Skip to main content
Download PDF

The link between obesity and vitamin D in bariatric patients with omega-loop gastric bypass surgery - a vitamin D supplementation trial to compare the efficacy of postoperative cholecalciferol loading (LOAD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials volume 16, Article number: 328 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Beyond its classical role in calcium homoeostasis and bone metabolism, vitamin D deficiency has been found to be associated with several diseases, including diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and even obesity itself. Importantly, there are limited data on therapeutic strategies for vitamin D deficiency in bariatric patients, and the procedure-specific guidelines may not be sufficient. To improve long-term outcomes, nutritional screening and appropriate supplementation to prevent nutrient deficiencies are urgently needed. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine effects and safety of a forced dosing regimen of vitamin D versus conventional dose supplementation on vitamin D levels and other parameters in bariatric patients.

Methods/Design

The study includes loading plus repeat dosing compared with repeated administration of vitamin D without a loading dose, according to guidelines, in a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Up to a triple oral loading dose is given on day 1, then 2 and 4 weeks after surgery (100,000 IU dose each time), followed by an oral maintenance dose (3420 IU/day). The control group (n = 25) will receive placebo, followed by administration of a standard dose (3420 IU/day). We hypothesize that a significant increase in vitamin D levels will occur in patients in the treatment group (n = 25) by 24 weeks after surgery. Further measurements are aimed at evaluating changes in inflammation, bone turnover, insulin resistance, blood pressure, liver, mental health, and gut microbiota of patients undergoing omega-loop gastric bypass surgery. Furthermore, possible associations between concentrations of vitamin D, the involved enzymes, or vitamin D receptor in adipose and/or liver tissues will be determined.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this trial is the first of its kind with this type of vitamin D supplementation in bariatric patients. Its major strength is the design and implementation of evaluation of influencing factors such as liver function, bone health, inflammation, insulin resistance, blood pressure, symptoms of depression, or microbiota. This alternative vitamin D dosing regimen has the potential to be a safe, fast, evidence-based treatment of vitamin D deficiency in bariatric patients. Owing to the increasing number of bariatric patients, it is also of interest to elucidate the link between obesity and vitamin D.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02092376. Registered on 17 March 2014.

Peer Review reports

Background

Obesity is a global epidemic [1] that is associated with various comorbidities. It is part of the definition of the metabolic syndrome, including arterial hypertension and disturbances in glucose and lipid metabolism, with an inherent risk of development of cardiovascular disease [2, 3]. These associated issues and obesity itself contribute to increased morbidity, mortality rates, and health care costs [4, 5].

Weight reduction is not easy to achieve and maintain. Consequently, many individuals, especially those with comorbidities, are referred for bariatric weight loss surgery as a way to treat obesity and (pre)diabetes successfully [6]. Bariatric surgery is associated with effective and long-term weight loss in morbidly obese patients and decreases overall mortality [7]. At present, there are three categories of bariatric procedures: (1) purely gastric restriction (e.g., gastric banding); (2) gastric restriction with some malabsorption, as represented by the Roux-en-Y (RYGB) or omega-loop gastric bypass (OLGB), reducing the intake and absorption of food [8]; and (3) gastric restriction with significant intestinal malabsorption (e.g., biliopancreatic diversion) [9]. In general, the more complex the procedure, the better are the results in terms of weight loss [10]. Because of this situation and the fact that obesity itself is often accompanied by nutritional deficiencies, bariatric patients often have perioperative nutrient deficiencies [9, 11–18]. These deficiencies should be detected and clinically addressed early to avoid postoperative complications. To improve long-term outcomes following bariatric surgery, nutritional screening and prescribing appropriate supplementation to prevent nutrient deficiencies is recommended at an early stage in pre- and postoperative care owing to the malabsorption and insufficient intake. Vitamin D deficiency is common following bariatric surgery and has been reported to occur in 50–80 % of bariatric patients [19–22]. There are limited data on how best to treat low vitamin D status in bariatric patients. Procedure-specific guidelines may not be helpful in daily practice, and the updated guidelines have not been evaluated yet [23].

Recent studies have shown that vitamin D may have an impact on the prevention of many diseases, including autoimmune disorders, hypertension, cancers, diabetes [3, 24–26], depression [27–29], and, even more theoretically, probably obesity itself [30].

Obesity is frequently characterized by reduced vitamin D bioavailability, insulin resistance, and a chronic inflammatory response. There is a relationship between serum concentrations of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-OHD) and several circulating inflammatory markers in severely obese individuals [31]. This observed relationship between low vitamin D status and obesity may be caused by mechanisms such as sequestration in adipose tissue. The mechanisms underlying the inverse relationship between obesity and vitamin D deficiency are largely unknown. Low serum 25-OHD might contribute to obesity by affecting lipogenesis and/or adipogenesis in the adipose tissue. Interestingly, recent studies [32] suggest that the adipose tissue could be a direct target of vitamin D and that the hormone may modulate adipose tissue formation and function [33–37].

Obesity has recently been associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD comprises a disease spectrum ranging from relatively benign hepatic steatosis to more severe steatohepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and ultimately liver cancer [38]. It has become the most common form of chronic liver disease in Western countries, with a prevalence approaching 50 % of the population (already 40 % in the European Union) [39, 40]. It is estimated that NAFLD will be the number 1 indication for liver transplants in the United States in 2020 [41]. Currently, surgical treatment of coexisting NAFLD in morbidly obese patients is an evolving matter of debate [42]. A few studies propose that low levels of vitamin D may contribute to the development of NAFLD [43]. However, the mechanisms underlying the association of vitamin D and NAFLD are not yet fully understood. Recent animal studies have shown that vitamin D has an important role in the regulation of oxidative stress, the production of proinflammatory cytokines [44, 45], hepatocyte apoptosis [46], and even liver fibrosis [47]. Furthermore, NAFLD is present in approximately 90 % of bariatric patients [48, 49], and up to 5 % of these patients may have unsuspected cirrhosis [50–52]. Because NAFLD is associated with the presence of obesity, glucose and/or lipid disturbances, and arterial hypertension, it is now considered the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome.

There are limited data on therapeutic strategies for vitamin D deficiency in bariatric patients, and procedure-specific guidelines may not be very helpful in daily clinical practice. Nevertheless, in the 2013 clinical practice guidelines [23], the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society and American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery recommend a vitamin D supplementation of at least 3000 IU per day and to titrate to the therapeutic 25-OHD level of >75 nmol/L. This recommendation outlines the best evidence level (grade A) [23], which is based on a single randomized controlled trial done in the United States [53]. In that study, the authors attempted to find the optimal vitamin D treatment dose after surgery. Patients who had undergone RYGB were randomized to three doses of cholecalciferol: 800 IU, 2000 IU, and 5000 IU per day. The authors found that all groups had insufficient vitamin D levels at baseline and after 12 months; sufficient vitamin D concentrations were reached in only 44, 78, and 70 % of the patients in the respective groups [53]. Thus, even with very high-dose supplementation, it may be challenging to achieve normal 25-OHD levels in bariatric patients [54].

Vitamin D has multiple physiological functions beyond its classical role in calcium homoeostasis and bone metabolism, and morbidly obese persons have an increased risk for low circulating 25-OHD levels [55, 56] owing to the storage of vitamin D in adipose tissue [55].

Therefore, randomized controlled trials with vitamin D supplementation, such as the present study (Link between Obesity And Vitamin D in bariatric patients with omega-loop bypass surgery [LOAD]), are needed to establish and further pursue evidence-based and potentially optimal treatment regimens for the increasing number patients with low vitamin D status following bariatric surgery and to define more carefully the impact of specific surgical factors on vitamin D status.

Methods/Design

Overview

This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled intervention trial includes administration of a vitamin D loading dose and repeat doses in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. A stratified randomization design is being used to obtain comparable groups to ensure that baseline variables (25-OHD, age, and sex) are evenly distributed between groups. Subjects are randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. In this study, 50 bariatric patients planning to undergo OLGB will be recruited. Over the first month postoperatively (day 1–3, weeks 2 and 4), they will receive the loading dose of vitamin D. Afterwards, the maintenance dose will be given up to 24 weeks and until the follow-up visit. An overview of the study design and the assessment points is provided in Fig. 1. The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna (reference number 1899/2013) by the Austrian Competent Authority (reference number LCM-718280-0001), and it complies with the Declaration of Helsinki [57]. Furthermore, the protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02092376) and EudraCT (identifier: 2013-003546-16). The study methods are in accordance with the 2010 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement guidelines for reporting randomized trials [58].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design and assessment points

Full size image

Preevaluation

The methods in this study are built upon a cohort study in which investigators evaluated inter alia the vitamin D status of 50 morbidly obese patients who underwent OLGB [54]. The findings of the evaluation illustrated that 96 % had vitamin D deficiency preoperatively and that, after non-standardized vitamin D supplementation, 80 % still had vitamin D deficiency 12 months postoperatively [54]. Additionally, there is evidence that, despite forced vitamin D supplementation, some patients are still at risk for increased bone resorption [22, 59, 60]. It could be possible that morbidly obese patients might need higher 25-OHD levels to reduce the risk for developing metabolic bone disease, osteoporosis [61], or other associated disorders.

Study objectives

Primary outcome measures

The primary objective of the present study is to examine whether administration of up to three oral loading doses in the first month postoperatively (day 1 and at weeks 2 and 4), followed by an oral maintenance dose (intervention group) in bariatric patients can significantly increase 25-OHD levels 24 weeks after surgery as compared with a control group receiving placebo followed by the standard daily maintenance dose (control group).

Secondary outcome measures

In further measurements, changes in inflammation, bone turnover, bone mineral density (BMD), insulin resistance, blood pressure, body fat mass, stage of liver stiffness and steatosis, and mental health (improvement of depression) will be investigated. Furthermore, we will assess the adipose depot vitamin D concentrations and expression of enzymes (25-hydroxylases such as CYP27A1, CYP2R1, CYP2J2, CYP3A4, CYP2C11, and CYP27B1, as well as 24-hydroxylase CYP24A1) and vitamin D receptor in subcutaneous tissue (SAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and liver tissue samples collected during surgery. Additionally, the liver tissue samples will be used in addition to the prescribed study-related measures for a histological examination as extended diagnostics for NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and molecular analysis to further evaluate disease specific mechanisms [62, 63].

Recruitment and eligibility

We are recruiting bariatric patients planning to undergo OLGB and who are in- and/or outpatients in the obesity clinic at the Department of Internal Medicine III or the Department of Surgery at Vienna General Hospital. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Full size table
Table 2 Measurements at several time points
Full size table

Sample size calculation

The study is powered to detect differences among the groups for 24-week serum 25-OHD levels. On basis of the preevaluation (cohort study), the placebo group was conservatively estimated to have an average 24-week 25-OHD level of 50 ± 30 nmol/L. For sample size calculation, the difference in 25-OHD levels between groups will be considered. Given a clinically relevant difference of 30 nmol/L and a standard deviation of 35 nmol/L of the differences, a two-sided significance level of 0.05, a sample size of 22 per group is needed to reach 80 % statistical power. Because imputation for dropouts of 20 % may have some inestimable effect on the assumed standard deviation of the differences, the sample size is increased to 25 per group. To reach this sample size, a total of 50 bariatric patients in the study are needed. The primary endpoint will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Randomization

Subjects are randomly assigned to the intervention or control group, stratified by 25-OHD, age, and sex using the Randomizer for Clinical Trials 1.8.1 online tool [64]. Each subject receives an appropriate randomization number. Randomization is carried out after the patient has signed the informed consent form and before undergoing bariatric surgery, right before the baseline assessment. Allocation to the groups is performed with consecutively numbered dark bottles containing either vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or placebo (carrier oil). These allocation bottles are labeled with the randomization number.

Intervention

Loading dose determination

A loading dose is an extent of drug or substance designed to fill the central volume of distribution to a concentration that matches the final plateau concentration achieved with the maintenance dose. Consequently, this final plateau could be achieved sooner than the four half-lives required if it is administered only at the maintenance dose rate [65]. According to the current guidelines, a minimal daily vitamin D supplementation of at least 3000 IU is recommended [23]. To prevent failure of the study due to an insufficient treatment dose, we chose the maximum loading dose for which sufficient safety data are available. The functional half-life for vitamin D3 in the body is between 2 and 3 months [66–68]. As a result, the loading dose can be calculated as the cumulative maintenance dose that is planned to be given through one functional half-life of vitamin D, as follows:

$$ \mathrm{Loading}\ \mathrm{dose}=\left(\mathrm{daily}\ \mathrm{maintenance}\ \mathrm{dose}\ \mathrm{of}\ 3420\ \mathrm{IU}\right)\times \left(90\ \mathrm{days}\right)=307,800\ \mathrm{IU}\left(\mathrm{total}\ \mathrm{loading}\ \mathrm{dose}\right) $$

In previous studies, researchers used doses exceeding this dosage, at 500,000 and 600,000 IU of cholecalciferol/vitamin D3 in frail elderly patients, young patients, and critically ill patients, without observing any adverse effects (e.g., hypercalcemia) [66, 69, 70]. The total loading dose of 300,000 IU is given on the basis of the measured 25-OHD blood levels and/or concentrations (except for the first dose, given at day 1 after surgery, of 100,000 IU) up to a maximum of 300,000 IU. To make the loading dose protocol safer, 100,000 IU of vitamin D is administered at one time to allow clearance from the circulation between each increment of the loading dose [71].

According to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the no observed adverse effect level was established at 10,000 IU per day and the tolerable upper intake level (UL) at 4000 IU per day (based on induction of hypercalcemia as the indicator of toxicity) [72, 73]. The maintenance dose, given after the loading dose, is 3420 IU per day, which is in accordance with the EFSA panel guideline of a UL of 4000 IU per day [72]. Taken together, no harm or risk is expected for patients in the intervention and placebo groups. Importantly, as a result, appropriate selection of maintenance and loading doses can reduce the need for follow-up monitoring of 25-OHD levels.

Intervention group

The oral loading dose of 300,000 IU cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) is divided into three doses (100,000 IU each) and is given on day 1 and at 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively. The oral maintenance dose is given up to 24 weeks and until the follow-up visit (46 weeks). All patients in the intervention group receive the first loading dose. The second and third doses are given based on the 25-OHD serum concentration, which is assessed before administration. If the 25-OHD does not reach a level above 75 nmol/L, a 100,000 IU dose is again given, up to 300,000 IU in total. After the last loading dose, a maintenance dose of 3420 IU per day (approximately translating to 60 drops and 24,000 IU per week) should maintain the high 25-OHD concentration, according to guidelines (Fig. 2) [23].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Dosing regimen. [25 - OHD 25-hydroxy vitamin D]

Full size image

Placebo group

The carrier solution (medium-chain triglyceride oil [MCT]), of the verum formulation (MCT + vitamin D) is used in the placebo-only group. The placebo group is treated exactly the same as the intervention group (Fig. 2).

Measurements

Patient history and dietary assessment data are documented at baseline and collected four times. For all subjects, body weight, body composition, and blood parameters are assessed eight times. The liver function assessment is done four times. Blood pressure, depression symptoms, BMD, and total body fat mass are measured two times in all study groups. The visit and assessment schedule are shown in Fig. 3 and Table 1.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Flowchart. [BMD bone mineral density]

Full size image

The measurements to be performed are described in the subsections below and in Table 2.

History, blood pressure, and dietary assessment

  1. 1.

    Medical history, such as comorbidities, prescribed medications, and demographics (marital status, education, migration background, and career)

  2. 2.

    Blood pressure (mmHg)

  3. 3.

    Dietary assessment to provide information regarding dietary vitamin D intake as follows:

    1. a.

      5-day food record: During the week before the scheduled visit, patients should record their food intake for 5 days. Data are analyzed using the nutritional software nut.s, which is based on Bundeslebensmittelschlüssel (Max Rubner-Institut; http://www.bls.nvs2.de/).

    2. b.

      Mediterranean Adherence Score: A brief, validated questionnaire regarding adherence to the Mediterranean diet results on a 14-point scale [74]; the higher the score, the better the adherence to the proposed diet

Anthropometry

  1. 1.

    Weight (kg), measured with a calibrated scale

  2. 2.

    Height (cm), measured with a wall stadiometer

  3. 3.

    Waist circumference, measured with an inelastic tape

  4. 4.

    Body composition: fat-free mass, lean body mass, total body water, and phase angle are assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) [75], based on the transfer of a low-voltage alternating current through the body. This measurement captures the voltage drop of the applied current and result in measuring resistance and reactance. It is used with height, weight, age, and sex in a number of multiple regression relationships to calculate body composition compartments [76]. A single frequency BIA at 50 kHz and 0.8 mA (Biacorpus RX 4000; MediCal HealthCare GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) is passed between electrodes (Bodystat, Isle of Man, UK) placed on the dominant side hand and foot with patients in the supine position.

Stage of liver stiffness and steatosis

Transient elastography FibroScan (Echosens, Paris, France) with a controlled attenuation parameter (CAP™) will be performed based on transmitting a vibration signal into the liver and receiving the resulting shear wave, which depends on liver stiffness. CAP™ measures ultrasonic attenuation in the liver at 3.5 MHz and detects liver steatosis.

Bone mineral density and total body fat mass

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) will be used to measure bone mineral content, BMD, and percent body fat.

Laboratory parameters

  1. 1.

    Vitamin D status: 25-OHD (nmol/L), 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D (pg/ml)

  2. 2.

    Biochemical parameters: sodium (nmol/L), potassium (nmol/L), chloride (nmol/L), calcium (nmol/L), magnesium (nmol/L), iron (μg/dl), total protein (g/L), albumin (g/L), triglyceride (mg/dl), total cholesterol (mg/dl), high-density lipoprotein (mg/dl), low-density lipoprotein (mg/dl), vitamin B12 (pmol/L), folic acid (nmol/L), vitamin A (μmol/L), vitamin E (μmol/L), ferritin (μg/L), transferrin (mg/dl), and transferrin saturation (%)

  3. 3.

    Bone turnover markers: calcium (mmol/L), osteocalcin (ng/ml), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (U/L), type I collagen cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide (ng/ml), anorganic phosphate (mmol/L), parathyroid hormone intact (pg/ml), and amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (ng/ml)

  4. 4.

    Inflammation markers: C-reactive protein (mg/dl) and interleukin 6 (pg/ml)

  5. 5.

    Insulin resistance markers: C-peptide (ng/ml), insulin (μU/ml), blood glucose (mg/dl), and glycosylated hemoglobin HbA1c (%)

  6. 6.

    Liver parameters: aspartate transaminase (U/L), alanine transaminase (U/L), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L), total alkaline phosphatase (U/L), and cholinesterase (U/L)

  7. 7.

    Blood count

  8. 8.

    Coagulation: Normotest (%) (Technoclone, Vienna, Austria), activated partial thromboplastin time (s), and fibrinogen (mg/dl)

  9. 9.

    Protein electrophoresis: serum protein electrophoresis, haptoglobin (mg/dl), and α2-macroglobulin (mg/dl)

Depression symptoms

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [77] (simplified BDI-V), a 21-question, multiple-choice, self-report inventory will be used for measuring the severity of depression [78].

Microbiota composition

Stool samples will be collected to evaluate changes in the composition of intestinal microbiota resulting from weight reduction and vitamin D supplementation.

Biopsy

For the purposes of describing adipose depot vitamin D concentrations and expression of enzymes in SAT, visceral adipose VAT and liver tissue samples are collected by the surgeon during surgery. Furthermore, liver tissue samples are used, in addition to the prescribed study-related measures, for histological examination as extended diagnostics. Samples are snap-frozen in isopentane and stored in nitrogen tanks at −196 °C until assayed. Biopsies will be performed as follows:

  1. 1.

    Adipose tissue: The SAT sample is extracted through a linear incision in the abdominal wall with no additional incision. The VAT sample is taken from the greater omentum, coming off the transverse colon.

  2. 2.

    Liver tissue: Standard intraoperative wedge and needle biopsies are collected during surgery.

Statistical analysis

Data exploration using descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistics (uni- and multivariate) will be performed. The data will be described by frequencies or percentages, means and standard deviations, medians and confidence intervals, and graphics. For proofing of normal distributions, visual inspection of histograms or box plots will be used. Independent samples t tests, Mann–Whitney U test or χ2 tests will be performed to compare groups. Correlation coefficients will be used with respect to the secondary outcomes. Analysis of covariance will be used to compare parameters at baseline and after the intervention (postoperatively), as well as after the follow-up, between intervention and control groups, adjusting for the baseline value as a covariate. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 22 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) will be used for all statistical analyses. All tests are two-sided, and a p value <0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Discussion

The major strengths of the proposed study are the prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design and the implementation of an independent evaluation of outcome parameters. The expected result, positive or negative, should provide an evidence-based and potentially optimal treatment of vitamin D deficiency following bariatric surgery and should define the interactions of vitamin D and specific factors, such as liver and bone health, inflammation, insulin resistance, blood pressure, depression symptoms, microbiota, and weight loss. Furthermore, as far as we know, the LOAD study is one of the first trials with this type of vitamin D supplementation in bariatric patients.

Some aspects of the study design, however, may deserve a closer discussion. Why was an active treatment regime after the loading dose chosen for the control group? From an ethical point of view, and bearing in mind the importance of vitamin D for bone metabolism, it would be difficult not to provide these patients with vitamin D supplementation at all. Therefore, we decided to use the placebo only for the loading dose (in the first postoperative month) to compare this dosing regimen with the usual supplementation. Indeed, with this study design, we expect to treat and provide supplements to the patients more effectively than in routine care.

The prospective benefit will have a positive impact on vitamin D status and therefore on the well-being and health-related quality of life, which has been described in the literature [79–81]. A further question might be why a supplementation regimen different from an established treatment of vitamin D deficiency in bariatric patients was chosen. In fact, from a methodological point of view, a constant daily supplementation of vitamin D would be preferable. However, there is evidence in the literature that this standard supplementation in bariatric patients is not sufficient, and with this novel dosing regimen, the final vitamin D plateau could be achieved earlier than the four half-lives required when administered only at the maintenance dose rate [65]. Another important point for the success of the LOAD study is the compliance of the participants regarding regular study visits. Hence, we are in close contact with the participants, and they are receiving text messages before the scheduled appointment.

Finally, one might assume that the rather small sample size of 50 bariatric patients in the proposed study might be underpowered to detect a significant difference between groups. However, the study is powered to detect differences between the groups for 24-week serum 25-OHD levels, with a given clinically relevant difference of 30 nmol/L and a standard deviation of 35 nmol/L of the differences. Thus, if high-dose supplementation with vitamin D is indeed effective, a reduction of vitamin D deficiency after 24 weeks would not be unrealistic.

In conclusion, this vitamin D supplementation regimen has the potential to be a safe, orally available, cheap, and evidence-based treatment of low vitamin D status following bariatric surgery in this increasingly prevalent group, and the study probably also is an opportunity to find an association between obesity and vitamin D deficiency.

Trial status

The LOAD study commenced recruitment in April 2014. Recruitment was completed in April 2015.

Abbreviations

BDI:

Beck Depression Inventory

BIA:

Bioelectrical impedance analysis

BMD:

Bone mineral density

BMI:

Body mass index

CAP:

Controlled attenuation parameter

DEXA:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

EFSA:

European Food Safety Authority

GFR:

Glomerular filtration rate

LOAD:

Link between Obesity And Vitamin D in bariatric patients with omega-loop bypass surgery

MCT:

Medium-chain triglyceride

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

25-OHD:

25-hydroxy vitamin D

OLGB:

Omega-loop gastric bypass

RYGB:

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

SAT:

Subcutaneous adipose tissue

UL:

Tolerable upper intake level

VAT:

Visceral adipose tissue

References

  1. Popkin BM. Recent dynamics suggest selected countries catching up to US obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(1):284S–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Botella-Carretero JI, Alvarez-Blasco F, Villafruela JJ, Balsa JA, Vázquez C, Escobar-Morreale HF. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with the metabolic syndrome in morbid obesity. Clin Nutr. 2007;26(5):573–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kayaniyil S, Vieth R, Harris SB, Retnakaran R, Knight JA, Gerstein HC, et al. Association of 25(OH)D and PTH with metabolic syndrome and its traditional and nontraditional components. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(1):168–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Liang L, Caballero B, Kumanyika SK. Will all Americans become overweight or obese? Estimating the progression and cost of the US obesity epidemic. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(10):2323–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yach D, Stuckler D, Brownell KD. Epidemiologic and economic consequences of the global epidemics of obesity and diabetes. Nat Med. 2006;12(1):62–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009;19(12):1605–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gloth FM, Alam W, Hollis B. Vitamin D vs broad spectrum phototherapy in the treatment of seasonal affective disorder. J Nutr Health Aging. 1999;3(1):5–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mechanick JI, Kushner RF, Sugerman HJ, Gonzalez-Campoy JM, Collazo-Clavell ML, Spitz AF, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery medical guidelines for clinical practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;17 Suppl 1:1–70. A published corrigendum appears in Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(3):649.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gagnon LE, Karwacki Sheff EJ. Outcomes and complications after bariatric surgery. Am J Nurs. 2012;112(9):26–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aasheim ET, Bjorkman S, Sovik TT, Engstrom M, Hanvold SE, Mala T, et al. Vitamin status after bariatric surgery: a randomized study of gastric bypass and duodenal switch. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(1):15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aasheim ET, Hofso D, Hjelmesaeth J, Birkeland KI, Bohmer T. Vitamin status in morbidly obese patients: a cross-sectional study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(2):362–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gasteyger C, Suter M, Gaillard RC, Giusti V. Nutritional deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity often cannot be prevented by standard multivitamin supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(5):1128–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ledoux S, Larger E. Nutritional deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be prevented by standard multivitamin supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(4):1176–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Skroubis G, Sakellaropoulos G, Pouggouras K, Mead N, Nikiforidis G, Kalfarentzos F. Comparison of nutritional deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and after biliopancreatic diversion with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2002;12(4):551–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sovik TT, Aasheim ET, Taha O, Engstrom M, Fagerland MW, Bjorkman S, et al. Weight loss, cardiovascular risk factors, and quality of life after gastric bypass and duodenal switch: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(5):281–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tucker ON, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Nutritional consequences of weight-loss surgery. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91(3):499–514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ziegler O, Sirveaux MA, Brunaud L, Reibel N, Quilliot D. Medical follow up after bariatric surgery: nutritional and drug issues. General recommendations for the prevention and treatment of nutritional deficiencies. Diabetes Metab. 2009;35(6 Pt 2):544–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bacci V, Silecchia G. Vitamin D status and supplementation in morbid obesity before and after bariatric surgery. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;4(6):781–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Censani M, Stein EM, Shane E, Oberfield SE, McMahon DJ, Lerner S, et al. Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in morbidly obese adolescents prior to bariatric surgery. ISRN Obes. 2013;2013:284516.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ducloux R, Nobecourt E, Chevallier JM, Ducloux H, Elian N, Altman JJ. Vitamin D deficiency before bariatric surgery: should supplement intake be routinely prescribed? Obes Surg. 2011;21(5):556–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fish E, Beverstein G, Olson D, Reinhardt S, Garren M, Gould J. Vitamin D status of morbidly obese bariatric surgery patients. J Surg Res. 2010;164(2):198–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, Garvey WT, Hurley DL, McMahon MM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Endocr Pract. 2013;19(2):337–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Artaza JN, Mehrotra R, Norris KC. Vitamin D and the cardiovascular system. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(9):1515–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Osei K. 25-OH vitamin D: is it the universal panacea for metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(9):4220–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozfirat Z, Chowdhury TA. Vitamin D deficiency and type 2 diabetes. Postgrad Med J. 2010;86(1011):18–25. quiz 24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anglin RE, Samaan Z, Walter SD, McDonald SD. Vitamin D deficiency and depression in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:100–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jorde R, Sneve M, Figenschau Y, Svartberg J, Waterloo K. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on symptoms of depression in overweight and obese subjects: randomized double blind trial. J Intern Med. 2008;264(6):599–609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kjaergaard M, Waterloo K, Wang CE, Almas B, Figenschau Y, Hutchinson MS, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplement on depression scores in people with low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D: nested case–control study and randomised clinical trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201(5):360–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Foss YJ. Vitamin D, deficiency is the cause of common obesity. Med Hypotheses. 2009;72(3):314–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bellia A, Garcovich C, D’Adamo M, Lombardo M, Tesauro M, Donadel G, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are inversely associated with systemic inflammation in severe obese subjects. Intern Emerg Med. 2013;8(1):33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang TT, Tavera-Mendoza LE, Laperriere D, Libby E, MacLeod NB, Nagai Y, et al. Large-scale in silico and microarray-based identification of direct 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 target genes. Mol Endocrinol. 2005;19(11):2685–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ching S, Kashinkunti S, Niehaus MD, Zinser GM. Mammary adipocytes bioactivate 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and signal via vitamin D3 receptor, modulating mammary epithelial cell growth. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112(11):3393–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wong KE, Kong J, Zhang W, Szeto FL, Ye H, Deb DK, et al. Targeted expression of human vitamin D receptor in adipocytes decreases energy expenditure and induces obesity in mice. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(39):33804–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Li J, Byrne ME, Chang E, Jiang Y, Donkin SS, Buhman KK, et al. 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D hydroxylase in adipocytes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;112(1–3):122–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kong J, Li Y. Molecular mechanism of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibition of adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003;290:E916–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kamei Y, Kawada T, Kazuki R, Ono T, Kato S, Sugimoto E. Vitamin D receptor gene expression is up-regulated by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;193(3):948–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(7):1592–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lazo M, Clark J. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a global perspective. Semin Liver Dis. 2008;28:339–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Blachier M, Leleu H, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Valla DC, Roudot-Thoraval F. The burden of liver disease in Europe: a review of available epidemiological data. J Hepatol. 2013;58(3):593–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Charlton MR, Burns JM, Pedersen RA, Watt KD, Heimbach JK, Dierkhising RA. Frequency and outcomes of liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(4):1249–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vander Naalt SJ, Gurria JP, Holterman AL. Surgical treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in severely obese patients. Hepat Med. 2014;6:103–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Eliades M, Spyrou E, Agrawal N, Lazo M, Brancati FL, Potter JJ, et al. Meta-analysis: vitamin D and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38:246–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. George N, Kumar T, Antony S, Jayanarayanan S, Paulose C. Effect of vitamin D3 in reducing metabolic and oxidative stress in the liver of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Br J Nutr. 2012;108:1410–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Roth C, Elfers C, Figlewicz D, Melhorn S, Morton G, Hoofnagle A, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in obese rats exacerbates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and increases hepatic resistin and Toll-like receptor activation. Hepatology. 2012;55(5):1103–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang A, Wang Y, Xie H, Zheng S. Calcitriol inhibits hepatocyte apoptosis in rat allograft by regulating apoptosis-associated genes. Int Immunopharmacol. 2007;7:1122–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Potter J, Liu X, Koteish A, Mezey E. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its nuclear receptor repress human α1(I) collagen expression and type I collagen formation. Liver Int. 2013;33:677–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Csendes A, Smok G, Burgos AM. Histological findings in the liver before and after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006;16(5):607–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Machado M, Marques-Vidal P, Cortez-Pinto H. Hepatic histology in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Hepatol. 2006;45(4):600–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, Marchesini G, Brunello F, Carucci P, et al. Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2002;123(1):134–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu YC, McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology. 1999;116(6):1413–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sasaki A, Nitta H, Otsuka K, Umemura A, Baba S, Obuchi T, et al. Bariatric surgery and non-alcoholic Fatty liver disease: current and potential future treatments. Front Endocrinol. 2014;5:164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Goldner WS, Stoner JA, Lyden E, Thompson J, Taylor K, Larson L, et al. Finding the optimal dose of vitamin D following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized pilot clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2009;19(2):173–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Luger M, Kruschitz R, Langer F, Prager G, Walker M, Marculescu R, et al. Effects of omega-loop gastric bypass on vitamin D and bone metabolism in morbidly obese bariatric patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(6):1056–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bell NH, Epstein S, Greene A, Shary J, Oexmann MJ, Shaw S. Evidence for alteration of the vitamin D-endocrine system in obese subjects. J Clin Invest. 1985;76(1):370–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Wortsman J, Matsuoka LY, Chen TC, Lu Z, Holick MF. Decreased bioavailability of vitamin D in obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(3):690–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dale O, Salo M. The Helsinki Declaration, research guidelines and regulations: present and future editorial aspects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;40(7):771–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials. 2010;11:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Clements RH, Yellumahanthi K, Wesley M, Ballem N, Bland KI. Hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Am Surg. 2008;74(6):469–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Johnson JM, Maher JW, DeMaria EJ, Downs RW, Wolfe LG, Kellum JM. The long-term effects of gastric bypass on vitamin D metabolism. Ann Surg. 2006;243(5):701–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Signori C, Zalesin KC, Franklin B, Miller WL, McCullough PA. Effect of gastric bypass on vitamin D and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Obes Surg. 2010;20(7):949–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wree A, Schlattjan M, Bechmann LP, Claudel T, Sowa JP, Stojakovic T, et al. Adipocyte cell size, free fatty acids and apolipoproteins are associated with non-alcoholic liver injury progression in severely obese patients. Metabolism. 2014;63(12):1542–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Starmann J, Falth M, Spindelbock W, Lanz KL, Lackner C, Zatloukal K, et al. Gene expression profiling unravels cancer-related hepatic molecular signatures in steatohepatitis but not in steatosis. PLoS One. 2012;7(10), e46584.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Vienna. Randomizer for clinical trials. https://www.randomizer.at/. Accessed 14 April 2014.

  65. Kenakin TP. Pharmacokinetics. In: A pharmacology primer: theory, applications, and methods. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2009. p. 179–214.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  66. Bacon CJ, Gamble GD, Horne AM, Scott MA, Reid IR. High-dose oral vitamin D3 supplementation in the elderly. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(8):1407–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Mawer EB, Backhouse J, Holman CA, Lumb GA, Stanbury SW. The distribution and storage of vitamin D and its metabolites in human tissues. Clin Sci. 1972;43(3):413–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Vieth R. Vitamin D, supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and safety. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(5):842–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Cipriani C, Romagnoli E, Scillitani A, Chiodini I, Clerico R, Carnevale V, et al. Effect of a single oral dose of 600,000 IU of cholecalciferol on serum calciotropic hormones in young subjects with vitamin D deficiency: a prospective intervention study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(10):4771–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Amrein K, Schnedl C, Holl A, Riedl R, Christopher KB, Pachler C, et al. Effect of high-dose vitamin D3 on hospital length of stay in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency: the VITdAL-ICU randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312(15):1520–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Vieth R. The pharmacology of vitamin D. In: Feldman D, Pike JW, Adams JS, editors. Vitamin D. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. p. 1058–61.

    Google Scholar 

  72. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level of vitamin D. EFSA J. 2012;10(7):2813. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Vieth R. Vitamin D, toxicity, policy, and science. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22 Suppl 2:V64–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Martínez-González M, García-Arellano A, Toledo E, Salas-Salvadó J, Buil-Cosiales P, Corella D, et al. A 14-item Mediterranean diet assessment tool and obesity indexes among high-risk subjects: the PREDIMED trial. PLoS One. 2012;7(8), e43134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gómez JM, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(5):1226–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Zarowitz BJ, Pilla AM. Bioelectrical impedance in clinical practice. DICP. 1989;23(7–8):548–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Schmitt M, Altstötter-Gleich C, Hinz A, Maes J, Brähler E. Normwerte für das Vereinfachte Beck-Depressions-Inventar (BDI-V) in der Allgemeinbevölkerung. Diagnostica. 2006;52(2):51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Pilone V, Mozzi E, Schettino AM, Furbetta F, Di Maro A, Giardiello C, et al. Improvement in health-related quality of life in first year after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(3):260–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Gress RE, Hunt SC, Adams TD. Two-year changes in health-related quality of life in gastric bypass patients compared with severely obese controls. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(2):250–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Mathus-Vliegen EM, de Wit LT. Health-related quality of life after gastric banding. Br J Surg. 2007;94(4):457–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study will be conducted in cooperation with the MedUni Wien Biobank. We are grateful to Fresenius Kabi and Aengus for supplying, cost-free, the Oleovit and placebo oil and the BIA for this study population. This research receives no specific grant from any funding agency or from the commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Maria Luger, Renate Kruschitz, Carmen Klammer, Karin Schindler & Bernhard Ludvik

  2. Special Institute for Preventive Cardiology and Nutrition – SIPCAN, Guggenbichlerstraße 8/15, 5026, Salzburg, Austria

    Maria Luger & Friedrich Hoppichler

  3. Clinical Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Rodrig Marculescu & Helmuth Haslacher

  4. Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Enikö Kallay

  5. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Christian Kienbacher, Melanie Kral, Michael Trauner & Stefan Traussnigg

  6. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Felix Langer & Gerhard Prager

  7. Institute of Social Medicine, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Eva Luger

  8. Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Tanja Würger

Authors
  1. Maria Luger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renate Kruschitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rodrig Marculescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Helmuth Haslacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Friedrich Hoppichler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Enikö Kallay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christian Kienbacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Carmen Klammer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Melanie Kral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Felix Langer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Eva Luger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Gerhard Prager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Michael Trauner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Stefan Traussnigg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Tanja Würger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Karin Schindler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Bernhard Ludvik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Schindler.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ML, RK, RM, EK, BL, CHK, ST, and MT designed the trial. ML, RK, FL, CHK, ST, CK, MEK, TW, HH, MT, FH, RM, KS, GP, and BL are responsible for the conduct of the trial. ML, EL, RK, and CK drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

ML: nutritionist, doctoral student, research associate at the Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna and at the Special Institute for Preventive Cardiology and Nutrition

RK: medical doctor at the Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna

RM: medical doctor, associate professor at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna

FL: medical doctor, associate professor at the Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna

CHK: medical doctor at the Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna

ST: medical doctor at the Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna

CK: nutritionist and graduate student at the Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna

MEK: dietician at the Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna

KS: nutritionist, associate professor at the Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna

EL: nutritionist and doctoral student at the Institute of Social Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna

TW: medical doctor at the Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna

HH: research associate at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna

MT: medical doctor, professor and chair of gastroenterology/hepatology at the Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna

FH: medical doctor, associate professor at the Special Institute for Preventive Cardiology and Nutrition

EK: biochemist, associate professor at the Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna

GP: medical doctor, associate professor at the Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna

BL: medical doctor, associate professor at the Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luger, M., Kruschitz, R., Marculescu, R. et al. The link between obesity and vitamin D in bariatric patients with omega-loop gastric bypass surgery - a vitamin D supplementation trial to compare the efficacy of postoperative cholecalciferol loading (LOAD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 16, 328 (2015). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13063-015-0877-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13063-015-0877-9

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215