Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Baseline income, follow-up income, income mobility and their roles in mental disorders: a longitudinal intra-generational community-based study

BMC Psychiatry volume 20, Article number: 181 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Although a number of studies have found that income mobility associated with an elevated risk of mental disorders, existing research does not provide sufficient evidence of how exactly individuals’ experience of income mobility per se affects their risk of mental health outcomes. This present study aimed to explore roles of baseline income, follow-up income, and income mobility in the development of mental disorders using an intra-generational, longitudinal follow-up study.

Methods

We used data from the Montreal South-West Longitudinal Catchment Area Study. A total of 1117 participants with complete information both on income and past 12-month diagnoses of mental disorders were selected for this study. Diagonal Reference Models were used to simultaneously examine roles of income at baseline, income at follow-up, and income mobility in mental disorders during a 4-year follow-up.

Results

Both baseline and follow-up income were important predictors for any mental disorder and major depression among males and females. Those with low income had a higher risk of any mental disorders and major depression. No evidence was found to support an association between income mobility (neither downwards nor upwards) and mental disorders. Marital status was uniquely associated with any mental disorder among males. Having a pre-existing diagnosis of any mental disorder at origin was associated with any mental disorder and major depression at the end of the 4-year follow-up.

Conclusions

This study first simultaneously examined roles of income at baseline, at follow-up, and mobility in mental disorders among a large-scale intra-generational community-based study. This present study provides additional evidence on how income is associated with an individuals’ likelihood of mental disorders.

Peer Review reports

Background

Income profoundly influences health and human capacity [1]. Low income increases the risk of developing a wide range of health-related determinants, such as poor nutrition, poor housing, and less access to necessary health services [2,3,4]. These stressful events and precarious pre-existing issues (e.g. poor housing, financial, employment, and relationship conditions) could then trigger mental disorders [5]. This impact could be even passed by to the next generation [6]. There are two major hypotheses (health selection and social causation) proposed to explain the causal direction of the socioeconomic status – health relationship [7], but there is no consistent evidence to support one hypothesis over another [8].

Income mobility is a change in income relative to one’s original income location within a given society. A high degree of income mobility, either upwards or downwards, indicates the stratification system of a society is open. The relationship between income mobility and health has profound ethical and political implications in the pernicious effects of human inequality and the differential impact on social classes of economic and social policies [9, 10].

Although a number of studies have found that income mobility associated with an elevated risk of mental disorders [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], existing research does not provide sufficient evidence of how exactly individuals’ experience of income mobility per se affects their risk of mental health outcomes. Investigating this question requires one to disentangle the separate effects of income at baseline, income at follow-up, and income mobility simultaneously. The literature to date has mainly been based on conventional methods, which can only estimate social mobility, social origin, and social destination, individually. These conventional approaches do not consider complex relationships between social origin, destination, and mobility.

One analytical approach that allows for simultaneous estimation of effects is the Diagonal Reference Models (DRMs). DRMs can estimate all three factors simultaneously. Recently more studies have begun to apply this approach to explore the effects of social mobility on health outcomes [19, 20]. A recent study on the effects of education mobility on overweight and obesity compared conventional approaches and DRMs in their analyses and found that the results from DRMs modeling to be superior [21]. They recommended the use of DRMs in evaluating the consequences of all different types of social mobility on health. Though DRMs are being used more in research on a broad range of social phenomena, few studies have been carried out to apply this approach in longitudinal data to disentangle the mobility effect from the origin and destination effects in a longitudinal data [22].

We believe that investigating the role of intra-generational income mobility could help us understand the social determinant of mental disorders. The present study aimed to explore roles of income at baseline and income at follow-up in major depression "and any mental disorder" and to examine how income mobility influenced mental disorders by applying DRMs methodology in an intra-generational, longitudinal follow-up study. We also investigated factors that were involved in the intra-generational transmission of income mobility on mental disorders.

Methods

Data source

The Montreal South-West Longitudinal Catchment Area Study—Zone d’Épidémiologie Psychiatrique du Sud-Ouest de Montréal (ZEPSOM), is a longitudinal population-based cohort study of a representative community sample of five neighbourhoods in the South-West sector of Montreal, Canada, which had a target population of 269,720.

The interviewers conducted a scheduled face-to-face meeting either at participants’ homes or in a research facility. To ensure the quality and consistency of data collected, all the interviewers have a university education in humanities; they received 5 days of training and were supervised every week. Data were collected using laptop computers, which transferred the information directly into the database of the study. The interview generally ranged from 1.5 to 3 hrs, depending on whether a mental disorder was discovered. The interview included a wide range of validated questionnaires on sociodemographic factors, psychological distress, and a set of common mental and behavioral problems. More detailed information about this study could be found in previously published articles [23,24,25].

Study sample

To examine the roles of baseline income, follow-up income, and income mobility in mental disorders, this current study only included participants who conducted the data collections at the baseline (2007/8) and the follow-up (2012/3). A total of 1117 participants with complete information both on income and past 12-month diagnoses of mental disorders were selected for this study.

Measures

Outcome

Past 12-month mental disorders were identified by the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) version 1.2 of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), including major depression, mania, panic disorder, social phobia, agoraphobia, and alcohol and drug dependence [26, 27]. We used “any mental disorder” to define the presence of any kind of studied mental disorders in the past 12-month prior to the interview. Because of the low incidence of most selected mental disorders assessed in the survey, major depression was the only specific mental disorder that could be analyzed separately.

Independent variable

Income was categorized into two categories low-income and non-low income. The low-income measures developed by Statistics Canada were used to identify the low-income population. Individuals with an adjusted family income that was lower than 50% of the median Canadian level were classified as low income. We used this binary variable to indicate income in the societal context and reflect economic fluctuations over the 4-year follow-up period in the study area.

Covariates

In addition to the effects of baseline and follow-up incomes, we also controlled for a variety of variables (age, sex, immigrant status, marital status, level of education, whether or not having a family history of mental health conditions, and whether or not the study participant had a lifetime diagnosis of any mental disorder at baseline) in our DRMs models. The Parental Psychiatric History [19] was used to assess if a biological parent had been treated by a psychiatrist or hospitalized for mental health problems, or experienced any of the following problems, depression, delirium or hallucination, anxiety disorders, substance abuse or suicide.

Statistical analyses

To reflect sex differences in mental health and social context, we analyzed males and females separately. The DRMs were used to test the roles of income at baseline and follow-up positions and income mobility on mental health outcomes. DRMs were developed for the purpose of empirically disentangling mobility effects from baseline and follow-up effects, and have demonstrated their utility in estimating health consequences of social mobility [19,20,21]. DRMs can estimate the effects of mobility and positions of baseline and follow-up [20]. DRMs estimate mobility effects using the following equation:

$$ {Y}_{ijk}=w\times {\mu}_{ii}+\left(1-w\right)\times {\mu}_{jj}+\sum {\beta}_{ijk l}+{e}_{ijk} $$

where Yijk is the value of outcome in cell ij of the mobility table which has k observations, μii is the estimated mean of Y in the diagonal cell in the row denoting the position at baseline, whereas μjj is the estimated mean of Y in the diagonal cell in the row denoting the position at follow-up, w estimates the contribution of baseline relative to follow-up, lies in the interval [0,1]. Using the w-parameter, the two effects are combined in an intercept for each cell. This method allows examining the effect of social mobility in addition to baseline and follow-up effects [28].

Our consideration of income mobility effects on mental health outcomes included baseline and follow-up effects of downwards or upwards mobility, and other relevant covariates. We used non-linear modeling in all the analyses. STATA version 15 subcommand DRM was used to analyze the DRM in this study [29].

Results

A summary of the study cohort

The mean age of the study cohort at follow-up was 43.9 (SD = 12.8) years. The cohort included more females (63.9, 95% CI 61.1–66.7%) than males (36.1, 95% CI 33.3–38.9%). A total of 200 participants (17.9, 95% CI 15.8–20.3%) had a lifetime diagnosis for any mental disorder at baseline. Overall, this study cohort had a reduced prevalence of low income over the 4-year follow-up. The proportion of low income at baseline was 19.8% (95% CI 17.5–22.2%) and this proportion dropped to 17.6% (95% CI 15.5–20.0%). The majority of participants, 87.6% (95% CI 85.6–89.5%) did not experience income mobility with 5.10% of the study sample (95% CI 3.95–6.56%) reporting downwards mobility and 7.25% (95% CI 5.87–8.93%) reporting upwards mobility.

Effects of baseline income, follow-up income, and income mobility on any selected mental disorder and major depression

We ran diagonal reference models for outcomes of any mental disorder and major depression, including baseline income, follow-up income, income mobility and a number of covariates (age, immigrant status, whether or not being a Caucasian, marital status, level of education, whether or not having a family history of mental disorder, whether or not having a history of lifetime mental disorder at the origin) in the models. Table 1 shows the estimated odds from DRMs for any mental disorder. The odds of having any mental disorder in the past 12-month for income immobile males in the low-income category was 0.19, whereas the immobile males who were not in the low-income category had much lower odds of having any mental disorder (0.09). A lower level of income was associated with a higher likelihood of any mental disorder for both females and males. The weight of baseline income is an indicator of relative effects the origin position had on mobile men compared to the effects of destination. Its value ranges from 0 to 1. For most of our analyses, the weight of origin was 0 or constrained. As the parameter of 0 differs from 0.5 (null hypothesis = origin and destination has an equal contribution to outcomes), it may suggest that mobile males were differently influenced by their baseline income and follow-up income. This was also true for females. The model also found downwards income mobility had no additional effect on the odds of having any mental disorder (p = 0.528). Similarly, no upwards income mobility was identified for any mental disorder (p = 0.486). Marital status was significantly associated with the odds of having any mental disorder. Males who were married or separate, widowed or divorced had lower odds of having any mental disorder compared to those who were single.

Table 1 Effects of baseline income, follow-up income, and income mobility on any studied mental disorder among males and females from diagonal reference models (DRMs) with 95% confidence intervals
Full size table

For females, we found that low-income immobile females had higher odds of having any mental disorder in the past 12-month. There was no statistical difference in marital status. Again, mobile females might also be differently influenced by their income at baseline and follow-up. Having a prior diagnosis of any mental disorder was consistently linked with the subsequent occurrence of any mental disorder among males and females during the study period (p < 0.001). Neither downwards nor upwards income mobility was associated with the occurrence of any mental disorder (p > 0.05). Table 2 provides the income mobility trajectories of all the participants included in the analyses.

Table 2 Overview of intra-generational income mobility among males and females
Full size table

For major depression (Table 3), low-income immobile males and females had higher odds of having major depression. Income mobile participants may be differently influenced by their income at baseline and follow-up. Having a prior diagnosis of any mental disorder at origin was consistently associated with a higher risk of major depression among males and females (p < 0.001). Neither downwards nor upwards income mobility among males and females was associated with major depression at follow-up (p > 0.05). Consistently, both income at baseline and follow-up played significant roles in major depression (p < 0.05). Having a lifetime diagnosis of any mental disorder at baseline predicted a greater risk of major depression at follow-up.

Table 3 Effects of baseline income, follow-up income, and income mobility on major depression among males and females from diagonal reference models (DRMs) with 95% confidence intervals
Full size table

We also tested the effects of baseline income, follow-up income, and income mobility on any mental disorder and major depression in the total study sample and found similar results (Table 4). No interactions among studied covariates were associated with any mental disorder or major depression (p > 0.05).

Table 4 Effects of baseline income, follow-up income, and income mobility on any mental disorder and major depression from diagonal reference models (DRMs) with 95% confidence intervals
Full size table

Discussion

This study first simultaneously examined the roles of baseline income, follow-up income, and income mobility in mental disorders among a large-scale intra-generational community-based study. We found that both baseline income and follow-up income were important predictors of any mental disorder and major depression among males and females. Those with low income had a higher risk of any mental disorders and major depression at follow-up. No evidence was found to support an association between income mobility (neither downwards nor upwards) and mental disorders. Marital status was only associated with any mental disorder among males. Having a pre-existing diagnosis of any mental disorder at baseline was linked with a higher risk of any mental disorder and major depression at the end of the 4-year follow-up.

As discussed in the Introduction, the social gradient (income) in mental disorders is well established [7, 8]. Participants in the low-income category were at increased odds of any mental disorders compared with those in the not low-income category. The main findings of this study have important public health implications and substantial policy implications. Most important, the findings suggest that low-income is associated with substantial psychopathology and that there is a need for targeted interventions to prevent and treat mental disorders in the population with low-income.

In terms of income mobility, studies have found a lagged effect of income on subsequent health outcomes [30]. It can take up to 6 years to observe the negative consequences of low income on health [31]. Likewise, we found that people with low income at baseline and the follow-up were more likely to report any mental disorder or major depressive episode at the end of the 4-year follow-up. One possible explanation for this is that low income had a long-lasting effect on mental disorders. This is in line with the social causation theory, which hypothesizes that low income leads to negative health outcomes [32]. In addition, social causation theory generally suggests the genetic liability to a disease interacts with poverty in developing disease [33]. Many studies have suggested the interplay between life stress and different genetic variants, such as serotonin transporter promoter variant [34,35,36]. Although we considered whether or not having a family history of mental disorders as a covariate, which might indicate the genetic susceptibility of mental disorders, no significant associations were identified between whether or not having a family history of the occurrence of mental disorders and any mental disorder or major depression at the end of the 4-year follow-up. Questions as to what extent genetic variations, and how these variations, interact with poverty in mental disorders remain to be answered.

Notably, our findings suggest that baseline income may have a different role in any mental disorder and major depression compared to follow-up income. As a result of most of our findings with 0 or constrained value for the weight of baseline income for the outcomes, further research is warranted to scrutinize the relative importance of baseline income versus follow-up income.

We did not find income mobility (neither upwards nor downwards) was associated with the occurrence of any mental disorder or major depression at the end of the 4-year follow-up. There are several possible explanations for this. First, changes in income positions might take a longer time to manifest the effect of income-induced stress attributed to any mental disorder and major depression. This income-induced stress could include upwards (people having high-income later-on and suffering from the societal stress of not familiar with their peers’ social norms) and downwards (people making less income later-on and struggling to provide basic living demands and dealing with the stress to meeting the basic needs). Second, the role of income mobility in mental disorders may be mediated by other covariates. It may largely be involved in externalizing disorders. Costello et al. [37] used a natural experimental study to examine the relationship between poverty and psychopathology among children and adolescents. They found that moving families out of poverty had a major effect in lowering behaviour problems, particularly conduct and oppositional disorders. Parental supervision was a significant mediator for the income mobility-conduct disorders relationship. When people moved out of poverty, parents tended to spend more time with their children, which in turn reduced the risk of externalizing disorders. Third, only substantial changes in income positions may relate to health outcomes. A Swedish study found only an increase in income over a 5-year period was associated with improvement in self-rated health [31]. Our current study only captured income data on two categories.

In line with the literature [38], we found that a pre-existing diagnosis of mental disorder was associated with a higher risk of any mental disorder and major depression at follow-up. We did not find having a positive family history of mental disorders associated with any mental disorder or major depression. Having a family history of mental health conditions, such as schizophrenia, major depression, has been associated with a higher risk of mental disorders among offspring [39]. One possible explanation for the finding in our study is that the competing risk between whether or not having a family history of mental disorders and whether or not having a pre-existing diagnosis of mental disorders at baseline in the final model. Compared to the family history of mental disorders, having a pre-existing diagnosis of mental disorders was a stronger risk predictor for developing a subsequent mental disorder.

Strengths and limitations

One of the apparent strengths of the present study is that it simultaneously examined the roles of baseline income, follow-up income, and income mobility in mental disorders. Also, this study demonstrated the possibility of applying DRMs to longitudinal data on mental health outcomes.

There are several limitations to be noted. First, we were limited to examine the relationships between income mobility and all studied mental disorders, except major depression, due to the small number of people developing other mental disorders. Second, income was dichotomized into low and not low groups after adjustment for household size. The data originally collected in the past did not allow us to further specify income categories. Third, the data analyzed in this study covered 4 years. The role of income mobility in mental disorders may take longer to manifest. Finally, we cannot disentangle the underlying mechanisms between roles of baseline income, follow-up income, and income mobility and mental disorders. We cannot infer causality in the relationship between income and mental disorders.

Conclusions

This present study provides additional evidence on how income is associated with an individuals’ likelihood of mental disorders. Males and females with low-income at baseline were more likely to develop mental disorders at follow-up. During the study period, neither upwards nor downwards income mobility was associated with developing a mental disorder.

Availability of data and materials

This study uses a dataset from an ongoing prospective cohort study. Permission was granted for analyzing the current dataset. Interested researchers could contact authors for the access.

Abbreviations

DRMs:

Diagonal Reference Models

ZEPSOM:

Zone d’Épidémiologie Psychiatrique du Sud-Ouest de Montréal

CCHS:

Canadian Community Health Survey

CIDI:

Composite International Diagnostic Interview

SD:

Standard Deviation

CI:

Confidence intervals

References

  1. WHO. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva; 2008.

  2. Adler NE, Ostrove JM. Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don't. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:3–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ostrove JM, Feldman P, Adler NE. Relations among socioeconomic status indicators and health for African-Americans and whites. J Health Psychol. 1999;4:451–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caron J, Latimer E, Tousignant M. Predictors of psychological distress in low-income populations of Montreal. Can J Public Health. 2007;98(Suppl 1):S35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Muennig P, Franks P, Jia H, et al. The income-associated burden of disease in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:2018–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ritsher JEB, Warner V, Johnson JG, et al. Inter-generational longitudinal study of social class and depression: a test of social causation and social selection models. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178:s84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldman N. Social factors and health: the causation-selection issue revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:1251–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kroger H, Pakpahan E, Hoffmann R. What causes health inequality? A systematic review on the relative importance of social causation and health selection. Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25:951–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Israel E, Frenkel A. Social justice and spatial inequality: Toward a conceptual framework. Prog Hum Geogr. 2017. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/0309132517702969.

  10. Simandan D. On how much one can take: relocating exploitation and exclusion within the broader framework of allostatic load theory. Health & Place 2010;16:1291-3.Pampel FC, Krueger PM, Denney JT. Socioeconomic disparities in health behaviors. Annu Rev Sociol. 2010;36:349–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Quadros LC, Quevedo Lde A, Motta JV, et al. Social mobility and mental disorders at 30 years of age in participants of the 1982 cohort, Pelotas, Rio Grande Do Sul – RS. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dal Grande E, Chittleborough CR, Wu J, et al. Effect of social mobility in family financial situation and housing tenure on mental health conditions among south Australian adults: results from a population health surveillance system, 2009 to 2011. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Das-Munshi J, Leavey G, Stansfeld SA, et al. Migration, social mobility and common mental disorders: critical review of the literature and meta-analysis. Ethn Health. 2012;17:17–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tiffin PA, Pearce MS, Parker L. Social mobility over the lifecourse and self reported mental health at age 50: prospective cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:870–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodgers B, Mann SL. Re-thinking the analysis of intergenerational social mobility: a comment on John W. Fox's "social class, mental illness, and social mobility". J Health Soc Behav. 1993;34:165–72 discussion 173-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fox JW. Social class, mental illness, and social mobility: the social selection-drift hypothesis for serious mental illness. J Health Soc Behav. 1990;31:344–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hollingshead AB, Redlich FC. Social mobility and mental illness. Am J Psychiatry. 1955;112:179–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sobel M. Diagonal mobility models- a substantivelyl motivated class of designs for the analysis of mobility effects. Am Sociol Rev. 1981;46:893–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sobel M. Social mobility and fertility revisited: some new models for the analysis of the mobility effects hypothesis. Am Sociol Rev. 1985;50:699–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Waal J, Daenekindt S, de Koster W. Statistical challenges in modelling the health consequences of social mobility: the need for diagonal reference models. Int J Public Health. 2017;62:1029–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Billingsley S, Drefahl S, Ghilagaber G. Diagonal reference models in longitudinal analyses of fertility and mortality: Stockholm University; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meng X, Brunet A, Turecki G, et al. Risk factor modifications and depression incidence: a 4-year longitudinal Canadian cohort of the Montreal catchment area study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Caron J, Fleury MJ, Perreault M, et al. Prevalence of psychological distress and mental disorders, and use of mental health services in the epidemiological catchment area of Montreal south-west. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fleury MJ, Grenier G, Bamvita JM, et al. Comprehensive determinants of health service utilisation for mental health reasons in a Canadian catchment area. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kessler RC, Ustun TB. The world mental health (WMH) survey initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13:93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gravel R, Beland Y. The Canadian community health survey: mental health and well-being. Can J Psychiatr. 2005;50:573–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Driessen G, Gunther N, Van Os J. Shared social environment and psychiatric disorder: a multilevel analysis of individual and ecological effects. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998;33:606–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaiser C. DRM Diagonal Reference Model Stata. Open Science Framework; 2018. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.17605/OSF.IO/KFDP6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Najman JM, Bor W, Ahmadabadi Z, et al. The inter- and intra- generational transmission of family poverty and hardship (adversity): a prospective 30 year study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0190504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miething A, Yngwe M. Stability and variability in income position over time: exploring their role in self-rated health in Swedish survey data. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dohrenwend BP, Levav I, Shrout PE, et al. Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: the causation-selection issue. Science. 1992;255:946–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fletcher JM, Conley D. The challenge of causal inference in gene-environment interaction research: leveraging research designs from the social sciences. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(Suppl 1):S42–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Caspi A, Sugden K, Moffitt TE, et al. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science. 2003;301:386–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Karg K, Burmeister M, Shedden K, et al. The serotonin transporter promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revisited: evidence of genetic moderation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68:444–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Risch N, Herrell R, Lehner T, et al. Interaction between the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR), stressful life events, and risk of depression: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301:2462–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Costello EJ, Compton SN, Keeler G, et al. Relationships between poverty and psychopathology: a natural experiment. JAMA. 2003;290:2023–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Patton GC, Coffey C, Romaniuk H, et al. The prognosis of common mental disorders in adolescents: a 14-year prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2014;383:1404–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Milne BJ, Caspi A, Harrington H, et al. Predictive value of family history on severity of illness: the case for depression, anxiety, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:738–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rasic D, Hajek T, Alda M, et al. Risk of mental illness in offspring of parents with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of family high-risk studies. Schizophr Bull. 2014.40:28–38.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the researchers, interviewers, and participants in the ZEPSOM study.

Funding

The ZEPSOM study was funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CTP-79839) and (PJT-148845). Meng received a researcher scholarship from the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec, Canada. The research was also supported by the Canada First Excellence Research Fund provided to McGill University for Healthy Brains for Healthy Lives. These funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Xiangfei Meng & Jean Caron

  2. Douglas Research Centre, Montreal, Canada

    Xiangfei Meng, Aihua Liu & Jean Caron

  3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

    Carl D’Arcy

  4. School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

    Carl D’Arcy

Authors
  1. Xiangfei Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aihua Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carl D’Arcy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jean Caron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.M. took part in concept, design, statistical analyses, drafting manuscript and interpretation of results. J.C. was responsible for design the ZEPSOM study and support for statistical analyses. AL and CD support the statistical analysis and critically review the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangfei Meng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Research Ethics Board of Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Canada. All participants of the longitudinal study provided written informed consent to take part in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, X., Liu, A., D’Arcy, C. et al. Baseline income, follow-up income, income mobility and their roles in mental disorders: a longitudinal intra-generational community-based study. BMC Psychiatry 20, 181 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12888-020-02578-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12888-020-02578-0

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us