Biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model

Sara El Moshy; Marwa M.S. Abbass; Amal M. El-Motayam

doi:10.12688/f1000research.16050.1

Home Browse Biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel...

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model

[version 1; peer review: 5 approved]

Sara El Moshy ¹, Marwa M.S. Abbass¹, Amal M. El-Motayam¹

PUBLISHED 17 Sep 2018

Author details Author details

¹ Oral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, 11553, Egypt

Sara El Moshy
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Marwa M.S. Abbass
Roles: Project Administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Amal M. El-Motayam
Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive dentistry aims to prevent progression of caries and treats non-cavitated lesions through non-invasive approaches to preserve the integrity of tooth structure. The aim of this research was to investigate the possible biomimetic effect of agarose hydrogel in remineralizing a human demineralized enamel model.
Methods: Mandibular third molars were distributed into three groups (G1, G2 and G3) according to the follow up time (2, 4 and 6 days respectively). Caries like lesion was prepared by applying 37% phosphoric acid gel for 1 minute and then remineralization was performed through applying agarose hydrogel on the demineralized surfaces. The specimens were placed in phosphate solution at 37˚C for 2, 4 & 6 days. Scanning electron microscope (SEM), surface microhardness (SMH) and surface roughness analysis (SR) were performed to assess the regenerated tissue.
Results: SEM revealed mineral depositions on the demineralized enamel surface that increased in density by time resulting in a relatively smooth surface in G3. SR and SMH analysis revealed significant differences between the remineralized enamel surfaces of different groups (p< 0.00001) with the highest SR in G1 and the highest SMH in G3.
Conclusions: Agarose hydrogel application is a promising approach to treat early carious lesion. Further studies are needed to clarify the stability of agarose hydrogels in clinical application.

Keywords

Remineralization, agarose, enamel, microhardness, surface roughness.

Corresponding author: Sara El Moshy

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2018 El Moshy S et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

How to cite: El Moshy S, Abbass MMS and El-Motayam AM. Biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model [version 1; peer review: 5 approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1476 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16050.1) First published: 17 Sep 2018, 7:1476 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16050.1) Latest published: 17 Sep 2018, 7:1476 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16050.1)

Introduction

Biomimetic remineralization is a non-invasive therapeutic approach that has received great attention in the last decades. It aims to restore the dental tissues to its normal biological function and esthetics¹. Although several studies have proposed different methods to remineralize enamel lesions, their clinical applications are limited because they require difficult application conditions^2–5. Agarose is a natural biocompatible polysaccharide that has been proposed as a matrix for crystal formation^6–9. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the possible biomimetic effect of agarose hydrogel in remineralizing a human demineralized enamel model.

Methods

Specimens preparation

The experiment was done according to the recommendations and approval of the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University for working on extracted human teeth (Approval no.18766). Mandibular third molars were collected after being surgically extracted due to impaction with patients' written consents. The roots of 47 tooth were removed using diamond disk (Komet, Rock Hill, USA, K6974) in low speed under water cooling. The crowns were divided mesio-distally and each half was embedded in self-cured acrylic resin (Acrostone Co. Cairo, Egypt, 01CCP50) exposing the uncovered enamel surface. Specimens were examined under stereomicroscope (Leica S8 APO, Leica Microsystems, Switzerland) and specimens with defects (erosions, cracks, visible stains, hypo-calcification) were excluded. Specimens were distributed into three groups (n = 31/ group), according to follow up time (Table 1). Specimens were demineralized using 37% phosphoric acid gel (Super Etch, SDI Limited, Australia, 8100040) for 1 min and rinsed with de-ionized water for 60 seconds.

Table 1. Specimens grouping and intervention.

Group	Demineralization	Remineralization	Time of application	Follow up
G1 (n = 31)	37% phosphoric acid gel for 1 min.	Agarose hydrogel 2mm thickness	48 hours	2 days
G2 (n = 31)			96 hours, hydrogel changed every 48 hours.	4 days
G 3 (n = 31)			144 hours, hydrogel changed every 48 hours.	6 days

G1 (2 days), G2 (4 days), G3 (6 days).

Remineralization

Agarose (Vivantis, USA, PC0701) hydrogel and phosphate solution were prepared as previously mentioned by Cao et al.,⁷. Agarose hydrogel was applied on the specimen using acrylic template of 2mm thickness to adjust the thickness of the applied hydrogel. After gelation of the applied hydrogels each specimen was placed into a container filled with 20 mL of phosphate solution and placed in an incubator at 37°C. The phosphate solution and the hydrogel were changed every 24 and 48 h respectively.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination

Thirteen specimens from each group were mounted on the SEM plate with electro-conductor glue (Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA, USA, 12660) to examine their surfaces. The used SEM Model was Quanta FEG 250 (Field Emission Gun) with accelerating voltage 30 K.V.

Surface microhardness (SMH) analysis

SMH of 9 specimens from each group was measured using microhardness tester with Vickers diamond indenter in different areas of the specimens (Vickers diamond, 100 g, 5 s, HMV 2; Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). SMH was measured at baseline, after demineralization and after remineralization.

Surface roughness (SR) analysis

SR of 9 specimens from each group was measured using digital microscope equipped with a built-in camera (Digital Microscope U500X, Guangdong, China). The microscope is connected to IBM compatible computer. WSxM software (Version 5 develop 4.1, Nanotec, Electronica, SL) was used to analyze the photos and to create a 3D image of the specimen surface. The average SR was estimated using WSxM software and expressed in µm. SR was measured at baseline, after demineralization and after remineralization.

Statistical analysis

The mean SMH values and the mean SR values were statistically analyzed. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test were performed to compare remineralizing potential at different time intervals (2,4,6 days). Furthermore, the same tests were used to compare enamel surfaces within the same group. The significant level was set at 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 18.0 for Windows (Statistical Package for Scientific Studies, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

SEM examination

Sound enamel has a smooth surface with some pits and scratches (Figure 1A, Figure 2A & Figure 3A). After acid etching different etching patterns were seen, most commonly type I and type II with scattered areas of type III (Figure 1B, Figure 2B & Figure 3B). After remineralization, G1 revealed partial occlusion of some rod cores with clearly thickened interprismatic substance (Figure 1C) while in G2 prismatic enamel configurations became hidden by mineral depositions (Figure 2C). G3 revealed a relatively smooth surface with less clearly seen rod ends. Some rods’ peripheries showed complete remineralization while others were still empty (Figure 3C).

Figure 1.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images for G1; sound enamel at baseline (A), demineralized enamel surface (B), remineralized enamel surface (C).

Figure 2.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images for G2; sound enamel at baseline (A), demineralized enamel surface (B), remineralized enamel surface (C).

Figure 3.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images for G3; sound enamel at baseline (A), demineralized enamel surface (B), remineralized enamel surface (C).

SMH analysis

The mean SMH values of enamel at different intervals (2,4,6 days) are presented in Table 2. In G1, significant differences were revealed between baseline, demineralized and remineralized enamel (p<0.05) with the highest SMH at baseline. While in G2 and G3, there was a significant difference between the baseline and the demineralized enamel (p<0.05), however there wasn’t a significant difference between baseline and remineralized enamel. Furthermore, there were significant differences among the remineralized enamel surfaces of different groups (p<0.05) with the highest SMH at G3.

Table 2. Analysis of Surface microhardness (SMH) (Kgf/mm²).

	SMH-B	SMH-D	SMH-R	P-value
G1 (2D)	254.377±24.73^a	171.138±15.23^c	196.864±9.74^b,C	< 0.00001*
G2 (4D)	251±35.88^a	171.84±32.42^b	218.485±14.76^a,B	0.000028^*
G3 (6D)	256.842±24^a	175±8.98^b	242.433±14.36^a;A	<0 .00001^*
P-value	0.911069	0.918935	< 0.00001^*

Baseline (B), after demineralization (D), after remineralization (R).

Different upper and lower-case superscript letters indicate significant difference between tested groups at P<0.05. Lower case superscript letters are used for comparison within the same row and upper case letters are used for comparison within each column.

SR analysis

The mean SR values of enamel at different intervals (2,4,6 days) are presented in Table 3. In G1, there were significant differences between baseline, demineralized and remineralized enamel (p<0.05) with the highest SR at the demineralized enamel. While in G2 and G3, there was a significant difference between the baseline and the demineralized enamel (p<0.05), however there wasn’t a significant difference between baseline and the remineralized enamel. Furthermore, there were significant differences among the remineralized enamel surfaces of different groups (p<0.05) with the highest SR in G1. The differences in SR at baseline, demineralized enamel and after remineralization in different groups were obvious when inspecting the 3D images in Figure 4.

Table 3. Analysis of Surface roughness (SR) (µm).

	SR-B	SR-D	SR-R	P-value
G1 (2D)	0.253±0.0009^c	0.274±0.0025^a	0.2663±0.002^b,A	< 0.00001^*
G2 (4D)	0.256±0.0096^b	0.275±0.0026^a	0.258±0.003^b,B	< 0.00001^*
G3 (6D)	0.254±0.00027^b	0.275±0.003^a	0.255±0.003^b,C	< 0.00001^*
P-value	0.376997	0.508623	< 0.00001^*

Baseline (B), after demineralization (D), after remineralization (R).

Different upper and lower-case superscript letters indicate significant difference between tested groups at P<0.05. Lower case superscript letters are used for comparison within the same row and upper case letters are used for comparison within each column.

Figure 4.

Representative Surface roughness (SR) images of enamel specimens; baseline A, demineralized enamel B, remineralized enamel surfaces C, D, E (G1, G2, G3 respectively).

Dataset 1.Raw surface microhardness (SMH) and surface roughness (SR).

Dataset 2.Raw scanning electron microscope (SEM) images.

Discussion

Biomimetic synthesis of enamel like apatite structures under a physiological condition is an alternative restorative pathway¹⁰. Acid etching technique was used to mimic early enamel lesions because of the simplicity and reproducibility of this technique¹¹. SEM results of the present study are in agreement with previous studies^6–9. Agarose hydrogel acted as enamel organic matrix to control the size and form of the formed hydroxyapatite crystals through the interaction between hydroxyl group of agarose and calcium. In addition, it acts as a mineral reservoir for continuing remineralization⁷. The SR analysis results confirmed the SEM results, as the SR values were gradually decreased between different groups which revealed a smoother enamel surface. SMH results are in accordance with previous studies^7,9. In the current work, the lower SMH than sound enamel could be attributed to incomplete compaction of formed crystals on enamel surface¹².

Conclusions

Agarose hydrogel model have a remineralizing potential to treat early carious lesion. Further studies are required to clarify the stability of agarose hydrogels in clinical application.

Data availability

Dataset 1: Raw surface microhardness (SMH) and surface roughness (SR) 10.5256/f1000research.16050.d217398¹³

Dataset 2: Raw scanning electron microscope (SEM) images 10.5256/f1000research.16050.d217399¹⁴

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Faculty Opinions recommended

References

1. Featherstone JD: Remineralization, the natural caries repair process--the need for new approaches. Adv Dent Res. 2009; 21(1): 4–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Yamagishi K, Onuma K, Suzuki T, et al.: Materials chemistry: a synthetic enamel for rapid tooth repair. Nature. 2005; 433(7028): 819. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
3. Fowler CE, Li M, Mann S, et al.: Influence of surfactant assembly on the formation of calcium phosphate materials—A model for dental enamel formation. J Mater Chem. 2005; 15(32): 3317–25. Publisher Full Text
4. Chen H, Tang Z, Liu J, et al.: Acellular synthesis of a human enamel‐like microstructure. Adv Mater. 2006; 18(14): 1846–51. Publisher Full Text
5. Ye W, Wang XX: Ribbon-like and rod-like hydroxyapatite crystals deposited on titanium surface with electrochemical method. Mater Lett. 2007; 61(19–20): 4062–5. Publisher Full Text
6. Ning TY, Xu XH, Zhu LF, et al.: Biomimetic mineralization of dentin induced by agarose gel loaded with calcium phosphate. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012; 100(1): 138–44. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
7. Cao Y, Mei ML, Li QL, et al.: Agarose hydrogel biomimetic mineralization model for the regeneration of enamel prismlike tissue. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014; 6(1): 410–20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
8. Cao CY, Li QL: Scanning electron microscopic analysis of using agarose hydrogel microenvironment to create enamel prism-like tissue on dentine surface. J Dent. 2016; 55: 54–60. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
9. Han M, Li QL, Cao Y, et al.: In vivo remineralization of dentin using an agarose hydrogel biomimetic mineralization system. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 41955. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
10. Busch S: Regeneration of human tooth enamel. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2004; 43(11): 1428–31. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
11. Skucha-Nowak M, Gibas M, Tanasiewicz M, et al.: Natural and Controlled Demineralization for Study Purposes in Minimally Invasive Dentistry. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015; 24(5): 891–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
12. Cao Y, Mei ML, Li QL, et al.: Enamel prism-like tissue regeneration using enamel matrix derivative. J Dent. 2014; 42(12): 1535–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
13. El Moshy S, Abbass MMS, El-Motayam AM: Dataset 1 in: Biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model. F1000Research. 2018. http://www.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16050.d217398
14. El Moshy S, Abbass MMS, El-Motayam AM: Dataset 2 in: Biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model. F1000Research. 2018. http://www.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16050.d217399

Comments on this article Comments (1)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 17 Sep 2018

Reviewer Response 05 Oct 2018

Radwa Elsharkawy, Faculty of Dentistry, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, Egypt

05 Oct 2018

Reviewer Response
Interesting topic, here are some points to be considered:
1. In the methodology: specimens with defects (erosions, cracks, visible stains, hypo-calcification) were excluded and you mentioned that teeth are
... Continue reading
Interesting topic, here are some points to be considered:

In the methodology: specimens with defects (erosions, cracks, visible stains, hypo-calcification) were excluded and you mentioned that teeth are surgically extracted third molar, erosion and visible stains detected in erupted teeth not impacted ones.

Etching pattern in SEM results with no reference.

Discussion is too short.
Interesting topic, here are some points to be considered:

In the methodology: specimens with defects (erosions, cracks, visible stains, hypo-calcification) were excluded and you mentioned that teeth are surgically extracted third molar, erosion and visible stains detected in erupted teeth not impacted ones.

Etching pattern in SEM results with no reference.

Discussion is too short.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Comment

Author details Author details

¹ Oral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, 11553, Egypt

Sara El Moshy
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Marwa M.S. Abbass
Roles: Project Administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Amal M. El-Motayam
Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (1)

version 1

Published: 17 Sep 2018, 7:1476

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16050.1

Copyright

© 2018 El Moshy S et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

El Moshy S, Abbass MMS and El-Motayam AM. Biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model [version 1; peer review: 5 approved] F1000Research 2018, 7:1476 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16050.1)

NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 17 Sep 2018

Views

8

Reviewer Report 17 Oct 2018

Mahmoud M. Bakr, School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld, Australia

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.17529.r39249

The study by El Moshy et al. is well designed and investigates an important topic with potential clinical applications.

However, there are a few issues that need to be addressed to improve the quality of the manuscript: ... Continue reading

The study by El Moshy et al. is well designed and investigates an important topic with potential clinical applications.

However, there are a few issues that need to be addressed to improve the quality of the manuscript:

Introduction and discussion sections are extremely short and do not cite enough literature on the topic.
Discussion section besides being short is basically a repetition of some results without discussing technical aspects of the study and comparing it to previous similar studies.
The quality of some of the images could be improved.
The statistical analysis is not a true representation of the results and could be inaccurate. The effect of time is neglected in this case. Ideally a two way ANOVA should be used to illustrate the interaction between time and treatment. If no interaction was observed then the single main effects of time and/or treatment could be reported then. Using the post hoc analysis is not the best practice as it neglects the effect of time and will most likely lead to false-positive results.
Some images for illustration of the techniques used in the materials and methods section would be helpful.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

13

Reviewer Report 15 Oct 2018

Mahmoud M. Al-Ankily, Oral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.17529.r39250

This report by El Moshy et al. examines biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model. The authors' inclusion of Agarose hydrogel model has a remineralizing potential to treat early carious lesion. The study, although it is small, ... Continue reading

This report by El Moshy et al. examines biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model. The authors' inclusion of Agarose hydrogel model has a remineralizing potential to treat early carious lesion. The study, although it is small, adds knowledge to the existing literature.

Minor comments would help to improve the impact of this paper:

Methods
Specimens preparation: It is better to use premolars extracted for orthodontic treatment, the surface of enamel is usually intact and standard in enamel rods orientation, crystallization and size rather than mandibular third molars with the anatomical varieties, surgical instrumentation and surface irregulars.

Remineralization: (Agarose hydrogel and phosphate solution were prepared as previously mentioned) there is no previously mentioned information about hydrogels and Phosphate Solution Preparation.

Surface roughness (SR) analysis: The average SR was expressed in 1 μm only. how can you be sure that you measure SR at baseline, after demineralization and after remineralization of the same 1 μm every time. It is recommended to use another type of surface roughness analysis with wider surface area at least 25 μm like AFM.

Results
SEM examination: Figures x3000 is not good enough to show baseline, after demineralization and after remineralization changes also x5000 is not so clear please do not minimize them to save the magnification benefits. It is recommended to use 20000 to 50000 to show the crystals, regenerated mineralized tissue and crystal orientation.

Discussion
Needs more details about mechanism of growth of the enamel crystals and the mechanical properties of the regeneration tissue.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

7

Reviewer Report 15 Oct 2018

Mohamed Shamel, Oral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Modern Sciences and Arts University, Cairo, Egypt

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.17529.r39209

The current study performed by El Moshy el al, is an interesting one that aims to investigate the possible biomimetic effect of agarose hydrogel in remineralizing a human demineralized enamel model.

Overall, the study is well constructed ... Continue reading

The current study performed by El Moshy el al, is an interesting one that aims to investigate the possible biomimetic effect of agarose hydrogel in remineralizing a human demineralized enamel model.

Overall, the study is well constructed and presented with the results efficiently supporting the discussion and conclusions.

However some minor points might be helpful in adding to the study:

SEM images used were croped from the original images which caused some blurriness in the images.
A more detailed statistical analysis needs to be performed on the relatively large amount of data obtained.
The discussion section needs to be more detailed as it is too short in comparison to the results obtained.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

11

Reviewer Report 05 Oct 2018

Nehad Samir Taha, Oral Biology Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University (MIU), Cairo, Egypt

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.17529.r38419

Excellent work:

1. The study design is appropriate to the work done.
2. Replication of this study could be applicable in the future based on the study results.
3. The statistical analysis is appropriate to ... Continue reading

Excellent work:

1. The study design is appropriate to the work done.
2. Replication of this study could be applicable in the future based on the study results.
3. The statistical analysis is appropriate to the study.
4. In my opinion, the study results efficiently support the conclusions drawn.

But, I had some questions about:

1. The acrylic templates: how to use it, and whether it is standard in size.
2. No references for the etching pattern.
3. Some pictures are hazy and with no arrows.

Further comments:

1. In the Methodology: I would prefer if you could show us in one picture the differences between a defected specimen that you excluded and one that you choose.

2. In the Results:

In Figure 1: no arrows to demonstrate the different types of acid etching.
In Figure 1C: no arrows to show the closed rod cores.
In Figure 2C: no arrows to show the areas of mineral deposition.
No reference to the acid etching classification.
Finally, I preferred to see a figure plate comparing the 3 states together to be easy to compare (i.e.: a plate of Figures 1A, 2A and 3A, a plate of Figures 1B, 2B and 3B, and a plate of Figures 1C, 2C and 3C).

3. The discussion is too short to clarify the findings of the study.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

16

Reviewer Report 20 Sep 2018

Raneem Farouk Obeid, Department of Oral Biology, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, Egypt

Radwa Taher el sharkawy, Faculty of Dentistry, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, Egypt

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.17529.r38418

Good work, but I have some comments to clarify my confusion:

In the Methodology: the acrylic template - why and how to use? And do you standardize the 2mm in this template?

Good work, but I have some comments to clarify my confusion:

In the Methodology: the acrylic template - why and how to use? And do you standardize the 2mm in this template?
In the Results:
- In Figure 2 you mention acid etch type? Where is the reference of this classification and arrows to show the different type?
- Picture C is hazy, please change it.
- Figure 3: please put arrows to show us rod complete and empty one in Picture C.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (1)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 17 Sep 2018

Reviewer Response 05 Oct 2018

Radwa Elsharkawy, Faculty of Dentistry, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, Egypt

05 Oct 2018

Reviewer Response
Interesting topic, here are some points to be considered:
1. In the methodology: specimens with defects (erosions, cracks, visible stains, hypo-calcification) were excluded and you mentioned that teeth are
... Continue reading
Interesting topic, here are some points to be considered:

In the methodology: specimens with defects (erosions, cracks, visible stains, hypo-calcification) were excluded and you mentioned that teeth are surgically extracted third molar, erosion and visible stains detected in erupted teeth not impacted ones.

Etching pattern in SEM results with no reference.

Discussion is too short.
Interesting topic, here are some points to be considered:

In the methodology: specimens with defects (erosions, cracks, visible stains, hypo-calcification) were excluded and you mentioned that teeth are surgically extracted third molar, erosion and visible stains detected in erupted teeth not impacted ones.

Etching pattern in SEM results with no reference.

Discussion is too short.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Comment

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3	4	5
Version 1 17 Sep 18	read	read	read	read	read

Raneem Farouk Obeid, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, Egypt

Radwa Taher el sharkawy, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, Egypt
Nehad Samir Taha, Misr International University (MIU), Cairo, Egypt
Mohamed Shamel, Modern Sciences and Arts University, Cairo, Egypt
Mahmoud M. Al-Ankily, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt
Mahmoud M. Bakr, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia

Comments on this article

All Comments(1)

Add a comment

Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

8 Views

17 Oct 2018 | for Version 1

Mahmoud M. Bakr, School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld, Australia

8 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

The study by El Moshy et al. is well designed and investigates an important topic with potential clinical applications.

However, there are a few issues that need to be addressed to improve the quality of the manuscript:

Introduction and discussion sections are extremely short and do not cite enough literature on the topic.
Discussion section besides being short is basically a repetition of some results without discussing technical aspects of the study and comparing it to previous similar studies.
The quality of some of the images could be improved.
The statistical analysis is not a true representation of the results and could be inaccurate. The effect of time is neglected in this case. Ideally a two way ANOVA should be used to illustrate the interaction between time and treatment. If no interaction was observed then the single main effects of time and/or treatment could be reported then. Using the post hoc analysis is not the best practice as it neglects the effect of time and will most likely lead to false-positive results.
Some images for illustration of the techniques used in the materials and methods section would be helpful.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

13 Views

15 Oct 2018 | for Version 1

Mahmoud M. Al-Ankily, Oral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt

13 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

This report by El Moshy et al. examines biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model. The authors' inclusion of Agarose hydrogel model has a remineralizing potential to treat early carious lesion. The study, although it is small, adds knowledge to the existing literature.

Minor comments would help to improve the impact of this paper:

Methods
Specimens preparation: It is better to use premolars extracted for orthodontic treatment, the surface of enamel is usually intact and standard in enamel rods orientation, crystallization and size rather than mandibular third molars with the anatomical varieties, surgical instrumentation and surface irregulars.

Remineralization: (Agarose hydrogel and phosphate solution were prepared as previously mentioned) there is no previously mentioned information about hydrogels and Phosphate Solution Preparation.

Surface roughness (SR) analysis: The average SR was expressed in 1 μm only. how can you be sure that you measure SR at baseline, after demineralization and after remineralization of the same 1 μm every time. It is recommended to use another type of surface roughness analysis with wider surface area at least 25 μm like AFM.

Results
SEM examination: Figures x3000 is not good enough to show baseline, after demineralization and after remineralization changes also x5000 is not so clear please do not minimize them to save the magnification benefits. It is recommended to use 20000 to 50000 to show the crystals, regenerated mineralized tissue and crystal orientation.

Discussion
Needs more details about mechanism of growth of the enamel crystals and the mechanical properties of the regeneration tissue.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

7 Views

15 Oct 2018 | for Version 1

Mohamed Shamel, Oral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Modern Sciences and Arts University, Cairo, Egypt

7 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

The current study performed by El Moshy el al, is an interesting one that aims to investigate the possible biomimetic effect of agarose hydrogel in remineralizing a human demineralized enamel model.

Overall, the study is well constructed and presented with the results efficiently supporting the discussion and conclusions.

However some minor points might be helpful in adding to the study:

SEM images used were croped from the original images which caused some blurriness in the images.
A more detailed statistical analysis needs to be performed on the relatively large amount of data obtained.
The discussion section needs to be more detailed as it is too short in comparison to the results obtained.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

11 Views

05 Oct 2018 | for Version 1

Nehad Samir Taha, Oral Biology Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University (MIU), Cairo, Egypt

11 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Excellent work:

1. The study design is appropriate to the work done.
2. Replication of this study could be applicable in the future based on the study results.
3. The statistical analysis is appropriate to the study.
4. In my opinion, the study results efficiently support the conclusions drawn.

But, I had some questions about:

1. The acrylic templates: how to use it, and whether it is standard in size.
2. No references for the etching pattern.
3. Some pictures are hazy and with no arrows.

Further comments:

1. In the Methodology: I would prefer if you could show us in one picture the differences between a defected specimen that you excluded and one that you choose.

2. In the Results:

In Figure 1: no arrows to demonstrate the different types of acid etching.
In Figure 1C: no arrows to show the closed rod cores.
In Figure 2C: no arrows to show the areas of mineral deposition.
No reference to the acid etching classification.
Finally, I preferred to see a figure plate comparing the 3 states together to be easy to compare (i.e.: a plate of Figures 1A, 2A and 3A, a plate of Figures 1B, 2B and 3B, and a plate of Figures 1C, 2C and 3C).

3. The discussion is too short to clarify the findings of the study.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

16 Views

20 Sep 2018 | for Version 1

Raneem Farouk Obeid, Department of Oral Biology, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, Egypt

Radwa Taher el sharkawy, Faculty of Dentistry, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, Egypt

16 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Good work, but I have some comments to clarify my confusion:

In the Methodology: the acrylic template - why and how to use? And do you standardize the 2mm in this template?
In the Results:
- In Figure 2 you mention acid etch type? Where is the reference of this classification and arrows to show the different type?
- Picture C is hazy, please change it.
- Figure 3: please put arrows to show us rod complete and empty one in Picture C.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

[1] 1. Featherstone JD: Remineralization, the natural caries repair process--the need for new approaches. Adv Dent Res. 2009; 21(1): 4–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Yamagishi K, Onuma K, Suzuki T, et al.: Materials chemistry: a synthetic enamel for rapid tooth repair. Nature. 2005; 433(7028): 819. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Fowler CE, Li M, Mann S, et al.: Influence of surfactant assembly on the formation of calcium phosphate materials—A model for dental enamel formation. J Mater Chem. 2005; 15(32): 3317–25. Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Chen H, Tang Z, Liu J, et al.: Acellular synthesis of a human enamel‐like microstructure. Adv Mater. 2006; 18(14): 1846–51. Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Ye W, Wang XX: Ribbon-like and rod-like hydroxyapatite crystals deposited on titanium surface with electrochemical method. Mater Lett. 2007; 61(19–20): 4062–5. Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Ning TY, Xu XH, Zhu LF, et al.: Biomimetic mineralization of dentin induced by agarose gel loaded with calcium phosphate. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012; 100(1): 138–44. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Cao Y, Mei ML, Li QL, et al.: Agarose hydrogel biomimetic mineralization model for the regeneration of enamel prismlike tissue. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014; 6(1): 410–20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[8] 8. Cao CY, Li QL: Scanning electron microscopic analysis of using agarose hydrogel microenvironment to create enamel prism-like tissue on dentine surface. J Dent. 2016; 55: 54–60. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Han M, Li QL, Cao Y, et al.: In vivo remineralization of dentin using an agarose hydrogel biomimetic mineralization system. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 41955. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[10] 10. Busch S: Regeneration of human tooth enamel. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2004; 43(11): 1428–31. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Skucha-Nowak M, Gibas M, Tanasiewicz M, et al.: Natural and Controlled Demineralization for Study Purposes in Minimally Invasive Dentistry. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015; 24(5): 891–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Cao Y, Mei ML, Li QL, et al.: Enamel prism-like tissue regeneration using enamel matrix derivative. J Dent. 2014; 42(12): 1535–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. El Moshy S, Abbass MMS, El-Motayam AM: Dataset 1 in: Biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model. F1000Research. 2018. http://www.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16050.d217398

[14] 14. El Moshy S, Abbass MMS, El-Motayam AM: Dataset 2 in: Biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model. F1000Research. 2018. http://www.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16050.d217399

Biomimetic remineralization of acid etched enamel using agarose hydrogel model

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Specimens preparation

Table 1. Specimens grouping and intervention.

Remineralization

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination

Surface microhardness (SMH) analysis

Surface roughness (SR) analysis

Statistical analysis

Results

SEM examination

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

SMH analysis

Table 2. Analysis of Surface microhardness (SMH) (Kgf/mm2).

SR analysis

Table 3. Analysis of Surface roughness (SR) (µm).

Figure 4.

Discussion

Conclusions

Data availability

Grant information

References

Comments on this article Comments (1)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (1)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

The problem

How to fix it

The problem

How to fix it

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated

Table 2. Analysis of Surface microhardness (SMH) (Kgf/mm²).