Introduction
Aging has been studied extensively in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using two fundamentally different systems: the replicative lifespan assay and the chronological lifespan assay1. Replicative life span is defined as the number of daughter cells that a mother cell can produce prior to entering an irreversible cell cycle arrest, while chronological lifespan is defined as the length of time that a yeast cell can maintain viability in a non-dividing state2,3. Numerous genetic and environmental factors have been identified that can modulate either replicative aging, or chronological aging, or both.
Replicative aging has been studied almost exclusively by maintaining individual cells on the surface of a nutrient agar plate, microdissecting daughter cells away from the mother cells, and counting the number of daughter cells that the mother cell produces prior to senescence4. Generally, rich YPD medium (2% glucose) is used for replicative lifespan assays. Calorie restriction by reducing the glucose concentration of the medium to 0.5% or lower has been shown in numerous studies to extend lifespan in different wild type strain backgrounds between 10–40%5,6.
Several methods have been described for studying chronological aging. The most widely utilized protocol involves culturing yeast cells in synthetic complete liquid medium with 2% glucose as the carbon source, either under shaking or static conditions, in culture tubes or 96-well plates7,8. Alternative, but less frequently used, liquid culture methods for chronological aging involve culturing cells in rich YPD medium, using a respiratory carbon source such as glycerol, or transferring cells to water once they have reached stationary phase growth arrest9,10. A plate-based assay for chronological life span analysis has also been described in which cells are growth arrested through limitation for tryptophan11. In all of these assays, viability over time is determined by restoring a small subset of the population to nutrient rich growth conditions and assaying their ability to re-enter the cell cycle, either through quantification of colony forming units on solid-agar plates or through outgrowth kinetics in liquid culture3,12. Similar to the case for replicative lifespan, calorie restriction by reducing the initial glucose concentration of the culture medium can extend chronological lifespan, generally by more than 100%13,14.
One important feature of the standard method for determining chronological aging is that the culture medium becomes acidified over the first few days of the experiment, with pH dropping from an initial value of around 4.0 to 2.5–2.9 within 96 hours15. This acidification of the external environment results from the production of organic acids, including acetic acid, following fermentation of glucose to ethanol and subsequent utilization of ethanol as a carbon source once the glucose is depleted. Preventing medium acidification by buffering the culture to a pH of 6.0 with either citrate phosphate buffer or low salt MES buffer results in a more than doubling of chronological lifespan15. Calorie restriction, or switching the yeast culture to a non-fermentable carbon source, such as glycerol or ethanol, also prevents acidification and results in a similar magnitude of chronological lifespan extension as buffering15,16.
Although the two yeast aging assays are nearly always studied independently, it is clear that they share at least some overlap. As mentioned above, calorie restriction extends both replicative and chronological lifespan, as do a few genetic interventions, such as deletion of either TOR1 or SCH9, both of which are nutrient-responsive kinases7,17–19. In addition, it has been shown that chronologically aged cells have reduced replicative lifespan when returned to rich growth conditions9. This reduction in replicative lifespan following chronological aging appears to be mediated through changes in mitochondrial function, since the chronologically old cells that retain the lowest mitochondrial membrane potential also have the longest replicative lifespan following resumption of cell division20. Calorie restriction or buffering the culture medium of the cells during chronological aging also protects against subsequent replicative lifespan reduction21, raising the possibility that medium acidification directly influences both types of yeast aging. To assess this possibility, we performed replicative lifespan analysis on wild type BY4742 mother cells under either standard conditions or on rich media buffered to different pH values. We were unable to detect a significant replicative lifespan extension from buffering the culture medium under any of the conditions examined, including those conditions that robustly extend chronological lifespan.
Methods
Replicative lifespans
All lifespan experiments were performed in the BY4742 strain background (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) as previously described4,22. Virgin daughter cells were isolated and allowed to grow into mother cells while their corresponding daughters were microdissected using Zeiss Axioskop 40 dissection microscopes and manually counted until the mother cell could no longer divide4. YEP agar plates (1% yeast extract, 2% bacto-peptone, 2% agar) containing 2% glucose (YPD) were utilized and strains were grown at 30°C during the day, dissected at room temperature, and placed in a refrigerator at 4°C over night. Daughter cells were removed from each mother cell roughly every 2 hours by micromanipulation4. Cells were scored as senescent when they had failed to divide for at least eight hours of incubation at 30°C. Terminal morphology was defined as the budded state of the mother cells upon senescence23. All experiments were performed by a team of dissectors who were blinded to the identity of the strains under examination in any given experiment. Prism Graphpad 5.0 was used for data analysis. Statistical significance for differences in median lifespan was determined using the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. Budded and unbudded states were determined visually for each mother cell assayed and statistical comparisons of budding rates utilized Fischer’s Exact two-tailed test. Multiple comparison corrections were performed using the Bonferroni correction.
Preparation of media
Stock buffers were prepared at 1 M in deionized water and pH was adjusted by addition of appropriate molar ratios of conjugate acid and conjugate base, or by empirical adjustment with HCl or NaOH. Buffer reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). The following buffers were used: Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) (; 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS); 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES); citrate buffer (sodium citrate and citric acid); acetate buffer (sodium acetate and acetic acid). Stock buffers were sterilized by filtration using a VWR International syringe driven 0.2 micron cellulose acetate membrane filter. Buffers were diluted to 100 mM final concentration in YPD agar after autoclaving and cooling to ~55°C. Appropriate stock buffer pH was empirically determined, as necessary to adjust the pH of YPD liquid media at room temperature to the indicated final pH. Measurement of pH was performed using an Accumet Excel XL15 pH meter. The pH of agar media was further verified by use of EMD colorpHast pH-indicator strips. For adjustment of media pH without buffer addition, the indicated acid or base was added to achieve the desired pH prior to autoclaving.
Results
pH and buffering
Lowering the pH of YPD agar plates to 5.0 by HCl (p = 0.0218) and to 6.0 using MES buffer (p = 0.0165) trended toward a decrease in lifespan that was statistically significant without adjusting for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05), but which did not reach significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0056) (Figure 1A, Table 1). Lowering pH to 5.0 by acetic acid (p = 0.8869) or buffering to pH 5.6 using acetate buffer (p = 0.0896) had no detectable effect on lifespan. Further reduction of pH to 3.0 using a citrate buffer (p = 0.3412) also had no effect on lifespan.
Figure 1.
Replicative lifespans with pH adjusted to 7–8 by buffering or NaOH (A), or pH 6.0 or below by acids or buffers (B) and to pH 9.0 by NaOH (C).
Table 1. Effects of pH and buffering on terminal morphology and statistical analysis for experimentally matched RLS data shown in Figure 1.
pH | Buffer or pH adjusted by | Median RLS | RLS vs. YPD P | Budded | Unbudded | %B | RLS B | %U | RLS U | B&U vs. YPD P value |
---|
8.0 | NaOH | 28.5 | 0.7658 | 18 | 22 | 45.0 | 23 | 55.0 | 30.5 | 0.3711 |
7.8 | Tris buffer | 27 | 0.1754 | 23 | 17 | 57.5 | 27 | 42.5 | 26 | 1 |
7.0 | MOPS buffer | 30 | 0.4161 | 21 | 19 | 52.5 | 25 | 47.5 | 36 | 0.8224 |
7.0 | Tris buffer | 27 | 0.3653 | 21 | 18 | 53.8 | 25 | 46.2 | 28 | 0.8224 |
6.8 | YPD | 29 | - | 23 | 17 | 57.5 | 25 | 42.5 | 34 | - |
6.0 | MES buffer | 21.5 | 0.0165 | 13 | 27 | 32.5 | 16 | 67.5 | 22 | 0.0424 |
5.6 | Acetate buffer | 20.5 | 0.0896 | 15 | 25 | 37.5 | 18 | 62.5 | 25 | 0.1165 |
5.0 | HCl | 22.5 | 0.0218 | 11 | 29 | 27.5 | 18 | 72.5 | 23 | 0.0123 |
5.0 | Acetic acid | 28 | 0.8869 | 14 | 25 | 35.9 | 25 | 64.1 | 30 | 0.0722 |
3.0 | Citrate buffer | 25.5 | 0.3412 | 11 | 29 | 27.5 | 26 | 72.5 | 25 | 0.0123 |
Buffering YPD media to pH 7 by MOPS (p = 0.4161) or Tris (p = 0.3653) had no detectable effect on yeast lifespan (Figure 1B). Increasing the pH of YPD to 8.0 by NaOH (p = 0.7658) or buffering at pH 7.8 with 100 mM Tris (p = 0.1754) also has no detectable effect on lifespan. Raising pH further to 9.0 by sodium hydroxide (p < 0.0001) resulted in a significant reduction of lifespan (Figure 1C), and cells on YPD buffered to pH 9.0 with 100 mM Tris buffer did not divide and, thus, replicative lifespan could not be determined for this condition.
Terminal morphology
Terminal morphology is defined as the budded state of the mother cells upon senescence23. Terminal morphology frequency was not significantly altered when pH was buffered at 7.0 by MOPS (p = 0.8224) or 7.0 (p = 0.8224) or 7.8 by Tris (p = 1) or by adjustment of pH to 8.0 by sodium hydroxide (p = 0.3711). Manipulations that lowered the pH displayed a trend toward a higher percentage of unbudded cells upon arrest (Table 1), but this did not reach statistical significance after correcting for multiple testing (α = 0.0056).
Discussion
The results presented here demonstrate that, unlike chronological lifespan, acidification of the culture medium does not limit replicative lifespan under standard conditions. This is relevant information, because it rules out the possibility that interventions shown to extend replicative lifespan are acting by either reducing the production and secretion of organic acids into the environment or by increasing resistance to acid stress.
The biological relevance of acidification limiting chronological lifespan has been an area of contention within the field, due in part to concerns that cell death due to acidification may be a yeast specific phenomenon1. Evidence supporting this concern has been provided by parallel analyses of replicative and chronological lifespan for yeast deletion mutants corresponding to Caenorhabditis elegans genes that increase lifespan when their expression is reduced. A significant enrichment for long replicative lifespan was found among this set of yeast deletions24, but no enrichment for increased chronological lifespan under standard conditions was observed25. On the other hand, there is evidence that a similar acid-induced mechanism of senescence occurs in mammalian cells, at least in culture, suggesting the possibility that the intracellular response to external pH may be conserved26,27.
The trend toward reduced lifespan noted under some of the conditions tested is of interest and may warrant further study. The significant reduction in lifespan associated with adjusting to pH 9.0 by NaOH may reflect a reduced ability of yeast to proliferate under basic conditions, which is consistent with the inability of yeast cells to grow in the replicative lifespan assay when the YPD was buffered to pH 9.0 by Tris buffer. Among the acidic conditions tested, any effects on lifespan are likely to be due to the composition of the buffer rather than a direct result of the lower pH. As evidence for this, we note that YPD buffered to pH 3.0, the most acidic condition tested, had no effect on lifespan.
In summary, we find no evidence that acidification of the culture medium, or pH changes in general, limit replicative lifespan in the BY4742 laboratory yeast strain under standard conditions. Buffer conditions that dramatically extend chronological lifespan of this strain do not similarly extend replicative lifespan. These data demonstrate that effects of acidification on aging in yeast are likely to be restricted to non-dividing cells.
Author contributions
MK and BMW conceived the study and designed the experiments. BMW, DC, HT, HD, NCS, JRN, JF, JL, BZ, JM, EO, TN, TS, AS and MT carried out the experiments. BMW performed the analyses of results. BMW and MK wrote the manuscript. All authors have critically reviewed and agreed to the content of the manuscript.
Competing interests
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information
This work was supported by NIH Grant R01AG039390 to MK. BMW was supported by NIH Training Grant T32ES007032.
Faculty Opinions recommendedReferences
- 1.
Longo VD, Shadel GS, Kaeberlein M, et al.:
Replicative and chronological aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Cell Metab.
2012; 16(1): 18–31. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 2.
Steinkraus KA, Kaeberlein M, Kennedy BK:
Replicative aging in yeast: the means to the end.
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol.
2008; 24(1): 29–54. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 3.
Fabrizio P, Longo VD:
The chronological life span of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Aging Cell.
2003; 2(2): 73–81. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 4.
Steffen KK, Kennedy BK, Kaeberlein M:
Measuring replicative life span in the budding yeast.
J Vis Exp.
2009; (28). PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 5.
Lin SJ, Defossez PA, Guarente L:
Requirement of NAD and SIR2 for life-span extension by calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Science.
2000; 289(5487): 2126–2128. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 6.
Schleit J, Johnson SC, Bennett CF, et al.:
Molecular mechanisms underlying genotype-dependent responses to dietary restriction.
Aging Cell.
2013. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 7.
Powers RW III, Kaeberlein M, Caldwell SD, et al.:
Extension of chronological life span in yeast by decreased TOR pathway signaling.
Genes Dev.
2006; 20(2): 174–184. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 8.
Longo VD, Gralla EB, Valentine JS:
Superoxide dismutase activity is essential for stationary phase survival in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mitochondrial production of toxic oxygen species in vivo.
J Biol Chem.
1996; 271(21): 12275–12280. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 9.
Ashrafi K, Sinclair D, Gordon JI, et al.:
Passage through stationary phase advances replicative aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.
1999; 96(16): 9100–9105. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 10.
MacLean M, Harris N, Piper PW:
Chronological lifespan of stationary phase yeast cells; a model for investigating the factors that might influence the ageing of postmitotic tissues in higher organisms.
Yeast.
2001; 18(6): 499–509. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 11.
Wei M, Fabrizio P, Madia F, et al.:
Tor1/Sch9-regulated carbon source substitution is as effective as calorie restriction in life span extension.
PLoS Genet.
2009; 5(5): e1000467. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 12.
Murakami C, Kaeberlein M:
Quantifying yeast chronological life span by outgrowth of aged cells.
J Vis Exp.
2009; (27). PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 13.
Smith DL Jr, McClure JM, Matecic M, et al.:
Calorie restriction extends the chronological lifespan of Saccharomyces cerevisiae independently of the Sirtuins.
Aging Cell.
2007; 6(5): 649–662. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 14.
Murakami CJ, Burtner CR, Kennedy BK, et al.:
A method for high-throughput quantitative analysis of yeast chronological life span.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.
2008; 63(2): 113–121. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 15.
Burtner CR, Murakami CJ, Kennedy BK, et al.:
A molecular mechanism of chronological aging in yeast.
Cell Cycle.
2009; 8(8): 1256–1270. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 16.
Murakami CJ, Wall V, Basisty N, et al.:
Composition and acidification of the culture medium influences chronological aging similarly in vineyard and laboratory yeast.
PLoS ONE.
2011; 6(9): e24530. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 17.
Kaeberlein M, Powers RW III, Steffen KK, et al.:
Regulation of yeast replicative life span by TOR and Sch9 in response to nutrients.
Science.
2005; 310(5751): 1193–1196. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 18.
Fabrizio P, Pozza F, Pletcher SD, et al.:
Regulation of longevity and stress resistance by Sch9 in yeast.
Science.
2001; 292(5515): 288–290. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 19.
Fabrizio P, Pletcher SD, Minois N, et al.:
Chronological aging-independent replicative life span regulation by Msn2/Msn4 and Sod2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
FEBS Lett.
2004; 557(1–3): 136–142. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 20.
Delaney JR, Murakami C, Chou A, et al.:
Dietary restriction and mitochondrial function link replicative and chronological aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Exp Gerontol.
2013; 48(10): 1006–13. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 21.
Murakami C, Delaney JR, Chou A, et al.:
pH neutralization protects against reduction in replicative lifespan following chronological aging in yeast.
Cell Cycle.
2012; 11(16): 3087–3096. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 22.
Kaeberlein M, Kirkland KT, Fields S, et al.:
Sir2-independent life span extension by calorie restriction in yeast.
PLoS Biol.
2004; 2(9): E296. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 23.
Delaney JR, Chou A, Olsen B, et al.:
End-of-life cell cycle arrest contributes to stochasticity of yeast replicative aging.
FEMS Yeast Res.
2013; 13(3): 267–276. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 24.
Smith ED, Kennedy BK, Kaeberlein M:
Genome-wide identification of conserved longevity genes in yeast and worms.
Mech Ageing Dev.
2007; 128(1): 106–111. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 25.
Burtner CR, Murakami CJ, Olsen B, et al.:
A genomic analysis of chronological longevity factors in budding yeast.
Cell Cycle.
2011; 10(9): 1385–1396. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 26.
Leontieva OV, Blagosklonny MV:
Yeast-like chronological senescence in mammalian cells: phenomenon, mechanism and pharmacological suppression.
Aging (Albany, NY Online).
2011; 3(11): 1078–1091. PubMed Abstract
| Free Full Text
- 27.
Kaeberlein M, Kennedy BK:
A new chronological survival assay in mammalian cell culture.
Cell Cycle.
2012; 11(2): 201–202. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
Comments on this article Comments (0)