread wheat in Qinghai Province, China, using agronomic traits and microsatellite markers. Biol Agric Horticul. 2012;28(2):120–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu Y, Lin Y, Gao S, Li Z, Ma J, Deng M, Chen G, Wei Y, Zheng Y. A genome-wide association study of 23 agronomic traits in Chinese wheat landraces. Plant J. 2017;91(5):861–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Conner RL, Kuzyk AD. Effectiveness of fungicides in controlling stripe rust, leaf rust, and black point in soft white spring wheat. Can J Plant Pathol. 1988;10(4):321–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Murray GM, Ellison PJ, Watson A. Effects of stripe rust on the wheat plant. Australas Plant Pathol. 1995;24(4):261–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith RCG, Heritage AD, Stapper M, Barrs HD. Effect of stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis west.) and irrigation on the yield and foliage temperature of wheat. Field Crops Res. 1986;14:39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schultz TR, Line RF. High-temperature, adult-plant resistance to wheat stripe rust and effects on yield components. Agron J. 1992;84(2):170–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sharma RC, Nazari K, Amanov A, Ziyaev Z, Jalilov AU. Reduction of winter wheat yield losses caused by stripe rust through fungicide management. J Phytopathol. 2016;164(9):671–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Herrera-Foessel SA, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Crossa J, Yuen J, Djurle A. Effect of leaf rust on grain yield and yield traits of durum wheats with race-specific and slow-rusting resistance to leaf rust. Plant Dis. 2006;90(8):1065–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fischer RA. Selection traits for improving yield potential. Application of physiology in wheat breeding. Mexico: CIMMYT; 2001. p. 148–59.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Murray DG, Murray GM. Stripe rust: understanding the disease in wheat. NSW: Department of Primary Industries; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jaradat AA. Wheat landraces: genetic resources for sustenance and sustainability. usda-ars; 2011. p. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Huang XQ, Hsam SLK, Zeller FJ, Wenzel G, Mohler V. Molecular mapping of the wheat powdery mildew resistance gene Pm24 and marker validation for molecular breeding. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;101(3):407–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Reynolds M, Dreccer F, Trethowan R. Drought-adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces. J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):177–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Xiao M, Song F, Jiao J, Wang X, Xu H, Li H. Identification of the gene Pm47 on chromosome 7BS conferring resistance to powdery mildew in the Chinese wheat landrace Hongyanglazi. Theor Appl Genet. 2013;126(5):1397–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang M, Chen X. Stripe Rust: Stripe Rust Resistance. Dordrecht: Springer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tan C, Li G, Cowger C, Carver BF, Xu X. Characterization of Pm59, a novel powdery mildew resistance gene in Afghanistan wheat landrace PI 181356. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131(5):1145–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Su Z, Hao C, Wang L, Dong Y, Zhang X. Identification and development of a functional marker of TaGW2 associated with grain weight in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2011;122(1):211–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang L, Zhao YL, Gao LF, Zhao GY, Zhou RH, Zhang BS, Jia JZ. TaCKX6-D1, the ortholog of rice OsCKX2, is associated with grain weight in hexaploid wheat. New Phytol. 2012;195(3):574–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang S, Zhang X, Chen F, Cui D. A single-nucleotide polymorphism of TaGS5 gene revealed its association with kernel weight in Chinese bread wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:1166.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Ma L, Li T, Hao C, Wang Y, Chen X, Zhang X. TaGS5-3A, a grain size gene selected during wheat improvement for larger kernel and yield. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14(5):1269–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. He ZH. A history of wheat breeding in China. CIMMYT: Mexico; 2001. p. 11–2.

    Google Scholar 

  56. He ZH, Xia XC, Bonjean AP. Wheat improvement in China. Cereals in China. Mexico: CIMMYT; 2010. p. 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Deng Z, Cui Y, Han Q, Fang W, Li J, Tian J. Discovery of consistent QTLs of wheat spike-related traits under nitrogen treatment at different development stages. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:2120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Chai L, Chen Z, Bian R, Zhai H, Cheng X, Peng H, Yao Y, Hu Z, Xin M, Guo W, et al. Dissection of two quantitative trait loci with pleiotropic effects on plant height and spike length linked in coupling phase on the short arm of chromosome 2D of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131(12):2621–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Luo W, Ma J, Zhou XH, Sun M, Kong XC, Wei YM, Jiang YF, Qi PF, Jiang QT, Liu YX, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling yield-related traits indicates breeding potential of Tibetan semiwild wheat (Triticum aestivum ssp. tibetanum). Crop Sci. 2016;56(5):2410–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Liu G, Jia L, Lu L, Qin D, Zhang J, Guan P, Ni Z, Yao Y, Sun Q, Peng H. Mapping QTLs of yield-related traits using RIL population derived from common wheat and Tibetan semi-wild wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127(11):2415–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Nezhad KZ, Weber WE, Röder MS, Sharma S, Lohwasser U, Meyer RC, Saal B, Börner A. QTL analysis for thousand-grain weight under terminal drought stress in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica. 2012;186(1):127–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang X, Deng Z, Wang Y, Li J, Tian J. Unconditional and conditional QTL analysis of kernel weight related traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in multiple genetic backgrounds. Genetica. 2014;142(4):371–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Cui F, Zhao CH, Li J, Ding AM, Li XF, Bao YG, Li J, Ji J, Wang HG. Kernel weight per spike: what contributes to it at the individual QTL level? Mol Breed. 2013;31(2):265–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Börner A, Schumann E, Fürste A, Cöster H, Leithold B, Röder M, Weber W. Mapping of quantitative trait loci determining agronomic important characters in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2002;105(6–7):921–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Scott DB, Jin W, Ledford HK, Jung HS, Honma MA. EAF1 regulates vegetative-phase change and flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1999;120(3):675–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Bieluszewski T, Galganski L, Sura W, Bieluszewska A, Abram M, Ludwikow A, Ziolkowski PA, Sadowski J. AtEAF1 is a potential platform protein for Arabidopsis NuA4 acetyltransferase complex. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15(1):75–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Bonnett OT. The development of the wheat spike. J Agric Res. 1936;53(6):445–51.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Friend DJ. Ear length and spikelet number of wheat grown at different temperatures and light intensities. Can J Bot. 1965;43(3):345–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Gardner JS, Hess WM, Trione EJ. Development of the young wheat spike: a SEM study of Chinese spring wheat. Am J Bot. 1985;72(4):548–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Jain M, Kaur N, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. The auxin-responsive GH3 gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). Funct Integr Genom. 2006;6(1):36–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Tamaki H, Konishi M, Daimon Y, Aida M, Tasaka M, Sugiyama M. Identification of novel meristem factors involved in shoot regeneration through the analysis of temperature-sensitive mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009;57(6):1027–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Babb S, Muehlbauer G. Genetic and morphological characterization of the barley uniculm2 (cul2) mutant. Theor Appl Genet. 2003;106(5):846–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Perea-Resa C, Hernández-Verdeja T, López-Cobollo R, del Mar CM, Salinas J. LSM proteins provide accurate splicing and decay of selected transcripts to ensure normal Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell. 2012;24(12):4930–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. DeYoung BJ, Bickle KL, Schrage KJ, Muskett P, Patel K, Clark SE. The CLAVATA1-related BAM1, BAM2 and BAM3 receptor kinase-like proteins are required for meristem function in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2006;45(1):1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Sun YJ, Hord CL, Chen CB, Ma H. Regulation of Arabidopsis early anther development by putative cell-cell signaling molecules and transcriptional regulators. J Integr Plant Biol. 2007;49(1):60–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Hord CL, Chen C, DeYoung BJ, Clark SE, Ma H. The BAM1/BAM2 receptor-like kinases are important regulators of Arabidopsis early anther development. Plant Cell. 2006;18(7):1667–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Paparelli E, Gonzali S, Parlanti S, Novi G, Giorgi FM, Licausi F, Kosmacz M, Feil R, Lunn JE, Brust H, et al. Misexpression of a chloroplast aspartyl protease leads to severe growth defects and alters carbohydrate metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012;160(3):1237–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Albert EV, Kavai-ool UN, Ezhova TA. Gene NANA regulates cell proliferation in Arabidopsis thaliana shoot apical meristem without interaction with CLV1, CLV2, CLV3. Russ J Dev Biol. 2014;45(5):267–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Kirby EJ. Ear development in spring wheat. J Agric Sci. 1974;82(3):437–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Hwang I, Sheen J. Two-component circuitry in Arabidopsis cytokinin signal transduction. Nature. 2001;413(6854):383–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Sakai H, Honma T, Aoyama T, Sato S, Kato T, Tabata S, Oka A. ARR1, a transcription factor for genes immediately responsive to cytokinins. Science. 2001;294(5546):1519–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Zhao Y, Tian X, Li Y, Zhang L, Guan P, Kou X, Wang X, Xin M, Hu Z, Yao Y, et al. Molecular and functional characterization of wheat ARGOS genes influencing plant growth and stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:170.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Wang B, Sang Y, Song J, Gao XQ, Zhang X. Expression of a rice OsARGOS gene in Arabidopsis promotes cell division and expansion and increases organ size. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36(1):31–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Schruff MC, Spielman M, Tiwari S, Adams S, Fenby N, Scott RJ. The AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 gene of Arabidopsis links auxin signalling, cell division, and the size of seeds and other organs. Development. 2006;133(2):251–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Liu L, Tong H, Xiao Y, Che R, Xu F, Hu B, Liang C, Chu J, Li J, Chu C. Activation of big Grain1 significantly improves grain size by regulating auxin transport in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(35):11102–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Gaudet P, Livstone MS, Lewis SE, Thomas PD. Phylogenetic-based propagation of functional annotations within the gene ontology consortium. Brief Bioinform. 2011;12(5):449–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Ceylan Y, Kutman UB, Mengutay M, Cakmak I. Magnesium applications to growth medium and foliage affect the starch distribution, increase the grain size and improve the seed germination in wheat. Plant Soil. 2016;406(1–2):145–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhang LY, Bai MY, Wu J, Zhu JY, Wang H, Zhang Z, Wang W, Sun Y, Zhao J, Sun X, et al. Antagonistic HLH/bHLH transcription factors mediate brassinosteroid regulation of cell elongation and plant development in rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21(12):3767–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Ikeda M, Fujiwara S, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M. A triantagonistic basic helix-loop-helix system regulates cell elongation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24(11):4483–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Liu Y, Li X, Li K, Liu H, Lin C. Multiple bHLH proteins form heterodimers to mediate CRY2-dependent regulation of flowering-time in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(10):e1003861.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Heang D, Sassa H. An atypical bHLH protein encoded by POSITIVE REGULATOR OF GRAIN LENGTH 2 is involved in controlling grain length and weight of rice through interaction with a typical bHLH protein APG. Breed Sci. 2012;62(2):133–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Yang J, Zhang J, Liu K, Wang Z, Liu L. Abscisic acid and ethylene interact in wheat grains in response to soil drying during grain filling. New Phytol. 2006;171(2):293–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Naik PK, Mohapatra PK. Ethylene inhibitors enhanced sucrose synthase activity and promoted grain filling of basal rice kernels. Funct Plant Biol. 2000;27(11):997–1008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Takumi S, Kosugi T, Murai K, Mori N, Nakamura C. Molecular cloning of three homoeologous cDNAs encoding orthologs of the maize KNOTTED1 homeobox protein from young spikes of hexaploid wheat. Gene. 2000;249(1–2):171–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Tsuda K, Ito Y, Sato Y, Kurata N. Positive autoregulation of a KNOX gene is essential for shoot apical meristem maintenance in rice. Plant Cell. 2011;23(12):4368–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Song S, Chen Y, Liu L, See YHB, Mao C, Gan Y, Yu H. OsFTIP7 determines auxin-mediated anther dehiscence in rice. Nat Plants. 2018;4(7):495–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Zhang D, Yuan Z. Molecular control of grass inflorescence development. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:553–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Baldwin TC, Handford MG, Yuseff MI, Orellana A, Dupree P. Identification and characterization of GONST1, a Golgi-localized GDP-mannose transporter in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2001;13(10):2283–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Kalinowska K, Nagel MK, Goodman K, Cuyas L, Anzenberger F, Alkofer A, Paz-Ares J, Braun P, Rubio V, Otegui MS, Isono E. Arabidopsis ALIX is required for the endosomal localization of the deubiquitinating enzyme AMSH3. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(40):5543–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Shi J, Wang H, Wu Y, Hazebroek J, Meeley RB, Ertl DS. The maize low-phytic acid mutant lpa2 is caused by mutation in an inositol phosphate kinase gene. Plant Physiol. 2003;131(2):507–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Jiang D, Gu X, He Y. Establishment of the winter-annual growth habit via FRIGIDA-mediated histone methylation at FLOWERING LOCUS C in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21(6):1733–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Jiang D, Kong NC, Gu X, Li Z, He Y. Arabidopsis COMPASS-like complexes mediate histone H3 lysine-4 trimethylation to control floral transition and plant development. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(3):e1001330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version. 2014;1(7):1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Smith SE, Kuehl RO, Ray IM, Hui R, Soleri D. Evaluation of simple methods for estimating broad-sense heritability in stands of randomly planted genotypes. Crop Sci. 1998;38:1125–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Li R, Zeng Y, Xu J, Wang Q, Wu F, Cao M, Lan H, Liu Y, Lu Y. Genetic variation for maize root architecture in response to drought stress at the seedling stage. Breed Sci. 2015;65(4):298–307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Earl DA. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genet Resour. 2012;4(2):359–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(19):2633–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer; 2016.

  110. Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD, Gaut BS, Nielsen DM, Holland JB, et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet. 2006;38(2):203–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai CQ, Todhunter RJ, Tiwari HK, Gore MA, Bradbury PJ, Yu J, Arnett DK, Ordovas JM, et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010;42:355–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10(1):421.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Qiu-Zheng Jia (Plant Protection Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, P. R. China) for providing the Pst isolates and Prof. Li-Hui Li and Xiu-Quan Li (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for supplying wheat germplasm (Sichuan wheat landraces).

Funding

This publication is based upon work supported by the projects from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0102000, 2016YFD0100100, 2017YFD0100900), and the International Science and Technology Cooperation and Exchanges Programs of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2019YFH0063). The funders had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or in the writing of the report or decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People’s Republic of China

    Xueling Ye, Jian Li, Yukun Cheng, Fangjie Yao, Li Long, Yuqi Wang, Yu Wu, Jing Li, Jirui Wang, Qiantao Jiang, Houyang Kang, Pengfei Qi, Xiujin Lan, Jian Ma, Yaxi Liu, Yunfeng Jiang, Yuming Wei, Youliang Zheng & Guoyue Chen

  2. College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People’s Republic of China

    Wei Li

  3. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Wheat Health, Genetics and Quality Research Unit; and Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-6430, USA

    Xianming Chen

  4. CSIRO Agriculture and Food, St Lucia, Queensland, 4067, Australia

    Chunji Liu

Authors
  1. Xueling Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yukun Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fangjie Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Li Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuqi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yu Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jirui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Qiantao Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Houyang Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Wei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Pengfei Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xiujin Lan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jian Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Yaxi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Yunfeng Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Yuming Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Xianming Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Chunji Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Youliang Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Guoyue Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XY carried out the experiments, analysed the data, and drafted the manuscript; JL1 carried out the phenotypic evaluation and extracted the DNA; YC carried out the analyses of association mapping; FY, LL, YW1, YW2 and JL2 carried out the phenotypic evaluation; JW provided the genotype data; HK, CL YL, YJ and XC contributed to revising the manuscript; QJ, PQ, WL, XL, JM and YW3 participated in the field experiments; YZ participated in the design of the experiments; GC formulated the questions, designed and carried out the experiments, analysed the data and revised the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Youliang Zheng or Guoyue Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Pearson coefficient analysis for eight yield-related traits among multiple environments (XLSX 11 kb)

Additional file 2:

Two hundred and forty-four wheat accessions used in this study and the evaluation of their yield-related traits and infection type (IT) in multiple environments (XLSX 106 kb)

Additional file 3:

The 44,059 effective 55 K SNP markers used in this study (ZIP 2718 kb)

Additional file 4:

Phenotypic variations for two sub-populations based on Q-matrix (XLSX 10 kb)

Additional file 5:

The distribution of the favourable alleles in 244 wheat accessions (XLSX 25 kb)

Additional file 6:

The candidate genes of three potential novel QTL (XLSX 12 kb)

Additional file 7:

Temperatures during the wheat growth seasons in three environments. The plant growth season was from October to the following May. The lowest temperature in CZ18 was lowest among all three environments and lower than 0 °C from December to following February. CZ17 = Chongzhou 2017; MY17 = Mianyang 2017; CZ18 = Chongzhou 2018 (PDF 74 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, X., Li, J., Cheng, Y. et al. Genome-wide association study reveals new loci for yield-related traits in Sichuan wheat germplasm under stripe rust stress. BMC Genomics 20, 640 (2019). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12864-019-6005-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12864-019-6005-6

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us