Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research note
  • Open access
  • Published:

PAD-Beads enrichment enhances detection of PrPSc using real-time quaking-induced conversion

BMC Research Notes volume 12, Article number: 806 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Scrapie is a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) that naturally occurs in sheep and goats. This fatal neurodegenerative disease results from misfolding of the normal cellular prion protein (PrPC) to a pathogenic prion protein form (PrPSc). This pathogenic form, PrPSc, accumulates in the brain and lymphoid tissues. The presence of PrPSc can be detected by an in vitro conversion assay known as real-time quaking induced conversion (RT-QuIC). RT-QuIC has been used to detect PrPSc in a variety of biological tissues from brains to fluids. While this technique is both rapid and sensitive, enhancing the detection of prions would be valuable in the diagnostic laboratories.

Results

In this study, we assessed whether PrPSc detection sensitivity of RT-QuIC can be increased by enriching PrPSc in scrapie tissue homogenates using commercially available aggregated protein binding ligands coated magnetic beads (PAD-Beads). Coupling of RT-QuIC to PAD-Beads based cleanup allowed detection of PrPSc rapidly and without dilution of scrapie sheep brain homogenates prior to RT-QuIC. The PAD-Beads sample pretreatment step prior to RT-QuIC is a useful enhancement in the diagnosis of TSEs.

Introduction

Mammalian prion diseases include human Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD), bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), sheep scrapie, and cervid chronic wasting disease (CWD). These diseases are fatal neurologic diseases known as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), and they result from the misfolding of the normal cellular prion protein (PrPC) into a pathogenic form (PrPSc) that accumulates primarily in the central nervous system [1,2,3,4].

Rodent bioassays can be considered a definitive technique for specific detection of prion infectivity. Two in vitro detection techniques such as protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) and real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) have demonstrated improved prion detection in PrPSc infected tissues. Both techniques are based on in vitro cell-free amplification of misfolded proteins present in samples. PMCA assay has been useful for detection of PrPSc in various samples including tissue and biological fluid samples of human and animals [5,6,7,8], but it requires specifically prepared normal animal brain material as a substrate and conversion is not observed in real-time. In contrast, recombinant prion proteins (rPrPC) are used as substrates for RT-QuIC reactions and RT-QuIC monitors the fibril formation in real-time [9,10,11,12]. RT-QuIC assay has been applied to the detection of a variety of sample types including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [4, 12,13,14,15], blood [5,6,7], saliva [8] and nasal brushings [16, 17]. While RT-QuIC itself offers considerable improvements in sensitivity over non-amplification approaches such as western blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and immunohistochemistry, any pretreatment that would improve speed and sensitivity should be useful in RT-QuIC assay.

Protocols for prion purification allows us to detect and characterize prion in a complex mixture with inhibitors and/or in a diluted samples to improve PrPSc detection sensitivity. Several studies have reported enhanced detection using PMCA and RT-QuIC assays by enrichment of PrPSc containing samples of various means such as immunoprecipitation [13], detergent enrichment [14], or non-specific metal surface binding [15, 16]. In this study, we have applied a commercially available sample enrichment kit called PAD-Beads that is based on a proprietary ligand that specifically binds misfolded proteins and allows for enrichment of PrPSc prior to detection and applied the approach to detection of PrPSc from scrapie-infected sheep brain samples by RT-QuIC.

Main text

Materials and methods

Source of tissue samples

All tissues samples used in this manuscript are from previously published sheep scrapie pathogenesis studies [17, 18] conducted at the National Animal Disease Center under the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol number: ARS-2017-629). The animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animal (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC).

PAD-Beads enrichment

A kit of PAD-Beads was purchased from Microsens Biotechnologies, London, UK [19, 20]. Samples were treated as described by the manufacturer. For elution, 12.5, 25, or 50 µl of 0.1 M NaOH, 0.1% Triton X-100, depending on desired final volume, was added to the beads and the tubes were shaken for 5 min. Tubes were placed on a magnet to capture the beads. While the tubes were on the magnet, the same volume, 12.5, 25, or 50 µl of 0.1 M HCl was added to the tubes to neutralize the alkali. Finally, liquid was removed and analyzed by RT-QuIC.

Recombinant prion protein production and purification

E. coli (BL21(λDE3)) was transformed with the pET28a vector containing the Met109 variant of bank vole PrP gene (amino acids 23–231; GenBank accession number AF367624) and the recombinant bank vole prion proteins were expressed and purified as described by Vrentas et al. [21, 22]. The concentration of protein is determined based upon UV absorbance at 280 nm using an extinction coefficient of 62005 M−1 cm−1 as calculated for the bank vole prion protein.

RT-QuIC protocol

RT-QuIC reactions were performed and analyzed as previously described [23,24,25]. The reaction substrate (98 µl) was composed of 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 300 mM NaCl, 0.1 mg/ml recombinant bank vole prion protein, 10 µM thioflavin T (ThT), 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tetrasodium salt (EDTA) and seeded with 2 µl of the indicated sample. ThT fluorescence measurements (excitation, 460 nm; emission 480 nm, bottom read, 20 flashes per well, manual gain 1400) were taken every 45 min with the reaction held at 42 °C in a BMG FLUOstar Omega plate reader for 100 h.

Results

RT-QuIC detection of PAD-Beads captured scrapie prions

To evaluate the efficacy of PAD-Beads based enrichment for the purposes of RT-QuIC, reactions containing recombinant bank vole prion protein (BV rPrPC) were seeded with different dilutions of PAD-Beads eluate for comparison with that of the directly diluted sheep brain homogenate and monitored for increased ThT fluorescence. RT-QuIC reactions containing bank vole substrate and 300 mM NaCl were seeded with brain stock solution (Fig. 1a, c) or the PAD-Beads eluate (Fig. 1b,d) and dilutions from 10−1 to 10−7 of brain homogenate from two sheep (#1 and #2) positive for scrapie. Both reactions seeded with brain stock and PAD-Beads eluted brain showed fibril formations as monitored by ThT fluorescence. Assays seeded with negative sheep brain homogenate did not produce ThT fluorescence under the conditions of the experiment. Assays seeded with high concentrations brain homogenate (non-diluted or 10−1 dilution) of brain homogenate also did not show ThT increase a result typically interpreted as indicative of inhibitors in the sample. In contrast, non-diluted PAD-Beads eluate seeded reactions exhibited positive ThT fluorescence suggesting PAD-Beads enrichment removes these unidentified inhibitors. Reactions seeded with PAD-Beads eluted brain samples showed a shorter lag time compared to the reactions seeded with non-PAD-Beads treated samples. A 20 h lag time was observed for non-PAD-Beads enriched brain homogenates dilutions from 10−2 to 10−4, but that lag time is reduced to only 10 h following enrichment with PAD-Beads for dilutions from 10−1 to 10−4. The undiluted PAD-Beads eluate without dilution showed the ThT fluorescence lag time of around 30 h. As can be seen in Fig. 1e, f, reaction assays seeded with PAD-Beads eluate brain dilutions between 100 to 10−4 for animal # 1 and between 100 to 10−2 for animal #2 show higher rate constants compared to the reactions seeded with brain homogenate dilutions.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of RT-QuIC reactions between scrapie infected sheep brain homogenate (a, c) and PAD-Beads treated scrapie infected sheep brain homogenate (b, d). Comparison of rate constant obtained RT-QuIC reactions between scrapie infected sheep brain homogenate (e) and PAD-Beads treated scrapie infected sheep brain homogenate (f). RT-QuIC reactions were run using full-length (23–231) bank vole prion protein as the substrate with the addition of 0.001% SDS in the presence of 300 mM NaCl. Data are presented as mean ThT fluorescence of 4 technical replicates

Full size image

Scrapie negative brain homogenate inhibits RT-QuIC detection of PAD-Beads eluted scrapie prions

In order to investigate the effect of inhibitory compounds that may be present in brain homogenate, PAD-Beads eluate of scrapie positive samples were diluted into 5% scrapie negative sheep brain homogenate. Unlike dilutions in PBS, RT-QuIC reactions did not produce any ThT increase from any assays with dilutions in scrapie-negative sheep brain homogenate confirming the presence of some inhibitory compounds (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of RT-QuIC reactions seeded with PAD-Beads treated brain homogenate diluted in PBS (a) and PAD-Beads treated brain homogenate diluted in negative sheep brain homogenate (b)

Full size image

Effect of PAD-Beads elution volume on RT-QuIC

To assess PAD-Beads PrPSc binding capacity and efficiency, we also tested if a lower volume of elution buffer increases seeding activity. Compared to brain eluted in 100 µl PBS, brain sample eluted in 50 µl or 25 µl elution buffer showed faster seeding activity especially for higher dilutions like 10−5 or 10−6 as can be seen in Fig. 3. Reactions seeded with 10−5 or 10−6 dilutions of PAD-Beads eluted with 100 µl elution buffer started ThT increase at 40 and 50 h (Fig. 3a) but shorten to 20 and 30 h with a 50 and 25 µl volumes (Fig. 3b, c). Lower elution volume resulted in higher sensitivity likely due to higher concentration of PrPSc in the final elution.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of RT-QuIC reactions seeded with different volume of elution buffer and PAD-Beads solution. All RT-QuIC reactions were run using full-length (23–231) bank vole prion protein as the substrate with the addition of 0.001% SDS in the presence of 300 mM NaCl. Data are presented as mean ThT fluorescence of 4 technical replicates

Full size image

Test of PAD-Beads binding capacity using RT-QuIC

To assess the PrPSc binding capacity of PAD-Beads, we used double the volume of PAD-Beads and eluted at the same (100 µl) volume. The use of a larger starting volume (200 µl) of PAD-Beads resulted in a reduced lag time (Fig. 3d). RT-QuIC reactions seeded with PAD-Beads eluted in a 100 µl volume but bound to twice the volume of PAD-Beads used in the standard protocol provided a similar reduction in lag time to the onset of ThT fluorescence to that observed for the standard elution volume. In this case, all brain dilutions up to 10−7 have higher seeding activity showing lag time shorter than 40 h compared to the reactions seeded with eluent from the lower amount of beads. Increased bead volume resulted in higher sensitivity indicating that for these samples and the lower amount of beads used the binding capacity of the beads was exceeded.

Discussion and conclusions

RT-QuIC is an efficient tool to detect PrPSc from humans and animals [9,10,11,12, 26,27,28], even in the presymptomatic stage of disease [24, 29, 30]. With the amplification of sensitivity afforded by the RT-QuIC technique, early diagnosis is becoming an increasingly feasible proposition since the technique amplifies the pathogenic form of prion protein in biological tissue or fluid samples. In this study, we have shown that PAD-Beads sample enrichment enhances RT-QuIC detection of prions, likely through removal of inhibitors to amplification present in brain samples. Specifically, PAD-Beads enrichment shortens the time required to detect PrPSc by RT-QuIC by approximately 50% relative to unenriched samples.

Other approaches exist for enrichment of PrPSc prior to detection. For example, several studies showed that infectious prion adheres to stainless steel [16, 31,32,33], which allows enrichment of PrPSc through non-specific binding. Phosphotungstic acid precipitation of PrPSc is often applied prior to detection by PMCA and RT-QuIC [29, 34,35,36,37]. Most similar to the work presented here, a study by Orru et al. demonstrated that anti-PrPSc antibody (15B3) coated magnetic beads could bind infectious prions in brain and blood samples and prions bound to the beads could be detected by RT-QuIC [13]. Later, Denkers et al. coupled RT-QuIC detection to an iron oxide magnetic extraction method (IOME) with samples from brain, saliva, urine, faces, and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) [15]. Collectively these studies show that enrichment of PrPSc relative to other components in the complex mixture that is present in a tissue homogenate enhance the detection of PrPSc by RT-QuIC, most likely due to the removal an undetermined contaminant that is inhibitory to the in vitro conversion process.

Commercially available PAD-Beads are a practical technique for separating misfolded proteins such as PrPSc from a complex mixture such as tissue homogenate or biological fluids. For the detection of scrapie prion using PAD-Beads, we have applied RT-QuIC and confirmed the presence of PrPSc by high seeding activity. PAD-Beads enrichment takes about 1 h, and the enriched samples resulted in a shorter lag time by approximately 10 h relative to unenriched samples for the detection of scrapie prions in brain samples. In addition, PAD-Beads enriched samples eluted with lower volume allowed higher detection sensitivity of RT-QuIC reactions. In a similar way, use of a larger starting volume (200 µl) of PAD-Beads shortened the lag time for detection of scrapie PrPSc by RT-QuIC.

Given the rapid-simple protocol and improved sensitivity shown here for detection of scrapie, the established ability of PAD-Beads to bind many different proteins in an amyloid conformation as well as the applicability of RT-QuIC to other amyloid diseases, this method could provide a useful enhancement to RT-QuIC for other diseases such as Parkinson’s Disease since RT-QuIC has now been applied successfully to amplify α-synuclein aggregates [38, 39].

Limitations

The primary limitation of this work is that we did not specifically address additional TSEs, but we would anticipate that the method is applicable to other TSEs from other host species based upon the broad applicability of both PAD-Beads and RT-QuIC to various TSE agents. However, we cannot comment as to the degree of enhancement in sensitivity or the time savings. Despite these limitations, PAD-Beads enrichment does provide a useful method to enhance RT-QuIC diagnosis of scrapie.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are in the manuscript and any additional details will be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TSE:

transmissible spongiform encephalopathy

PrPC:

normal cellular prion protein

PrPSc:

pathogenic prion protein

RT-QuIC:

real-time quaking induced conversion

CJD:

Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease

BSE:

bovine spongiform encephalopathy

CWD:

cervid chronic wasting disease

PMCA:

protein misfolding cyclic amplification

rPrPC:

recombinant prion protein

CSF:

cerebrospinal fluid

ELISA:

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

ThT:

thioflavin T

EDTA:

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

BV:

bank vole

References

  1. Prusiner SB. Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:13363–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Collinge J. Prion diseases of humans and animals: their causes and molecular basis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:519–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weissmann C. The Ninth Datta Lecture. Molecular biology of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. FEBS letters. 1996;389:3–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caughey B, Chesebro B. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and prion protein interconversions. Adv Virus Res. 2001;56:277–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Soto C, Saborio GP, Anderes L. Cyclic amplification of protein misfolding: application to prion-related disorders and beyond. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:390–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Soto C, Anderes L, Suardi S, Cardone F, Castilla J, Frossard MJ, Peano S, Saa P, Limido L, Carbonatto M, Ironside J, Torres JM, Pocchiari M, Tagliavini F. Pre-symptomatic detection of prions by cyclic amplification of protein misfolding. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:638–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saa P, Cervenakova L. Protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA): current status and future directions. Virus Res. 2015;207:47–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen B, Morales R, Barria MA, Soto C. Estimating prion concentration in fluids and tissues by quantitative PMCA. Nat Methods. 2010;7:519–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Atarashi R, Sano K, Satoh K, Nishida N. Real-time quaking-induced conversion: a highly sensitive assay for prion detection. Prion. 2011;5:150–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Atarashi R, Satoh K, Sano K, Fuse T, Yamaguchi N, Ishibashi D, Matsubara T, Nakagaki T, Yamanaka H, Shirabe S, Yamada M, Mizusawa H, Kitamoto T, Klug G, McGlade A, Collins SJ, Nishida N. Ultrasensitive human prion detection in cerebrospinal fluid by real-time quaking-induced conversion. Nat Med. 2011;17:175–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McGuire LI, Peden AH, Orru CD, Wilham JM, Appleford NE, Mallinson G, Andrews M, Head MW, Caughey B, Will RG, Knight RS, Green AJ. Real time quaking-induced conversion analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Ann Neurol. 2012;72:278–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Orru CD, Wilham JM, Vascellari S, Hughson AG, Caughey B. New generation QuIC assays for prion seeding activity. Prion. 2012;6:147–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Orru CD, Wilham JM, Raymond LD, Kuhn F, Schroeder B, Raeber AJ, Caughey B. Prion disease blood test using immunoprecipitation and improved quaking-induced conversion. mBio. 2011;2:e00078-00011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shikiya RA, Langenfeld KA, Eckland TE, Trinh J, Holec SAM, Mathiason CK, Kincaid AE, Bartz JC. PrPSc formation and clearance as determinants of prion tropism. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Denkers ND, Henderson DM, Mathiason CK, Hoover EA. Enhanced prion detection in biological samples by magnetic particle extraction and real-time quaking-induced conversion. J Gen Virol. 2016;97:2023–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan ZX, Stitz L, Heeg P, Pfaff E, Roth K. Infectivity of prion protein bound to stainless steel wires: a model for testing decontamination procedures for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:280–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moore SJ, Smith JD, Greenlee MH, Nicholson EM, Richt JA, Greenlee JJ. Comparison of two US sheep scrapie isolates supports identification as separate strains. Vet Pathol. 2016;53:1187–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vrentas CE, Greenlee JJ, Tatum TL, Nicholson EM. Relationships between PrPSc stability and incubation time for United States scrapie isolates in a natural host system. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e43060.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Clewley JP, Kelly CM, Andrews N, Vogliqi K, Mallinson G, Kaisar M, Hilton DA, Ironside JW, Edwards P, McCardle LM, Ritchie DL, Dabaghian R, Ambrose HE, Gill ON. Prevalence of disease related prion protein in anonymous tonsil specimens in Britain: cross sectional opportunistic survey. BMJ. 2009;338:b1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sathasivam K, Lane A, Legleiter J, Warley A, Woodman B, Finkbeiner S, Paganetti P, Muchowski PJ, Wilson S, Bates GP. Identical oligomeric and fibrillar structures captured from the brains of R6/2 and knock-in mouse models of Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:65–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vrentas CE, Onstot S, Nicholson EM. A comparative analysis of rapid methods for purification and refolding of recombinant bovine prion protein. Protein Expr Purif. 2012;82:380–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwang S, Tatum T, Lebepe-Mazur S, Nicholson EM. Preparation of lyophilized recombinant prion protein for TSE diagnosis by RT-QuIC. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:895.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hwang S, Greenlee JJ, Nicholson EM. Use of bovine recombinant prion protein and real-time quaking-induced conversion to detect cattle transmissible mink encephalopathy prions and discriminate classical and atypical L- and H-Type bovine spongiform encephalopathy. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0172391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hwang S, West Greenlee MH, Balkema-Buschmann A, Groschup MH, Nicholson EM, Greenlee JJ. Real-time quaking-induced conversion detection of bovine spongiform encephalopathy prions in a subclinical steer. Front Vet Sci. 2017;4:242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hwang S, Greenlee JJ, Vance NM, Nicholson EM. Source genotype influence on cross species transmission of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies evaluated by RT-QuIC. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0209106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilham JM, Orru CD, Bessen RA, Atarashi R, Sano K, Race B, Meade-White KD, Taubner LM, Timmes A, Caughey B. Rapid end-point quantitation of prion seeding activity with sensitivity comparable to bioassays. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peden AH, McGuire LI, Appleford NE, Mallinson G, Wilham JM, Orru CD, Caughey B, Ironside JW, Knight RS, Will RG, Green AJ, Head MW. Sensitive and specific detection of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease brain prion protein using real-time quaking-induced conversion. J Gen Virol. 2012;93:438–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Elder AM, Henderson DM, Nalls AV, Wilham JM, Caughey BW, Hoover EA, Kincaid AE, Bartz JC, Mathiason CK. In vitro detection of prionemia in TSE-infected cervids and hamsters. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e80203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng YC, Hannaoui S, John TR, Dudas S, Czub S, Gilch S. Early and non-invasive detection of chronic wasting disease prions in elk feces by real-time quaking induced conversion. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0166187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Haley NJ, Henderson DM, Wycoff S, Tennant J, Hoover EA, Love D, Kline E, Lehmkuhl A, Thomsen B. Chronic wasting disease management in ranched elk using rectal biopsy testing. Prion. 2018;12:93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zobeley E, Flechsig E, Cozzio A, Enari M, Weissmann C. Infectivity of scrapie prions bound to a stainless steel surface. Mol Med. 1999;5:240–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bernoulli C, Siegfried J, Baumgartner G, Regli F, Rabinowicz T, Gajdusek DC, Gibbs CJ Jr. Danger of accidental person-to-person transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by surgery. Lancet. 1977;1:478–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Luhr KM, Low P, Taraboulos A, Bergman T, Kristensson K. Prion adsorption to stainless steel is promoted by nickel and molybdenum. J Gen Virol. 2009;90:2821–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Eiden M, Hoffmann C, Balkema-Buschmann A, Muller M, Baumgartner K, Groschup MH. Biochemical and immunohistochemical characterization of feline spongiform encephalopathy in a German captive cheetah. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:2874–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Plummer IH, Johnson CJ, Chesney AR, Pedersen JA, Samuel MD. Mineral licks as environmental reservoirs of chronic wasting disease prions. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0196745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Michel B, Ferguson A, Johnson T, Bender H, Meyerett-Reid C, Pulford B, von Teichman A, Seelig D, Weis JH, Telling GC, Aguzzi A, Zabel MD. Genetic depletion of complement receptors CD21/35 prevents terminal prion disease in a mouse model of chronic wasting disease. J Immunol. 2012;189:4520–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Safar J, Wille H, Itri V, Groth D, Serban H, Torchia M, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB. Eight prion strains have PrP(Sc) molecules with different conformations. Nat Med. 1998;4:1157–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Groveman BR, Orru CD, Hughson AG, Raymond LD, Zanusso G, Ghetti B, Campbell KJ, Safar J, Galasko D, Caughey B. Rapid and ultra-sensitive quantitation of disease-associated alpha-synuclein seeds in brain and cerebrospinal fluid by alphaSyn RT-QuIC. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018;6:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Manne S, Kondru N, Hepker M, Jin H, Anantharam V, Lewis M, Huang X, Kanthasamy A, Kanthasamy AG. Ultrasensitive detection of aggregated alpha-synuclein in glial cells, human cerebrospinal fluid, and brain tissue using the RT-QuIC assay: new high-throughput neuroimmune biomarker assay for parkinsonian disorders. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2019. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11481-019-09835-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Semakaleng Lebepe-Mazur, Joseph Lesan and Trudy Tatum for providing technical support to this project. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Funding

This research was funded in its entirety by congressionally appropriated funds to the United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service. The funder of the work did not influence study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virus and Prion Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, 50010, USA

    Soyoun Hwang & Eric M. Nicholson

  2. Ruminant Disease and Immunology Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, 50010, USA

    Rohana P. Dassanayake

Authors
  1. Soyoun Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rohana P. Dassanayake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric M. Nicholson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: EMN, RPD, SH. Formal analysis: SH. Investigation: SH. Methodology: SH, EMN. Resources: EMN. Supervision: EMN. Writing ± original draft: SH EMN RPD. Writing ± review and editing: SH EMN RPD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric M. Nicholson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, S., Dassanayake, R.P. & Nicholson, E.M. PAD-Beads enrichment enhances detection of PrPSc using real-time quaking-induced conversion. BMC Res Notes 12, 806 (2019). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13104-019-4842-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13104-019-4842-7

Keywords

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us