ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review

A theoretical model of temperate phages as mediators of gut microbiome dysbiosis

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 01 Jul 2019
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Bacteriophages are the most prominent members of the gut microbiome, outnumbering their bacterial hosts by a factor of 10. Phages are bacteria-specific viruses that are gaining attention as highly influential regulators of the gut bacterial community. Dysregulation of the gut bacterial community contributes to dysbiosis, a microbiome disorder characterized by compositional and functional changes that contribute to disease. A role for phages in gut microbiome dysbiosis is emerging with evidence that the gut phage community is altered in dysbiosis-associated disorders such as colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. Several recent studies have linked successful fecal microbiota transplantation to uptake of the donor’s gut phage community, offering some insight into why some recipients respond to treatment whereas others do not. Here, we review the literature supporting a role for phages in mediating the gut bacterial community, giving special attention to Western diet dysbiosis as a case study to demonstrate a theoretical phage-based mechanism for the establishment and maintenance of dysbiosis.

Keywords

Bacteriophage, phage, gut, microbiome, virome, western diet, prophage-encoded genes, dysbiosis, fecal microbiota transplant

Introduction

Insights into the relationship between diet and the gut microbiome have significantly advanced our understanding of nutrition as a mediator of health and disease. The influence of the Western diet specifically on dysbiosis in the gut bacterial community is well established1. Conspicuously lacking from this body of research is a fundamental understanding of the gut virome, sometimes referred to as the “dark matter” of the microbiome2. It has long been known that the virome harbors genes for antibiotic resistance and bacterial toxins3,4, contributing to the virulence of clinically relevant bacterial pathogens5,6. Emerging evidence implicates an altered gut virome in colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, and other states associated with microbiome dysbiosis710. The role of the virome, whether as cause or consequence of dysbiosis, is unclear.

Gut microbiome dysbiosis

Gut microbiome dysbiosis broadly encompasses the various states of perturbed gut microbial community composition associated with disease or disorder in the host. In a healthy gut environment, the resident (commensal) gut bacteria (that is, symbionts) are non-pathogenic. A healthy gut microbiota–host interaction is a mutualism in which gut bacteria thrive in the gastrointestinal environment of the host while providing the host with multiple benefits through metabolism, immune system development, and protection from pathogens11. During dysbiosis, the homeostatic balance of this symbiosis shifts, disrupting the beneficial nature of the relationship and contributing to disease states. In this setting, otherwise beneficial gut symbionts may transition to a state of pathogenicity (that is, pathobionts). Dysbiosis is implicated in the etiology of numerous clinical disorders ranging from those involving the digestive tract, such as inflammatory bowel disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, to those outside the digestive tract, such as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and autism1215.

The gut virome

Evidence on the role of gut viruses during dysbiosis is limited. The predominant members of the gut virome are bacteria-specific viruses called bacteriophages (phages). Phages are most commonly associated with phage therapy, a practice of administering lytic phages to control bacterial pathogens (for example, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa)16. About 1014 viruses, comprised of about 1200 virotypes, reside in the gut17; this population is 10 times as abundant as gut bacteria but comparable in diversity18,19. Contemporary studies of the gut bacterial community rely on next-generation sequencing of the universal 16s rRNA bacterial gene, which provides a compositional readout of the microbiome. This approach is not possible with phages as they lack a conserved phylogenetic marker20, one of many challenges in phage research. Even the gold standard for studying phage communities, viral metagenomics, is limited by the lack of a genomic library to compare against the enormous diversity of uncharacterized phage genes collectively referred to as “viral dark matter”2.

Advances in gut phage research have demonstrated a role for phages as agents of compositional change in the gut microbial community21,22. Phages exert enormous evolutionary pressure on microbial communities by lysing their bacterial hosts or by mediating gene transfer23. In oceanic surface waters, phage-mediated lysis leads to the death of 20 to 40% of the total bacterial population every 24 hours24. In the gut, phages are primarily temperate and able to incorporate into the bacterial chromosome as latent prophages, thereby reproducing with the bacterial host (that is, the lysogenic cycle); prophages then may produce phage progeny by inducing the lytic cycle (Figure 1)20. Temperate phages also have the option of reproducing by entering the lytic cycle directly and immediately lysing their bacterial host. About half of all sequenced bacterial genomes in the GenBank database contain at least one prophage, and some species can harbor up to 1525. Prophages are intimately linked to bacterial resilience and function, encoding genes for metabolism, antibacterial resistance, and toxin production (for example, shiga toxin production), thereby providing fitness benefits for the bacterial host6,9. Prophages further enhance fitness in their bacterial hosts by preventing infection from other phages (that is, superinfection exclusion) and by lysing competing bacteria (that is, “kill-the-relative”)26,27. Some phage-encoded genes are required for commensal gut bacteria to form a mutualism with their host28; conversely, phage-encoded virulence factors promote pathogenic behavior in their host6,29. These findings are highly relevant to the study of gut microbiome dysbiosis, which can be characterized by the transition of commensal bacteria from symbiont to pathobiont. The transition to dysbiosis is multifactorial and once established it becomes difficult to treat30.

d42d67a4-d156-4a4f-9946-14743d65c0c8_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Reproductive life cycles of a temperate phage.

Temperate phages can reproduce via both lytic and lysogenic cycles. The decision as to which cycle gets induced depends on environmental factors. This simplified version of phage life cycles demonstrates how the cycles are intertwined.

A role for phages in mediating dysbiosis

Dysbiosis is associated with an increased abundance and richness of the mucosal temperate phage population79,31,32. Prophages in the gut are spontaneously induced into the lytic cycle at a modest baseline level33. Large-scale induction typically requires environmental stressors that cause a community-wide “SOS response” in the bacterial hosts34. The SOS response is triggered by DNA damage in the bacterial chromosome35, essentially signaling to the prophage that the bacterial host is no longer suitable. The prophage reacts by inducing the lytic cycle to produce a new population of phage progeny, which seek out new hosts to infect. The inflamed gut is associated with an upregulated SOS response in resident gut bacteria36, loss of phage diversity32, and elevated levels prophage induction37. Elevated prophage induction is a mechanism of horizontal gene transfer between bacterial hosts, increasing rates of genetic recombination and diversification of phage-encoded genes38. This process has been found to drive the evolution of bacterial pathogens by expanding the reservoir of phage-encoded genes for virulence factors and antibiotic resistance5,37. In the setting of an infection by enteric pathogens such as shiga toxin–producing E. coli, antibiotics that trigger the SOS response activate shiga toxin synthesis through the phage induction pathway; this can lead to diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, hemolytic-uremic syndrome, and even death6. Prophages encode virulence factors for other clinically relevant pathogens, including Vibrio cholerae, S. aureus, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, and Clostridium botulinum29. In addition to directly encoding genes for toxins, phage genes can indirectly upregulate production of bacterial toxins and can influence adhesion, colonization, and invasion39.

Within the gut environment, phages are suspected of mediating diversification of the non-pathogenic, commensal microbial community40. Temperate phages are theorized to act on the commensal microbiota via “community shuffling”, whereby prophage induction in response to SOS-triggering stressors may increase the pathobiont-to-symbiont ratio observed during dysbiosis41. Lending support to this theory is the finding that changes to gut phage community composition precede the onset of type 1 diabetes in children42. Furthermore, recovery from Clostridium difficile dysbiosis after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is associated with an uptake of the donor phage community4345. Collectively, there is strong evidence of a role for gut phages in numerous disease states associated with gut microbiome dysbiosis.

Western diet dysbiosis as a case study

A Western diet, characterized by a high-fat, high-sugar, and low-fiber intake, is one of the most clinically important disruptors of the gut microbiome. The substantial body of literature on the Western diet provides an ideal case study for this theoretical model, illustrating the potential role of phages in mediating dysbiosis (a graphical representation of this model can be found in Figure 2). It should be noted that a “Western” diet is often generalized as “high fat” when it has been shown that the type of fat is an important factor in the onset of dysbiosis and disease46,47. Indeed, a Western diet can be classified differently but is commonly associated with high levels of either n-6 polyunsaturated fats or saturated fats1.

d42d67a4-d156-4a4f-9946-14743d65c0c8_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Theoretical model for phage-mediated dysbiosis.

Prophages can drive otherwise commensal bacterial hosts (symbionts) to behave pathogenically (pathobionts) when exposed to environmental stressors, such as those associated with a Western diet. Phage-encoded genes support bacterial mechanisms for bacterial survival at the cost of the human host. The pathogenic behavior of these resident gut microbes promotes inflammation in the intestinal epithelium, which perpetuates the state of environmental stress and persistent dysbiosis.

In a Western diet–induced mouse model of obesity, adverse effects include glucose intolerance and fatty liver, both of which improve after treatment with norfloxacin and ampicillin48, demonstrating the role of an antibiotic-sensitive microbiome. Antibiotic treatment reverses the state of increased intestinal permeability, a common outcome of a Western diet that results in elevated plasma concentration of bacterial endotoxins49. These findings suggest that a Western diet can disrupt homeostatic balance in the gut microbiome, promoting a state of increased intestinal permeability, increased endotoxin absorption, and endotoxemia. The endotoxin, in turn, drives the immune response of the host, thereby producing inflammation, glucose intolerance, and the other characteristic features of metabolic syndrome.

A Western diet is distinguished by not only its high lipid content but also its low availability of fiber. Deprived of fiber from the diet, the gut microbiota compensates by foraging host glycans from the epithelial mucus layer50. Whether phages mediate genes related to glycan foraging has yet to be studied. A healthy mucus layer is a protective boundary separating the sensitive host epithelium from the pro-inflammatory contents of the intestinal lumen (for example, bacterial endotoxins). Degradation of the mucus layer by glycan-foraging bacteria depletes this protection, bringing luminal bacteria closer to the epithelium, thus promoting inflammation and increased intestinal permeability51,52. A more permeable intestinal lining is hypothesized to allow more oxygen from the bloodstream to enter the normally anoxic intestinal lumen53, inflicting oxidative stress on obligate anaerobes in the gut54. This idea is supported by the finding that oxygen respiration becomes a dominant metabolic signature in mouse models of colitis55. Using the phosphorescence quenching method, Albenberg et al. (2014) showed that there is an oxygen gradient radially in the gut lumen whereby the oxygen concentration is highest near the mucosa56. Accordingly, the composition of the gut bacterial community is organized radially, and mucosally associated bacteria are the most oxygen-tolerant57. It is now appreciated that the intestinal barrier does not simply have two states, impermeable and permeable, but rather there exists degrees of permeability. However, there is a consensus that increased permeability associated with bacterial translocation and immune activation is harmful and leads to chronic inflammation11,53. A change in oxygen concentration may also affect the gut phage population as oxidative stress is a trigger of the SOS response and can induce prophages to enter the lytic cycle. In support of this hypothesis is a study by Kim and Bae (2016), who demonstrated that a Western diet expands phage-encoded genes for oxidative tolerance9. It is unlikely that oxidative stress on commensal bacteria is solely responsible for inducing gut phages, as the metabolic by-products of a Western diet have also been shown to trigger prophage induction58.

A Western diet has been found to increase the population density of phages in the gut mucosa and expand the reservoir of phage-encoded genes for phage reproduction9. Higher rates of temperate phage infection can cause pathogenicity in commensal gut bacteria by disrupting the function of bacterial genes29. Systematic disruption of bacterial genes by phages may have the potential to drive the entire gut microbial community toward a state of increased pathogenic potential (that is, dysbiosis). Whether other disruptors of the gut microbiome—including antibiotic therapy, inflammation, exposure to anesthesia, surgery or other traumas, immune deficiency, and exposure to toxins—exert their effects on the microbiome via its phage population remains to be tested.

Most laboratory observations suggest that phages generally have a narrow host range (all bacteria a phage can infect)23, although recent evidence suggests that phages have a much broader host range in the gut than what has been observed in vitro59,60. Stressors that induce prophages (for example, antibiotic treatment) consequently broaden phage host range and expand the reservoir of phage-encoded genes for surviving the stressor (for example, antibiotic resistance genes)5. Diet is a potential regulator of prophage induction among commensal gut bacteria59, and unregulated prophage induction may be responsible for disturbing the homeostatic relationship between microbiome and host. Since perturbation of the gut environment by a Western diet upregulates phage-encoded genes for lipid metabolism and oxidative tolerance9, it can be reasonably postulated that these phages likely confer a competitive advantage to their bacterial hosts in a gut environment with higher availability of lipids and increased levels of luminal oxygen. Phages with the combination of broad host range and genes for bacterial host fitness may have a substantial competitive advantage in the gut microbial community, thereby propagating these genes across taxonomically distinct bacterial species within the microbiota and increasing competition for limited resources such as host glycans from the mucus layer. The microbiome composition during Western diet dysbiosis shifts with an expansion of bacteria in the phyla Proteobacteria and Firmicutes61; Proteobacteria specifically are associated with numerous dysbioses, intestinal barrier dysfunction, and low-grade inflammation57. The majority of gut prophages are found in the genomes of these two phyla59, and there is a positive correlation between viral content and Firmicutes in the feces during obesity62.

There is clear evidence that prophages can help make the decision for their bacterial hosts to act as either symbionts or pathobionts6,28 and consumption of a Western diet may influence that decision. Outlined above is one possible mechanism for the evolution of a phage community that promotes pathogen-like behavior in otherwise commensal gut bacteria through elevated prophage induction, wherein bacterial survival may come at a cost to the human host. This theoretical model also takes into account the loss of phage diversity observed in response to gut microbiome perturbations, which may be responsible for the persistence of dysbiosis and resistance to clinical treatment. It is worth noting that our proposed model is not mutually exclusive with other mechanisms that may lead to Western diet–associated dysbiosis, such as those involving host metabolism in response to specific dietary fats47 or host genetic factors63,64.

Moving forward

As demonstrated by Howe et al. (2016), a Western diet mouse model reduces both bacterial and phage diversity65. After mice are transitioned back to a standard diet, diversity of the bacterial community returns to pre–Western diet levels whereas the diversity of the phage community remains low. It is possible that dietary disturbances permanently alter phage diversity as well as the functional nature of the phage-encoded gene reservoir; the long-term impacts of this lost diversity are unknown. Treatment of dysbiosis may be contingent on re-establishing a healthy phage community.

Recent developments in clinical FMT therapy have identified an association between successful treatment of C. difficile infection and uptake of the donor’s fecal phage community by the FMT recipient43,45. A clinical study found that administration of a bacteria-depleted fecal filtrate (phages retained) was sufficient for treatment of C. difficile infection and transition of the recipient phage community toward that of the donor44. In an ulcerative colitis mouse model, FMT responders had reduced populations of mucosal phages compared with non-responders31. The composition of the donor’s phage community has yet to be considered an important factor for FMT. For that matter, the recipient’s diet has also not been considered. Gut phages heavily influence the composition of the gut microbiota and in turn its relationship with the human host. Much research still needs to be carried out to determine how the phage community responds to perturbation and contributes to the establishment, maintenance, and remediation of dysbiosis.

Abbreviation

FMT, fecal microbiota transplantation

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 01 Jul 2019
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Lin DM and Lin HC. A theoretical model of temperate phages as mediators of gut microbiome dysbiosis [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] F1000Research 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):997 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18480.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 01 Jul 2019
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 01 Jul 2019
Deanna L Gibson, Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada 
Approved
VIEWS 0
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Gibson DL. Reviewer Report For: A theoretical model of temperate phages as mediators of gut microbiome dysbiosis [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):997 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.20218.r50022)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 01 Jul 2019
Hariom Yadav, Department of Internal Medicine-Molecular Medicine and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 0
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Yadav H. Reviewer Report For: A theoretical model of temperate phages as mediators of gut microbiome dysbiosis [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):997 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.20218.r50023)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 01 Jul 2019
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.