Advances in the understanding of mitochondrial DNA as a pathogenic factor in inflammatory diseases

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a serious condition associated with high mortality, and affected individuals display progressive signs or symptoms of systemic upset reflecting widespread inflammation, often involving multiple organ dysfunction and failure (for example, lungs, kidneys, and brain). SIRS is often a result of major sepsis but also commonly occurs in the context of injury such as trauma. An early study by Lam et al. found that individuals admitted for blunt traumatic injury had increased plasma nuclear DNA and mtDNA levels⁷. Subsequently, Hauser et al. made the seminal observation that it is the freely circulating mtDNA following traumatic injury which possesses the distinct ability to trigger and drive the clinical manifestation of SIRS⁸. Several studies have confirmed the observation of elevated plasma mtDNA in trauma and SIRS^9–15. A number of studies have found correlations with injury severity in trauma^7,11 and higher mtDNA in non-survivors compared with survivors^11,15. Furthermore, Gu et al. found that elevated plasma mtDNA was an independent predictor of SIRS in trauma patients¹². In sepsis, elevated levels of circulating mtDNA have also been found in multiple studies^11,16–21. De Caro et al. found higher mtDNA in the plasma of critically ill paediatric patients who were septic compared with similarly unwell but non-septic patients²¹. The one negative study in sepsis may be explained by numerous factors, including a relatively well patient cohort, only one “spot” measurement being taken at presentation, and the potentially confounding factor of cellular content/debris²². Studies of patients in the intensive care setting have found that higher mtDNA levels are associated with poorer outcomes^23,24.

Acute single-organ injury: liver, heart, and brain

High levels of mtDNA are present in the serum and plasma of patients with acute injury to a variety of single organs. Acetaminophen overdose induces massive hepatocyte necrosis and in severe cases can lead to multi-organ failure and remains one of the commonest indications for liver transplantation. In fulminant liver failure secondary to acetaminophen overdose, mtDNA in the serum was found to be 30 to 40 times higher than normal, and non-survivors had higher levels than survivors²⁵; a separate study of drug-induced acute liver failure found serum mtDNA levels to be 10,000-fold higher²⁶. Serum mtDNA of acetaminophen overdose patients with derangement in the liver enzyme alanine aminotransferase (a marker of hepatocyte damage) is significantly higher than that of overdose patients who had normal liver enzymes²⁷, suggesting that the extent of mtDNA release into the circulation depends on the extent of hepatocyte necrosis. Similarly, extensive cardiomyocyte necrosis is found in acute myocardial infarction, which is also associated with elevated mtDNA in multiple studies^28–30 and falls after angioplasty or coronary stent insertion to restore blood flow to the damaged myocardium^28,29. Patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease have higher mtDNA levels than those with diabetes but without coronary artery disease^31,32. mtDNA is also higher in acute cerebral ischaemia, caused by a reduction in cerebral blood flow by embolus or local thrombosis, and plasma levels gradually drop over time after the initial tissue injury³³. Interestingly, studies by the same group relating to plasma mtDNA in subarachnoid haemorrhage and spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage found no significant difference compared with healthy controls, although both were small studies^34,35. Higher mtDNA is found in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage³⁴ and traumatic brain injury³⁶ and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Overall, in these conditions, significant mtDNA release following massive tissue or cellular injury is evident and likely contributes to the uncontrolled inflammatory response²⁵.

Chronic inflammatory and immune-mediated diseases

The role for mtDNA in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, unlike conditions relating to injury, is now also emerging. In rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic relapsing autoimmune condition affecting the joints, mtDNA was present in the plasma and synovial fluid of most patients but undetectable in healthy controls³⁷. Similarly, higher plasma mtDNA is found in granulomatosis with polyangiitis, an autoimmune disease whose features include necrotising granulomatous inflammation and vasculitis³⁸. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-organ autoimmune disease with hallmarks including excessive type I interferon (IFN) and antibodies against nucleic acids. Caielli et al. explored the potential pathogenic importance of oxidised mtDNA in SLE³⁹. They showed that there is a defect in mitochondrial clearance that leads to abnormal extrusion of oxidised mtDNA, which triggers a subsequent interferogenic response. Elevated anti-mtDNA antibodies were found in a separate study of SLE, particularly in lupus nephritis, where levels correlated with the lupus nephritis activity index better than anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody levels did⁴⁰. In a further study of SLE, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) released from the inflammatory subset of low-density granulocyte were highly enriched in mtDNA compared with NETs from healthy control neutrophils⁴¹. NETs are networks of extracellular fibres that are primarily composed of DNA and that are strikingly expelled following a form of neutrophil cell death (NETosis) with an aim to control pathogens; however, this study demonstrates that mtDNA-enriched NETs are pro-inflammatory in nature. Similar findings are reported in chronic granulomatous disease in this study. Higher levels of mtDNA have been found in the chronic inflammatory states of HIV (although not in all studies), end-stage renal failure, and diabetes mellitus (Table 1). In obese individuals with steatohepatitis, mitochondria enclosed in microparticles can also be detected in plasma⁴². These findings suggest that mtDNA, otherwise a “self-signal”, may be an active component in the aberrant immune or inflammatory response in chronic diseases and in autoimmunity.

Toll-like receptor 9

TLR9 is located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of various immune cells and translocates to the endosome upon sensing of hypomethylated DNA with CpG motifs, such as bacterial DNA^47,48. Given its high frequency of unmethylated CpG dinucleotide repeats, it is postulated that mtDNA mediates inflammation dependent on the TLR9 pathway and potentially exerts a similar effect as on bacterial CpG. TLR9 recognises a variety of types of oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs); for example, class A ODNs preferentially activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells whilst class B CpG ODNs activate B cells⁴⁹. Some of our understanding of how mtDNA may interact with TLR9 is extrapolated from work with class A ODNs, although they do not necessarily have the same effect. After activation of TLR9 by CpG DNA, inflammatory cytokine induction and Th1 immune responses occur⁵⁰ and TLR9 is necessary in CpG DNA-driven responses⁵¹. TLR9 ligands can preferentially activate downstream pathways, including pro-inflammatory nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB), nucleotide-bindingdomain and leucine-rich repeat (NLR) pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes, and interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-dependent type 1 IFN, which can upregulate IL-1 receptor antagonist^52,53.

Most tissue injury models show better outcomes when the tlr9 gene is deleted. Wei et al. recently observed that tlr9^−/− mice have improved survival outcome in a necrotic lung model of cationic nanocarrier-induced necrosis and mtDNA release in vivo⁵⁴. Furthermore, the pulmonary inflammation seen after injection of mtDNA was significantly reduced in tlr9^−/− and MyD88^−/− mice, underlining the importance of the TLR9–MyD88 pathway⁵⁴. Intravenous injection of mitochondrial debris with substantial amounts of mtDNA into mice induced a systemic inflammatory response in wild-type mice that was significantly attenuated in tlr9^−/− mice⁴⁵. Tlr9^−/− mice also have better survival compared with wild-type counterparts in severe renal ischaemia reperfusion injury with associated decreased circulating mtDNA⁵⁵. A similar protective effect is seen in tlr9^−/− mice with acute acetaminophen overdose with observed lower serum mtDNA and an absence of lung inflammation in contrast to the findings of wild-type mice²⁶. Nevertheless, the reduction in mtDNA in tlr9^−/− mice is intriguing and could be explained by the reduced inflammation with lower resultant cellular necrosis. Alternatively, it is possible that TLR9 is somehow involved in mtDNA release into the extracellular circulation. In a recent study using a murine model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), mtDNA from NASH hepatocytes resulted in greater activation of TLR9 than did mtDNA from control livers⁴². This suggests that mtDNA that is selectively modified during pathologic disease processes can augment the ensuing inflammatory response. Similarly, the level of TLR9 expression (due to various factors) appears to be important. In those with high mtDNA levels, higher TLR9 expression is associated with increased mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU), as discussed earlier⁵⁶.

Neutrophils have received the most attention in studies on mtDNA–TLR9 signalling in several different inflammatory settings. Zhang et al. found that mtDNA activates neutrophil p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) through TLR9 with release of matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP8) and MMP9^8,9, a finding confirmed in a study in which phosphorylated p38 and MMP9 increased after mtDNA treatment of neutrophils⁵⁷. A separate study reported similar findings where pre-treatment with TLR9 inhibitor ODN2088 inhibited the activation of p38 MAPK and release of MMP8⁵⁴. Gu et al. also found that intratracheal administration of mtDNA provokes lung inflammation through TLR9–p38 MAPK⁵⁸. Hip fracture in rats resulted in mtDNA release into the circulation as well as higher TLR9 and NFκB p65 activation and subsequent lung injury⁴⁶. The role of other MAPKs such as extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) and c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) remains unclear and, to our knowledge, unexamined in this context. These data suggest a pathway where mtDNA activates neutrophils through TLR9 binding and activation of the MAPK pathway with subsequent MMP8 and MMP9 release (Figure 1).

When mtDNA is considered vis-à-vis the site and location of TLR9 receptor, mtDNA must be either displaced from whole mitochondria and moved into the cytosol or, when extracellular, internalised by some mechanism(s) to act on endosomal TLR9. The endosomal location of TLR9 is most likely a mechanism to avoid unwanted activation⁵⁹. It is unclear how extracellular mtDNA is internalised, but possibilities include endocytosis, transmembrane diffusion, phagocytosis, and receptor-mediated endocytosis⁶⁰. Transmembrane diffusion is unlikely because of the highly (negatively) charged nature of DNA, which makes it difficult to pass through the cellular membrane. A recent study found that monocyte-derived macrophages can take up whole mitochondria released from necroptosis, suggesting that phagocytosis could be a relevant mechanism⁶¹. The macrophage has a clear role in resolving inflammation by clearing up cellular debris and apoptotic bodies by phagocytosis. When mitochondria are not cleared during non-apoptotic cell death, the macrophage may phagocytose cellular corpses with mtDNA still abundantly present. Typically, apoptotic corpses can suppress the transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokine genes, promote the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines by phagocytes, and cause antigen-presenting cells to present dead cell antigen in a manner that promotes immunological tolerance (reviewed by Zitvogel et al.⁶²). It will be of interest to consider the fate of mtDNA when macrophages or dendritic cells phagocytose cellular corpses with mtDNA. Does this clear the mtDNA or does it regulate subsequent functions (for example, immune responsiveness) in these cell types? This has yet to be studied in detail. It is also possible that binding to additional cofactors facilitates the internalisation into immune cells, and, in this instance, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) have been implicated⁶³. In this study, HMGB1–CpG (class A) complexes resulted in TLR9/RAGE association and recruitment of MyD88 in B cells⁶³. Here, RAGE was visualised as associating with the DNA and was internalised with some sequestered in endosome-like structures. However, this possible mechanism requires further investigation. It has also been proposed that activation of autoreactive B cells by CpG DNA occurs after B-cell receptor engagement, leading to the delivery of CpG DNA to endosomal TLR9⁶⁴.

Although nucleic acid-sensing TLRs on immune cells are found mainly within cells, cell surface expression has also been described. Via flow cytometry, TLR9 has been detected on the surface of resting B lymphocytes^65,66 and peripheral blood mononuclear cells^67,68. One functional ex vivo study found primary human and mouse TLR9 surface expression in neutrophils, which are upregulated by a variety of stimuli, including TLR9 agonists⁶⁹. However, it remains unclear whether TLR9 is able to signal from the cell surface. In other cell types, TLR9 is also expressed on the cell surface. For example, TLR9 is expressed on both the apical and the basolateral membranes of intestinal epithelial cells, although NFκB is activated only via basolateral stimulation of CpG ligands^70,71. This is relevant at the gut mucosal interface, as this limits the extent of TLR9 activation at the apical surface, which is in contact with a luminal milieu rich with bacterial DNA. Hence, compromised intestinal barrier integrity and translocation of bacterial CpG from the lumen during gut pathology will lead to basolateral stimulation in this context. Whether mtDNA has a different propensity compared with bacterial CpG to trigger TLR9 depending on epithelial site has not been studied.

The inflammasome

The inflammasomes are targets of mtDNA leading to cleavage and activation of caspase-1 and downstream maturation of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-18⁷². Here, it is the cytosolic release of mtDNA that exerts the dominant effect on inflammasome activation. Of the several inflammasomes described, the NLRP3 inflammasome is the best characterised in this regard. Nakahira et al. showed that depletion of mtDNA reduced IL-1β secretion in macrophages following treatment with known inflammasome triggers lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and ATP⁷³. Of interest, mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species (mtROS) is a further key mediator in this process. Pharmacologic induction of mtROS correlates with higher secretion of active IL-1β in an NLRP3- and caspase-1-dependent manner, and treatment with mtROS scavengers suppresses this effect⁷⁴. The requirement for mtROS in NLRP3 activation has been confirmed by other studies^73,75–77 and may be explained by its oxidising effects on mtDNA. Shimada et al. showed that it is the oxidised form of mtDNA that confers the inflammatogenic potential to mtDNA⁷⁵. mtROS enhances not only the oxidative process but also the cytosolic translocation of oxidised mtDNA that then binds directly to NLRP3⁷⁵. Non-oxidised mtDNA is insufficient to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, although it may stimulate IL-1β production via other inflammasomes such as the absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2)⁷⁸. Interestingly, genetic deletion of NLRP3 and caspase-1 results in less mtDNA release^73,77. This suggests a positive-feedback loop, in which activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by oxidised mtDNA further promotes mtDNA release. The overwhelming or persisting (or both) ROS production by inflammatory cells, for example, is known to damage macromolecules (DNA as well as RNA, lipids, carbohydrates, and proteins) of the surrounding cells. Activated neutrophils produce large amounts of ROS as part of their essential role in host defense⁷⁹. Hence, this is a likely major contributory factor to mtDNA damage once the inflammatory process is triggered.

Other factors controlling mitochondria-mediated NLRP3 activation are also relevant. For example, defective autophagy increases caspase-1 activation, IL-1β and IL-18 production, and cytosolic mtDNA translocation in LPS- and ATP-primed macrophages⁷⁶. Pharmacological inhibition of mitophagy/autophagy in human macrophages results in the accumulation of damaged mitochondria, ROS generation and IL-1β secretion⁷⁴, and increased NLRP3 expression in the presence of LPS⁸⁰. Hence, defective autophagy leads to inadequate clearance of damaged mitochondria, priming the internal cellular environment for NLRP3 activation. It is noteworthy that, given the diversity of NLRP3 activators, current literature suggests that the precise mechanism of NLRP3 activation is still under debate⁸¹. Although the role of the inflammasome is often considered separately from TLR9 here, there is evidence that TLR/NFκB activation is a necessary priming step leading to NLRP3 upregulation and subsequent downstream signalling. NFκB-activating stimulus is required for cells to express pro-IL-1β and NLRP3⁸². Imeada et al. showed that stimulation of TLR9 by DNA fragments during early acetaminophen-induced cell death can lead to the transcriptional activation of the IL-1β gene, resulting in the formation of pro-IL-1β⁸³. Using the acetaminophen hepatotoxicity model, they showed that NLRP3 deletion and related inflammasome components ASC and Caspase-1 were protective against induced liver failure⁸³. A further study, however, did not show any effect of NLRP3 deletion on the outcomes of acetaminophen-induced liver failure⁸⁴. Hence, in the context of liver necrosis, the role for NLRP3 inflammasome remains controversial.

STING pathway

The role of mtDNA in innate immunity through the STING pathway has also been a focus of recent studies. STING is a cytosolic protein anchored to the ER⁸⁵. STING can be activated either by direct association with dsDNA or by cyclic dinucleotides, which can be derived from intracellular bacteria or viruses or produced by a DNA sensor, cyclic GMP–AMP (cGAMP) synthetase (cGAS)⁸⁶. This, in turn, activates IRF3, which ultimately translocates to the nucleus and transcribes type I IFN genes, and also the NFκB pathway⁸⁵.

Two independent groups recently discovered that the STING-mediated IFN response can also be activated by mtDNA^87,88. They first observed that deficiency of apoptotic caspases (3, 7, and 9) resulted in upregulation of type I IFN genes. This response was dependent on Bak/Bax, pro-apoptotic proteins responsible for mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilisation leading to mtDNA release, and the release of cytochrome C, which activates the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Typically, apoptosis is considered immunologic-silent; for example, it does not trigger an inflammatory response. However, these studies demonstrated that, when caspases (9 and 3/7) responsible for the completion of apoptotic process are inhibited or deleted, cytosolic mtDNA goes on to activate cGAS/STING-mediated type I IFN signalling^87,88. Hence, these caspases serve as a “brake” on the mtDNA-inflammatory effect during cell death. mtDNA released during cell death has been previously reported to provide a second signal that cooperates with an additional inflammatory signal (for example, LPS) to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and induce IL-1β production in murine macrophages⁷⁵. Further evidence of an mtDNA role in STING-mediated IFN responses comes from West et al.⁸⁹. Here, partial deficiency of the mtDNA-binding protein mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) was associated with increased concentrations of cytosolic mtDNA and enhanced type I IFN response, which was attenuated by knockdown of components of the STING pathway.

Aberrant mtDNA–STING signalling has also been implicated in human inflammatory diseases, such as SLE. As discussed earlier, Lood et al. showed that treatment of human neutrophils with SLE-abundant ribonucleoprotein immune complexes induces mtROS, mtDNA oxidation, and translocation of the mitochondria to the plasma membrane⁴¹. Oxidised mtDNA is then released extracellularly as a component of NETs. Transfection of NET-derived mtDNA results in expression of IFN-β in human peripheral mononuclear cells. Systemic injection of oxidised mtDNA increases IFN-stimulated gene expression in the spleen of wild-type but not STING-deficient mice. Similar to inflammasomes, uncontrolled mtROS production promoting cytosolic mtDNA release is important in STING activation and potentially in the case of autoimmunity. These studies highlight the importance of the innate cellular functions to handle mtDNA release during the initiation of cell death, which ultimately will decide whether the ensuing fate will be that of a silent or inflammatory outcome.

Mechanisms for mtDNA release

Two levels of mtDNA release—cytosolic and then extracellular—are critically important steps (Figure 1). In the former, the mechanism of release of mtDNA from mitochondria relies on the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) pores in the inner mitochondrial membrane⁹⁰. Inhibition of pore opening with cyclosporine A resulted in lower mtDNA in the cytosol after stimulation with LPS and ATP⁷³. Ding et al. showed that the induction of ROS using oxidised low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) increased mtDNA leakage into the cytosol in a dose-dependent manner, and this effect was ameliorated with blockade of the ox-LDL receptor or a ROS inhibitor⁹¹.

In terms of extracellular release, cellular stress and necrosis are primary factors in the non-discriminant liberation of a host of mitochondrial components such as mtDNA, N-formyl peptides, ATP, TFAM, and mitochondrial lipids. These mitochondrial constituents also exert their respective effects, which are wide-ranging, on key inflammatory pathways (extensively reviewed by Nakahira et al.⁸¹). Aside from this non-selective release after uncontrolled cell death, several studies have suggested additional mechanisms such as necroptosis (or programmed necrosis)⁹². Blood transfusion-induced endothelial necroptosis was recently found to increase extracellular mtDNA as a potential mechanism to explain transfusion-related lung injury⁹³. A recent study suggested that, during necroptosis, mitochondria were released before plasma membrane rupture and then phagocytosed by monocyte-derived macrophages or dendritic cells, triggering an inflammatory response as shown by cytokine production and cell maturation, respectively⁶¹. Thus, ingestion of intact mitochondria may represent a distinct uptake mechanism following necroptosis. In a separate study, platelets were also found to be a source for free extracellular mitochondria release and then to act as an endogenous substrate for bactericidal secreted phospholipase A₂IIA (sPLA₂-IIA) leading to mitochondrial membrane hydrolysis, loss of mitochondrial structural integrity, and mtDNA release⁹⁴. Intriguingly, Xin et al. found lower levels of mtROS production when metformin was added to activated platelets, and this was associated with decreased extracellular mtDNA release⁹⁵. The authors found lower complex I activity of the platelet mitochondrial respiratory chain and suggested this as a mechanism for the observed suppressed mitochondrial dysfunction.

Whether there is an active element in mtDNA release is an interesting point of consideration. Active cellular transfer of mitochondria from stromal cells to rescue stricken lung alveoli cells in acute lung injury has been demonstrated⁹⁶. Extracellular vesicles are important modes of intercellular communication and comprise exosomes (endosomal) and microvesicles (plasma membrane-derived) and are directed by exocytosis. Both chromosomal DNA^97,98 and mtDNA^99,100 have been observed in extracellular vesicles; it has been suggested that the transfer of altered mtDNA between cells may play a role in Alzheimer’s disease and skeletal muscle diseases^99,100. As described earlier, in patients with NASH, a greater percentage of mitochondria was found inside extracellular microparticles and a higher percentage of microparticles contained mitochondria compared with lean subjects⁴². Furthermore, subjects with NASH had a higher level of oxidised mtDNA in microparticles. Further clarification is required on the concentration and significance of mtDNA in extracellular vesicles and whether this has different immunostimulatory effects compared with cell-free or surface-bound mtDNA. As previously mentioned, the pro-inflammatory effects of mtDNA are dependent on its oxidisation^75,101. The highly oxidative extracellular milieu at sites of tissue inflammation in patients with chronic inflammatory disease may overwhelm anti-oxidant systems, further potentiating the inflammatory potential of DAMPs such as mtDNA⁵.

mtDNA degradation and clearance

Several well-described clearance mechanisms limit the pro-inflammatory nature of mtDNA. Autophagy as discussed earlier is important¹⁰². Defective autophagy has been implicated in several chronic inflammatory human diseases, including Crohn’s disease¹⁰³. A proportion of circulating DNA in the bloodstream appears to cross the kidney barrier and be excreted in the urine¹⁰⁴. Indeed, mtDNA has been detected in the urine at elevated levels in patients with progressive acute kidney injury¹⁰⁵. This may be due to the inflammatory state associated with this condition, the increased clearance with a disturbed kidney barrier, or both. Another possible mechanism of mtDNA clearance is phagocytosis by macrophages in a manner similar to the ingestion of the structurally similar bacterial DNA¹⁰⁶. As described earlier, the outcome of phagocytosis of intact mitochondria may be pro- rather than anti-inflammatory; these divergent effects may also be dependent on the phenotype of the phagocytosing cells (for example, inflammatory versus pro-resolution macrophages/monocytes, neutrophils, and red blood cells)^61,93.

In general, non-host DNA in the circulation is digested in part by circulating nucleases, and mtDNA may be affected by a similar mechanism¹⁰⁷. Intracellularly, DNases found in the autophagolysosome play a vital role in degrading mtDNA^102,108. Oka et al. showed that cardiac-specific deletion of DNase II resulted in mtDNA accumulation in cardiomyocytes and the development of heart failure¹⁰². In human umbilical vein endothelial cells, lysosomal DNases protect cells against inflammation from mtDNA damage induced by ox-LDL⁹¹. Here, small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of DNase II amplifies the mtDNA–TLR9-mediated inflammatory response⁹¹. It is unclear whether nucleases have a similar action on mtDNA in the extracellular space or are relevant in the physiological setting, especially when mtDNA is present in microvesicles or housed within intact mitochondria, which protect against DNase II. Intriguingly, DNase pre-treatment abolished renal mitochondrial injury that was observed after injection of mitochondrial debris (including mtDNA) in mice⁴⁵. However, the precise role of DNase and its effect on the immunostimulatory effects of mtDNA is likely to be more complex, as illustrated by a recent study which showed that DNase II was required for TLR9 activation by bacterial genomic DNA¹⁰⁹.