Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

NaCl-responsive ROS scavenging and energy supply in alkaligrass callus revealed from proteomic analysis

BMC Genomics volume 20, Article number: 990 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Salinity has obvious effects on plant growth and crop productivity. The salinity-responsive mechanisms have been well-studied in differentiated organs (e.g., leaves, roots and stems), but not in unorganized cells such as callus. High-throughput quantitative proteomics approaches have been used to investigate callus development, somatic embryogenesis, organogenesis, and stress response in numbers of plant species. However, they have not been applied to callus from monocotyledonous halophyte alkaligrass (Puccinellia tenuifora).

Results

The alkaligrass callus growth, viability and membrane integrity were perturbed by 50 mM and 150 mM NaCl treatments. Callus cells accumulated the proline, soluble sugar and glycine betaine for the maintenance of osmotic homeostasis. Importantly, the activities of ROS scavenging enzymes (e.g., SOD, APX, POD, GPX, MDHAR and GR) and antioxidants (e.g., ASA, DHA and GSH) were induced by salinity. The abundance patterns of 55 salt-responsive proteins indicate that salt signal transduction, cytoskeleton, ROS scavenging, energy supply, gene expression, protein synthesis and processing, as well as other basic metabolic processes were altered in callus to cope with the stress.

Conclusions

The undifferentiated callus exhibited unique salinity-responsive mechanisms for ROS scavenging and energy supply. Activation of the POD pathway and AsA-GSH cycle was universal in callus and differentiated organs, but salinity-induced SOD pathway and salinity-reduced CAT pathway in callus were different from those in leaves and roots. To cope with salinity, callus mainly relied on glycolysis, but not the TCA cycle, for energy supply.

Background

Salt stress is a major abiotic threat to plants and has severe effects on agricultural productivity worldwide [1]. Salinity induces ion imbalance, hyperosmotic stress and oxidative damage in plants [2]. Plants have developed complex adaptive mechanisms to cope with the salt stress, such as photosynthetic adjustments, synthesis of osmolytes (e.g., glycine betaine, soluble sugar and proline), and ion homeostasis [3]. In the past years, the salinity-responsive mechanisms in leaves and roots from a number of plant species have been investigated using molecular genetics and different omics strategies [4,5,6,7,8,9]. In plants, the salt signal perception and transduction, detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ion uptake/exclusion and compartmentalization, salt-responsive gene expression, protein translation and turnover, cytoskeleton dynamics, cell wall modulation, as well as carbohydrate and energy supply have been investigated in various organs [5, 6]. However, these differentiated organs (e.g., leaves and roots) contain heterogeneous cell types and developmental stages, which may exhibit contrasting sensitivity to salinity. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the cell specific characteristics of salt tolerance when using leaves and roots as materials [10].

Cultured cells are a good model system for investigating cell-specific metabolism because they can be synchronized. Callus obtained by in vitro culture is a group of unorganized cell mass, which has capability to regenerate into a whole plant through somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis. Importantly, callus is an excellent material for genetic transformation in molecular genetics studies. Physiological alterations in calli obtained from sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) [11,12,13], wheat (Triticum durum) [10], rice (Oryza sativa) [14, 15], and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) [16] under salinity, osmosis or oxidant conditions were investigated to reveal the stress-responsive mechanisms at cell levels. When being exposed to NaCl stress, sugarcane callus reduced its growth and cell viability, although the cells have the ability to accumulate proline and glycine betaine, and secrete Na+ [13]. The growth of sugarcane callus was also decreased under mannitol-induced osmotic stress, likely due to the decreased K+ and Ca2+ concentrations [12]. The salt-tolerant callus selected from sugarcane cultivar CP65–357 can accumulate more K+, proline and soluble sugar, which could facilitate ion and osmotic homeostasis [11]. In general, proline accumulation is an important strategy for osmotic adjustment. However, it has been regarded as an injury symptom rather than an indicator of tolerance in rice callus under salt stress [15]. Among calli from durum wheat (T. durum) cultivars with different salt-tolerance capabilities, salt-altered relative growth rate (RGR) and cell viability were correlated, and an induced non-phosphorylating alternative pathway played an important role in salt tolerance [10]. The calli from salt-tolerant wheat cultivar were able to recover after stress relief, and ATP-production was crucial for its growth maintenance [10]. Also, in the callus from NaCl-tolerant cotton, the activities of antioxidant enzymes (e.g., ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT) and glutathione reductase (GR)) were induced, and ROS and nitric oxide played important signaling roles in the course of establishing NaCl tolerance [16]. However, the sophisticated salinity-responsive signaling and metabolic pathways in callus are still unclear.

High-throughput proteomics is a powerful platform for revealing the protein abundance patterns during plant development and environmental responses [17]. Two dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) gel-based and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) /tandem mass tag (TMT)-based quantitative approaches have been applied to reveal molecular changes during callus development, differentiation and somatic embryogenesis of different plant species, such as sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) [18, 19], maize (Zea mays) [20,21,22], rice (O. sativa) [23], oil palm (Elaeis oleifera × Elaeis guineensis) [24], Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) [25], Cyclamen persicum [26], Vanilla planifolia [27, 28], and lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. spp. baijianlian) [29]. These studies have improved understanding of the molecular regulatory roles of H+-pumps (i.e., P H+-ATPase, V H+-ATPase, and H+-PPase), sucrose and pyruvate accumulations, ROS homeostasis, protein ubiquitination, phytohormone and growth regulators (e.g., auxin, cytokinin, abscisic acid and polyamine putrescine) in embryogenic competence acquisition in callus. Importantly, some critical proteins identified in these studies are potential biomarkers for embryogenic competence acquisition, and their functions need to be further investigated [24]. To date, proteomic studies of callus salt tolerance have rarely been reported.

Alkaligrass (Puccinellia tenuifora) is a monocotyledonous halophyte with high salinity, alkali and chilling tolerance. It can grow under 600 mM NaCl and 150 mM Na2CO3 (pH 11.0) for 6 days [30], and can survive chilling stress [31]. Our previous proteomics and physiological studies have reported the salt−/alkali-responsive mechanisms in leaves and roots in response to NaCl (50 mM and 150 mM for 7 days) [32], Na2CO3 (38 mM and 95 mM for 7 days; 150 mM and 200 mM for 12 h and 24 h) [33,34,35], and NaHCO3 (150 mM, 400 mM and 800 mM for 7 days) [36] stresses. We found alkaligrass accumulated Na+, K+ and organic acids in vacuoles, as well as proline, betaine and soluble sugar in the protoplasm to maintain osmotic and pH homeostasis in response to salt stress [32, 37]. In these differentiated organs, the fine-tuned mechanisms of signal transduction, ion and osmotic homeostasis, ROS scavenging, transcription and protein synthesis, as well as energy and secondary metabolisms were quite different. However, the salinity-responsive mechanisms in the unorganized callus of alkaligrass have not been reported.

In this study, we investigated the physiological and proteomic characteristics of alkaligrass callus in response to NaCl treatments. The molecular modulations of ROS scavenging, osmotic homeostasis, energy supply, as well as gene expression and protein processing were active in callus under salinity stress. Our results provide new insight into the NaCl response in undifferentiated plant cells, and may have potential applications in the engineering and breeding of salt-tolerant plants.

Results

Salinity altered callus growth, viability and membrane integrity

After 28 days treatment with NaCl, the callus exhibited obvious phenotypes when compared with control. For example, its growth was decreased with increasing levels of salts. The callus color turned darker under 50 mM NaCl and appeared brown under 150 mM NaCl treatment (Fig. 1a-f). Although the volume of callus mass under control and treatment conditions were significantly increased after 28-day-culture (Fig. 1a-f), their RGR decreased by 1.3-fold and 2.1-fold under 50 mM and 150 mM NaCl, respectively, when compared to control condition (Fig. 1g). Importantly, cell viability was decreased by 62% under 50 mM NaCl and 89% under 150 mM NaCl (Fig. 1h). Furthermore, the membrane integrity of callus cells was affected, as reflected by malondialdehyde (MDA) content. MDA was decreased under 50 mM NaCl, but increased under 150 mM NaCl treatment (Fig. 1i).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Morphology and growth of alkaligrass calli under NaCl stress. a-f Morphology of the callus cultured on MS medium. The 45-day-old callus was transferred to MS medium supplemented with 0, 50, and 150 mM NaCl (a-c), and was cultured for additional 28 days (d-f). Bar = 1.5 cm. g Callus relative growth rate (n = 20). h Callus cell viability (n = 8). i Malondialdehyde content (n = 3). Values are presented as means ± standard deviation. The values were determined from callus under 0, 50, and 150 mM for 28 days. Significant differences between control and treatments are marked with asterisks (* represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01)

Full size image

Osmotic homeostasis in callus was disturbed by salt stress

To evaluate osmotic adjustment of the callus, the contents of proline, soluble sugar and glycine betaine were determined. The proline contents under 50 mM and 150 mM NaCl treatments were increased by 5.6-fold and 5.2-fold, respectively, compared to the control (Fig. 2a), while the soluble sugar contents were increased by 1.6-fold under 50 mM NaCl and 1.8-fold under 150 mM NaCl treatment (Fig. 2b). The glycine betaine content in callus did not change under 50 mM NaCl, but was significantly increased under 150 mM NaCl (Fig. 2c). These results indicate that the osmotic homeostasis was enhanced by osmolyte synthesis, and the accumulation of proline was marked in NaCl-stressed alkaligrass calli.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Osmolyte accumulation in the alkaligrass calli under NaCl treatment. a Proline content; b Soluble sugar content; c Glycine betaine content. The values were determined under 0, 50, and 150 mM NaCl and presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among different treatments

Full size image

Salt stress-induced ROS levels and antioxidant enzyme activities

To evaluate the ROS levels, H2O2 content and O2•− generation rate in control and NaCl-stressed callus were measured. H2O2 content and O2•− generation were obviously induced by the NaCl treatments (Fig. 3a). This indicates that NaCl treatment triggered oxidative stress in callus cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of NaCl on ROS production and antioxidant enzyme activities in the alkaligrass calli. a H2O2 content and O2•- generation rate; b Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT); c Activities of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and peroxidase (POD); d Glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity; e Activities of monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR); f Activities of glutathione reductase (GR) and glutathione S-transferase (GST); g Contents of ascorbate (AsA) and dehydroascorbate (DHA); h Contents of reduced glutathione (GSH) content and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) content. The values were determined under 0, 50, 150 mM NaCl for 28 days, and were presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Different small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among different treatments

Full size image

The activities of nine antioxidant enzymes and four antioxidant contents were analyzed (Fig. 3b-h). Among them, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was increased by about 1.9-fold under 50 mM NaCl and 3.5-fold under 150 mM NaCl, but the CAT activity was decreased gradually under the two NaCl conditions (Fig. 3b). Conversely, the activities of APX and peroxidase (POD) were both increased under the NaCl treatments (Fig. 3c), and the glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity was also increased under NaCl treatments (Fig. 3d). Moreover, the activities of monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), and GR in ascorbate-glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle were perturbed by the NaCl stress. The activities of MDHAR and GR were significantly increased, but the DHAR activity was slightly decreased under the salt stress (Fig. 3e, f). Also, the glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity was decreased under salt stress (Fig. 3f). In addition, the contents of ASA, dehydroascorbate (DHA) and reduced GSH were all increased, concomitant with the decrease of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) under the NaCl treatments (Fig. 3g, h).

Identification of salt stress-responsive proteins

To investigate protein abundance changes under salt stress, 2DE-based proteomics was employed to separate proteins and analyze their abundance changes. For each callus sample under different NaCl stress conditions, three biological replicates were performed for generating reproducible 2DE results (Fig. 4, Additional file 1). The average spot number on 2DE gels from the three biological replicates was about 1100 in control and treatment samples. Among them, 686, 615 and 657 protein spots were shared in three biological replicates of control, 50 mM and 150 mM NaCl, respectively. In total, 82 protein spots were detected as differentially abundant protein (DAP) spots in calli under NaCl stress (> 1.5-fold and p < 0.05). All the DAP spots were excised from 2DE gels, in-gel digested, and subjected to MALDI-TOF MS/MS for protein identification. After Mascot database searching, 55 protein spots were identified to contain a single protein each, and they were taken as NaCl-responsive proteins in alkaligrass calli (Fig. 5, Additional file 2). There were 45 DAPs under 50 mM NaCl and 39 DAPs under 150 mM NaCl when compared with 0 mM NaCl. Among them, 29 DAPs were detected in both NaCl treatment conditions. Four DAPs (i.e., salt tolerance protein 1, aldo-keto reductase 2, cysteine synthase (CSase), and heat shock protein 90.1 (HSP90)) and two DAPs (i.e., actin 2 and heat shock 70 kDa protein (HSP70)) were only identified in callus under 50 mM NaCl and 150 mM NaCl treatment, respectively (Fig. 5a, Additional file 2). Among the 55 NaCl-responsive proteins, 24 were increased and 30 were decreased under one or two treatment conditions, as well as one protein was decreased under 50 mM NaCl, but increased under 150 NaCl treatment (Fig. 5b, Additional file 2).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Representative Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB)-stained two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) gel. Proteins were extracted from the alkaligrass calli under NaCl treatments for 28 days. They were separated on 24 cm IPG strips (pH 4–7 liner gradient) using isoelectric focusing (IEF) in the first dimension, followed by 12.5% SDS-PAGE gels in the second dimension. The numbered gel spots contain the 82 proteins identified by MALDI TOF-TOF mass spectrometry. Please refer to Additional file 1: Figure S1 and Additional file 2: Table S1 for detailed information

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Abundance patterns and subcellular localization of NaCl-responsive proteins in the alkaligrass calli. a Overlap between protein lists from three comparison of NaCl treatments. The outer circle represents three comparisons of NaCl treatment conditions (i.e., 50 mM vs 0 mM, 150 mM vs 0 mM, and 150 mM vs 50 mM). The inner circle represents NaCl-responsive protein lists of each treatment conditions, where hits are arranged along the arc. Proteins that hit multiple lists are colored in dark orange, and proteins unique to a list are shown in light orange. The purple and blue curves link the same proteins among three lists. b Graphical of the numbers of proteins in various functional categories. The numbers in the y axis are referred in names of function categories in (d). c Subcellular localization analysis of 55 NaCl-responsive proteins. Subcellular localization categories of proteins predicted by internet tools and knowledge from literatures. The numbers of proteins with different locations are shown in the pie. d Abundance patterns of NaCl-responsive proteins in the alkaligrass calli. Three columns represent different treatments of 0, 50, and 150 mM NaCl. The rows represent individual proteins. The increased or decreased proteins are indicated in red or blue, respectively. The color intensity increases with increasing abundant differences, as shown in the scale bar. The scale bar indicates relative protein abundance ratios ranging from 0.1 to 6. The abbreviations of protein name are listed on the right side, and the full names are listed in Additonal file 2: Table S1. The protein names marked with a pentagram (*) were edited according to the functional domain annotations from NCBInr protein database. Abbreviation: 14–3-31, 14–3-3-like protein A; 14–3-32, 14–3-3-like protein GF14–12 isoform X1; α-Gal, Alpha-galactosidase; ACT7, Actin 7 isoform 1; ACY, Aminoacylase-1; AGPR, N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase; AKR2, Aldo-keto reductase 2; APX, Ascorbate peroxidase; BADH, Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase; CAL1, Carbonic anhydrase-like1; CPO, Oxygen-dependent coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase; Csase, Cysteine synthase; EF2, Elongation factor2; ENO, Enolase; Fer, Ferritin; FQR1, NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (quinone) FQR1-like; G6PDH, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase 1; GAPDH2, Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 2; GSTI, Glutathione S-transferase I; HSP70, Heat shock 70 kDa protein; HSP90, Cytosolic heat shock protein 90.1; HOP, Hsp70-Hsp90 organizing protein 1; IDH, Isocitrate dehydrogenase; Macro, Macro domain-containing protein VPA0103; mATPS, ATP synthase; SIR, Sulfite reductase; MDH, Malate dehydrogenase; MDHAR, Monodehydroascorbate reductase like; PDC, Pyruvate decarboxylase; POD12, Peroxidase12; PPP, Pentose phosphate pathway; RAD23, DNA repair protein RAD23; RH2, DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase 2; SAHH, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase; STOI, Salt tolerance protein I; SUS, Sucrose synthase; TCP1, T-complex protein 1 subunit theta; TSJT1, Stem-specific protein TSJT 1 like

Full size image

Subcellular localization and functional categorization of salt-responsive proteins

The subcellular localization of salt-responsive proteins was predicted based on five Internet tools (i.e., YLoc, LocTree3, Plant-mPLoc, WoLF POSRT and TargetP) and literature. Among them, 18 proteins were predicted to be localized in cytoplasm, ten in plastids, nine in mitochondria, one in nucleus, one in peroxisome, four secreted, and three uncertain. Nine proteins were predicted to be localized in two places, including six in cytoplasm and mitochondria, one in cytoplasm and nucleus, and one in cytoplasm and peroxisome (Fig. 5c, Additional file 4).

Among the 55 DAPs, 20 proteins were originally annotated in the database as unknown proteins, hypothetical proteins, or without annotation. Based on the BLAST alignments and Gene Ontology, 20 proteins were re-annotated (Additional file 3). Subsequently, all the 55 NaCl-responsive proteins were classified into six functional categories, including signaling and cytoskeleton (6 DAPs), ROS scavenging and defense (13 DAPs), carbohydrate and energy metabolism (20 DAPs), other basic metabolism (8 DAPs), transcription regulation (3 DAPs), as well as protein synthesis and processing (5 DAPs) (Fig. 5d).

We identified three NaCl-decreased signaling proteins including two 14–3-3 proteins and a TaWIN1. Thirteen detoxification and oxidative stress-related proteins were identified. They include eight enzymes and five stress-related proteins. Several enzymatic antioxidants (e.g., POD, APX and MDHAR) were increased in abundance under the salt treatments. Other stress-related proteins including ferritin (Fer), betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH), and stem-specific protein 1 (TSJT1) were increased under NaCl. In addition, AKRs and STO1 were decreased after salt treatments (Fig. 5d, Additional file 2).

The 20 proteins involved in carbohydrate and energy metabolism account for 36.4% of salt-responsive proteins in callus. Several DAPs, such as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), enolase (ENO), and pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) involved in glycolysis were increased in the salt-treated calli, while other DAPs (e.g., isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH) in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle) were decreased in the salt-treated calli. Besides, sucrose synthase (SUS) in sugar metabolism was salt-increased, but 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) showed a decrease. In addition, three ATP synthases increased, but two decreased (Fig. 5d).

Three proteins were characterized as transcription-related and five were involved in protein translation and folding. Most of the proteins were increased under salt stress, such as DNA repair protein RAD23, DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase (RH), elongation factor (EF), HSP70, HSP90, and T-complex protein 1 subunit theta (TCP1). A few protein species were decreased under 150 mM NaCl treatment, such as Macro domain-containing protein, RNA helicase 2, HSP70, and Hsp70-Hsp90 organizing protein 1 (Fig. 5d).

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis

To evaluate the salt-responsive protein-protein interaction in the callus, a PPI network of NaCl-responsive proteins was visualized using STRING analysis based on homologous proteins in Arabidopsis (Fig. 6, Additional file 5). Among the 55 DAPs, 44 unique homologs were found in Arabidopsis, 37 of which were depicted in the PPI network. Four modules formed tightly connected clusters, and stronger associations were represented by thicker lines in the network (Fig. 6). Module 1 (yellow nodes) contained 22 proteins mainly involved in gene expression, protein synthesis and folding, cytoskeleton dynamics, and glycolysis. The relationship of these proteins indicates that the translation of these proteins involved in glycolysis and cytoskeleton was regulated by EF2, while their processing was mainly dependent on HSP family proteins. Module 2 (green nodes) included nine proteins in TCA cycle, PPP, as well as ATP synthesis and H+ supplying, indicating energy supply and H+ homeostasis were crucial and interconnected. Module 3 (blue nodes) contained four proteins mainly in charge of ROS scavenging. Module 4 (purple nodes) included two proteins in other basic metabolic processes. In addition, several proteins among four modules also linked with each other. For example, EF2 in module 1 has links with members of ATP synthase (mATP) in module 2, while ENO in module 1 interacted with MDHs, N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase (AGPR) and mATPSα in module 2, as well as MDHARs in module 3. This implies that ATP synthase abundance was modulated by protein translation and diversely-linked energy-supplying pathways, probably being modulated by ROS homeostasis in the callus.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network in the alkaligrass calli revealed by STRING analysis. A total of 55 NaCl-responsive proteins represented by 37 unique homologous proteins from Arabidopsis are shown in the PPI network. Four modules are presented in different colors. The PPI network is shown in the confidence view generated by STRING database. Stronger associations are represented by thicker lines. Please refer to Fig. 5 and Additional file 5: Table S4 for abbreviations

Full size image

Discussion

Salt stress signaling and cytoskeleton dynamics in callus

Callus development is sensitive to salt stress, and many signaling and metabolic pathways were modulated by the salt treatments. In alkaligrass callus, the signal transduction and cytoskeleton dynamics were altered due to several NaCl-regulated 14–3-3 proteins and actins (Fig. 7a). 14–3-3 proteins as multifunctional proteins regulate diverse downstream target proteins in signal transduction, vesicle trafficking, ion transport, chromatin modulation, and various metabolic pathways in plant response and adaptation to stresses [19]. The abundances of two 14–3-3-like proteins and a TaWIN1 protein were decreased in salt-stressed calli and leaves of alkaligrass [32]. 14–3-3 GF14λ protein was shown to interact with somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 1 (SERK1) in signal transduction cascade regulating Arabidopsis embryogenic development [38], and to function in the regulation of actin cytoskeleton, cell wall remodeling, and the cell cycle during early stages of somatic embryogenesis of oil palm [39]. Importantly, 14–3-3 proteins were found to trigger programmed cell death in calli from grape [40], barley [41] and tomato [42] in response to biotic stresses, such as infection of A. tumefaciens and powdery mildew. In salt stress, whether the decreases of several 14–3-3 proteins help to alleviate salt sensitivity in calli is not known. Their downstream interacting proteins need to be studied toward understanding the 14–3-3 protein-regulated signaling pathways during callus salt response.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Schematic presentation of systematic salt tolerance mechanisms in the alkaligrass calli. The identified proteins were integrated into subcellular locations and pathways. Relative protein abundances, enzyme activities, and substrate contents in salt treatments compared with control are marked with squares, circles, and triangles white (unchanged), red (increased), and green (decreased), respectively. a Signaling and cytoskeleton; b Redox homeostasis and stress defense; c Osmotic hemostasis; d Protein synthesis and processing; e Carbohydrate and energy metabolism. Abbreviations: 1,3-BPG, 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate; 2-PG, 2-phosphoglycerate; 6PδL, 6-phosphoglucono-δ-lacton; 6-PG, 6-phosphogluconate; AsA, ascorbic acid; CAT, catalase; DHA, dehydroascorbic; DHAR, dehydroascorbate reductase; E4P, erythrose 4-phosphate; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; G3P, glycerate 3-phosphate; G6P, glucose 6-phosphate; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; GR, glutathione reductase; GSH, reduced glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; MDHA, monodehydroascorbate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; POD, peroxidase; R5P, ribose 5-phosphate; Ru5P, ribulose 5-phosphate; S7P, Sedoheptulose 7-phosphate; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; X5P, Xylulose 5-phosphate; Please refer Fig. 5 for abbreviations of proteins identified in this study

Full size image

Cytoskeletal dynamic changes were revealed from the salt-altered abundance patterns of three actin species (two salt-increased and one decreased). Actin is necessary for callus formation in Arabidopsis [43] and different oil palm species [24, 44]. The depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton was taken as an important strategy for stress adaptation, triggering the execution of programmed cell death in non-embryogenic callus from maize [21, 45]. It has been reported that Arabidopsis TCP1 helped to facilitate the actin and tubulin protein folding as molecular chaperone to keep the stem cell maintenance [46], suggesting the role of the salinity-induced TCP1 in regulating cytoskeletal dynamics to cope with salt stress.

Salinity-responsive ROS scavenging pathways in callus

Salt-induced ROS are capable of causing cellular damage by disrupting membrane integrity, degradation of proteins, and inactivation of enzymes [47]. In addition, certain levels of ROS can function to signal cell dedifferentiation and promote somatic embryogenesis in embryogenic callus (EC) [48]. ROS homeostasis in plant calli is fine-tuned [40]. For example, in grape (Vitis vinifera) callus, strong APX pathway was triggered in embryogenic callus, whereas CAT pathway was utilized in non-EC [40]. Our study revealed the ROS signal and scavenging networks were sophisticatedly regulated in alkaligrass callus.

The increase of SOD activity contributes to dismutase intracellular O2•- to H2O2 in alkaligrass callus under NaCl stress (Fig. 3b). Similarly, it has been shown that callus from a NaCl-tolerant cotton cultivar exhibited significantly salt-enhanced SOD activity, whereas calli from a NaCl-sensitive cultivar exposed to salt stress showed little change in the SOD activity [49]. Besides, high SOD accumulation was detected in EC compared to non-EC from grapevine (V. vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) [40]. This result was different from the NaCl−/Na2CO3- decreased SOD activities in alkaligrass leaves and roots [32,33,34]. This result indicates that the undifferentiated salt-tolerant calli from halophyte alkaligrass initially and specifically utilize SOD pathway for ROS homeostasis, when comparing with the salt-sensitive calli and the differentiated organs.

To further maintain homeostasis, the increased H2O2 is scavenged in diverse pathways. CAT pathway can directly dismutase H2O2 to H2O and O2 in peroxisomes. In salinity−/alkali-stressed alkaligrass, CAT activities were decreased in the calli and short-term (12 h and 24 h) salt-treated leaves and roots [34, 35], but increased in long-term (7 days) salt-treated leaves [32, 33]. POD also catalyzes the reduction of H2O2 using various substrates, such as phenolic compounds, lignin precursors, auxin and secondary metabolites. The NaCl-induced POD activity in the alkaligrass callus implies its crucial role in protecting the callus cells. Similarly, a wide variety of peroxidases were also induced in sugarcane and maize embryogenic calli [19, 22], and peroxidases were very active in ECs from lettuce (Lactuca sativa), palm (Phoenix dactylifera), and Medicago truncatula [50,51,52]. In addition, the AsA-GSH cycle catalyzed by APX, MDHAR, DHAR and GR participates in the removal of H2O2, which was implicated in the maintenance of cell wall plasticity and the stimulation of organized cell division [53]. In the alkaligrass callus, the activities of APX, MDHAR and GR were NaCl-increased, but DHAR activity was NaCl-decreased. This result was similar to that in leaves under Na2CO3-treatmenf for 12 h and 24 h [35]. In addition, the amount of APX and an isoform of MDHAR, as well as the AsA content were all increased in the alkaligrass callus after salt stress. These data suggest that the induced AsA-GSH cycle was critical in regulating the ROS levels in response to salinity stress, and also in maintaining the ability for stimulating cell differentiation upon somatic embryo formation [54].

The increase of GSH and decrease of GSSG are consistent with the induced GPX activity and decreased GST activity in the alkaligrass callus and similar to the changes observed in short-term Na2CO3-treated roots [34]. The salt-induced CSase in the alkaligrass callus would facilitate the biosynthesis of cysteine, which serves as a precursor for the synthesis of various sulfur-containing metabolites including GSH [25, 55]. It has been reported that cysteine synthase was highly expressed in EC to promote dedifferentiation [54]. Another salinity-increased protein ferritin plays an important role in iron sequestration, preventing the reaction of iron with ROS to cause severe oxidative stress [56]. Clearly, among the complicated ROS pathways in the alkaligrass callus, the NaCl-induced AsA-GSH cycle and POD pathway function to enhance oxidative stress tolerance and maintain cell dedifferentiation, thereby promoting somatic embryo formation [40].

Diverse osmotic regulation strategies in salt-stressed callus

Under salinity, cell membrane integrity and membrane lipid composition were altered to modulate signal transduction, osmotic homeostasis and cell structure. Cellular MDA contents are often used to evaluate cell membrane damage. In alkaligrass calli under 50 mM and 150 mM NaCl treatments, MDA content was increased (Fig. 1i) but not significantly altered in leaves [32]. However, MDA contents were increased in leaves under Na2CO3 (38 mM and 95 mM for 7 days) and NaHCO3 (150 mM, 400 mM, and 800 mM for 7 days) [33, 36]. This indicates different tissues may respond differently to neutral salt stress and alkali stress.

To cope with osmotic imbalance, diverse compatible osmolytes accumulated in the callus. In this study, the contents of proline, soluble sugar, and glycine betaine were significantly increased (Fig. 2a-c), and BADH involved in glycine betaine biosynthesis was also increased under salt stress (Additional file 2). Proline is not only a compatible osmoticum, but also serves as a storage sink for carbon and nitrogen, stabilizes subcellular structures and buffers cellular redox potential for protecting from oxidative damage under salt stress [57,58,59]. In leaves of alkaligrass, the proline content was increased under 50 mM and 150 mM NaCl for 7 days [32] or 150 mM, 400 mM, and 800 mM NaHCO3 for 7 days [36]. Moreover, proline content was also increased in calli form rice (O. sativa cv. KDML 105) [14] and two cultivars of Medicago sativa (cv. Yazdi and cv. hamedani) [60] under NaCl stress. In sugarcane (Saccharum sp.), proline content is higher in salt-tolerant calli obtained by in vitro selection than in non-selected calli under NaCl stress [11]. Similarly, salt-adapted tobacco calli accumulated more proline than unadapted calli after salt shock [61]. However, in the calli from three sugarcane cultivars with different salt tolerance ability, the salt-resistant cv. R570 accumulated less proline than intermediary salt-resistant cv. NCo310 and salt-sensitive cv. CP59–73 [12]. This perhaps indicates that proline accumulation was merely a stress response, rather than a stress tolerance trait. Similar phenomenon was also reported in calli from tomato [62], rice [63], and Fraxinus angustifolia [64] under NaCl stress. All these suggest that the contribution of proline to osmotic adjustment vary in calli derived from different plant species and under different stress conditions. Sometimes, soluble sugars and glycine betaine may play more important roles than proline. For example, soluble sugar content was induced in the alkaligrass calli and leaves under stresses of NaCl [32] or Na2CO3 [33]. Besides, the salt-tolerant callus of sugarcane accumulated more soluble sugars under NaCl stress [11]. However, the soluble sugars did not accumulate in calli from salt-resistant wheat cv. belikh [10]. In the NaCl-stressed alkaligrass calli, the glycine betaine content was significantly increased. This result was consistent with the results from NaCl-stressed sugarcane calli [13] and the salinity- or alkali treated alkaligrass leaves [32, 35, 36].

Active glycolysis for energy supply in callus

Calli grow fast and have high cell division rate. A large amount of energy is needed via glycolysis, the TCA cycle, and subsequent energy via the mitochondrial respiratory chain [26]. In the EC of V. planifolia and C. persicum, glycolytic enzymes were significantly increased due to energy demand of rapid growth and cell division [27, 65]. In this study, eight enzymes involved in glycolysis, PPP, TCA cycle, and other sugar metabolism pathways were altered in the alkaligrass calli under NaCl stress (Figs. 5d and 7d, Additional file 2). Among them, the NaCl-induced GAPDH, ENOs and PDCs suggest that glycolysis was enhanced [66]. Similarly, the protein abundance of GAPDH was increased during Vanilla planifolia callus development [27, 28], and the gene expression level of GAPDH was also induced significantly in grape EC [40]. Besides, ENOs were induced in EC relative to non-EC of V. vinifera [40], as well as in the developing embryos of spruce (Picea asperata) under oxidative stress [67]. These results imply that the increase of glycolysis may promote cellular division and differentiation during callus development and somatic embryogenesis processes [68]. However, the NaCl-decreased IDH and MDH indicate that the TCA cycle was salinity-inhibited in the alkaligrass callus. Consistently, the abundance of various enzymes involved in the generation of acetyl-CoA for the subsequent TCA cycle were lower in EC than in non-EC of maize [20]. In addition, several mitochondria-localized ATP synthase α and β subunits were decreased in the salt-treated alkaligrass calli, consistent with the results obtained in maize and grape [21, 40]. This implies that the energy supply mainly relies on glycolysis, not TCA cycle, because the demand for energy is low in slow growth of EC under salt stress.

Importantly, SUS is a key reversible link of sucrose metabolism in respiration, carbohydrate biosynthesis, and carbohydrate utilization [69]. In this study, two NaCl-induced SUS family proteins could facilitate sucrose flux for energy supply and osmotic homeostasis in the alkaligrass callus. In addition, NaCl-altered alpha-galactosidase (α-Gal) may also help sugar flux for the cell wall expansion in the callus to cope with salinity (Figs. 5d and 7d, Additional file 2).

Protein synthesis and processing are necessary for callus

Protein synthesis and processing are active during rapid cell reprogramming of somatic embryogenic growth [70, 71]. The proteins involved in protein synthesis and processing accounted for 20% of total proteins in EC and non-EC from saffron (Crocus sativus) [70]. The changes to protein profiles observed in our proteomics results imply that transcription, translation, and protein processing in the alkaligrass callus were perturbed by salinity. The altered transcription can be reflected by the NaCl-induced DNA repair protein RAD23, as well as NaCl-decreased Macro domain-containing protein VPA0103 and RH2 [66, 72]. In addition, NaCl-increased EF2 functions in the GTP-dependent ribosomal translocation step during translation elongation. Our PPI analysis showed that EF2 may connect with a number of proteins in energy supply, cytoskeleton, protein folding, and ROS scavenging (Fig. 6). This implies that the enhanced protein synthesis may facilitate diverse pathways in the alkaligrass callus to cope with salinity.

In embryogenic development and callus stress response, removal and refolding of unnecessary and misfolded polypeptides are vital for cell reprogramming [24]. In the alkaligrass calli, we found that salt increased HSP90 and TCP1, as well as salt-decreased HSP70 and Hsp70-Hsp90 organizing protein 1 (HOP). Importantly, our PPI prediction implies that these salt-responsive molecular chaperonins interact with most proteins involved in energy metabolism, protein synthesis, and ROS scavenging (Fig. 6). The accumulation of HSP70 and other HSPs was also found in EC when compared with non-EC from grape [40, 73]. Interestingly, different members of HSP family exhibited diverse abundance patterns during embryo development. For example, HSP60 and HSP101 were typical for the early somatic embryos, while HSP20 and HSP70 marked the late stage of embryogenesis [26]. The assorted chaperon-depended modulations of protein structure indicate that the assembly/structure of the newly-synthesized peptides and stabilization of the mature proteins were dynamically regulated during callus development and stress response [28, 73, 74].

Conclusion

Investigation of the molecular regulatory mechanisms in callus development and stress response is vital for genetic transformation and plant breeding. Although the NaCl-responsive mechanisms have been reported in leaves and roots, they have not been explored in undifferentiated callus from alkaligrass. In this study, the protein abundance patterns highlight the NaCl-responsive strategies in the alkaligrass calli. Compared with differentiated leaves and roots, the cell membrane of callus cells was more sensitive to salt stress, and significant content changes of the osmolytes (e.g., proline, soluble sugars and glycine betaine) allow synergetic and instantaneous modulation of cellular osmotic homeostasis in salt-stressed calli. Importantly, salinity-induced SOD activities and salinity-decreased CAT activity in the calli were different from those reported in leaves and roots, while the increases of POD activity and AsA-GSH cycle were proposed to be universal strategies in both calli and leaves to cope with salinity and alkali stresses. The halophyte alkaligrass calli mainly relied on glycolysis for energy to cope with salinity, which was similar to the developing EC. In addition, enhanced protein synthesis and folding was crucial for stabilizing diverse proteins involved in energy supply and ROS homeostasis during the callus stress response.

Methods

Callus induction and NaCl treatment

Alkaligrass seeds were provided by the Alkali Soil Natural Environment Science Center of Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China. After removing the seed coat, the mature seeds from alkaligrass (Puccinelia tenuiflora) were rinsed in 75% ethanol for 2 min, and washed twice with sterilized water. The seed surface was sterilized in 30% NaClO solution for 5 min, followed by being washed with sterile deionized water 6 times. The surface sterilized seeds were cultured on MS medium, supplemented with 4 mg/L 2,4-dichlorphenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 30 g/L sucrose, 4 g/L phytagel, adjusted to pH 5.8. Callus was induced at 25 °C in darkness for 28 days. Proliferating callus were sub-cultured every 28 days on the MS medium. After three rounds of subculturing, the uniform callus was divided into three groups, and treated with 0 mM, 50 mM and 150 mM NaCl in new subculture medium for 28 days. After treatments, callus was harvested and blotted dry briefly on filter paper, and either used fresh or frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. For each experiment, at least three biological replicates were collected.

Callus growth rate and viability determination

The callus RGR was determined on fresh weight (FW) of callus according to the formula: RGR = (final FW - initial FW)/initial FW. The initial FW and final FW were weighted at the 0 day and 28 day of culturing, respectively [12].

The cell viability was determined by a method using 2,3,5-triphenylterazolium chloride (TTC) [10]. Aliquots of 50 mg callus were quickly rinsed in deionized water containing 0.05% Tween 20, and then incubated at 30 °C in darkness containing 5 mL of 0.5% TTC in 50 mM K2HPO4 (pH 7.0) for 15 h. The samples were filtered through Whatman No. 4 filter paper, rinsed with deionized water, and incubated in 3 mL 94% ethanol at 80 °C for 5 min under gentle agitation to ensure homogenization during the extraction. After centrifugation at 5000×g for 1 min, the extracted formazan was quantified spectrophotometrically at 485 nm. The cell viability is defined as the absorbance measured per gram of fresh tissue (∆OD 485 nm g− 1 FW).

Measurements of MDA, proline, total soluble sugar, and glycine betaine contents

The MDA content in callus was determined by the thiobarbituric acid reaction according to the method of Wang et al. [75]. MDA was extracted from fresh callus in 10% trichloroacetic acid and 0.6% thiobarbituric acid solution under 100 °C for 5 min. The absorbances of the supernatant at 450 nm, 532 nm, and 600 nm were measured as OD450, OD532 and OD600, respectively. The MDA concentration was calculated according to the following equations: C (μmol L− 1) = 6.45 x (OD532-OD600) - 0.56 x OD450; MDA concentration (μmol g− 1 FW) = C*V/FW (V, volume of total extraction solution; FW, fresh weight of callus).

Proline and total soluble sugar contents were determined using a ninhydrin reaction and an anthrone reagent, respectively, according to the method of Li et al. [76]. The proline was extracted from fresh callus and resolved in 3% sulfosalicylic acid, and then was incubated with the mixture of glacial acetic acid, ninhydrin, and methylbenzene for 2 h. The upper layer of the solution was collected and detected at 520 nm using a spectrophotometer. In addition, the soluble sugar from fresh callus was resolved in deionized water. Then the supernatant was reacted with 2% (w/v) ethyl acetate solution of anthrone and concentrated sulfuric acid, and then measured at 630 nm [76]. The proline and soluble sugar contents were calculated according to the equations from Li et al. [76].

Glycine betaine content was determined using Reinecke salt according to a method from Yu et al. [77]. Briefly, fresh callus was ground to powder in liquid nitrogen, and then incubated in 6 mL 0.375% (w/v) reinecke salt solution for 24 h. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000×g at 20 °C for 15 min. The supernatant was filtered, dried, and resuspended in deionized water. After addition of reinecke salt solution, the reaction solution was incubated at 4 °C for 2 h, and then centrifuged at 4000×g at 4 °C for 15 min. The precipitate was washed with ether and 70% acetone. The absorbance was determined at 525 nm using a spectrophotometer.

ROS measurement and enzyme activity assay

H2O2 content was determined spectrophotometrically after reaction with potassium iodide [78, 79]. The O2•− generation rate was detected using a hydroxylamine oxidization method [77].

The antioxidant enzyme activities were determined according to the methods from Suo et al. [79]. The enzymes were extracted from callus and resolved in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.8). The supernatant was collected for determination of the activities of SOD, CAT, APX, POD, GPX and GST [79]. For SOD activity detection, the inhibition of the photochemical reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) was detected at 560 nm. CAT activity and POD activity were measured by detecting H2O2 consumption at 240 nm and a guaiacol method at 470 nm, respectively [76]. APX activity and GPX activity were measured by monitoring the absorbance changes at 290 nm and 340 nm, according to the oxidized ascorbate and NADPH, respectively. GST activity was measured at 340 nm, according to the product of CDNB conjugated with GSH absorbed. The activities of MDHAR and DHAR were measured at 340 nm and 265 nm according to the oxidation of NADH and the production of GSSG, respectively [76]. The GR activity was detected at 340 nm as the oxidation of NADPH [76]. Their activities were expressed as the amount of NADH oxidized, GSSG produced, and NADPH oxidized per minute per milligram protein, respectively [80]. For all the enzyme activity assays, protein content was determined using the Bradford method [81].

In addition, the contents of AsA, DHA, GSH, and GSSG were measured by recording the absorbance changes at 525 nm [82].

Protein sample preparation, 2DE, and protein abundance analysis

Protein extraction was according to the phenol extraction method from Wang et al. [75]. The calli were homogenized in extraction buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 0.9 M sucrose, 0.4% β-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM EDTA) and Tris buffered phenol (pH 8.8). The proteins were precipitated by ammonium acetate in methanol, rinsed with cold acetone, and then dissolved in a lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 40 mM DTT, 4% CHAPS, 0.5% IPG buffer pH 4–7). Protein concentration was determined using a Quan-kit (GE Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT).

Protein samples were separated and visualized on 2D gels according to the method from Wang et al. [75]. The gel images were acquired and analyzed using an ImageScanner III (GE Healthcare) and ImageMaster 2D software (version 5.0) (GE Healthcare). For each sample, three biological replicates were run on 2D gels. More than 1.5-fold change of the average vol% values for protein spot among the treatments and a p value < 0.05 were considered to be DAPs [75, 79].

The DAP spots were excised and digested with trypsin according the method of Yu et al. [32]. MS/MS spectra were obtained using an ABI 4800 MALDI TOF/TOF MS (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA). The mass error was below 30 ppm at both MS and MS/MS mode, and the resolution was 25,000 [75]. The peak list of MS/MS spectra were search against the NCBInr protein database (http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/protein/) using the online Mascot program (http://www.matrixscience.com). The taxonomic category was Green Plants. The searching parameters were including mass accuracy was 0.3 ppm, the maximum number of missed cleavages was set to one, carbamidomethyl of cysteine as a fixed medication, and oxidation of methionine as a variable modification. The high confident identification of proteins had met the following criteria: the top hits on the database searching report, a probability-based MOWSE score greater than 49 (p < 0.05), and more than two peptides matched nearly complete y-ion series and b-ion series.

Protein classification and hierarchical cluster analysis

To determine their function description, the identified proteins were searched against the NCBI database (https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/) and UniProt database (http://www.uniprot.org/). Combined BLAST alignments with literature, the identified proteins were classified into different categories. Self-organizing maps analysis of the protein abundances was performed using cluster 3.0 (http://bonsai.hgc.jp/~mdehoon/software/cluster/software.htm) [78].

Protein subcellular localization prediction and protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis

The subcellular localization of the identified proteins was predicted using five Internet tools: (1) YLoc (http://abi.inf.uni-tuebingen.de/Services/YLoc/webloc.cgi), confidence score ≥ 0.4; (2) LocTree3 (https://rostlab.org/services/loctree3/), expected accuracy ≥0.8; (3) Plant-mPLoc (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/); (4) WoLF POSRT (https://wolfpsort.hgc.jp/); (5) TargetP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/), reliability class ≤4 [76]. Only consistent predictions from at least two different tools were accepted. The protein-protein interactions were predicted using the web tool STRING10 (http://string-db.org). The homologs of the different abundance proteins in Arabidopsis were found by sequence BLAST in TAIR database (http://www.arabidopsis.org/Blast/index.jsp). The homologs were subjected to STRING for creating the proteome-scale interaction network [78].

Statistical analysis

All the results were presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three biological replicates. The data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A p value smaller than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

2DE:

Two-dimensional electrophoresis

AKR2:

Aldo-keto reductase 2

APX:

Ascorbate peroxidase

ASA:

Ascorbate

BADH:

Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase

CAT:

Catalase

DAP:

Differentially abundant protein

DHA:

Dehydroascorbate

DHAR:

Dehydroascorbate reductase

EC:

Embryogenic callus

EF:

Elongation factor

ENO:

Enolase

Fer:

Ferritin

FW:

Fresh weight

G6PDH:

6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

GPX:

Glutathione peroxidase

GR:

Glutathione reductase

GSH:

Glutathione

GSSG:

Oxidized glutathione

GST:

Glutathione S-transferase

HOP:

Hsp70-Hsp90 organizing protein

HSP70:

Heat shock 70 kDa protein

HSP90:

Heat shock protein 90.1

IDH:

Isocitrate dehydrogenase

mATP:

ATP synthase

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

MDH:

Malate dehydrogenase

MDHAR:

Monodehydroascorbate reductase

PDC:

Pyruvate decarboxylase

POD:

Peroxidase

PPI:

Protein-protein interaction

PPP:

Pentose phosphate pathway

RGR:

Relative growth rate

RH:

RNA helicase

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

STO1:

Salt tolerance protein 1

SUS:

Sucrose synthase

TCA:

Tricarboxylic acid

TCP1:

T-complex protein 1

TSJT1:

Stem-specific protein 1

References

  1. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang CM, Zhang JL, Liu XS, Li Z, Wu GQ, Cai JY, et al. Puccinellia tenuiflora maintains a low Na+ level under salinity by limiting unidirectional Na+ influx resulting in a high selectivity for K+ over Na+. Plant Cell Environ. 2009;32(5):486–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abreu IA, Farinha AP, Negrao S, Goncalves N, Fonseca C, Rodrigues M, et al. Coping with abiotic stress: proteome changes for crop improvement. J Proteome. 2013;93:145–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Urano K, Kurihara Y, Seki M, Shinozaki K. ‘Omics’ analyses of regulatory networks in plant abiotic stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13(2):132–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang H, Han B, Wang T, Chen S, Li H, Zhang Y, et al. Mechanisms of plant salt response: insights from proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2011;11(1):49–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao Q, Zhang H, Wang T, Chen S, Dai S. Proteomics-based investigation of salt-responsive mechanisms in plant roots. J Proteome. 2013;82:230–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu JK. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016;167(2):313–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhan Y, Wu Q, Chen Y, Tang M, Sun C, Sun J, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) seedlings under salt stress. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):381.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Wei M, Liu A, Zhou R, Li D, Dossa K, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of two sesame genotypes with contrasting salinity tolerance in response to salt stress. J Proteome. 2019;201:73–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lutts S, Almansouri M, Kinet JM. Salinity and water stress have contrasting effects on the relationship between growth and cell viability during and after stress exposure in durum wheat callus. Plant Sci. 2004;167(1):9–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gandonou CB, Errabii T, Abrini J, Idaomar M, Senhaji NS. Selection of callus cultures of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) tolerant to NaCl and their response to salt stress. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 2006;87(1):9–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Errabii T, Gandonou CB, Essalmani H, Abrini J, Idaomar M, Senhaji NS. Effects of NaCl and mannitol induced stress on sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) callus cultures. Acta Physiol Plant. 2007;29(2):95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patade VY, Suprasanna P, Bapat VA. Effects of salt stress in relation to osmotic adjustment on sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) callus cultures. Plant Growth Regul. 2008;55(3):169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Summart J, Thanonkeo P, Panichajakul S, Prathepha P, McManus M. Effect of salt stress on growth, inorganic ion and proline accumulation in Thai aromatic rice, Khao Dawk Mali 105, callus culture. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9(2):145–152.

  15. Lutts S, Kinet J, Bouharmont J. Effects of various salts and of mannitol on ion and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in rice (Oryza sativa L.) callus cultures. J Plant Physiol. 1996;149(1–2):186–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vital SA, Fowler RW, Virgen A, Gossett DR, Banks SW, Rodriguez J. Opposing roles for superoxide and nitric oxide in the NaCl stress-induced upregulation of antioxidant enzyme activity in cotton callus tissue. Environ Exp Bot. 2008;62(1):60–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dai S, Chen S. Understanding information processes at the proteomics level. In: Springer Handbook of Bio-/Neuroinformatics. Berlin: Springer. 2014;57–72.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Passamani LZ, Bertolazi AA, Ramos AC, Santa-Catarina C, Thelen JJ, Silveira V. Embryogenic competence acquisition in sugar cane callus is associated with differential H+-pump abundance and activity. J Proteome Res. 2018;17(8):2767–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reis RS, De Moura VE, Heringer AS, Santa-Catarina C, Silveira V. Putrescine induces somatic embryo development and proteomic changes in embryogenic callus of sugarcane. J Proteome. 2016;130:170–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu B, Shan X, Wu Y, Su S, Li S, Liu H, et al. iTRAQ-Based quantitative proteomic analysis of embryogenic and non-embryogenic calli derived from a maize (Zea mays L.) Inbred line Y423. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(12):4004.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun L, Wu Y, Zou H, Su S, Li S, Shan X, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of the H99 inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 2013;113(1):103–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ge F, Hu H, Huang X, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li Z, et al. Metabolomic and proteomic analysis of maize embryonic callus induced from immature embryo. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin L, Tao Y, Zhao K, Shao J, Li X, Liu G, et al. Proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of rice mature seed-derived callus differentiation. Proteomics. 2007;7(5):755–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ribeiro DG, De Almeida RF, Fontes W, De Souza CM, De Sousa MV, Ricart CAO, et al. Stress and cell cycle regulation during somatic embryogenesis plays a key role in oil palm callus development. J Proteome. 2019;192:137–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pan Z, Zhu S, Guan R, Deng X. Identification of 2, 4-D-responsive proteins in embryogenic callus of Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) following osmotic stress. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 2010;103(2):145–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rode C, Lindhorst K, Braun HP, Winkelmann T. From callus to embryo: a proteomic view on the development and maturation of somatic embryos in Cyclamen persicum. Planta. 2012;235(5):995–1011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan BC, Chin CF, Liddell S, Alderson P. Proteomic analysis of callus development in Vanilla planifolia Andrews. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2013;31(6):1220–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Palama TL, Menard P, Fock I, Choi YH, Bourdon E, Govinden-Soulange J, et al. Shoot differentiation from protocorm callus cultures of Vanilla planifolia (Orchidaceae): proteomic and metabolic responses at early stage. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10(1):82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Chaturvedi P, Fu J, Cai Q, Weckwerth W, Yang P. Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Spp. baijianlian). J Proteome. 2016;131:61–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang X, Wei LQ, Wang ZZ, Wang T. Physiological and molecular features of Puccinellia tenuiflora tolerating salt and alkaline-salt stress. J Integr Plant Biol. 2013;55(3):262–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meng XJ, Zhao Q, Jin YD, Yu JJ, Yin ZP, Chen SX, Dai SJ. Chilling-responsive mechanisms in halophyte Puccinellia tenuiflora seedlings revealed from proteomics analysis. J Proteome. 2016;143:365–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu J, Chen S, Zhao Q, Wang T, Yang C, Diaz C, et al. Physiological and proteomic analysis of salinity tolerance in Puccinellia tenuiflora. J Proteome Res. 2011;10(9):3852–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu J, Chen S, Wang T, Sun G, Dai S. Comparative proteomic analysis of Puccinellia tenuiflora leaves under Na2CO3 stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(1):1740–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao Q, Suo J, Chen S, Jin Y, Ma X, Yin Z, et al. Na2CO3-responsive mechanisms in halophyte Puccinellia tenuiflora roots revealed by physiological and proteomic analyses. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32717.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Suo J, Zhang H, Zhao Q, Zhang N, Zhang Y, Li Y, et al. Na2CO3-responsive photosynthetic and ROS scavenging mechanisms in chloroplasts of alkaligrass revealed by phosphoproteomics. BioRxiv. 2019;871046.

  36. Yin Z, Zhang H, Zhao Q, Yoo MJ, Zhu N, Yu J, et al. Physiological and comparative proteomic analyses of saline-alkali NaHCO3-responses in leaves of halophyte Puccinellia tenuiflora. Plant Soil. 2019;437(1–2):137–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Guo L, Shi D, Wang D. The key physiological response to alkali stress by the alkali-resistant halophyte Puccinellia tenuiflora is the accumulation of large quantities of organic acids and into the rhyzosphere. J Agron Crop Sci. 2010;196(2):123–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rienties IM, Vink J, Borst JW, Russinova E, De Vries SC. The Arabidopsis SERK1 protein interacts with the AAA-ATPase AtCDC48, the 14-3-3 protein GF14λ and the PP2C phosphatase KAPP. Planta. 2005;221(3):394–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fehér A. Somatic embryogenesis—stress-induced remodeling of plant cell fate. BBA Gene Regul Mech. 2015;1849(4):385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang J, Ma H, Chen S, Ji M, Perl A, Kovacs L, et al. Stress response proteins’ differential expression in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet sauvignon-a proteomic approach. Plant Sci. 2009;177(2):103–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Finnie C, Andersen CH, Borch J, Gjetting S, Christensen AB, De Boer A, et al. Do 14-3-3 proteins and plasma membrane H+-ATPases interact in the barley epidermis in response to the barley powdery mildew fungus? Plant Mol Biol. 2002;49(2):137–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Oh CS, Pedley KF, Martin GB. Tomato 14-3-3 protein 7 positively regulates immunity-associated programmed cell death by enhancing protein abundance and signaling ability of MAPKKK α. Plant Cell. 2010;22(1):260–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kandasamy MK, Gilliland LU, McKinney EC, Meagher RB. One plant actin isovariant, ACT7, is induced by auxin and required for normal callus formation. Plant Cell. 2001;13(7):1541–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Teixeira J, Söndahl M, Kirby E. Somatic embryogenesis from immature inflorescences of oil palm. Plant Cell Rep. 1994;13(5):247–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Malerba M, Contran N, Tonelli M, Crosti P, Cerana R. Role of nitric oxide in actin depolymerization and programmed cell death induced by fusicoccin in sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) cultured cells. Physiol Plant. 2008;133(2):449–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu XM, Wang J, Xuan Z, Goldshmidt A, Borrill PG, Hariharan N, et al. Chaperonins facilitate KNOTTED1 cell-to-cell trafficking and stem cell function. Science. 2011;333(6046):1141–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. You J, Chan Z. ROS regulation during abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:1092.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Holmes P, Farquharson R, Hall PJ, Rolfe BG. Proteomic analysis of root meristems and the effects of acetohydroxyacid synthase-inhibiting herbicides in the root of Medicago truncatula. J Proteome Res. 2006;5(9):2309–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gossett DR, Millhollon EP, Lucas MC, Banks SW, Marney MM. The effects of NaCl on antioxidant enzyme activities in callus tissue of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cotton cultivars (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Rep. 1994;13(9):498–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou X, Han Y, Yang W, Xi T. Somatic embryogenesis and analysis of peroxidase in cultured lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cotyledons. Ann Bot. 1992;69(2):97–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. El Hadrami I, Baaziz M. Somatic embryogenesis and analysis of peroxidases in Phoenix dactylifera L. Biol Plant. 1995;37(2):197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Almeida AM, Parreira JR, Santos R, Duque AS, Francisco R, Tomé DF, et al. A proteomics study of the induction of somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula using 2DE and MALDI-TOF/TOF. Physiol Plant. 2012;146(2):236–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ld DG, De Pinto M, Arrigoni O. Ascorbate synthesis and ascorbate peroxidase activity during the early stage of wheat germination. Physiol Plant. 1997;100(4):894–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pan Z, Guan R, Zhu S, Deng X. Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck). Plant Cell Rep. 2009;28(2):281–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Youssefian S, Nakamura M, Orudgev E, Kondo N. Increased cysteine biosynthesis capacity of transgenic tobacco overexpressing an O-acetylserine (thiol) lyase modifies plant responses to oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 2001;126(3):1001–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Briat JF, Duc C, Ravet K, Gaymard F. Ferritins and iron storage in plants. BBA Gen Subjects. 2010;1800(8):806–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Chinnusamy V, Jagendorf A, Zhu JK. Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci. 2005;45(2):437–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kuźniak E, Gabara B, Skłodowska M, Libik-Konieczny M, Miszalski Z. Effects of NaCl on the response of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum callus to Botrytis cinerea infection. Biol Plant. 2011;55(3):423–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhu JK. Plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6(2):66–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ehsanpour A, Fatahian N. Effects of salt and proline on Medicago sativa callus. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 2003;73(1):53–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gangopadhyay G, Basu S, Mukherjee BB, Gupta S. Effects of salt and osmotic shocks on unadapted and adapted callus lines of tobacco. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 1997;49(1):45–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Cano EA, Pérez-Alfocea F, Moreno V, Bolarin MC. Responses to NaCl stress of cultivated and wild tomato species and their hybrids in callus cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 1996;15(10):791–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Garcia AB, Engler J, Iyer S, Gerats T, Van Montagu M, Caplan AB. Effects of osmoprotectants upon NaCl stress in rice. Plant Physiol. 1997;115(1):159–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Tonon G, Kevers C, Faivre-Rampant O, Graziani M, Gaspar T. Effect of NaCl and mannitol iso-osmotic stresses on proline and free polyamine levels in embryogenic Fraxinus angustifolia callus. J Plant Physiol. 2004;161(6):701–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lyngved R, Renaut J, Hausman JF, Iversen TH, Hvoslef-Eide AK. Embryo-specific proteins in Cyclamen persicum analyzed with 2-D DIGE. J Plant Growth Regul. 2008;27(4):353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Zuo Z, Mahajan PB. Recombinant expression of maize nucleotide excision repair protein Rad23 in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2005;41(2):287–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lippert D, Zhuang J, Ralph S, Ellis DE, Gilbert M, Olafson R, et al. Proteome analysis of early somatic embryogenesis in Picea glauca. Proteomics. 2005;5(2):461–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Fortes AM, Santos F, Choi YH, Silva MS, Figueiredo A, Sousa L, et al. Organogenic nodule development in hop (Humulus lupulus L.): transcript and metabolic responses. BMC Genomics. 2008;9(1):445.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Zörb C, Schmitt S, Mühling KH. Proteomic changes in maize roots after short-term adjustment to saline growth conditions. Proteomics. 2010;10(24):4441–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Sharifi G, Ebrahimzadeh H, Ghareyazie B, Gharechahi J, Vatankhah E. Identification of differentially accumulated proteins associated with embryogenic and non-embryogenic calli in saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Proteome Sci. 2012;10(1):3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Correia S, Vinhas R, Manadas B, Lourenço AS, Veríssimo P, Canhoto JM. Comparative proteomic analysis of auxin-induced embryogenic and nonembryogenic tissues of the Solanaceous tree Cyphomandra betacea (Tamarillo). J Proteome Res. 2012;11(3):1666–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lin YL, Sung SC, Tsai HL, Yu TT, Radjacommare R, Usharani R, et al. The defective proteasome but not substrate recognition function is responsible for the null phenotypes of the Arabidopsis proteasome subunit RPN10. Plant Cell. 2011;23(7):2754–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Marsoni M, Bracale M, Espen L, Prinsi B, Negri AS, Vannini C. Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Vitis vinifera. Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27(2):347–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Imin N, Nizamidin M, Daniher D, Nolan KE, Rose RJ, Rolfe BG. Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula. Explant cultures grown under 6-benzylaminopurine and 1-naphthaleneacetic acid treatments. Plant Physiol. 2005;137(4):1250–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang X, Chen S, Zhang H, Shi L, Cao F, Guo L, et al. Desiccation tolerance mechanism in resurrection fern-ally Selaginella tamariscina revealed by physiological and proteomic analysis. J Proteome Res. 2010;9(12):6561–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Li S, Yu J, Li Y, Zhang H, Bao X, Bian J, et al. Heat-responsive proteomics of a heat-sensitive spinach variety. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(16):3872.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Yu J, Jin X, Sun X, Gao T, Chen X, She Y, et al. Hydrogen peroxide response in leaves of poplar (Populus simonii× Populus nigra) revealed from physiological and proteomic analyses. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2085.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Yu J, Zhang Y, Liu J, Wang L, Liu P, Yin Z, et al. Proteomic discovery of H2O2 response in roots and functional characterization of PutGLP gene from alkaligrass. Planta. 2018;248(5):1079–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Suo J, Zhao Q, Zhang Z, Chen S, Liu G, Wei X, et al. Cytological and proteomic analyses of Osmunda cinnamomea germinating spores reveal characteristics of fern spore germination and rhizoid tip growth. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14(9):2510–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Yin Z, Balmant K, Geng S, Zhu N, Zhang T, Dufresne C, et al. Bicarbonate induced redox proteome changes in Arabidopsis suspension cells. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Wei S, Bian Y, Zhao Q, Chen S, Mao J, Song C, et al. Salinity-induced palmella formation mechanism in halotolerant algae Dunaliella salina revealed by quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:810.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Joe Collins from University of Florida for critical reading and editing of the manuscript.

Funding

The project was supported by grants from the Natural and Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Provence (No. ZD2019C003), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. 2572017ET01 and 2572017EA05), Foundation of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee, China (No. 17391900600), the Fund of Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Plant Germplasm Resources (No. 17DZ2252700). The funding agencies of this study had no role in the design of the study, data collection and analysis, interpretation of data, the decision to submit the report for publication or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Saline-alkali Vegetation Ecology Restoration (Northeast Forestry University), Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China

    Yongxue Zhang, Yue Zhang, Juanjuan Yu, Liyue Wang, Sining Wang & Ying Li

  2. Development Center of Plant Germplasm Resources, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China

    Yongxue Zhang, Heng Zhang & Shaojun Dai

  3. College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453007, China

    Juanjuan Yu

  4. Institute of Plant Stress Biology, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Department of Biology, Henan University, Kaifeng, 455000, China

    Siyi Guo & Yuchen Miao

  5. Department of Biology, Genetics Institute, Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA

    Sixue Chen

Authors
  1. Yongxue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juanjuan Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liyue Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sining Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Siyi Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yuchen Miao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sixue Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ying Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Shaojun Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SD, YL designed the study. YZ, YZ, JY, HZ, LW, SW, SG, and YM performed the research and analyzed the data. YZ wrote the draft. SC and SD finalized the data interpretation and the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ying Li or Shaojun Dai.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Three biological replicates of 2DE gels of proteins extracted in from the alkaligrass calli under NaCl treatments.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

NaCl-responsive proteins identified in the alkaligrass calli using 2DE gel combined with MALDI-TOF MS/MS.

Additional file 3: Table S2.

Functional annotation of the NaCl-responsive proteins identified in the alkaligrass calli.

Additional file 4: Table S3.

Subcellular localization prediction of the NaCl-responsive proteins in the alkaligrass calli.

Additional file 5: Table S4.

Homologs of alkaligrass proteins in Arabidopsis found by sequence BLASTing in TAIR database.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, J. et al. NaCl-responsive ROS scavenging and energy supply in alkaligrass callus revealed from proteomic analysis. BMC Genomics 20, 990 (2019). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12864-019-6325-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12864-019-6325-6

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us