Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Characterization and fine mapping of a new dwarf mutant in Brassica napus

BMC Plant Biology volume 21, Article number: 117 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Plant height is an important plant characteristic closely related to yield performance of many crops. Reasonable reduction of plant height of crops is beneficial for improving yield and enhancing lodging resistance.

Results

In the present study, we described the Brassica napus dwarf mutant bnd2 that was isolated using ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis. Compared to wild type (WT), bnd2 exhibited reduced height and shorter hypocotyl and petiole leaves. By crossing the bnd2 mutant with the WT strain, we found that the ratio of the mutant to the WT in the F2 population was close to 1:3, indicating that bnd2 is a recessive mutation of a single locus. Following bulked segregant analysis (BSA) by resequencing, BND2 was found to be located in the 13.77–18.08 Mb interval of chromosome A08, with a length of 4.31 Mb. After fine mapping with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and insertion/deletion (InDel) markers, the gene was narrowed to a 140-Kb interval ranging from 15.62 Mb to 15.76 Mb. According to reference genome annotation, there were 27 genes in the interval, of which BnaA08g20960D had an SNP type variation in the intron between the mutant and its parent, which may be the candidate gene corresponding to BND2. The hybrid line derived from a cross between the mutant bnd2 and the commercial cultivar L329 had similar plant height but higher grain yield compared to the commercial cultivar, suggesting that the allele bnd2 is beneficial for hybrid breeding of lodging resistant and high yield rapeseed.

Conclusion

In this study, we identified a novel dwarf mutant of rapeseed with a new locus, which may be useful for functional analyses of genetic mechanisms of plant architecture and grain yield in rapeseed.

Background

Brassica napus (rapeseed) is a major oil crop that is vital for ensuring a supply of edible oil, improving food structure, and promoting the development of aquaculture and light textile industry [1]. B. napus belongs to the Brassica oil crops of Cruciferae [2]. It is a heterotetraploid plant species formed by natural distant hybridization of two basic diploid species of B. rapa and B. oleracea. The genome of B. napus contains approximately 100,000 protein coding genes [3]. The plant exhibits increased height among the conventional rapeseed varieties, and its height is increased by more than 20 cm on average in the hybrid varieties due to widespread heterosis in B. napus [4]. A serious problem that framers encounter with tall plants is that they are prone to lodging. As plant height increases, it becomes a major factor restricting yield increase and mechanized harvesting of rapeseed oil [5]. More than 60% reduction in yield was reported to be caused by lodging as a result of increased plant height in B. napus [6]. Dwarfism of B. napus is crucial for increasing both lodging resistance and yield production [7]. However, dwarf phenotypes are sometimes associated with poor agronomic traits, resulting in poor yield. Therefore, it is of great value for rapeseed breeding to cultivate varieties which can be used for cross breeding with no change in plant height and that perform better in terms of yield.

To date, many dwarf mutants have been identified, but the alleles useful for breeding are rare in rapeseed. For example, the B. napus dwarf mutant NDF-1 was approximately 70 cm tall, and all agronomic characteristics except for seed weight were much less favorable than its original parents. The decrease in the number of siliques per plant as well as the number of seeds per silique led to a decline in yield [8]. Mutant bndf-1 with a height of 75 cm had more branches, but the plants were too short, resulting in fewer siliques and lower yield [9]. The semi-dwarf mutant ds-1 was only 69.3 cm high, and showed a lower yield per plant due to the decrease in the number of siliques per plant [10]. The semi-dwarf mutant dw-1, approximately 95 cm high, showed a higher number of siliques per plant, but the decreased yield per plant was due to significantly lower numbers of seeds per plant [11]. The mutant ‘GRC1157’ was only ~ 90 cm at maturity and showed obvious reduction in main inflorescence length, silique numbers per main inflorescence, and seeds per silique [12]. The semi-dwarf mutant ds-3 with a height of ~ 70 cm displayed fewer total nodes, shorter internodes and main inflorescences, and the position of the first main branch was lower than that of the wild type [13]. There were also some mutants that although shorter than wild type, their yield was unaffected. The dwarf mutant DW 871 had an average plant height of 139.1 cm, and compared to the homologous high stem strain, had more effective first branches; however, there was no significant difference in the number of effective siliques, the number and weight of seeds per plant, nor in yield per plant [14]. The EMS-mutagenized sca mutant with a plant height of ~ 80 cm was derived as a consequence of a mutation in a single semi-dominant gene, which encodes an Aux/IAA protein (BnaA3.IAA7). The mutant had more siliques per plant, with a similar thousand-seed weight, but each silique had fewer seeds resulting in a similar yield per plant compared to wild type [15]. In addition, the mutants Bndwf1 [16], ds-4 [17], and G7 [18] had heights of 80–110 cm, 23.4 cm, and 30 cm, respectively, but there was no more description of yield-related traits. In this study, we described the dwarf mutant bnd2 (B. napus dwarf 2) generated by EMS mutagenesis [19]. The bnd2 mutant showed a reduction in plant height, and grain yield compared to wild type. However, the hybrid line F1 produced by crossing the mutant bnd2 with the commercial variety L329, showed no increase in plant height, but showed an increase in grain yield compared to the variety L329, suggesting that bnd2 was a new locus for plant dwarfism and is useful for hybrid breeding of lodging resistant and high yielding in B. napus.

Bulked segregant analysis (BSA) is a rapid method used to detect molecular markers associated with target traits in mapping populations [20]. The combination of BSA and Next Generation Sequencing (BSA-seq) accelerates the cloning of genes responsible for important traits [21]. BSA-seq has been successfully used to map important agronomic traits in many crops such as rice [22, 23], potato [24], and soybean [25]. In this study, the locus bnd2 for dwarfism was primarily mapped using BSA-seq. The bnd2 was then fine mapped into a 140-Kb interval where the candidate gene BnaA08g20960D was identified. Our findings provide a foundation for cloning of the BND2 gene, providing a new locus for conferring lodging-resistance and hybrid breeding in B. napus.

Results

Phenotypic characteristics of the dwarf mutant bnd2

The B. napus mutant, bnd2, was isolated from EMS-mutagenized seeds of the cultivar “2B” (wild type, WT) [19]. At the seedling stage, bnd2 showed reduced hypocotyl length and shorter petiole leaves compared to WT (Fig. 1a-e, Additional files 1, 2 and 3: Figs. S1–3). At the flowering stage, the bnd2 mutant exhibited an extremely dwarf and compact stature, and the flowering period of bnd2 was slightly longer than that of WT (Fig. 1f and g, Additional file 4: Fig. S4). At maturity, the plant height of bnd2 was 100.65 ± 8.09 cm (n = 10), which was 59.8% of WT height (168.2 ± 7.61 cm, n = 10) (Fig. 1h and i, Additional file 5: Fig. S5, Additional file 6: Table S1). Furthermore, the first branch height, internode length, internode number, and main inflorescence length of bnd2 were 41, 76.7, 69, and 85.2% of that of WT, respectively. These results suggested that the dwarf traits were associated with lower position of the first branch, shorter internode length, lower internode number, and reduced main inflorescence length (Fig. 1h-j, Additional files 5 and 7: Figs. S5 and 6, Additional file 6: Table S1). Accordingly, bnd2 produced lower yield per plant (YPP) (48.4% of WT) due to shorter silique length (83.1% of WT), fewer seeds per silique (SPS) (92.1% of WT), and less thousand-seed weight (TSW) (90% of WT) compared to WT, although similar siliques per plant (SPP) were observed in both bnd2 and WT (Fig. 1k-n, Additional file 6: Table S1, Additional file 8: Fig. S7).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phenotype characteristics of the mutant bnd2. a-b The hypocotyls length of one-week-old wild type (WT) and bnd2 seedlings. c-e Plants (c) and leaves (d-e) of WT and bnd2 at 5-week-old seedling stage. f-g Plants at peak flowering stage (f) and flowering period (g) of WT and bnd2. h Effects of the bnd2 mutant on plant height (PH), first branch height (FBH), main inflorescence length (MIL), internode length (IL) and internode number (IN). i-j Comparison of whole plant phenotype (i), internodes (j) between WT and bnd2. k-n Comparison of yield-related traits between WT and bnd2 including siliques per plant (SPP), seeds per silique (SPS), thousand-seed weight (TSW) and yield per plant (YPP). All values in (b, e, g, h, k-n) are mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 10). Bars = 20 cm in (a, f, i, j) and 5 cm in (c-d). Significance of difference was determined by Student’s t-test (n.s., not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001)

Full size image

Cell elongation and expansion is decreased in stems of bnd2

To investigate the underlying cellular basis for the dwarf phenotype in bnd2, we performed paraffin sectioning and observed cross and longitudinal sections of the stems of bnd2 and WT at the early bolting stage. As shown in Fig. 2, the parenchymal cells of bnd2 were arranged closely and displayed irregular shapes and different sizes compared to WT (Fig. 2a and b). The cell area and cell length were significantly reduced in both cross and longitudinal sections in the bnd2 plant (Fig. 2c-f). Indeed, in cross and longitudinal sections, the cell area was decreased by 48.2 and 50.5%, and cell length was decreased by 31.6 and 16.6%, respectively. These results suggested that the reduction of parenchyma cell area and length in the plant stem was likely to be the main cause of the dwarfism of the mutant bnd2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cell elongation and expansion in stem of the mutant bnd2. a-b The longitudinal sections (a) and the cross sections (b) of parenchyma cells in the 2nd to 3rd internodes of WT and bnd2. c-d Statistical analysis of the length (c) and size (d) of the parenchyma cells shown in (a). e-f Statistical analysis of the length (e) and size (f) of the parenchyma cells shown in (b). All values in c-f are shown as mean ± SD (n = 58, 110 of WT and bnd2 cells in c and d; n = 68, 107 of WT and bnd2 cells in e and f). Bars = 10 μm. The significance of the difference was determined by Student’s t-test (***, P < 0.001)

Full size image

Inheritance of the dwarf phenotype in the mutant bnd2

To analyze the inheritance of the dwarf mutant, bnd2 was crossed with its original WT parent, and with the commercial cultivar L329. The resulting heterozygous BC1F1 plants (bnd2/WT) displayed an intermediate plant height between that of WT and the mid-parent value, suggesting that the allele BND2 is semi-dominant to the allele bnd2 (Fig. 3a-c, Additional files 9 and 10: Figs. S8 and 9). In addition, based on the plant height of the BC1F2 generation of (WT × bnd2), the 236 BC1F2 plants were classified into two groups: the dwarf phenotype of bnd2 (dwarf plants, n = 49), and the tall plant group with a height similar or close to WT (tall plants, n = 187). The BC1F2 generation was in line with an expected Mendelian inheritance ratio of 1:3 (dwarf plants: tall plants, χ2 = 2.04 < χ20.05,1 = 3.84) (Fig. 3d). Another F2 population was generated from a cross between bnd2 and the commercial cultivar L329 which possessed a normal plant height of ~ 159 cm. There were 75 plants with a dwarf phenotype and 188 plants with plant height similar or close to that of L329 in the F2 population, also showing a Mendelian segregation ratio of 3:1 (tall plants: dwarf plants, χ2 = 1.46 < χ20.05,1 = 3.84) (Additional file 11: Fig. S10). Taken together, these results suggested that the dwarf phenotype of bnd2 was controlled by a single recessive gene.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phenotype and trait inheritance of bnd2 in the backcross population. a-b Performance of WT (left), bnd2 (right) and their F1 hybrid (middle) at maturity. c Plant height comparison among WT, bnd2 and their F1 at the maturity stage. Values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 25). Bars = 20 cm. The significance of difference was determined by Student’s t-test (**, P < 0.01). d Frequency distribution of plant height in the BC1F2 population containing 236 individuals derived from the cross of WT and bnd2

Full size image

Genetic mapping of the dwarf mutant bnd2 by BSA-seq

To map the gene conferring the bnd2 phenotype, the F2:3 population derived from a cross between bnd2 and L329 was used to perform BSA resequencing. In the F2:3 population (n = 157), 25 extremely dwarf and 23 extremely tall homozygous lines were selected to make a short and high bulk. After sequencing the two bulks and their parents, the total data after quality control filtering was 118.75 Gb, of which 31.21, 26.11, 29.09, and 32.34 Gb corresponded to the L329 parent, the mutant bnd2 parent, the high bulk, and the short bulk, respectively, with a coverage depth of 24.33 X, 18.55 X, 21.41 X, and 22.35 X, separately (Additional file 12: Table S2). Clean reads of 105,361,953, 89,416,611, 99,097,181 and 109,214,266 were harvested for the L329 parent, the mutant bnd2 parent, the high bulk, and the short bulk, respectively (Additional file 12: Table S2). The sequencing data showed that the percentage of bases with a quality score of more than 30 (Q30) in two pools and two parents reached more than 92.99%, and Q20 reached more than 97.78% (Additional file 12: Table S2). In addition, the average GC content was 37.35%, and the average genome coverage was 74.57% (Additional file 12: Table S2). Therefore, we consider that the quality of the sequencing data is consistent with expectations and can be used for further analysis. According to alignment with the ‘Darmor-bzh’ reference genome [26], 1,157,351 polymorphisms (containing 948,896 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 208,455 insertions/deletions (InDels)) were identified in the two pools. The G’ value and SNP-index were calculated from the short bulk and the high bulk; the ∆(SNP-index) was drawn based on the physical positions of the reference genome (Fig. 4a and b). Only one significant ∆(SNP-index) peak was identified and located in the 4.31 Mb region from 13.77 Mb to 18.08 Mb on chromosome A08 (Fig. 4c), suggesting that it was the candidate locus harboring the BND2 gene.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Primary mapping of BND2 by bulked segregant analysis using resequencing. The physical position (unit: MB) of each chromosome in Brassica napus is represented as the x-axis. a The G’-value was represented as the y-axis. b The SNP index of 3-Mb interval with 10-kb sliding window each time was represented by the y axis. The △(SNP-index) was calculated by subtracting the SNP index of the short bulk (SB) from that of the high bulk (HB). The dotted line was the threshold of △(SNP-index) set as the mean of △(SNP-index) ± 3*SD. c The BND2-containing genomic interval was identified by using the threshold line

Full size image

Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis

To fine map the BND2 locus, six InDel markers (ID1421, ID1470, ID1482, ID1530, ID1656, and ID1667) were developed from the 4.31-Mb region harboring bnd2 based on the BSA-seq result. Then, in the F2:3 population (bnd2/L329) with 543 lines, the six markers were used to genotype 107 recessive dwarf lines, as well as two controls, including 25 WT lines and 25 heterozygous lines with segregation in plant height (Fig. 5, Additional file 13: Fig. S11). According to fine genotypes of these lines, bnd2 was further fine mapped into the 1.26-Mb interval flanked by two InDel markers, ID1530 and ID1656 (Fig. 6a). To further narrow the candidate interval, six pairs of new polymorphic markers were developed in the region of bnd2, including the SNP markers SNP1540, SNP1552, SNP1553, SNP1557, and SNP1562, and the InDel marker ID1576 (Fig. 6b). Subsequently, BND2 was narrowed down to an interval from 15.62 Mb to 15.76 Mb, and the physical distance was 140.0 Kb (Fig. 6b). After fine mapping and annotating the information of the reference genome ‘Darmor-bzh’, there were 27 genes in the 140 Kb candidate interval, 14 of which were not cloned or had unknown functions (Fig. 6c). By analyzing the annotation results of all mutations in the candidate interval, one SNP occurred in the candidate gene, BnaA08g20960D (Fig. 6d), which encodes an inositol-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase family protein, where a single nucleotide change from C to T occurred in the fifth intron region. Moreover, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) results showed that the expression of BnaA08g20960D in bnd2 was significantly lower than that of WT (Additional file 14: Fig. S12). Semi-quantitative PCR (semi-qPCR) analysis further confirmed that BnaA08g20960D exhibited reduced mRNA expression, although no splicing changes were found in bnd2 (Additional file 15: Fig. S13). Therefore, we considered this gene as a key candidate gene.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The genotypes of some F2:3 lines derived from cross between bnd2 and L329 at the marker ID1656. a The genotypes of the lines with the bnd2 phenotype. b The genotypes of the lines with WT phenotype. c The genotype of the lines with phenotype segregation. M means DNA Marker. P1 means the mutant parent bnd2. P2 means the WT parent L329. The red arrow indicates the recombinants between BND2 and the marker ID1656

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Fine mapping of BND2. a The BND2 locus was primary mapped into the interval flanked by the markers ID1530 and ID1656. Numbers below each marker is the number of recombinants. b The BND2 locus was finally mapped to a 140-Kb flanked by SNP1562 and ID1576. c Relative physical position of the BND2 locus. Numbers above chromosome A08 indicate physical distance (unit: Mb). The region contains 27 annotated genes according to the ‘Darmor-bzh’ reference genome. The candidate gene, BnaA08g20960D is marked in red. d Structure of the BnaA08g20960D gene, a single nucleotide substitution (C-T) between bnd2 and its wild type parent 2B was identified in the fifth intron. Exons and introns were represented as black boxes or black lines, respectively

Full size image

The potential application of bnd2 in hybrid rapeseed breeding

Due to the low yield of bnd2, it cannot be used for inbreeding of rapeseed. To test its potential application in hybrid breeding, we crossed the bnd2 mutant (bnd2/bnd2) with the commercial cultivar L329 (BND2/BND2) to derive the hybrid line F1 (BND2/bnd2). The plant height of the F1 hybrid was similar to L329 (Fig. 7a and b, Additional file 16: Fig. S14, Additional file 17: Table S3). However, the yield per plant (YPP) of F1 was significantly higher than both of bnd2 and L329, showing an increase of 32.7% compared to L329 due to more seeds per silique (SPS), and three times as much as bnd2 (Fig. 7c, Additional file 17: Table S3). These results suggested that although the presence of bnd2 in the hybrid line dose not increase plant height, it induces higher grain yield due to the semi-dominant effect of BND2 over bnd2 and the heterosis between the two lines.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Performance on plant height and grain yield of bnd2 in the hybrid line. a Phenotypes of L329 (left), bnd2 (right) and their hybrid (F1, middle) at the maturation stage. b-c Plant height (b) and yield per plant (c) of L329, bnd2 and their F1 hybrid at maturity. Values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 10). Bars = 20 cm. The significance of difference was determined by Student’s t-test (n.s. not significant; ***, P < 0.001)

Full size image

Discussion

Plant height is an important plant characteristic closely related to yield performance of many crops; however, very tall plants tend to have increased risk of lodging. Although many dwarf mutants in rapeseed have been identified and reported, only a few varieties could be used as practical breeding resources [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Compared with rice and wheat [27], rapeseed dwarf mutants are rare. In this study, we described a new dwarf mutant bnd2 isolated from EMS-mutagenized seeds of B. napus [19]. The mutant bnd2 displayed a height of approximately 100 cm at maturity. The decrease in plant height was due to lower position of the first branch, shorter internodes, and reduced main inflorescence length (Fig. 1h-j, Additional files 5 and 7: Figs. S5 and 6, Additional file 6: Table S1). The reduced first branch height and main inflorescence length are conducive to lodging resistance [28]. The mutant bnd2 displayed a poor biological yield performance due to the limitation of its height (Fig. 1k-n), which limits its benefit for inbreeding of high-yield cultivars. While it was reported that a B. rapa dwarf mutant Brrga1-d showed significant reduction in seed yield, it had no significant influence on the seed yield of hybrid lines containing the dwarf allele in B. napus [29]. The relatively short sca mutant displayed intermediate height between corresponding parents, and significantly higher YPP after crossing it with the rapeseed cultivars 4312, ZS11, and ZY821 [15]. In this study, as shown in Fig. 3, the heterozygous BC1F1 plants (bnd2/WT) derived from a backcross of bnd2 with its WT parent, displayed intermediate plant height between that of WT and the mid-parent value (Fig. 3a-c, Additional files 9 and 10: Figs. S8 and 9), suggesting that the allele BND2 is semi-dominant over the allele bnd2. While the F1 plants (bnd2/L329) derived from crossing bnd2 with the commercial cultivar L329 showed no significant difference with regards to plant height (Fig. 7a and b, Additional file 16: Fig. S14, Additional file 17: Table S3), the plants displayed a significant increase in grain yield compared to L329 (Fig. 7c, Additional file 17: Table S3), suggesting that by combining the semi-dominant effect of bnd2 and the heterosis between two lines, the allele bnd2 may be a potential genetic resource for lodging-resistance and high-yield breeding in hybrid rapeseed.

In the fine mapping interval of bnd2, a candidate gene BnIPK1, BnaA08g20960D (Fig. 6c) was annotated to encode an inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentapentaphosphate 2 kinase, which catalyzes the terminal step in the biosynthetic pathway of phytic acid (myo-inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate [InsP6]) [30]. Over the last two decades, with the discovery of IPK1 in budding yeast [31], IPK1 homologous genes were subsequently isolated from Schizosaccharomyces pombe [32], human [33], Drosophila [34], maize [30, 35], and Arabidopsis thaliana [36]. As a product of IPK1, phytic acid acts not only as a storage compound in seeds, but is also involved in hormones and signal transduction processes [37]. It has been reported that InsP6 is a specific functional co-factor of the auxin receptor TIR1 [38] and acts as a ‘conformational stabilizer’ for TIR1 protein [39]. InsP6 binds TIR1 and stabilizes the active amino acid residues around auxin, thus ensuring effective signal transduction between TIR1 and auxin [40]. In addition, AtIPK1 has been reported to be essential for sustaining plant growth. In Arabidopsis, the mutant atipk1–1 displayed reduced size and leaf epinasty [35], while the two mutants atipk1–2 and atipk1–3 showed more serious growth retardation [41]. Similarly, Lee et al. found that the atipk1–1 mutant was significantly smaller than the wild type (Columbia-0) [37]. The seed yield of the atipk1 mutant was only 52% of that of WT because many pods of the mutant contained abortive seeds [37]. In the present study, bnd2 showed shorter petiole leaves, decreased and shorter internodes, and decreased plant height and seed yield compared to WT (Fig. 1c-e, h-n, Additional files 2, 3, 5, and 7: Figs. S2, 3, 5, and 6, Additional file 6: Table S1), suggesting that its dwarfism may be related to auxin signal transduction, which needs to be further explored.

It has been reported that introns of many genes have a positive regulatory effect on gene expression [42]. The promoter of the rice gene OsBP-73 requires the participation of the gene intron sequence to drive the expression of the GUS gene in transgenic rice, but the complete OsBP-73 intron itself has no promoter activity [42]. Liu et al. [43] found that the intron of BnFAD2-C5 can enhance the transcription level of the promoter. The 5′ UTR of Arabidopsis AtVTC1 contains an intron sequence, which can promote the expression of AtVTC1 [44]. In addition, the existence of introns provides a variety of splicing methods for genes. The same DNA sequence can produce different protein products after mRNA transcription by alternative splicing [45]. Sun et al. [30] found that, among 18 maize full-length ZmIPK1A cDNA clones in leaves and seeds, 50% of the transcripts had interrupted reading frames due to alternative splicing of introns 6 and 7. However, intron mutations can lead to abnormal splicing, which in turn could result in exon skipping, new exon generation or intron retention [46]. Yuan et al. [47] found that a single G-A point mutation of the soybean GmIPK1 in the 5′ terminal of intron 5 resulted in the exclusion of the fifth exon, disrupting GmIPK1 functionality. In this study, we identified a single C-T mutation in the fifth intron of BnaA08g20960D in the dwarf mutant bnd2 (Fig. 6d), and found that the expression of BnaA08g20960D was attenuated in bnd2 (Additional file 14: Fig. S12), although no splicing change was observed between bnd2 and WT (Additional file 15: Fig. S13). We therefore considered it as the candidate gene for the dwarf phenotype of bnd2; however, the molecular basis needs to be further examined.

Conclusion

In this study, we described a new dwarf mutant bnd2 isolated using EMS mutagenesis. The mutation of BND2 decreased plant height and grain yield in the background of the inbred line, but maintained the plant height and increased grain yield in the background of the hybrid line. Through BSA-seq and fine mapping, bnd2 was mapped to a 140.0-Kb region on chromosome A08 in B. napus. In summary, we identified a dwarf mutant bnd2 which may be useful for hybrid breeding with lodging resistance and high yield, and the fine mapping results will benefit functional analyses of genetic mechanisms of plant architecture and grain yield in rapeseed.

Methods

Plant materials and growth

B. napus 2B was used as a wild type in this study. 2B is a maintainer line of bolima cytoplasmic male sterile line. The B. napus dwarf mutant bnd2 was isolated and screened from 2B seeds induced by 0.8% EMS solution in our previous study [19]. Another commercial cultivar L329 (Xiangyou 15) described previously [48] was used to construct the F2:3 population and the F1 hybrid line for BND2’s genetic analysis and evaluation of its potential value in hybrid breeding. Plants of all generations including their parents were grown in the filed in Ningxiang, Hunan province.

Agronomic traits analysis

Plants of all generations including their parents were grown in an irrigated field. Each plot in the field is about 2 m wide, 2 m long, with a row spacing of 33 cm. Ten plants were planted in each row. The agronomic traits were measured and counted at maturity stage. Ten plants from plot were randomly selected for agronomic traits analysis. The plant height (PH), internode length (IL), internode number (IN), first branch height (FBH), main inflorescence length (MIL), number of effective primary branches (NPB), number of siliques on raceme (NSR), siliques per plant (SPP), length of siliques (LS), seeds per silique (SPS), thousand-seed weight (TSW) and yield per plant (YPP), were measured and counted as previously described [49, 50]. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t-test using SPSS version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago). The segregation ratio was calculated by Chi square test.

Microscopy analysis

The second internode stem segment from the top to the bottom of bnd2 and WT plants at the early stage of bolting were fixed in FAA (formalin-acetic acid-alcohol) solution for 16–20 h, and then subjected to dehydration and transparency. The tissues were then immersed and embedded in paraffin wax (Sigma, USA), and sectioned to 6–10 μm (Leica rm2265). After staining with 0.05% toluidine blue, the samples were examined and photographed by a reverse fluorescence phase contrast microscope (Nikon). The stem cell size and number were calculated by the Image J software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).

Genetic mapping and BSA-seq

To map the BND2 locus, a F2:3 mapping population containing 157 lines was obtained from the self-pollinated F2 lines, which was derived by the cross between bnd2 and L329. Young leaves were collected from each 157 F2:3 line for genomic DNA extraction using the method of SDS extraction as described by Dellaporta et al [51]. The DNA concentration and purity were detected by Nanodrop one (Thermo Fisher, USA). The DNA of 25 extremely dwarf and 23 extremely tall individuals were mixed to make a short bulk and high bulk, separately.

Both two parents, together with above two bulks, were sequenced by next generation sequencing strategy. The paired end (PE) library was constructed according to the manufacture’s instructions (NEBNext®Ultra™IIFS DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina®), in which the genomic DNA was randomly broken into 300-500 bp fragments. High-throughput sequencing was performed on Illumina NovaSeq platform to generate average 30 Gb sequence data per sample. Burrows-Wheeler Alignment tool (BWA, version 0.7.15) was used to align the PE reads to the reference genome of ‘Darmor-bzh’ v4.1 [26]. And, SAM format was then converted to the BAM format using SAMtools (version 1.3.1). Picard tool (version 1.91) was used to sort the reads in the BAM file and remove polymerase chain reaction (PCR) duplication. Variants including single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and insertion/deletion (InDel) were detected by the HaplotypeCaller of Genome analysis toolkit (GATK, version 3.7). The candidate region was determined based on Δ (SNP-index) and G’ value [52] calculated by QTLseqr (version 0.7.5.2) [53], and ANNOVAR (version 2016FeB1) was used to predict the effect of variants on gene function (Wuhan Genoseq Technology Co. Ltd., Hubei, China).

Development of molecular markers and their genotyping

According to the BSA-seq results and the positions of SNP and InDel on chromosomes contained in the target gene candidate region, and based on the ‘Darmor-bzh’ sequence of the B. napus reference genome, DNA sequences of SNP/InDel were extracted by extending 250 bp forward (5’ end) and back (3’ end) respectively, and Primer Premier (version 5.0) was used to design SNP/InDel markers. For all markers, two parents L329 and bnd2 were used for polymorphism screening, and markers with polymorphism were used for PCR amplification and genotype identification of F2:3 population. For InDel markers, 3% agarose gel electrophoresis was used to separate PCR products. While for SNP markers, PCR products were first identified by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and if bands between the bnd2 and L329 were clear, then sent the PCR products to sequencing (TsingKe Biological Technology Co. Ltd., Changsha, Hunan, China). PCR sequencing results were analyzed with Sequencher (version 5.0). The band type consistent with bnd2 (P1) was recorded as A, the band type consistent with L329 (P2) was recorded as B, and both band types were recorded as H, and the deletion was not recorded. The corresponding mapping markers sequences are listed in Additional file 18: Table S4.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

To detect mRNA expression of the bnd2 candidate gene, BnaA08g20960D, seven-day-old seedlings of bnd2 and wild type 2B grown in soil were sampled. Total RNA was extracted by AG RNAex Pro Reagent (Accurate Biology, China). The cDNA was then synthesized using the HiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme, China). qRT-PCR was performed in an ABI StepOne Plus system (Thermo Fisher, USA) using ChamQ universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, China) according to the manufacture’s instructions. All primers are listed in (Additional file 19: Table S5) and BnActin7 was used as an internal reference. Each experiment was biologically repeated three times.

Semi-quantitative PCR (semi-qPCR) analysis

To detect the splicing of the bnd2 candidate gene, BnaA08g20960D, seven-day-old seedlings of bnd2 and wild type 2B grown in soil were sampled for RNA extraction. 2xTaq Master Mix (Novoprotein, China) was used in PCR reaction according to the manufacture’s instructions. PCR was performed with a 5 min denaturation at 94 °C followed by 28 (for BnActin7) or 36 (for BnaA08g20960D) cycles with each cycle composed of 94 °C for 30s, 58 °C for 30s and 72 °C for 30s. PCR products were then analyzed by 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis. All primers are listed in (Additional file 20: Table S6). Each experiment was biologically repeated three times.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its additional files). The original sequencing datasets of BSA-seq for bnd2 have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA, https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/sra) under accession numbers: SRR12968239, SRR12968240, SRR12968241, and SRR12968242. Any material generated during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BND2:

Brassica napus dwarf 2

EMS:

ethyl methanesulfonate

BSA:

bulked segregant analysis

BSA-seq:

BSA and Next generation sequencing

SNP(s):

single nucleotide polymorphism(s)

InDel(s):

insertion(s) and deletion(s)

YPP:

yield per plant

SPS:

seeds per silique

SPP:

siliques per plant

PH:

plant height

IL:

internode length

FBH:

first branch height

MIL:

main inflorescence length

NPB:

number of effective primary branches

NSR:

number of siliques on raceme

LS:

length of siliques

TSW:

thousand-seed weight

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

IPK1:

Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-Pentapentaphosphate 2 kinase 1

References

  1. Zhu DJ, Zhang H, Huang H, Ning WY, Zhang YC. Effects of different fertilization treatments on yield and economic benefits of rape at different soil fertility levels. Jiangsu Agricultural Science. 2013;41(10):73–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang X, Wang H, Wang J, Sun R, Wu J, Liu S, Bai Y, Mun JH, Bancroft I, Cheng F, et al. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):1035–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayer PE, Hurgobin B, Golicz AA, Chan CK, Yuan Y, Lee HT, Renton M, Meng J, Li R, Long Y, Zou J, Bancroft I, Chalhoub B, King GJ, Batley J, Edwards D. Assembly and comparison of two closely related Brassica napus genomes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15(12):1602–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Foisset N, Delourme R, Barret P, Renard M. Molecular tagging of the dwarf BREIZH (Bzh) gene in Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet. 1995;91(5):756–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeng, XH: Comparing effrctiveness of different mutagens for seed quality and analysis of mutants in Brassica napus. http://www.hzau.edu.cn/ (2010). Accessed 1 Dec 2010.

  6. Liu HL. Cultivation of edible rape. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Chen W, Chu P, Wan S, Yang M, Wang M. Mapping a major QTL responsible for dwarf architecture in Brassica napus using a single-nucleotide polymorphism marker approach. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16(1):178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang M, Zhao Y, Chen F, Yin XC. Inheritance and potentials of a mutated dwarfing gene ndf1 in Brassica napus. Plant Breed. 2004;123(5):449–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Fu SH, Yang J, Wang JS, Zhou Q, Chen XH, Tao LR, Kang ZM, Tang R, Zhang RQ. The identification and application of dwarf mutation bndf-1 in Brassica napus. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2013;29(13):173–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu C, Wu JS. Subcellular localization of semi-dwarf gene BnaA6. rga-ds and identification of its transgenic Brassica napus L. Chinese J Oil Crop Sciences. 2015;37(4):427–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Song X, Pu DF, Tian LS, Yu QQ, Yang YH, Dai BB, Zhao CB, Huang CY, Deng WM. Genetic analysis and characterization of hormone response of semi-dwarf mutant dw-1 in Brasscia napus L. Sci Agric Sin. 2019;52(10):1667–77.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xiang Y, Tong C, Yu S, Zhang T, Zhao J, Lei S, Du C, Liu S. Genetic segregation analysis of a rapeseed dwarf mutant. Pakistan J Bot. 2016;48(4):1629–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao B, Li H, Li J, Wang B, Dai C, Wang J, Liu K. Brassica napus DS-3, encoding a DELLA protein, negatively regulates stem elongation through gibberellin signaling pathway. Theor Appl Genet. 2017;130(4):727–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang RM, Li C, Chen DL, Xiang Y. Breeding of short stem, erect plant type DW 871 in Brassica napus L. Seed. 2019;38(2):116–23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li H, Li J, Song J, Zhao B, Guo C, Wang B, Zhang Q, Wang J, King GJ, Liu K. An auxin signaling gene BnaA3.IAA7 contributes to improved plant architecture and yield heterosis in rapeseed. New Phytol 2019;222(2):837–851.

  16. Wang Y, He J, Yang L, Wang Y, Chen W, Wan S, Chu P, Guan R. Fine mapping of a major locus controlling plant height using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism map in Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet. 2016;129(8):1479–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao B, Wang B, Li Z, Guo T, Zhao J, Guan Z, Liu K. Identification and characterization of a new dwarf locus DS-4 encoding an aux/IAA7 protein in Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132(5):1435–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng H, Jin F, Zaman QU, Ding B, Hao M, Wang Y, Huang Y, Wells R, Dong Y, Hu Q. Identification of Bna.IAA7.C05 as allelic gene for dwarf mutant generated from tissue culture in oilseed rape. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liao XY, Yan JD, Zhong M, Zhuo YH, Wu D, He RQ, Zhao XY, Liu XM. EMS mutagenesis and analysis of multi-branched and long-silique mutants in Brassica napus L. Life Science Research. 2016;20(5):435–41.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseli RV. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(21):9828–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zou C, Wang P, Xu Y. Bulked sample analysis in genetics, genomics and crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14(10):1941–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang Z, Huang D, Tang W, Zheng Y, Liang K, Cutler AJ, Wu W. Mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying cold tolerance in rice seedlings via high-throughput sequencing of pooled extremes. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun J, Yang L, Wang J, Liu H, Zheng H, Xie D, Zhang M, Feng M, Jia Y, Zhao H, Zou D. Identification of a cold-tolerant locus in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using bulked segregant analysis with a next-generation sequencing strategy. Rice. 2018;11(1):24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaminski KP, Kørup K, Andersen MN, Sønderkær M, Andersen MS, Kirk HG, Nielsen KL. Next generation sequencing bulk segregant analysis of potato support that differential flux into the cholesterol and stigmasterol metabolite pools is important for steroidal glycoalkaloid content. Potato Res. 2016;59(1):81–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Song J, Li Z, Liu Z, Guo Y, Qiu LJ. Next-generation sequencing from bulked-segregant analysis accelerates the simultaneous identification of two qualitative genes in soybean. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:919.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chalhoub B, Denoeud F, Liu S, Parkin IAP, Tang H, Wang X, Chiquet J, Belcram H, Tong C, Samans B, et al. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science. 2014;345(6199):950–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hedden P. The genes of the green revolution. Trends Genet. 2003;19(1):5–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma N, Li L, Xu J, Li J, Yu LP, Li GM, Zhang CL. Researches on the lodging resistance and agronomic traits of winter rape (Brassica napus L.). Crops. 2010;6(6):36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Muangprom A, Mauriera I, Osborn TC. Transfer of a dwarf gene from Brassica rapa to oilseed B. napus, effects on agronomic traits, and development of a 'perfect' marker for selection. Mol Breeding. 2006;17(2):101–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun Y, Thompson M, Lin G, Butler H, Gao Z, Thornburgh S, Yau K, Smith DA, Shukla VK. Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase from maize: molecular and biochemical characterization. Plant Physiol. 2007;144(3):1278–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. York JD, Odom AR, Murphy R, Ives EB, Wente SR. A phospholipase C-dependent inositol polyphosphate kinase pathway required for efficient messenger RNA export. Science. 1999;285:96–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ives EB, Nichols J, Wente SR, York JD. Biochemical and functional characterization of inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinases. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(47):36575–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Verbsky JW, Wilson MP, Kisseleva MV, Majerus PW, Wente SR. The synthesis of inositol hexakisphosphate: characterization of human inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(35):31857–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Seeds AM, Sandquist JC, Spana EP, York JD. A molecular basis for inositol polyphosphate synthesis in Drosophila melanogaster. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(45):47222–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stevenson-Paulik J, Bastidas RJ, Chiou ST, Frye RA, York JD. Generation of phytate-free seeds in Arabidopsis through disruption of inositol polyphosphate kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(35):12612–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sweetman D, Johnson S, Caddick SEK, Hanke DE, Brearley CA. Characterization of an Arabidopsis inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase (AtIPK1). Biochem J. 2006;394(1):95–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee HS, Lee DH, Cho HK, Kim SH, Auh JH, Pai HS. InsP6-sensitive variants of the Gle1 mRNA export factor rescue growth and fertility defects of the ipk1 low-phytic-acid mutation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2015;27(2):417–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tan X, Calderon-villalobos LIA, Sharon M, Zheng C, Robinson CV, Estelle M, Zheng N. Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase. Nature. 2007;446(7136):640–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hao GF, Yang GF. The role of Phe82 and Phe351 in auxin-induced substrate perception by TIR1 ubiquitin ligase: a novel insight from molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10742.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jia XB, Zhang Y, Sun HW, Chen L, Shen RX, Lai CM. Molecular dynamics simulation study on the interaction mode of auxin perception. Acta Chimica Sin. 2010;68(24):2500–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kuo HF, Chang TY, Chiang SF, Di Wang W, Charng YY, Chiou TJ. Arabidopsis inositol pentakisphosphate 2-kinase, AtIPK1, is required for growth and modulates phosphate homeostasis at the transcriptional level. Plant J. 2014;80(3):503–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen J, Wang ZY. Expression of OsBP-73 gene requires involvement of its intron in rice. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol. 2004;30(1):81–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu RY, Liu F, Zhang ZQ, Guan CY. Functional analysis of BnFAD2-C5 promoter and intron at expression level in Brassica napus. Acta Agron Sin. 2016;42(10):1471–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li SH, Wang FR, Huang RF, Dong JG, Wang J. Function analysis of VTC1 5′ UTR intron in Arabidopsis. J Agric Sci and Tech. 2016;18(6):52–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ner-gaon H, Halachmi R, Savaldi-goldstein S, Rubin E, Ophir R, Fluhr R. Intron retention is a major phenomenon in alternative splicing in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2004;39(6):877–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nakai K, Sakamoto H. Construction of a novel database containing aberrant splicing mutations of mammalian genes. Gene. 1994;141(2):171–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yuan FJ, Zhu DH, Tan YY, Dong DK, Fu XJ, Zhu SL, Li BQ, Shu QY. Identification and characterization of the soybean IPK1 ortholog of a low phytic acid mutant reveals an exon-excluding splice-site mutation. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;125(7):1413–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang ZQ, Xiao G, Liu RY, Tan TL, Guan CY, Wang GH, Chen SY, Wu XM, Guan M, Li Q. Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins between Xiangyou 15 variety and the mutant M15. Front Biol. 2014;9(3):234–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou B, Lin J, Peng W, Peng D, Zhuo Y, Zhu D, Huang X, Tang D, Guo M, He R, Zhang J, Li X, Zhao X, Liu X. Dwarfism in Brassica napus L. induced by the over-expression of a gibberellin 2-oxidase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Breeding. 2012;29(1):115–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Yang P, Li Y, He C, Yan J, Zhang W, Li X, Xiang F, Zuo Z, Li X, Zhu Y, Liu X. Phenotype and TMT-based quantitative proteomics analysis of Brassica napus reveals new insight into chlorophyll synthesis and chloroplast structure. J Proteome. 2020;214:103621.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Report. 1983;1(4):19–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Magwene PM, Willis JH, Kelly JK. The statistics of bulk segregant analysis using next generation sequencing. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(11):1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Mansfeld BN, Grumet R. QTLseqr: an R package for bulk segregant analysis with next-generation sequencing. Plant Genome. 2018;11(2):1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Zhongsong Liu for providing L329 (xiangyou 15) seeds, Prof. Wusheng Peng for 2B seeds.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic Research Program of Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Innovation Committee (No. JCYJ20170818112212721), the Basic Research Program of Changsha Municipal Science and Technology (No. kq1901028), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan province (No. 2018JJ3036). All the funders only provided funds but did not take participation in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xin Li, Fujiang Xiang and Wei Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Biology, Hunan Hybrid Rape Engineering and Technology Research Center, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China

    Xin Li, Fujiang Xiang, Jindong Yan, Xinmei Li, Ming Zhong, Piao Yang, Xuanming Liu & Xiaoying Zhao

  2. Shenzhen Institute, Hunan University, Shenzhen, 518057, China

    Xin Li, Fujiang Xiang, Jindong Yan, Xinmei Li, Ming Zhong, Piao Yang & Xiaoying Zhao

  3. Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, 410125, China

    Xin Li, Caiyan Chen & Donghai Mao

  4. College of Agronnomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, China

    Wei Zhang

Authors
  1. Xin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fujiang Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jindong Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xinmei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ming Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Piao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Caiyan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xuanming Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Donghai Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xiaoying Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XL, FX, DM and XZ designed and carried out the research. XL and FX performed the experiments. WZ, JY, XL, MZ, PY provided technical assistance to XL and FX. XL, CC, XL, DM and XZ analyzed the data. XL wrote the manuscript. CC, XL, DM and XZ revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Donghai Mao or Xiaoying Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Phenotype of one-week-old wild type (WT) and bnd2 seedlings.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Plants of WT and bnd2 at 5-week-old seedling stage.

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

Leaves of WT and bnd2 at 5-week-old seedling stage.

Additional file 4: Figure S4.

Plants of WT and bnd2 at peak flowering stage.

Additional file 5: Figure S5.

Whole plant phenotype of WT and bnd2.

Additional file 6: Table S1.

Agronomic characters of WT and bnd2.

Additional file 7: Figure S6.

Plant internodes of WT and bnd2.

Additional file 8: Figure S7.

Phenotype of siliques of WT and bnd2. (DOCX 94 kb)

Additional file 9: Figure S8.

Phenotypes of WT (left), bnd2 (right) and their F1 hybrid (middle) at maturity.

Additional file 10: Figure S9.

Plant internodes of WT (left), bnd2 (right) and their F1 hybrid (middle) at maturity.

Additional file 11: Figure S10.

Phenotype and trait inheritance of bnd2 in the cross population.

Additional file 12: Table S2.

Statistics of the sequencing datasets.

Additional file 13: Figure S11.

The genotypes of some F2:3 lines derived from cross between bnd2 and L329 at the marker ID1656.

Additional file 14: Figure S12

. qRT-PCR analysis showing the mRNA expression levels of BnaA08g20960D in WT and bnd2.

Additional file 15: Figure S13.

semi-qPCR analysis showing the mRNA expression pattern of BnaA08g20960D in WT and bnd2.

Additional file 16: Figure S14.

Phenotypes of L329 (left), bnd2 (right) and their hybrid (F1, middle) at the maturation stage.

Additional file 17: Table S3.

Agronomic characters of heterozygous F1 between L329 and bnd2.

Additional file 18: Table S4.

Primer sequences for designed markers.

Additional file 19: Table S5.

Primer sequences for qRT-PCR.

Additional file 20: Table S6.

Primer sequences for semi-qPCR.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Xiang, F., Zhang, W. et al. Characterization and fine mapping of a new dwarf mutant in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol 21, 117 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12870-021-02885-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12870-021-02885-y

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us