Skip to main content

Prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt and completed suicide in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Abstract

Background

Suicide is an emergency psychiatric problem that needs an urgent intervention. Ethiopia, as a nation, has been experiencing high burden of suicide. Cultural taboo, stigma, and criticism associated with suicidal behaviors affect the communities’ attitude and practice toward suicide and its help-seeking behaviors. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide the pooled prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide in Ethiopia.

Methods

This review protocol is designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P 2015 Guidelines). Studies reporting the prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide will be included from the databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Sciences. The reference lists of retrieved articles, Google Scholar, and national health database reporting suicide will be also searched. No time and language restrictions will be imposed on the search strategy. The methodological quality of included studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. The heterogeneity between studies will be measured by the index of heterogeneity (I2 statistics) test. Funnel plots and Egger’s test will be used to determine publication bias. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be carried out. The pooled prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide will be calculated by metaprop command using random effects model with the Dersimonian and Laird method.

Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the available epidemiological evidences about suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide. The final results of this review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. The review of the results will help to raise awareness about the burden of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide in Ethiopia.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42018112836

Peer Review reports

Background

Suicide is a complex process ranging from suicidal ideation to planning of suicide, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide [1, 2]. Two overlapping terms are used to describe the concept of suicide [1, 3, 4]. These are (i) suicidal attempt/self-harm/suicidal intent, refers to a deliberated direct destruction of body tissues with a conscious suicidal intent, and (ii) non-suicidal attempt/self-injury (NSSI), refers to a deliberated direct destruction of body tissues without a conscious suicidal intent [1, 3, 4]. Most standard guidelines focus on self-harm irrespective of the intent, and there are commonly four different forms of suicidal behaviors [1, 3]. These are (i) suicidal ideation, refers to thoughts fantasies and wishes about ending of one’s own life, (ii) suicide plan, refers to planning on how to end one’s own life, (iii) suicide attempt, refers to the self-destructive act with intent to end one’s own life, and (iv) completed suicide, refers to the act of self-harm with a fatal outcome [1,2,3]. Suicide is a worldwide phenomenon that takes a heavy toll on the individuals, families, and communities [5]. Globally, one million people die due to suicide per year (one person every 40 s) [5,6,7,8,9]. It is the tenth leading cause of death worldwide, but the second and third leading cause for those age group between 15 and 29 years and 15–44 years respectively [1, 7, 9,10,11,12]. It is predicted that, by 2020, annual suicide fatalities will be increased to 1.5 million (one every 20 s) [5]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) study among 21 countries, approximately, the 12 months and lifetime prevalence of suicidal attempt was 0.3 to 0.4% respectively 2 and 9% for suicidal ideation [10]. Suicidal attempt is more common than suicide deaths [5, 8]. For example, in the USA, there are more than 30 suicidal attempts for each suicide death [10]. In Africa, the overall magnitude of suicide ranged from 2–3% [range 0.7–6.0%] [11, 13]. In Ethiopia, the prevalence of suicidal behaviors ranged from 0.9 to 60% [14,15,16] for suicidal ideation, 3.8 to 27% [14, 17] for suicidal attempt, and 13.96% per 100,000 [18, 19] for completed suicide.

Suicidal ideation, plan, and attempt are major risk factors for completed suicide [1, 5]. Among individual with lifetime suicidal ideation, the probability of ever making suicidal plan was 33%, and attempted suicide was 30%. For lifetime history of suicidal ideation and plan, the probability of completed suicide was 55% [8]. Factors such as psychiatric disorder [20], hopelessness, and substance use were also associated with completed suicide [1, 3, 5, 20]. Suicide is an emergency psychiatric problem [9, 20, 21] and need an urgent treatment; yet, stigma, taboo, laws, and other associated cultural criticism affect the societies’ attitude and practice toward the identification and treatment of suicidal behaviors [3, 5, 8, 9, 13, 21]. In spite of the high burden of suicidal behaviors, developing countries [11, 13] like Ethiopia give little research attention, and the available individual studies also reported inconsistent results, which need comprehensive up-to-date information. Thus, the aim of this proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide in Ethiopia.

Methods

This protocol is designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P 2015 Guidelines) [22]. This review protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, with the registration number of CRD42018112836.

Search strategy

The search and document retrieval strategy will be intended to capture range of published and unpublished literature using databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Sciences. A combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesaurus, text words, and combining with appropriate Boolean operators will be used in order to identify as many studies as possible. We will develop a comprehensive search of MEDLINE through PubMed search strategy tailored to each database. No time and language restrictions will be imposed on the search strategy. Reference lists of all articles will also be searched. Moreover, national health databases reporting suicide including the Ethiopian Journal of Health Development (EJHD) (1984) (http://www.ejhd.org/index.php/ejhd/index), Ethiopian Journal of Health Science (EJHS) (1990) (https://www.ju.edu.et/ejhs/), and the Central Statistical Agency (CSA) (www.csa.gov.et) will be searched. Furthermore, Google Scholar will be searched for gray literature. The drafted full electronic search strategy for PubMed/MEDLINE database is included in the supplementary information.

Selection of studies

All articles retrieved through search strategy will be imported to EndNote X7 (Thomson Reuters, New York, USA). After excluding the duplicated studies from EndNote Library, the title and abstracts of the remaining articles will be assessed independently by two reviewers (BBB and YDG) and disagreement will be resolved by discussion and/or third author (BTT). Full-text studies will be included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Conference abstracts, letters to editors, review, and commentary articles will be excluded.

Definition of concepts

(i) Suicide is defined as an act of self-harm with a fatal outcome, (ii) deliberate self-harm is a non-fatal act of self-harm carried out with variable motivations, (iii) suicidal ideation is the engagement in thoughts about self-inflicted harm to end one’s own life, (iv) suicidal plan is the formulation of a specific method through which one intends to die, (v) suicidal attempt is the engagement in potentially self-injurious behaviors in which there is at least some intent to die, and (vi) suicidal behaviors include both fatal and non-fatal suicidal behaviors [1,2,3].

Eligibility criteria

Participants

This review will targets all human participants that reported the prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide irrespective of age, sex, setting (institution [health facility/school (high school, college, and university)] and community), and population (patient, general population). Studies in which participants are drawn from prisons, refugees, and homeless will be excluded because they are not the representative of either patient or the general population.

Outcome measures

This review will include studies that investigated the prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide using diagnostic criteria in the Tenth Revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV or DSM-5) or autopsy or chart review or self-developed tool. All available studies, irrespective of the data collection tools or cutoff scores and duration (current, period (6 months or 12 months), or lifetime prevalence), will be included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Study design

Observational studies (cross-sectional and cohort/longitudinal) will be included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies that focused on case reports and conference abstracts with inadequate information will be excluded.

Data extraction

Data will be extracted from the eligible studies by two independent reviewers (BBB and YDG) using a pre-conceived data abstraction form, and any disagreement will be resolved by discussion and/or by the third author (BTT). The extracted data will be collated in a Microsoft Excel 2016 spreadsheet (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA). These data will include name of first author last name, year of publication, study setting/region, study design, study population, age and sex, sample size, response rate, data collection tool, prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide.

Quality assessment

The methodological quality of included studies will be assessed by two independent reviewers (BBB and YDG) using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) critical appraisal tool for prevalence studies [23]. Disagreements will be solved by discussion and/or by the third author (BTT). The JBI quality assessment tool for prevalence studies has eight items with response option “yes,” “no,” “unclear,” and “not applicable”. The results of each individual paper will be graded with a score ranging from 0 to 8. Interpersonal scoring discrepancies during critical appraisal will be resolved after a thorough discussion, and if disagreement will be continued, the decision of the quality assessment score will be based on the calculated mean scores of the three reviewers. All articles scored greater than 50% will be included in the analysis.

Data synthesis and statistical analysis

The extracted data from the eligible studies will be entered into a Microsoft Excel Database and then will be imported into STATA version 14 (Stata Corp LLC, Texas, USA) for analysis. The pooled prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide will be calculated by metaprop command using a random effects model [24] with the Dersimonian and Laird method based on the transformed values and their variance [25]. We will fit the Freeman–Tuckey variant of the arcsine square root transformation of proportions to avoid variance instability when handling proportions close to one [26]. The magnitude of heterogeneity between studies will be measured by the index of heterogeneity (I2 statistics) test [27]. I2 values of 25%, 50%, and 75% will be used as low, medium, and high heterogeneity respectively. Generally, we plan to conduct subgroup analyses by sex, age, sample size, study quality (high, fair, and low), setting (institution and community based), year of publication, time frame (lifelong and last 12 months), and study population (patient, general community, and students). Publication bias will be evaluated using the visual funnel plot [28] and Egger test [29]. A p value < 0.1 will be considered as indicative of statistically significant publication bias. If there is evidence of small study effect and heterogeneity, we plan to perform sensitivity analysis [30].

Presenting and reporting results

A flow diagram will be included to outline the step by step process of study selection methods. The characteristics and quality assessment of the included studies will be presented in tables. Pooled estimates will be presented using forest plots.

Discussion

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis has been reported about the suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide in Ethiopia. This needs a comprehensive epidemiological evidence for further research and decision-making for the prevention and control of suicide. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis will explore the available epidemiological evidences about suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide in Ethiopia. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will serve to draw attention and raise awareness among policy maker, health care practitioners, and researchers on the growing epidemiological concern of suicidal ideation, attempted suicide, and completed suicide in Ethiopia. This study will be based on published data; thus, approval of ethical clearance will not be required. The final report of the systematic review and meta-analysis will be disseminated in the form of a scientific paper (published) in a peer-reviewed journal. Moreover, the results will be presented at conferences and submitted to relevant health authorities. We plan to update the review in the future to evaluate the changes in epidemiological evidences.

Strength and potential limitations

This review of protocol is the first systematic review and meta-analysis protocol about suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide in Ethiopia. The registration of review protocol in the PROSPERO, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol (PRISMA-P 2015 guideline). Plans to include studies without the restriction of the publication year and to perform tests for heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis will help to get the desired results. The exclusion of studies carried out among prisoners and refugees will minimize the number of included studies, and there will be a possibility of missing unpublished studies.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

CRD:

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination

DSH:

Deliberate self-harm

DSM-IV:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition

EMBASE:

Excerpta Medica database

I 2 :

Index of heterogeneity

ICD-10:

Tenth Revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems

MEDLINE:

Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online

MeSH:

Medical Subject Headings

NSSI:

Non-suicidal self-injury

OR:

Odds ratio

PRISMA-P:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols

References

  1. Jans TVT, Taneli Y, Warnke A. Suicide and self-harming behaviour. Suicide and self-harming behaviour. In: Rey JM, editor. IACAPAP e-textbook of child and adolescent mental health. Geneva: International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association AP. DSM-5, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong M, et al. Prevalence of suicidal behaviors in patients with major depressive disorder in China: a comprehensive meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018;225:32–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bagley C, Shahnaz A. Taxonomies of death by suicide: a review, with proposals for research and policy, and a challenge for suicidology. Challenges. 2017;8:27. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/challe8020027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Suicide W. Fact sheet. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide (Accessed on 10 Oct 2017).

  6. Stone DM, Holland KM, Bartholow B, Crosby AE, Davis S, Wilkins N. Preventing suicide: a technical package of policies, programs, and practices. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017. p. 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  7. American. Foundation for suicide prevention. Available online: https://afsp.org/about-suicide/suicidestatistics/ (Accessed on 15 Oct 2017).

  8. WHO. Global Health Observatory Data Repository. Available online: http://apps.whoint/gho/data/nodemainMHSUICIDE?lang=en (Accessed on 14 Oct 2017).

  9. Health WM. Prevention of suicidal behaviours: a task for all. Available online: http://www.whoint/mental_health/prevention/suicide/background (Accessed on 15 Oct 2017).

  10. WHO. Figure: male: female ratio of age-standardized suicide rates (per 100 000 population). Geneva: WHO; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bantjes J, Iemmi V, Coast E, Channer K, Leone T, McDaid D, Palfreyman A, Stephens B, Lund C. Poverty and suicide research in low- and middle-income countries: systematic mapping of literature published in English and a proposed research agenda. Glob Ment Health. 2017;3:e32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Control NCfIPa. Using WISQARSTM 10 leading causes of death by age group, United States–2016. Available online: https://www.cdcgov/injury/wisqars/LeadingCauseshtml (Accessed on 4 July 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Esque Ruiz MT, Moretones Sunol MG, Rodriguez Miguelez JM, Sanchez Ortiz E, Izco Urroz M, de Lamo Camino M, et al. Medication errors in a neonatal unit: one of the main adverse events. An Pediatr (Barc 2003). 2016;84(4):211–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fekadu A, Medhin G, Selamu M, Shiferaw T, Hailemariam M, Rathod SD, et al. Non-fatal suicidal behaviour in rural Ethiopia: a cross-sectional facility- and population-based study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alem A, Kebede D, Jacobsson L, Kullgren G. Suicide attempts among adults in Butajira, Ethiopia. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1999;397:70–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kebede D, Alem A. Suicide attempts and ideation among adults in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1999;397:35–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. al ABe. Suicidal attempt and associated factors among patients with depressive disorder visiting psychiatric unit. IOSR J Nurs Health Sci. 2018;7(1):62–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Misganaw A, et al. National mortality burden due to communicable, non-communicable, and other diseases in Ethiopia, 1990–2015: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Popul Health Metrics. 2017;15:29. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12963-017-0145-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bekry AA. Trends in suicide, parasuicide and accidental poisoning in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 1999;13(3):247–61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bachmann S. Epidemiology of suicide and the psychiatric perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:1425. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph15071425.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Stene-Larsen K, Reneflot A. Contact with primary and mental health care prior to suicide: a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2017. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2017;6:1–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.909

  22. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2014;13(3):147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Berkey CS, Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Colditz GA. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. Stat Med. 1995;14(4):395–411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Freeman MF, Tukey JW. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. AnnMath Stats. 1950;21(4):607–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu JL. The role of the funnel plot in detecting publication and related biases in meta-analysis. Evid Based Dent. 2011;12(4):121–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34 (Clinical research ed).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56:455–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors’ gratitude goes to University of Gondar for office arrangement and motivational support to conduct this protocol.

Funding

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Amendments of the protocol

In case there is a need to amend this protocol, the reasons for the amendment and the date when it has been amended will be explicitly described.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BBB designed the review protocol in collaboration with BAD, BTT, and YDG. BBB developed the search strategy and drafted the protocol. BAD, BTT, and YDG improved the drafted protocol. BBB, YDG, and BAD provided their expertise to the section of suicidal behaviors’ and methodological section. BBB and YDG performed searches and conducted data selection and extraction. All authors are involved in data analysis and interpretation of the results. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berhanu Boru Bifftu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bifftu, B.B., Dachew, B.A., Tiruneh, B.T. et al. Prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt and completed suicide in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev 8, 72 (2019). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13643-019-0986-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13643-019-0986-8

Keywords