ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review
Revised

Enteropathogenic E. coli: breaking the intestinal tight junction barrier

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 04 May 2016
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) causes acute intestinal infections in infants in the developing world. Infection typically spreads through contaminated food and water and leads to severe, watery diarrhea. EPEC attaches to the intestinal epithelial cells and directly injects virulence factors which modulate multiple signaling pathways leading to host cell dysfunction. However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the onset of diarrhea are poorly defined. A major target of EPEC is the host cell tight junction complex which acts as a barrier and regulates the passage of water and solutes through the paracellular space. In this review, we focus on the EPEC effectors that target the epithelial barrier, alter its functions and contribute to leakage through the tight junctions.

Keywords

Enteropathogenic E. coli, tight junctions, paracellular permeability.

Revised Amendments from Version 1

In version 2, we have incorporated the suggestions of Prof. Dudeja (Reviewer #1) and have (i) outlined the effect of EPEC on the disruption of ion channels and transporters in the beginning of the discussion section; (ii) included a discussion on the role the EPEC effector EspG on Cl- absorption in host cells; (iii) discussed the microtubule-dependent effect of EspG1/G2 on tight junction barrier function and (iv) included references # 5, 13, 15,16, 34 and 35 in the reference section in support of the above.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Pradeep Dudeja
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Fernando Navarro-Garcia

Introduction

EPEC causes diarrhea in infants in developing countries and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality1,2. EPEC infection results in excessive loss of water and electrolytes from the body leading to dehydration and death3. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are not completely understood. EPEC has been reported to disrupt the ion transporters and channels as well as tight junctions in intestinal epithelial cells leading to rapid onset of diarrhea4,5. EPEC directly injects virulence factors into the host cells which target multiple signaling pathways and some have been linked to tight junction disruption6. In this review, we focus only on the EPEC effectors reported to be involved in the disruption of tight junctions.

Discussion

EPEC attaches to the apical surface of the intestinal epithelial cells and effaces the microvilli causing localized lesions7,8. EPEC uses a type three secretion system to inject at least twenty five effector proteins into the host cells9. Many of the effectors are encoded by genes located on a pathogenicity island called the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) although non-LEE encoded effectors have also been identified10. Intimate attachment of the bacterium to the host cell is facilitated by the effector, Tir (Translocated intimin receptor) which is inserted into the host plasma membrane where it serves as a receptor for intimin, the outer surface protein of EPEC11.

Recent studies have revealed that the rapid onset of diarrhea in EPEC infections is a result of increased intestinal secretion as well as reduced absorption of ions and solutes5. EPEC uses several effectors to disable the ion transport systems in host intestinal cells. The EPEC effector EspF inactivates the sodium-D-glucose co-transporter SGLT-1 through co-operative actions of other EPEC effectors Map, Tir and intimin and also inhibits the activity of the Na+/H+ exchanger NHE312,13. Map and the effector NleA interact with Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor 2 (NHERF2) altering its function14. The net result of these effector actions is reduced uptake of Na+ into the cells. EPEC also inhibits Cl- absorption in intestinal epithelial cells by downregulation of the Cl-/HCO3- exchanger SLC26A3 also known as DRA (downregulated in adenoma)15,16. This process is mediated by the effectors EspG1 and G2 in a microtubule-dependent manner as disruption of the microtubules results in a decrease in the levels of DRA at the apical surface of host cells16. These data indicate that EPEC increases the endocytosis of DRA and also prevents its recycling to the apical surface by inhibiting exocytosis16.

In addition to their effects on ion absorption, EPEC effectors also disrupt host cell functions by cytoskeletal reorganization, mitochondrial dysfunction, protein transport defects, suppression of immune responses and epithelial barrier disruption9. Since the barrier function is regulated by the intestinal epithelial tight junctions, EPEC-mediated disruption of this complex also contributes to the onset of diarrhea.

Tight junctions seal adjacent epithelial cells and act as (i) a gate that selectively regulates the passage of ions and solutes through the paracellular space and (ii) a fence that prevents the intermixing of apical and basal plasma membrane proteins thereby maintaining cell polarity17,18. The tight junction complex consists of transmembrane proteins, adaptor proteins, small GTPases, kinases, phosphatases, transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators17,18. The transmembrane proteins regulate cell-cell adhesion and are linked to the cytoskeleton through the adaptor proteins17,18. Paracellular permeability is regulated by the transmembrane proteins belonging to the Marvel-domain containing protein family (occludin, Tricellulin/MarvelD2 and MarvelD3) as well as by members of the claudin family17,19. Additionally, permeability is regulated by tight junction-associated guanine-nucleotide exchange factors for Rho GTPases through the modulation of the actin cytoskeleton17–19.

Leakage through tight junctions occurs in diarrhea and the EPEC effectors EspF, Map, EspG1/G2 and NleA have been implicated in the disruption of host cell tight junctions20–22.

EspF is a multifunctional effector which disrupts the tight junction barrier20. The N-terminus of EspF contains mitochondrial and nucleolus targeting sequences which direct EspF to the mitochondria and nucleolus respectively where it alters their functions23. The C-terminus of EspF contains three proline rich repeats with binding sites for eukaryotic sorting nexin 9 (SNX9) and neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP)23. Binding of EspF with SNX9 is required for its recruitment to the plasma membrane but is not sufficient for tight junction disruption as EspF mutants deficient in SNX9 binding also disrupt tight junctions24. Binding of EspF with N-WASP triggers the activation of the Arp2/3 complex leading to actin polymerization24. EspF from the rabbit EPEC strain E22 has been shown to bind actin and recruit the tight junction proteins ZO-1 and ZO-2 into actin pedestals25 while EspF from the mouse EPEC strain C. rodentium is involved in the internalization of claudin-1, -3 and -5 in vivo26 causing tight junction disruption.

The EPEC effector Map cooperates with EspF in the disruption of tight junctions20. Like EspF, Map is also targeted to the mitochondria where it alters mitochondrial functions20. Map activates the Cdc42 GTPase by functioning as its GEF (guanine-nucleotide exchange factor) leading to the formation of transient filopodia27. The C-terminus of Map contains a TRL (Thr-Arg-Leu) motif through which it interacts with EBP50 (ERM-binding phosphoprotein 50) also called Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor 1 (NHERF1)28. Binding with EBP50 recruits the actin scaffold protein ezrin to this complex linking Map to the actin cytoskeleton. The precise mechanism by which Map disrupts tight junctions is not known but it likely occurs through the modulation of the actin cytoskeleton.

NleA has been reported to increase paracellular permeability by disrupting the tight junction proteins ZO-1 and occludin22. NleA inhibits protein secretion from the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) to the Golgi by direct interaction with Sec24, a subunit of the coat protein complex II (COP-II)29. It has been proposed that NleA inhibits the transport of newly synthesized tight junction proteins disrupting the barrier.

The EPEC effector EspG and its homolog EspG2 have been shown to increase the permeability of small tracers through the tight junctions21. EspG binds the Golgi matrix protein GM130 disrupting the Golgi structure30. Additionally, EspG deregulates the small GTPases Arf1/6 (ADP ribosylation factor 1/6) and Rab1 causing arrest of protein trafficking from the ER to the Golgi31,32. EspG binds p21-activated kinase at the same site required for Rab1 binding32,33 linking the microtubules to this signaling axis. Recent studies have shown that EspG1 and G2 not only disrupt the microtubules causing internalization of occludin but also inhibit the recovery of tight junctions in calcium switch experiments34,35 indicating that EspG regulates multiple signaling pathways ultimately disrupting tight junctions.

Finally, EspF and EspG have also been implicated in the internalization of aquaporins-2 and -3, leading to reduced water absorption36.

Conclusions

Coordinated actions of the EPEC effectors EspF, Map, NleA and EspG disrupt tight junctions. With the exception of EspF, which forms a complex with ZO-1/ZO-2, none of the other effectors have been reported to interact with any tight junction protein. Therefore, their role in the disruption of tight junctions and onset of diarrhea is possibly due to (i) modulation of the actin cytoskeleton (EspF, Map) or the microtubules (EspG); (ii) inhibition of protein trafficking from the ER to the Golgi (EspG, NleA); (iii) inhibition of tight junction restoration (EspG); (iv) interference with the functions of the Na+/H + exchanger 3 (EspF), SGLT-1 (EspF, Map), NHERF-1, -2 (Map, NleA), DRA (EspG1/G2) and (v) deregulation of aquaporins (EspF, EspG).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 13 Jul 2015
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Singh AP and Aijaz S. Enteropathogenic E. coli: breaking the intestinal tight junction barrier [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] F1000Research 2016, 4:231 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6778.2)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 04 May 2016
Revised
Views
7
Cite
Reviewer Report 13 May 2016
Pradeep Dudeja, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 7
The authors have appropriately revised the manuscript and ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Dudeja P. Reviewer Report For: Enteropathogenic E. coli: breaking the intestinal tight junction barrier [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 4:231 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.9314.r13852)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 13 Jul 2015
Views
19
Cite
Reviewer Report 06 Jan 2016
Fernando Navarro-Garcia, Department of Cell Biology, Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute (CINVESTAV-IPN), Mexico City, Mexico 
Approved
VIEWS 19
This is an interesting review, and I think it makes a positive review to the current knowledge about the effects of EPEC on the tight junctions. However, it will be interesting to note the observations posted by the first reviewer ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Navarro-Garcia F. Reviewer Report For: Enteropathogenic E. coli: breaking the intestinal tight junction barrier [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 4:231 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.7282.r11552)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 18 Apr 2016
    Saima Aijaz, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
    18 Apr 2016
    Author Response
    Thank you for your comments. I have now amended the review to incorporate the suggestions of Prof. Dudeja.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests.
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 18 Apr 2016
    Saima Aijaz, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
    18 Apr 2016
    Author Response
    Thank you for your comments. I have now amended the review to incorporate the suggestions of Prof. Dudeja.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests.
Views
33
Cite
Reviewer Report 05 Oct 2015
Pradeep Dudeja, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 33
  1. The first sentence conveys the wrong message.  EPEC does not cause 1 million deaths but as quoted reference 1, it causes an average of 79000 dealth/year.  The overall deaths due to diarrheal diseases are about 1 million/year.
     
  2. The authors should first
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Dudeja P. Reviewer Report For: Enteropathogenic E. coli: breaking the intestinal tight junction barrier [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 4:231 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.7282.r10659)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 04 May 2016
    Saima Aijaz, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
    04 May 2016
    Author Response
    Thank you for your comments Prof. Dudeja. We are working on addressing the issues raised by you and will incorporate them in the revised version.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
  • Author Response 18 Apr 2016
    Saima Aijaz, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
    18 Apr 2016
    Author Response
    Thank you for your valuable comments. I have now addressed the concerns you had and have incorporated the literature and references related to Cl- absorption as well as references by ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 04 May 2016
    Saima Aijaz, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
    04 May 2016
    Author Response
    Thank you for your comments Prof. Dudeja. We are working on addressing the issues raised by you and will incorporate them in the revised version.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
  • Author Response 18 Apr 2016
    Saima Aijaz, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
    18 Apr 2016
    Author Response
    Thank you for your valuable comments. I have now addressed the concerns you had and have incorporated the literature and references related to Cl- absorption as well as references by ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 13 Jul 2015
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.